Відео

Pure sophistry!

Ezekiel 1:16 “The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.” The corn. Ezekiel 1:16. A wheel in the middle of A wheel. This is how God taught me, A wheel in the middle of a wheel. Imagine a circle on your left side, and imagine a circle on your right side, now imagine a circle in the middle of the circle on your left side, now imagine a circle in the middle of the circle on your right side, now imagine the circle on your left side is called the beginning and the circle inside the circle on your left side is called the last, now imagine the circle on your right side is called the end, and the circle inside the circle on your right side is called the first. This is the theology of the structure of God. Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Imagine the circle on your left side, houses your physical body, and the circle on your right side houses your spirit body, now imagine the circle inside the circle on your left side is the energy source that supports your physical body, now imagine the circle inside the circle on your right side is the energy source that supports your spirit body. Now, Imagine the circle inside the circle on your left side becoming one with the circle inside the circle on your right side, the properties of the outer circle on your left side will become the properties of the outer circle on your right side. Now imagine the circle inside the circle on your right side, becoming one with the circle, inside the circle on your left side, the properties of the outer circle on your right side will become the properties of the outdoor circle on your left side. So this is how we are created in the structure of God’s image, and the structure of God’s image, is created within us. This is the theology of the structure of God. I can hear someone say, why aren’t you preaching? Christ Jesus, crucified. Because the dispensation of grace in Jesus Christ is over! I can preach on Jesus Christ, very well if I choose to, I have done it! I choose not to because I know that it’s over. We have entered into a new time, of the judgment, in The Spirit Of Truth. Revelations. 14:3 and they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. The song as if it were a new song, is the theology of the structure of God, and I am singing it to you right now. Wise virgins, you must see what you say, and say what you see, concerning the theology of the structure of God. The theology of the structure of God, is how reality in creation is actually experienced, it’s made up of, the beginning and the end the first and the last which is the structure of God, it transcends being and non-being creational experience. God, derived from within himself, to be air of himself, that no stranger may sit on the throne, that he may dwell amongst his own people, within his own creation, within his own time, for God is a conscious spirit, when he speaks to you, he thinks to you, for he is always, and all things, and forever God. If you’re not the spirit of the living creature that is in the wheels, then you are a stranger to the throne of God, and what is the throne of God? it’s the first and the last, within the beginning and the end. Welcome to the dispensation of The Spirit Of Truth.

I have a sense for bollocks...Sensus Divinitatus, what a cheap trick.

I could see someone saying that we know things exist because we experience them through our senses and that this is sufficient to define that things exist in that it is the generally accepted way to know and the objects maintain integrity. I could see someone saying God doesnt exist because we do not experience God through the senses.However God as creator is by definition responsible for everything and no one thing expresses all of God. However to me God as creator does exist regardless of peripheral religious framework because God has designed proofs of his existance into the human body. Consider the following: you have 5 toes 4 are similar and one is different, the big toe and the one thats different gives you control, balance while standing and walking. You have 5 fingers 4 are similar and one is different, the thumb and this one thats different gives control. You have 5 limbs or extensions from the body 4 are similar and 1 is different, the head and this one thats different gives control. You have 5 senses 4 are similar and one is different, the sense of touch and this one thats different gives control. You couldnt move without it. Now consider this pattern across digits, limbs and senses. Is it really a design of nature. What aspect of nature produces bodies on a theme like this. Even the simplest cell that ever existed is too complex for nature to produce. Living things are not constructions they are living processes. Science can say what they are made of but cant replicate the process. No scientist can build an apple from scratch.

you can tell what God is NOT, but you can never tell what God is! as it will always be and has always been beyond anyone's pathetic understanding. common religions are in fact the biggest insult to the "idea and concept of God"

Religions such as Abrahamic styles exist to provide big brother control over your tribe. It is believed because most humans are more concerned with feeling good than knowing the truth. By the time we get to Christianity, that variant emerges as little more than idol worship in practice. Humans are over-evolving in our terrarium but the drives that got us to emerges are not in check. Evolution is denied by those masses and you cannot get them to understand what is real. That interferes with their belief. It is less of a way of life and more of a behavioral excuse in practice. But to the simple theist, it is all there is. They shun true awareness. I find it ironic that science metaphorically seeks and knocks for truth while the very Christians who idol worship Jesus don't follow his teachings. Yep. That's idol worship in practice but on a very huge scale. Be ready. It's coming. Those supernaturalists don't respect or wish to protect mother Earth.

