Відео

I found the software isn't entirely intuitive. If you're getting a doubling of your voice, make sure you have the XLR Dock channel muted (or turn the volume all the way down) on your Monitor mix. I just created a new video that is a 6 month review that might be helpful to see if it can help you dial in the XLR Dock a little better. ua-cam.com/video/6fI1iuXW3DM/v-deo.html Do you get the tube problem if you record with something else or is it only when using OBS?

This space is growing quickly. I was hoping they’d add some realistic voices, but that doesn’t seem to be in their plans. What online services do you recommend? What plugins do you recommend?

In my opinion, Accentize dxRevive Pro is worth the money. It does a much better job at noise reduction than Clarity VX with less artifacts and the reverb reduction is on par with VX De-Reverb, though VX De-reverb Pro may perform slightly better on reverb reduction. In case you haven't seen it, I have a shootout video of 9 different noise and reverb reduction tools. It might help you find the plugin you're looking for. ua-cam.com/video/r0kkwyZIey4/v-deo.html

@@jesse.mccune I agree 1000%. For me, dxRevive is a gem. Also, I've found great results using Supertone Clear

Yeah, the MV7 is a bit brighter, which may not be a bad thing out of the box. The SM7B is a flatter mic and would probably more closely match the MV7 if I turned on the presence boost instead of leaving it flat. And I'm sure I could EQ them both to sound the same.

It could be if it performed well, but in terms of cleaning up dialog, Auphonic blows this out of the water. What functions in Auphonic are you looking to replace?

@@jesse.mccune I was hoping to completely replace Auphonic and also have more control of what is happening

@koenignero Auphonic can be used in different ways. If you tell me which functions you're using, I might be able to help you find replacement options.

Glad you found it helpful.

Thanks, Stephen. You nailed it, this feels like an MVP product. I question the logic behind putting out an MVP of something like this because there is already a lot of competition in this space and that first impression can really make or break a software release. I look at dxRevive as a really good example of how to release an MVP type plugin. It was pretty good out of the box. It was useable, but the EQ was too much in most cases, so I passed on it upon release while paying attention to how they improved it. Over the year or so since its release, they have added new algorithms and it's become my go-to tool for anything more than minimal noise and reverb reduction. Their continuous release of new algorithms really stands out because I'm not seeing this with the competition. It has a choice of 7 algorithms now so we can choose the one that works best for our material. Another good example of an MVP is the new Dialog Isolate in RX11. It performs well, but is poorly optimized, so we can only run a couple of instances before we run into overloads. I have no doubts that future versions on RX will see better optimization and tuning of the algorithm. Unless I start seeing a lot of buzz around it, I can't see myself revisiting Prime Vocal.

Thanks for the good feedback. I really like your idea and will be working on a video about this. In response to your comment about dxRevive, there are a few things to consider. Not all noise and reverb are created equal. I have a collection of these tools because there are times when dxRevive doesn't perform well, but maybe Supertone Clear does. It really depends on how well our audio matches what the algorithm was trained on. If we look at Adobe's Enhance Speech, I would guess it was trained on truly bad audio because it struggles with good recordings that don't need a lot of work. This would explain why it can perform better than others at garbage audio, and struggle with something that needs a lighter touch. You can watch this video to get an idea of how there isn't one tool that always performs the best. ua-cam.com/video/r0kkwyZIey4/v-deo.html If you're using dxRevive on your own audio which is recorded in the same space each time, I would look into how consistent your recordings are from one to the next. If you're not setting everything up the same exact way each time you'll likely get varying results. The biggest key to good sound is to have to rely as little on tools like dxRevive as possible. Which problem is your biggest, reverb, noise, or are they equally problematic?

@@jesse.mccune Thanks for explaining the limitations of DxRevive and other plugins! That makes a lot of sense as to why Adobe Enhance Speech wasn't working as well for me. My biggest issue is definitely the reverb. I'm recording in a quiet room, but it's untreated and has a lot of echo. I've tried various plugins, including Enhance Speech, but haven't gotten the results I was hoping for.

