Відео

Can't have a free market with so many people and such scarce resources and finders keepers homesteading logic. You might have something like a free market with a single tax a la Georgism paid out to everyone.

Remember Tomorrow

What's wrong with that?

​@@Nicolas1909_ cuz you gatekeep the genre and are assholes lol

​@@OzanT-dt8mk 1. Lmao rent free 2. Gatekeeping should be state-mandated

Not metal

@@ArnyColeman Question of taste... back than it was considered Metal

Yeah it's my channel, of course you're gonna see my opinion and my opinion alone. Imagine trying to be objective when it comes to music.

E.g.?

@@Nicolas1909_ tg

Why ridiculous??? Tell me. How comes this is so bad that the effort isn't even worth appreciation??? C'mon, tell me, which point ???

@@Nicolas1909_1982 Id put Number of the Beast perhaps!?? 1998 Death SOP..? 1990 Rust in Peace anyone..?

@@Nicolas1909_ Fairy

Maybe but Sabbath was already overrepresented and I'm not too big on Budgie. 70s metal was limited

@@Nicolas1909_ Limited yes. It's really hard to define metal in the early years as there are plenty of crossovers with blues/rock/folk/prog etc etc. Then again lots of other possible choices to be made [outside mainstream rock/hardrock]. Not album wise but separate songs defenitely [Toad, 3 man army, blue cheer, Iron butterfly, Wish bone ash, Bedemon, Blast, Flower Travellin Band, Dust etc etc etc] Anywayz, taking this into account, I dont think this song of King Crimson is a bad choice. I was lucky enough to be spoonfed by my Dad end 60's/beginning 70's with the hardest rock released that time.

Lol. Can’t help but just laugh at this naïveté. Btw libertarian heroes like Milton Friedman supported literal dictators (Pinochet for example) bc they cared more about profits than people. Doesn’t matter if it’s “libertarian” or whatever nonsense. You’ve been fooled bc those with wealth & power would simply be even more free to exploit everyone in that sort of system

All forms that capitalism have taken, however you want to dress them up, are at its best highly productive and efficient at converting massive parts of the natural world into profit based in no other method but exploitation of the vast majority of the public and oppressive violence to scare them into obedience. Thats at its best. At its worst (so far) we have seen what it has become and the unimaginable horrors systematically committed for profit and insatiable growth.

Name a successful libertarian anything

Mate, capitalism evolves according to changing material conditions. Todays capitalism is very different to the capitalism of the 1800's, because through primitive accumulation and imperialist value transfer wealth has been concentrated in the hands of corporations and the class interest of the metropolitan proletariat has been tied to the bourgeoisie. You can't change capitalism back to the time before monopolistic finance capital without breaking up those monopolies, which I'm sure you'd consider socialistic, and then you'd be back in a time of intense market competition leading to the horrific worker exploitation we saw at the time. And eventually the natural laws of motion of capitalism would lead us right back to the same position. We need total socialism, not more capitalism.

Bruh all that big innovation was started by public taxpayer money, not profits, wanna see profit driven innovation? Watch shopping channels and cum on that sweet ideology.

I'm not judging or anything, but why do people feel the need to call him "Jimmy"? Is it to be more personal or something? He changed his name, so I don't understand why people would call him that.

Those are rookie numbers. You gotta pump it up

They can fix , anything.....