He keeps saying something out there, why not in here ? 🤔

Can this man not leave out HE when he refers to God ?

As a human ' THOUGHT ' we would have to admit God exists as a concept but does this concept have a real meaning that we can explain.? Put another way we ought to ask 'what is meant by God '?

Why is God (the source) a "he" or "him" and not an "it"? Why are people stuck on that?

Religion is a HUMAN INVENTION. Further, religion causes nearly all of the world's problems for humans. Humans created GOD to deal with their anxieties around death. Additionally, modern science says humans are neuroelectrical, biochemical organisms that live and die - and that's our sole purpose in life. You didn't exist for billions of years before birth, and we won't exist for eternity after we die. We really don't need analytical videos created for clickbait.

Fortune or misfortune in Life and business is based on Thrift=because Economy is rhe highest virtue (survival) without which=there's nothing (survival can be called God or Thrift*) Only that which is publicly denied can be believed=anything that is not publicly denied=cannot be believed! What is it Definition*(analytical) is not superior to where is it(synthetic)=(prepositions): it is weakness of Germanic (English) mind as evidenced by Darwin's definitions twist by Blavatsky pseudo-science and following nazis! *​Reason=conditioning (like smell of hair shampoo) *moral argument for nonexistence of God is that if he were Almighty=devine intervention based: =he wouldn't allow evil from within living nature (physical manifestation of God=source of everything)=(even in FREE Will=almighty good God would always win options, not the adversary evil); °Everyone is born FREE open book without any sin=human is not a sinner, satanic verses Bible labels humanity evil and so it becomes! ​=Bible is immoral(immoral=no meaning and no good fruits)=if Bible was moral there wouldn't be Palestynian Children genocide commited by Bible verse believers... accordingly Bible is full of satanic verses! Saying anything about God is as ridiculous as trying to describe the smell of radio wave" Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

Only that which is publicly denied can be believed=anything that is not publicly denied=cannot be believed! What is it Definition*(analytical) is not superior to where is it(synthetic)=(prepositions): it is weakness of Germanic (English) mind as evidenced by Darwin's definitions twist by Blavatsky pseudo-science and following nazis! *​Reason=conditioning (like smell of hair shampoo) *moral argument for nonexistence of God is that if he were Almighty=devine intervention based: =he wouldn't allow evil from within living nature (physical manifestation of God=source of everything)=(even in FREE Will=almighty good God would always win options, not the adversary evil); °Everyone is born FREE open book without any sin=human is not a sinner, satanic verses Bible labels humanity evil and so it becomes! ​=Bible is immoral(immoral=no meaning and no good fruits)=if Bible was moral there wouldn't be Palestynian Children genocide commited by Bible verse believers... accordingly Bible is full of satanic verses! Saying anything about God is as ridiculous as trying to describe the smell of radio wave" Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

What is it Definition* is not superior to where is it (prepositions): it is weakness of Germanic (English) mind as evidenced by Darwin's definitions twist by Blavatsky pseudo-science and following nazis! *​Reason=conditioning (like smell of hair shampoo) *moral argument for nonexistence of God is that if he were Almighty=devine intervention based: =he wouldn't allow evil from within living nature (physical manifestation of God=source of everything)=(even in FREE Will=almighty good God would always win options, not the adversary evil); °Everyone is born FREE open book without any sin=human is not a sinner, satanic verses Bible labels humanity evil and so it becomes! ​=Bible is immoral(immoral=no meaning and no good fruits)=if Bible was moral there wouldn't be Palestynian Children genocide commited by Bible verse believers... accordingly Bible is full of satanic verses! Saying anything about God is as ridiculous as trying to describe the smell of radio wave" Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