Reverb can be the toughest element to deal with when working with dialog. If none of the tools you've tried have provided the results you're looking for, this suggests to me that there is likely a lot of reverb. You'll want to address this before recording rather than after. Lav mics are great for convenience and a clean look, but they are condenser mics and don't perform well in untreated spaces. For the average viewer, your audio is fine. The quality isn't such that people will stop listening because of the audio. I think that, given your current audio, putting a little effort into treating your space should make a difference. In case you haven't watched my video about the Yeti mic, I provide some examples that show the difference between recording in a completely untreated space and a treated space. It also shows the difference between condenser and dynamic mics in an untreated space. You can watch that video here. ua-cam.com/video/8h2LUw4_c-0/v-deo.html

You'll be fine. I don't use a laptop either. It provides power only if it's needed by the device you have connected to the Uplink port, which will be your computer. PD uses a negotiation protocol to determine how much power is needed and provides only what it needed. Since your computer doesn't need any, PD is smart enough to know that. You won't hurt your computer. Hope that helps.

@jesse.mccune thank you! No where on the entire Internet or UA-cam did I find this information

@igotbusybees I'm glad I was able to help. I know how frustrating it can be when you can't find an answer to what should be a pretty simple question.

It's tough to say without hearing the audio in question, but I'm pretty sure it will compromise the audio to some degree. Is the sound consistent across the entire recording or only when you had the buffering issues? If it's intermittent, I would probably start by trying Spectral De-noise and see how it fares. If that doesn't work, I might try De-click and De-crackleon those sections or even attempt to manually paint it out . Regardless if which method I attempt, my goal would be to do as little as possible to take the edge off the noise while maintaining as much of the underlying music as possible. If the sound is throughout the entire recording, I'm not sure that it's going to be salvageable without compromising the music too much since it runs the full spectrum. From the way you're describing it, I wonder if SpectraLayers might be able to help. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it tries to separate the different elements into different layers, similar to something like Photoshop or other graphic design programs if you're familiar. Essentially, it would try to split your recording into one layer with the music and another with the noise, but like I said, I don't have any experience using it, so I don't know how well it works or how easy it is to fine tune.

No, no boycotting going on. I focused on the devices most commonly used for podcasting and live streaming. I know the Gigcasters are marketed for that use, and I’m sure they do a fine job, but I don’t hear many using them for those uses. The other reason I didn’t include them is because they have a lot of features designed for musicians, which could make the device feel a bit overwhelming for non-musicians. Thanks for the question. I hope it can help others.

Thanks for the comment. It's an unfortunate scenario that I hear about all too often and I'm hoping I'm able to help a few people avoid it.

It's possible I missed that setting, but I'm pretty sure I turned everything off except noise reduction...unless I left it on since I was using that clip in a video comparing to other tools that tend to have EQ turned on. That clip was created so long ago I honestly don't remember.

@@jesse.mccune Hmm, yeah. It just caught my ear because Auphonic doesn't usually tonally change the sound like that unless you enable the Auto-EQ feature. I'd expect it to sound more like Hush in that example, in terms of the EQ. I ran that clip through Auphonic and on my end it confirms that. I don't recall that being the case in your previous shootouts though. Not sure if UA-cam allows me to comment a link, but I'll try adding it in a separate comment in case you're curious.

@ChrisPFuchs I only have the one set of Auphonic processed files. Thinking back on it, those were produced for my big shootout that included plugins and apps, so I probably did leave auto-eq on since that is so common in most of these tools these days.

Thanks for this comment. I'm curious where you're coming from with this. I agree that there is a valid debate about whether to use an external preamp or interface with the MV7, but it's not one I tend to see podcasters having, which is who I created this video for. The most common question I see is about whether XLR is better than USB. From my perspective, I don't feel the difference in recording quality makes much difference once we've cleaned up and mixed the audio and converted to mp3. Many of the subtle differences will get lost in the mp3 conversion. I've recorded and edited hundreds of podcasts using the MV7 connected with USB and have received zero complaints about the audio quality. Now, if we were talking about recording a song, my take would be different. I would 100% advocate for using a quality preamp because once we start stacking tracks, the merits of a good preamp start to show up. Even then, the preamps in something like a Focusrite 2i2 are going to be good enough for music. I know there are many people who will debate the quality of a preamp or the AD and DA conversion and obsess over which is best in this or that category. I used to be one who really got into those types of things, but have recently started realizing that most of the equipment out there these days is more than good enough to record and release music that sounds good. But for podcasts, I don't think it really matters at all. No one is going to stop listening because a podcaster used an MV7 with its built-in preamp/interface instead of an external preamp/interface. Most listeners won't hear the difference and none will even care as long as it sounds good enough.

