Відео

that was my initial thought too. i found a way to log and plan is to üut the old setup back on and compare the data of the afm and see what the difference really is.

check the link to the discord bmw tuning channel. ms4x.net

@@thevirqnope. Flashed the ECU with a b18 ECU flash. Fuel trims are in check..

@@madmanwheelies6157 check my videos. Installation + test drive and tuning already posted

​@@CSI_tuning_solutions sorry 😂😂 i thought it was new video already watched every detail and learned alot from you over a year about tuning and everything even tho i have m50obd1 😂.💪💪

feel strong but cant tell if its a gain or not. need to log with stock vs this setup and look at the maf values..not sure when i will get to that

wanted to keep the appearance and look stock. also testing what does the asc do with the flap removed.

Are you going to test with removing it altogether?

@ not planned at the moment.

dont know.

dont know who recommend but im not the one developed these tools. i suggest joining the bmw discord tuning channel. ms4x.net . lots of experts there

@@CSI_tuning_solutions thank you a lot

@@bmxmaster1997 Not sure. Sounds pretty hard limiter already stock

@ mine sounds like a fuel cut, if i hit rev limiter during acceleration, it really start jerking like its accelerating and decelerating as it “bangs” the limiter. a friend also had a 318i but his had a more classic rev limiter which sounded more like a hardcut and it didnt jerk the car when he hit it. is this maybe the difference between bosch motronic and ms43 ecu? i believe his car was pre facelift and mine is a facelift.

The 4 banger Had hard limiter Stock, maybe there is Something wrong with your car

@@patrickpehar theres nothing wrong with my car, goes better than every other m43/m40 i drove and keeps up with 318is e30, just the software is different like the limiter between m52 vanos and m50 for example

@@bmxmaster1997 then you Tell us why every m43 has hard limit Stock and yours doesnt

You

Never 😂

@CSI_tuning_solutions you have a map for ms41.0 ?

Various ones. I described them in the video. To tune tuner pro mainly

That's a different ECU Bosch ME5.2 . Afaik it's flashable. For more support join the discord BMW tunning channel community link in ms4x.net

difficult to say. was getting maf values above 600. so like 3-5% percent higher than before. but outside temp was a also very cold. so cold iats. definately abit snappier throttle response now, which i like

@@CSI_tuning_solutions And ASC still retards the ignition?

@Mopsasus1 thats a valid point. i havent changed the asc table in ms41. totally forgot about it and need to look into that

@@ThomasMBusch eher nicht was genau?

basically same procedure yes

iirc 20-25nm

from the bmw discord tuning community. link u can find in ms4x.net

@@CSI_tuning_solutions thanks a lot

@@CSI_tuning_solutions i cant find the xdf can you please send it to me or make a link for download ?

Sorry but this is not a forum. Click on the discord link on ms4x.net and join the discord tuning forum. Ask ur questions there and u will receive assistance

no clue. give it a shot

i dont remember

i dont remember

The part was machined with fresh parts

Thanks. I looked Into that too...

@@thomasbrandt1299 Minimum😅

i dont have time to work on other people issues. best to joing the bmw tuning community on discord www.ms4x.net/index.php?title=Main_Page

Thanks for the info. I need to look for that but couldn't find it in real oem

@@CSI_tuning_solutions search for e36 m3 Evo airbox, you can use that maf and whole setup too

сообщение от владельца транспортного средства; с кулачками он не может так быстро разгоняться внизу. Они для максимальной скорости

@CSI_tuning_solutions какие параметры распредвалов?

@@БарсикБарсик-л4я Es steht in der Überschrift, dass es eine Schrick 316° Welle ist. Warum suchst du nicht einfach?

Про градусы в заголовке ни слова не написано

@@БарсикБарсик-л4я Сообщение от владельца автомобиля: 272 258 градусов А Ванос запрограммирован так, что в нижнем диапазоне скоростей он работает плавно. А затем максимальная скорость 260 км/ч. посмотреть другое видео ua-cam.com/video/jReo5KnjI6U/v-deo.html

not possible via ncs expert. as this is illegal here i cant and wont give more info how to do it..

there are numbers inside the pin. best to check the ms41 wiki for more info

using ms41quickflash does checksum correction. never had to deal with checksum

standard

@CSI_tuning_solutions сенкс)

Edit just saw its only on m52 metal mash behind plastic m50 and others dont have that metal mash🤦🏼

@@TatoQoiava dont remember the whp. Measured engine HP was like 195hp or something...with m50 manifold that is

Thanks for sharing your experience.. also can't really say that I noticed a huge difference. but can't hurt I suppose..😅

Thanx for the support. It's hard for small channels...

@@Andy-bm6zo the cons outweighed the pros for me. While in gear acceleration was slightly better, I didn't like the highway Autobahn High Speed driving and high revs plus fuel consumption about 1 liter more per 100km.

The ecu will adjust within its set limits only. WOT fueling will also be affected by the LTFTs. Base fuel map tuning is required when doing major mods like cams / injectors to get the base fuel map somewhat stoich again. Fuel map tuning first and then ignition.

@@CSI_tuning_solutions I have still yet to understand the fueling logic of the MS41. At part throttle its base fuel map + STFT + LTFT? At WOT, its base fuel map + LTFT + WOT Enrichment?

It’s making me wonder if it’s worth it to install an m50 intake manifold into my 1997 z3 2.8 with an m52b28. I have a bit of a lead foot so maybe no issue? 😄

@@Z3greg If racecar (not drift but time attack or hpde the M50 has some upside). If street car more torque lower makes more sense. If you want an e36 to feel sporty learn to shift at higher rpm, practice rev matching etc. In a little Z3 the 2.8 just needs to be wound up a bit and it will make you smile.

@@robertfontaine3650 thanks - I’m in the process of pulling the cylinder head, getting new valve cover (old one seems warped), resurfacing the head, cleaning up the gunk in it, maybe just new springs and lap the existing valves. ARP studs. After that want to install m50 manifold and centrifugal supercharger for around 7 psi of boost. Solid plan?

@@Z3greg Turbo is generally a better solution than supercharger for these cars. I have an old vf engineering kit on mine and I like it but I would like a 6266 or 6466 turbo much more. Assuming you are doing a centrifugal SC it will give you more power as rpm incrases and nothing in the low end. Keep the M52 intake for more torque in the low end. The blower will push the air you need into the engine no matter what intake you have under 10 psi.

@@robertfontaine3650 I’ve got a second question now lol. I think you’ve convinced me not to use centrifugal, even though it’s the easiest install. Assuming I turbo charged, or even went to Eaton m122h, I’ve been reading horror stories about cut ring gaskets leaking coolant. I’ve ordered arp studs and an Athena cut ring gasket. Multiple forums are saying no matter what they do these gaskets are leaking coolant. Some are saying a goezelle or elring stock gasket with the arp studs is plenty good up to 600hp. What gaskets have you installed on your engine and would you do differently if you rebuilt?

@@Z3gregunfortunately I tried but failed in post edit cutting. Need to get a mic. Last part analysis is clear

No worries, the education you’re giving me is worth the extra effort to listen closely 😅