Відео

As far as I recall texture packs for the water and ground and the rest was a bit of contrast and editing.

Yes especially when lightly loaded, but this aircraft may require a new set of brakes or tyres...or both.

One of the shortest but definitely the most interesting approach

what

From flightsim.to

@@mmstraker1 fsfx conversation

Mod

This is MSFS 2020

Project Opensky, but very similar textures and model.

Lol that was the only part I didn't get right

Only if you buy the official MAX expansion

Left is 2020.

Injust bought the virpil hotas and rudder pedals. If they work on fs9 inam staying with that. If not it looks like XP 11 or 12.

flightsim.to

@@mmstraker1 Thank you!

Xbox version has close to no freeware aircraft and mods so I still mostly play p3d since it works on my laptop with many mods

Они не могут до сих рор убрать зависания видео карты при касании

The reason why the tyres in msfs stick through the ground is because when you make a plane in msfs there are ground contact points which haven't been designed to dynamically interact with the ground when using tilted undercarriage, which means the wheels will just glitch through the runway until the landing gear has fully touched down.

its because we are use to watching them in videos which have low quality where as in msfs it is like what you would see in real life and not in a video

​@@lucastan7995 you actually want it to look a bit more like a camera than real life though, imperfections sell realism. Imperfections also hide imperfections. You don't want to see the game too raw. because then you see all the grainy low quality imagery, all the weird buildings, and film grain and bumps in the road and weird artifacts. I use a mod for fs2020 that makes it look a bit more like a camera quality, makes you feel like you're really watching real footage you can control. Fs2020 as it is just looks too smooth and dull.

​@@althepsyphros3314I think I agree with you. Which addon are you referring to?

@@xeno._yt it's just a reshade thing + some Nvidia game filters

its makes it look like realistic camera quality

The 2004 one is modded like crazy at high setting vs a default 2020 with regular or low settings.

FS2020 on low settings? Where? The 2020 is running on high preset, 2004 was running on a laptop with integrated graphics.

Hey Jeremy

This is the An-124, the An-225 which was larger had 6.

Oh ok thanks bro

ЛОЛ

I spend two years comparing and testing betwen MSFS and XP11/12 at the end i choose XP12, but FS9 still life in my machine.

Thanks, I used the drone camera and locked it to that section of the aircraft.

It was Project Opensky which is freeware so nowhere near PMDG level. Also, it's more of a comparison of graphics than the aircraft.

​@@mmstraker1posky used to have some of the best freeware planes back in the day ahhh the memories

Download from flightsim.to and place in the community folder

In what way? Plenty of extremely high fidelity aircraft coming to the sim, not to mention the couple that are already there like the fenix a320. What about it makes you say this

@@oliverek7 Not complaining about the scenery, though I am complaining about the aircraft. You mention the FenixA320...hmm...How many Airbus A320's are there?..Too Many!...Easy for the developers to just 'tweak' the cockpits from the default. Yes, there are some (hopefully) decent aircraft coming...but when you look down the list of aircraft in the Marketplace, it's full to overflowing with GE aircraft that are so rare, you'd never see one in the skies overhead..Or Jet fighters that are soooo bad, they're laughable.

@@googleisshittossthis just shows your ignorance about the topic. Fenix cockpit is made from the ground up, not reusing Default cockpit assets. Furthermore, when you compare MSFS to FS9, you have to realise that when it comes to flight sims, MSFS is still very new. It’s not honest to compare a sim on a new engine with 3 years of addons development to FS9/FSX/P3D engine which had like 16 years of development by the time MSFS came out. It took more than 4-5 years before good studysims got released for FS9 (Pmdg 737 for example). A more honest comparison would be to compare what addons were available for FS9 in 2006-7 to MSFS now. (Using this method for FSX does not work as well, since FSX and FS9 share the same engine so many planes and existing work could be ported)

@@googleisshittossmy comment is not saying that all addons of msfs are good or better. Like you said the MSFS marketplace is filled with shit addons, wish microsoft removed those scam aircraft. But looking back, there were as many shit aircraft back in the day for the older sims too. We just remember the Gems

@@stijnservaes It's a fair point you make, but to be honest, it's just a flightsim I suppose. There are more pressing things going on