Відео

I have the exact same question, someone please advise

I only have 1 lens with stab and it does work with my a7sm3 and the adapter. However, I've heard mix views depending on the camera and firmware in question. If you find someone in the comments of this or my other video and ask someone with your camera. Good hunting!

So IS works with A7Siii. It's a good start.

@@MaiElizabeth the 24-70 tamron did but the 70-200mm 2.8 didn’t appear to

@@taubenblau wow thank you so much for sharing you will have helped many ppl no doubt. In the lens that sometimes works once the camera is on and the lens connected, click and rotate the lens as if you are taking it off and then reconnect. See if that works as I’ve got a 100-300 that only work if I do that strange process.

@@taubenblau also what camera are you using and firmware on the camera?

@@minutesback Thank you for your quick response! i'm usin a A7CII. I just updated this morning. And voila: it works! until i switched off the camera and turned it back on again. Same thing as before :( I'll try your trick, but similar atempts did not turn out to be working :| I looked on reddit and found people using the 28mm USM. Seemingly the same performance as the other USMs... So sad, because this glas might be old has loud and slow focus, but it provides exactly the look i am aiming for. If it was just the AF it wouldn't be such an issue because i can pull focus my self. but not having the Aputure is really annoying... thank you for going so in depth about that issue

@ ah the aputure thing is annoying for sure. If you still have a canon you can always set your aputure there then swap out in a pinch but less then ideal. Please do keep us updated. I had been thinking about that 28mm lens myself.

@@VisitPunjab thanks

@@skyzero968 the sirui 1.25x my preview video has more shots using the same set up. 👍

@@chrismariano.studio33 I guess there are worse things in the world 🤣

@@samuelbagas7741 I’ve been using the tamron 24-70 2.8 perfectly fine. However, check comments on this and other video for cameras that are working. Also, I’m on camera a7s3 on firmware 2.11. I’ve not ungraded the camera firmware currently is causing issues so until they update again or fix I will stay on 2.11

@@gabrielcortez9699 I’ve not personally tested with it but it work great in the a7s3 however, the latest firmware on Sony makes it stop working so I’m stuck at 2.11.

@@KristopherSatchell the new version I have did seem a lot better and after a year with it I’m very happy.

@@amalng I’ve never been able to connect my adapter to the computer. I think I mis placed the cable it came with and I’ve for whatever reason the cables I have don’t work. If I ever do I will come back 👍.

@@minutesback OK thank you

@@minutesback im not able to connect the adapter to my mac either.

@ are you using the cable supplied with the adapter?

@ I don’t think they include the cable. 😂

@@euphoriantraveller8651 yes, true I didn’t get around to that, although I think I did at one stage but it was a monster video with a lot of footage and I think I either lost or didn’t manage to add to the timeline. Is there a question to anyone of these laptops?

@@minutesback yes, I can’t find anything about the performance of the M3 max with heavy mograph on After effects anywhere. So was wondering how it performs

@@euphoriantraveller8651 In a nutshell it handle very well. My biggest issue is is that if you are running all the latest software for AE and or pluggins it’s generally very good bar sometimes apples is far too ahead with their software so sometimes makes older plugins not useable or it take companies a longer time to update. Also if you using 3D software I’ve found some limitations on the 3D as I don’t think it competes as well with my 3080ti. However, scrubbing is better than my desktop running the 3080ti in most everyday situations and editing is way better. Running a 5950X I believe. I think the only difference I would have made was to buy more ram as occasion on big projects it fills up on the standard M3 Max.

@@minutesback ok thank you. I am planning on getting the M4 Max 96gb or ram. I hope they do improve 3D on the M4 max as I am planning on starting out 3D

@@minutesback thank you for your time :)

@@Altcine thanks!

@@ChengduLittleA I just did a new video with, I thought the results came out well. Thanks for sharing your experience.