Thanks for the feedback. I have had a couple of situations where I either switched to a new EQ and forgot to turn it on, or more recently, found that the EQ settings I have saved somehow had the high pass turned off. Out of curiosity, what are you listening with? Headphones, speakers? Do you have a sub?

@jesse.mccune I'm listening on nearfield studio monitors, specifically the ADAM Audio T5V, no sub.

@wonderjaxe I looked into my settings for this video and this was recorded when I was having some issues with my preamp. I spent a couple weeks working with tech support to find out that the XLR output on the preamp is noticeably noisier than the TRS out because they are balanced differently. That, combined with my preset not saving properly, the De-esser and low-cut were bypassed, and we get that low end rumble.

Happy to help.

I agree that the EQ is a bit better, but still not great. To my ears, dxRevive Pro is worth the upgrade because it provides so much more control over which algorithm is being used. The only thing I've heard worse than Adobe's Enhance Speech is Riverside's monstrosity, though I expect them to get it better than Adobe fairly quickly.

Oh btw in your video I can hear a very big difference in crackling and hissing

Noise/hiss is typical with mics and many preamps/interfaces. Something like the Solo doesn't have a lot of gain on tap, so that is likely to be a source of some of your noise. It has enough gain for recording instruments or vocals, but I'd like to see 65+ dB of gain when using a dynamic mic for spoken word/dialog. That provides more usable gain before the preamps start to get noisy. I do wonder if some of the Shure processing might have been turned on, causing the mushy and bassy sound when using it via USB.

@Ethernel0 I left the recordings unprocessed to provide an accurate comparison. The reality is that once we apply a little noise reduction, there won't be a perceivable difference between the two.

@@jesse.mccune It's the best way, uploading raw audio is the best for comparison and thank you for that. I eventually figured out that every interface have a noise level, at this point I don't really care, it's not audible and I use the active noise cancellation on Sonar (Clearcast AI NC) I don't really know if there is anyway to reduce it even more

​@@jesse.mccune Thanks for uploading the raw audio because it's the best content in terms of comparison. I eventually figured out that every interface have it's own noise level. Now I'm using the active NC from Sonar (Clearcast AI noise cancellation) which works very well. I'm still trying to figure out what I could improve. At this point i've went trough and beyond searching for the noise source, but yeah seems like it's coming from the interface itself.

That’s the only way for zero latency, but the software was buggy on Mac when I did this video. It’s possible things have been corrected, but I haven’t tried it since I have other interfaces to use.

It can be impressive on terrible recordings. As a podcast editor, if someone provides a recording that is truly that bad, they're going to re-record it or deal with what I can do with plugins. I don't use Enhance Speech, so I haven't tried mixing it with the original. It just doesn't fit with my workflow, but it seems like something worth investigating for those who do use Enhance Speech. Thanks for providing that tip.

You should be able to, though I would prefer to see the Facecam Pro plugged directly into the computer since the hub shares bandwidth with everything connected to it. The USB Hub can be a bit tricky in that the power supply needs to be plugged into the correct port, which is the one farthest to the right, and ensure the power supply is PD3 compatible. If that's where you have it plugged in and it's PD3 compatible, I'm not sure why it's not powering the Prompter and Facecam, so I'd recommend either reaching out to tech support, or you may be able to get some help on Elgato's Reddit channel.

@@jesse.mccune Hi Jessie, thanks for trying to help me. I put a separate card that has 2 USB C & 3 USB a ports into the computer and it is plugged directly into that. Kind regards, Leonard

It's interesting how we all hear things. I was a big fan of Deverberate 3, but never a big fan of their de-noising plugins. However, over the last 18 months or so, Deverberate 3 has been surpassed by the new tier of noise and reverb reduction tools. To my ears, they offer better reduction with less artifacting and dxRevive Pro has gotten much better since this initial review. Again, just my personal opinion. We all get to choose which tools we use and there's no right or wrong decision here.

You're welcome! I'm glad it was helpful.

Thanks for the comment. It can be tough and with so many ways for companies to market to us these days makes it easy to overspend, or worse, go into debt.

@@jesse.mccune Yeah, going into debt is just not worth it man. And these marketing gurus are experts and getting you to open your wallet.

Could you elaborate on this? Do you feel the audio isn't very clear throughout the video, in a specific section, or on a specific set up?

Thank you for bringing this to my attention because I wasn't aware of Supertone Air. I'll have to download the demo and hear how well it does. Once I've spent some time with it, I'll probably do some sort of video.

I haven't used the older music rebalance to compare, but the new Dialog Isolate is noticeably better than it was in previous versions, aside from the performance issue. I like your idea, but I'm happy to be able to work in a completely non-destructive manner. For me and the work that I do, efficiency is more important. I have moved away from using the RX editor in favor of only using plugins for the last 18 months. The two things I have learned from this experiment is that I can accomplish everything I need with plugins and not making that trip to the editor saves me a decent amount of time.

The biggest pro for having separate knobs is the convenience of having dedicated controls, but that's a theoretical pro more than a realistic one. It's nice to be able to set those volumes individually, but there aren't likely to be situations where you'd be using the monitors and headphones at the same time. The biggest con to having a shared control is that you'll need to be mindful of that when you switch from monitors to headphones. For me, I reset the volume whenever I put headphones on anyway, so that's not as much of an issue. One thing to consider is that if you were to go with the Vocaster 2, you could plug your headphones and mic into channel 2. This would give you independent control over both volumes since headphone port 2 has its own control, leaving the Headphone1/Monitor control to adjust the monitor volume...as long as you're only recording yourself. For me, I wouldn't let the controls be the deciding factor here. I would focus more on cost and needs. If you need music functionality, go with the 2i2. If you're a podcaster go with the Vocaster.

@@jesse.mccune I think the two knobs of the 2i2 will be useful to me. It means I won't have to adjust the volume each time I switch between using my monitor speakers or headphones as the output for my sound. I switch between the two quite often depending on the time of day and if people are in my house. I don't do music or podcasting but need an interface to drive my xlr dynamic mic and also something to power my Sennheiser 490 pro headphones. Mainly using the mic for discord, zoom, etc.

@leryeo Given your use case, having independent control over the headphone and speaker volumes is important. I took a look and it doesn't look like there's a way to set those volumes separately on the Vocaster 1. If it were me, I would opt for the Vocaster 2 to save a few dollars over the 2i2. Connect your headphones into the Headphone 2 port. This will allow you to use the Headphone 1/monitor knob to set your speaker volume and Headphone 2 to control the headphone volume. You can also go with the 2i2 if you prefer that form factor and aesthetic and are willing to pay more for it.

@ great idea with the vocaster 2! Thanks for your help with my purchasing decision

It looks like it's not possible to access V1 if you're using the free version. If you have n Adobe subscription, you'll see the option in a gray box in the upper right hand corner of the upload box. You'll see V2 and a dropdown arrow next to it.

You can see at 15:57 in the video where you can make the change. I'm not an Adobe expert, so I don't know if the premium version of Voice Enhance is available with all subscriptions, or only some. I wish I could be of more assistance.

@@jesse.mccune Ah thank you so much! Wasn't sure where to look. Much appreciated!

@NeilFennell I'm glad I was able to help. I didn't see it at first either.

They do allow you to switch between V1 and V2 if you use the paid version, but it looks like the free version uses V2 only.

Thank you for pointing these out. Sadly, UA-cam doesn't allow me to fix those and replace this video with a corrected version, so I'll pin this comment as the next best thing.

I like Hush, but I'm really hoping he can bring it to a plugin format other than ProTools so we can audition its results in real time instead. dxRevive Pro does allow the user to choose an algorithm that doesn't have the shaping included, and I feel that helps quite a bit. On tougher audio, that shaping can sometimes be an acceptable artifact if it makes the audio more listenable. It really depends on the specific recording. I would hope that anyone doing serious work is hiring someone with professional tools to handle this.

*Yes, both *one. It kills *problems, but *voice, which *also, the *weird. Four *documentary, *film, or podcasting work.

Thanks for the comments. I'm glad it was helpful to you. From the testing I've done, the only tool like this that performs worse in terms of overall audio quality is Riverside's built-in option. I feel Enhance Speech is best reserved for that last ditch effort on truly terrible recordings and it's not a tool I would depend on if my goal is good audio. For clips 1 & 3, I used Hush at 100%. Those were tougher situations and 100% is the one that performed best on those two. I usually start at 70% on Hush and adjust from there and usually try 2 other settings to find the one that sounds best. I don't use Hush outside of these comparisons simply because I can't make quick, real time decisions like I can with plugins.