This has become far more difficult question because I bought one a few weeks ago and since then I replaced it as I found it didn't work as well as this version I tested. I now I and getting another replacement due to the noise level and AF. I'm not sure if I was just unlucky. However, my key points are this. I thought I was more happy with the version in this video. AF face tracking overall I'd say I was 90% happy with. On my 2 recent versions I found CU AF didn't track fast on either native or EF although at the fastest settings it wasn't too bad I'd give a 7/10. In a long interview on a native 35mm lens it lost focus a few times and refound focus. However it was a side angle and 1 person had a hat covering part of the face but the other wasn't. Funny thing is I've not found the low to be a problem with AF. Biggest issue was the Eye tracking on a close up. If you learn forward and back it will be slow and drift. Like I said I will be replacing for a second time as the camera in this video did not behave the same. Also I did notice a little more lens noise via the adapter. So that a lot to read and I probably am planning to do a video on it but thought you might like to know!

@@minutesback ohh thanks, understood, think works for me,, at that price range!

@@Armantomato I think all lenses will vary, I don’t think as far as I know there is a set look to EF vs E. EF being old than current E mount glass may well not be sharper and faster on AF but colour will probably be varied across both. I might be wrong but I do have and have used both sets and not noticed.

@@minutesback thank you for the reply

Update: I have finally worked out how this thing actually works and when you get it, it is really good. I couldn't find this info anywhere else and from the complaints here and in the other video this doesn't seem to be an obvious or well known trait of the adaptor. There is an easy way to know which mode you are in and it is fairly easy to access the two modes. I have tried version 1.2 and 1.4 firmware and they both work the same. When you connect a canon lens, you should connect the lens to the adaptor first. Then connect the two to the camera. This will help you in setting the mode you want to be in. When you connect the adaptor and lens to your camera it will be in contrast detect, unless you hold the C/P button down. You HAVE to hold down the C/P button when you connect the lens and adaptor to turn it to Phase detect mode. How do I know this? Try connecting the adaptor with lens, and focusing. If you see an area box turn green then you are in contrast mode, if instead, you see one or more small green boxes on the screen or EVF in a grid shape, you are in phase detect mode. The two modes work very differently and phase detect turns my old shitty lens into a beast but strangely my canon 55-250 is better in contrast detect than phase. The phase detect is also super fast so if your lenses are focusing slowly and seem to jump past the focus point and then creep back, then you are still in contrast detect. The native Sony lenses flick between these modes depending on the situation so I am not sure why the adaptor has to specify these modes separately but if you have the adaptor and a number of canon lenses then try the two modes out for each lens. Either of the modes seem to work better for different lenses so you should try both on all your lenses. I still also recommend turning off Pre-AF in the sony menus, because it just adds to the confusion. I think that only works well in Phase mode, because in contrast mode, it tried to focus the camera constantly without my touching the shutter button. I hope this helps people having issues, get their head around the adaptor. Once you can use the C/P modes correctly the adaptor takes on a whole new level. It is actually pretty awesome. I just wish I knew this at the start and not 4 months later.

Would metabones mk 5 be a better adapter? It’s expensive but this sounds like a pain to deal with.

@@cameragod1 when I updated to the latest Sony firmware on a7s3 it stopped doing the continuous af so stuck with the previous.

You found it?

@@casamusicrevisao No

Thanks for the great info, I just got a A7Cii and have a lot of EF Glasss. Looking through my options the Sigma adapter apparently don’t work with eye focus in video, the other option is Metabone which is not cheap. Might just give Artisan a go, will also report back here to share what works and what’s doesn’t.

@@DiCasaFilm thank you so much for the information

@@minutesback No problem!

@@fangkc Excellent!

@@flyingwithoutwingful I’ve used with IS on the A7s3 however, I didn’t realise at first that when the stable is greyed out when your button is on so I think it is working.

@@SaiKelly yes I’ve used it with although only briefly used on a shoot so best to look at the comments as many even sometimes in the replies have given their use cases. Btw I found the latest version on my a7s3 makes the adapter not work in continuous so I’ve stuck with 2.11 firmware. So I’m not sure if something similar has or did happen on the FX3. But when it does work like I get it too it is a joy. Maybe worth trying and or returning if it doesn’t work for you.