No need to apologize about the length, Barry. I appreciate your response and, sometimes, they need to be longer to say what we want to say. I understand what I'm getting into with branded groups, but I take issue with the groups that are branded groups that hide that fact. I originally started trying to build a community like you mentioned away from social media. Unfortunately, there are costs, both in terms of money and time, to running a community. I've provided a number of free accounts to people to try to get it going, but the truth is that most people would just forget about it because it doesn't pop up in their feed. I tested a $5 per month option, but there was no interest, so I closed that and turned the community into something that exists only for people who sign up for our hybrid courses. The community now is essentially a place where students can get direct access to me to get their questions answered, find guidance, or even mentorship. I also ended up closing down our Pro Group which focused on the business side of things because people would sign up for a couple of months but wouldn't ask questions or participate, so they would cancel and drift away. This has forced me to re-evaluate things and continue to look for better ways I can help those who want it. It's why I started the YT channel. And I love having these types of discussions. I feel we are in a better place to learn when we get to see a variety of methods or hear from diverse voices. I know you and I have different working styles in Hindenburg, but I learned a new way of approaching things if I need it by reading how you do things. That's the beauty of things, there's usually not only one right way, only the right way for you or the right way for me. I'm always looking for new ways, better ways, faster ways, or just smarter ways of doing whatever it is that I'm doing and that usually doesn't happen in a silo. At least it doesn't for me.

Thanks, Jesse. I appreciate your account of trying to create and run a community - I have had similar experiences on a professional level with only the organically grown user groups surviving (in-person component being a key attribute). I agree with your other assessments as well. Just finishing editing a 10 episode podcast (including SFX and sound design) in Hindenburg and all the things good and bad arose. A few new techniques developed. Live, learn, share. That’s the takeaway and you exemplify that workflow. Thanks!

Thanks for the heads up. This is what the page says about the new software update: Vocaster Hub v1.3 is now available to download as the ongoing support for podcasters continues. Further Auto Gain support has been added. When selecting Default, Stream, or Camera in the settings, the Auto Gain target level and Enhance settings will adjust so that they are optimal if you are podcasting, streaming, or vlogging. You can now change the look and feel of Vocaster Hub in the settings and choose the new dark theme in the theme selector. The theme can be set to “system” to match your OS’s dark mode setting, which is useful if you have your operating system automatically change after sunset or sunrise. Switch seamlessly between headphones and speakers at the click of a button with the upgraded mute function for Host and Guest. Save yourself from changing volumes between the two so that your preferred level is always untouched while leaving everything plugged in. No more endless adjusting between breaks in recording or editing.

My absence won’t make much of a difference to one of the groups. One of them I was able to provide a lot of assistance as a power user. Those aren’t big losses for me. The one that really frustrates me is Podcast Editors Group. That group was always billed as being about the community and a place for editors. It was created by Steve long before he had Podcast Editors Academy. For me, them deciding only their products can be mentioned in the group where feels a lot like a more like a branded endeavor than a community. I was there to help the community, not to help them build a commercial vehicle for themselves. It feels like a decision made in their best interest without regard to the people that make the community valuable.

@@jesse.mccune Indeed... It seems a bit of a selfish move on their part. :(

@robnecronomicon1570 Selfish or not, it's their group and their call, but I know I'm not the only one who has felt pushed away from that group.

It’s something that I’ve known in the back of my head that I needed to do, but needed something to encourage me to do it. I’m not surprised that you’re experiencing the same thing. I’m curious about your comment “and I’m really starting to see the obscurity that leads to competition in the space.” I think I know, but want to clarify with you.