@@minutesback thanks for that! Yes I've asked in a few places now and it's looking like it may well be worth the risk. TBH I'd rather not 'try or return' something like a camera but an adapter is fine.

@@SaiKelly btw the latest version of the v 3 firmware ( on Sony a7s3) made the adapter not work so well so I’ve not updated the Sony firmware which is a shame but I prefer AF than the new features.

@@roshsuaverdez882 yes it can 👍

@@Zayvion4L not personally tested but check comment on this and my other video as some people have posted there use case

@@DiCasaFilm I love your approach 👍

@@ormpoa I’ve never heard of flocking before I’ll look into that👍

@@Joyful-Yarn ha thanks, I don’t normally make fun 😇. Btw I did actually buy the camera so will probably post some thoughts in future. I also got the mc-21 too. Only complaint so far is the in photo mode there’s no AFC in the adapter . But I mostly do video so doesn’t bother me too much bar watching YT all day for alternatives 😇.

@@mcdicky which camera are you using?

@@minutesback I am using A6700 and FX30

@@mcdicky I have heard people are using FX30 on this and my other video that say it is working. I noticed that the new firmware on Sony the V3 has stopped the AF on my A7s3 so I’ve stuck to V2.11 where it works perfect. You’d have to check the comments for the 6700 on this or my other video but again it may be the firmware of the camera or adapter. However, I’ve said to many in the comments recently there might well be an issue of production happening. Btw try the button in the side of adapter. The CD/Pdaf button that switches between contrast and phase AF.

@@minutesback Thanks for the reply, I already did try getting button on the side of the adaptor, about the firmware of the Adaptor is 0.1.2 and it doesn't allow me to update the firmware or the current one already up to date.

@@mcdicky try checking the firmware of the camera itself as I mentioned the 2.11 on the Sony a7s3 worked great but then the 3.0 made it stop working in contrast AF.

@@jonathanelboim7338 what Sony camera are you looking at using? Also are your Samyang lenses EF?

@@minutesback Thanks for the reply! Subscribed. I have a few a6500 cameras, so this is also relevant to them. But in principle, I'm planning to upgrade to full-frame, a7 and fx3. I believe I'm using EF mount lenses because it's a Blackmagic CCP 6K that I'm currently using, which if I'm not mistaken, is indeed EF mount, and the lenses are compatible with it.

@@jonathanelboim7338 I can’t quite remember from the top of my head about the a6500 usage that I’ve read in the comments but of take a look through there may well be a comment about some usage on it. If I get time I’ll do a scroll myself. One thing I’d say is my Sony A7s3 works perfect with Sony firmware 2.11 in the camera. A tried it on firmware 3.0 and the video autofocus didn’t work well so I’m sticking to firmware 2.11 and will not be updating. I may do a video about that. One word of potential warning I might say is that there seems to some disparity in comments from people, whether there is firmware comb between adapter firmware or camera that creates a hiccup Is possible. Or there could production issue with some working better than others. Perhaps test or buy with the option of returning if it doesn’t work as planned. That said it’s been a life and money saver for me over the past year. The AF function has been as native for the age of the lenses I’ve used which are older being EF.

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.

You can use the EF 24-104 which I think is a FULL Frame lens on a sony full frame so you should not have a problem. AF function depends on the camera / adapter / firmware. Are you looking to get an adapter or do you already have one?

what firmware is your A7sm3?

I’m running firmware 0.1.2

@@minutesbackI just tried both my Sigma lenses and they work fine but I’m getting false aperture readings. I can’t tell if it’s the Canon lens, the adapter, or the firmware ??

@@MyMarketingGuy101 BTW I don't the firmware of the adaptor but the camera. My camera is on 2.11. think. The later version t3 of sony's update made my lenses not work so I'm sticking with version 2.11 which work great. I've never updated the firmware of my adapter.

@@minutesback thanks for your insight I thought that this would have worked flawlessly for me since I have the same exact camera. I have an updated my camera since they released the sone update about three or four years ago. I heard really bad things about the latest Sony update, so I decided not to do it. I also replied to your comment on the 7artisans video about this adapter a few minutes ago. It really seems like they have some serious quality control issues because so many people are reporting so many different problems. I think this company makes awesome cinema lenses and I’m about to release a video review on one of their lenses. That’s the irony of all of this, I really wanted to love this adapter!