@jesse.mccune I mean that when editors float in a vacuum without support, the price-setting, professional developmen and, self-esteem can all get quite low. Then they second-guess everything leading to burnout, low pay, exploitation, etc. If we can share our skills and support without fear of losing clients like we're trying to "beat" every other editor, it would help 😊

@matthewblisspod It's a good thing I asked because that wasn't quite what I thought, but close. I agree that we need community, but so many of us are so protective of certain things out of fear that it might provide a competitive edge to someone else. Even though we all do the same work, we are rarely ever competing for the same clients, so I don't understand that fear and need to hold "trade secrets" close to the chest. It's why I've been open with sharing my experiences and knowledge since there aren't many people doing that in the editing space. I also don't mind going against the grain of what's accepted as "the norm" if there's room for improvement. I'm a big believer in the idea that there isn't only one way to do things. My way isn't the only way. Your way isn't the only way. Their way isn't the only way. We are at our best when we get to hear from diverse voices. When we're starting out, it is extremely important to have access to as many viewpoints as possible so we can decide what is best for ourselves. One of the biggest things I've seen, and this applies to other industries as well, is that many people providing advice or coaching have been doing the thing for 10-20 years and are already well established in their field. Trying to establish a podcast editing business in 2024 is a lot different than it was in 2018. It just is. A lot of things have changed over the years and it's very likely that what worked for these people back then isn't going to work today.

My opinion is that any interface will work well. I haven't noticed a difference when using it connected into the Apollo, Vocaster, or the Camden preamp. It's not something I would pay attention to, but nothing stood out. Having said that, I do prefer the Camden as a preamp because it's much cleaner and the Mojo Thump setting adds a little weight to my voice. This applies to all the mics I've tried it with when it comes to dialog. A mic is going to perform the same regardless of the interface used. The preamps and conversion in the interface may have some slight differences in terms of quality, but this is something most people will never hear. To spin it a little differently, I'd rather have a nice mic into a cheap interface than a cheap mic into an expensive interface.

@ if you have to compare the rodecaster to the wave xlr . How would that turn out for you ?

If those were my two options, and price was not a concern, I would go with the Rodecaster. It's not even close. Rode has a long history in the audio world and their equipment works well. As much as I love Elgato products, (I have two Stream Decks, 2 Key Lights, CamLink, a few of their mounts, and a couple Prompters), their software is not as reliable as Rode's. From a technical perspective, the Wave XLR will get the job done and no one listening will know the difference. My advice is to pick the one that best serves your needs. If you're only needing basic interface functionality (1 mic and headphones) go with the Wave XLR. If you'd use some of the additional features of the Rodecaster, I would go with that. Some things that might be useful is that it's a portable recorder, can have 2-4 xlr inputs, and built-in audio processing, among others.

You can use the contact form on my website: tansyasteracademy.com/contact/

I feel your frustration with the transcriptions, especially now that they only transcribe portions that actually have dialog. I asked them about this recently because I don't need 15 hours, but there are no smaller options. This was their response: "Thanks for the question. I do understand how the transcription time can be a little inflexible - but we don't currently have a way of making smaller packages. We do have some thoughts for the future that should improve the situation." I would be ecstatic if they would allow us to import our own transcripts since there are so many options available these days. As for new features, I would be happy to see them release the rest of the new features they announced and to see Hindenburg made into a multicore app like every other DAW out there. There's no good reason to be limited to one core in 2024. I don't want to switch to another DAW for editing podcasts, because I do feel it's the best tool for the job. They have done so many things well in terms of workflow and ease of use, but there is room for improvement. All we can do is wait and see what happens over the next year or two. Based on the first 1.5 years of H2, I don't have high hopes.

Thanks for providing your thoughts on this comparison. Would you say that, once cleaned up and mixed, the sound out of any of them would be a reason you would stop watching a video or listening to a podcast?

I feel that Izotope has lost a step over the last couple years when it comes to general noise and reverb reduction. Since NI took over, they have stopped innovating and their new Dialog Isolate is a couple years too late. They may not have anything to worry about right now, but there is growing competition.

@@jesse.mccune Fair point. And actually yeah very good point. I've kind of been out of the loop for a little bit but I haven't seen anything to outstanding come from them for a while either 😬

Thanks for the feedback. Honestly, I didn't know how this video would perform or how many people would want more details. In retrospect, I made a mistake when I was planning out the video because I approached it from the perspective of people who have seen some of the changes and improvements over the year. Looking at my analytics, I know that the vast majority of views come from new viewers and not returning viewers. I'll see if I can put together a more comprehensive video in the future that dives deeper into some of these topics. I'm all ears if you have any ideas or suggestions of what you'd like to see.

It's in 1.11, but requires specific computer hardware to run. If you're not seeing it, that could be why. This is what the website lists in terms of requirements: Windows: NVIDIA RTX 2060 or better macOS: Apple Silicon M1 or better Microphone