Let me know if it worked

@@sa.t.2507 what would you say is the biggest problem with it?

@@minutesback 1. No 50/60p in full frame 8.6K 2. It has the same sensor as a Sony a1 but not the full frame 4K 120p. Instead the BURRITO has to crop to 2x, to achieve those lovely high frame rates. 3. Horrible IR-polution that should never be happening on a CineAlta-camera. 4. It cannot output a 4K feed with a LUT in most modes, and cannot shoot full frame 4K 120fps even though the same sensor has this capability in the Sony a1. There’s no uncompressed internal RAW recording, you know… like your Canon 5D Mark II has. The X-OCN codec is compressed RAW, and it remains to be seen what RED thinks of that. 5. The camera forgets certain critical setting when you go from full frame 8.6K to cropped mode in order to get slow motion. This is a major issue that plagued us FX9 users and were never adressed.

@@sa.t.2507 yeah for the money I think defo 4K 120 without crop should be in it, even downsampled should have been good. I wonder if they will release any of these settings.

@@sa.t.2507 I love you called it a burrito too 🤣🤣🤣🤣. My video was worth it just for that.

@@sa.t.2507 that last point with the FX9 is unbelievable, I’ve not used that camera all that much so never ran into that before so amazed it’s hasn’t been fixed. What do you shoot now in 2024?

@@ZoenzoD53_OW2 thanks 😇

@@papolini109 yes, most adapters work fine for photos it’s the video side that is generally problematic

@@Sneaky-Sneaky yeah that is the elephant in the room. It maybe more of a rental option for many who don’t want make such a big investment. What do think its nearest neighbour would be?

@@minutesback Well … not too sure….if you’re looking for a new tech recent release but a lot cheaper something like a Canon C400 at 8000….if you want to go older there is some good 35mm cinema cameras like the VaricamLT etc. At about 10,000….

@@Sneaky-Sneaky yeah the C400 with the triple native iso is a great addition.

Ha, looks like I made a graphic mistake it was at 80mm on the 80-200 I just meant to show it at the wide end in this case 80 and not 70. Thanks for spotting and letting me know I missed that.

Hey, I like this lens I used it on an event this week and it was great although I used on a sony a7sm3 with AF which actually worked better. I don't use it for photography but for video it is great. This video example was a use case however if I was using on a R6 again I would prefer the 16mm but I only own the 11-16 Tokina.

@@ivandj707 I did loads of tests with and without. From memory you are probably right but seem to remember that even on the wide angle side of 11 is may have still done some strangeness even on a gimbal so the best was on a gimbal at around 16mm. Defo not hand held. To be fair with was over a year ago now so I’d have to go back and re test. Either I know on a gimbal it’s still great for short spells. I am literally looking at using it tomorrow 😇 as I no longer have the RF 16mm.

@@SimonKage do you have any other lenses to try it with? Dam sorry to hear that, have checked the contact point by rotating on or off again? I did have 1 tamron 70-300 it didn’t like and some which have been faster than other but a modern lens like the sigma 35mm I wouldn’t have thought would be a problem. Have you or can you update the firmware of the sigma? Or try a different EF lens to check if the adapter itself is working.

@@minutesback Another Canon lens is coming tomorrow, I'll try it out 👍 I'll get back to you tomorrow! Thanks for the quick answer!

@@minutesback Today the Canon lens arrived and unfortunately it doesn't work with the adapter either. I think the adapter can't cope with the 3.01 software.

@@SimonKage I’m on 2.11. I’ve not yet upgraded. I’ve been meaning to update but not done so yet. Have you tried updating the firmware of the adapter?

@@minutesback Yes, and unfortunately it made no difference. I heard that the 3.00 software was developed based on the a6700, which had a lot of problems with the adapter.

@@benyyz I’ve not heard about being removed but I must say their site isn’t easy to navigate. Did you manage to find it?