Saying anything about God is as ridiculous as trying to describe the smell of radio wave" Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

Saying anything about God is as ridiculous as trying to describe the smell of radio wave" Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

Radiation=real but can't be experienced God=unreal but can be experienced God= creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.: No.1: Universe wasn't created it existed always otherwise it wouldn't exist at all; No.2 There's no morality in humanity nor Nature=there's no supreme personality of Godhead as we wish for No.3 Evolution is blind=no Devine plan (No supernatural intervention & resurrection is ancient Egyptian absolute rule catalyst "whoever will work and die for Pharaoh (=the son of God) =will be resurrected with the Pharaoh" how can you prove that God exists=because of Soul illusion of Self as separate from Flesh=no different from TV on and off....

Kant seemed to affect a Humean skepticism and agnosticism about external reality in general, including ultimate reality.

If we can't comprehend god, why do you refer to god as he/him? Pure speculation? Bias? No woman could ever be thought of or experienced as god?

The Kantilope: a philosophical creature grazing the vast conceptual savannas, feeding on dry perspectives and forever drawn to the elusive noumenal. It roams in search of insights, pondering freedom, morality, and the hidden 'thing-in-itself' beyond appearances. I shot the last one ;)

Plantinga pisses me off for his EAAN. I think it is idiotic.

Hume never used the terms "analytic" and "synthetic", Kant did. Regardless, at the end of his "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" Hume concludes that God exists as a being remotely analogous to a human intelligence.

The question is not does god exist, but the point is how the word "God" Exist in the first place, have you met God?, if yes, then what is God?, if not, then what is the essence of God?, if you can't answer both, it means I know that i know nothing (Socrates to people of Athens),

An atheist should hope God does exist. They should be seeking the truth. If they don't, you have to ask the question why aren't they seeking? 🤔

Centuries later Bill Clinton would steal this arguement.. "Its depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

We can't really say if Kant's philosophy exists or not or even what it is so we really don't know what Kant's answer is. This video is only describing the phenomenal Kant but a squirrel may have a different experience, therefore, we can never know. Kant's philosophy truly is moronic. I wish Socrates were here.. he would wipe the floor with Kant.

Mom and dad are not all powerful.. That argument doesn't hold.. If they are all powerful they would just tell the disease to leave with words.. Letting necessary evil is the 1st sign that you are not all powerful

Argument from motion he clearly didn't understand relativity 😂

Why most major spiritual traditions have Scriptures. In Christianity, in 2 Tim. 2:15 a gifted pastor-teacher must rightfully divide the word of truth. That means Isagogics, categorical, and exegetical understanding must be known to that teacher. Just reading the Bible won't cut it. Why? The Mind of God is that vast.

If your religion did not promise eternal persistence of your thoughts, memories, and self-awareness, then is there any reason to worship that god of your religion? There are no such things as magical supernatural beings; no heaven, no hell; your existence is finite and non-repeatable. Not only can the negative not be proven, but there is also no obligation to prove the negative. There are no leprechauns: That is NOT an existential claim, it is a non-existential claim. Show the independently verifiable empirical evidence of existence to refute a non-existential claim. One cannot prove that there are no black swans; one can only REFUTE "no black swans" by demonstrating the existence of a black swan. Using logical fallacies, scientific illiteracy, science denial, virtue signaling, and intellectually insulting sophistry proves that a position is not based on reason & evidence, but only on the politics of initiating force to violate informed consent. All of reality is natural, regardless of whether you can understand the laws of physics or how to think critically without relying on logical fallacies or intellectually insulting sophistry. The Scientific Method intends to REFUTE claims about reality by applying sound reason to the impartial analysis of independently verifiable empirical evidence (it speaks for itself). Claims that survive all rational attempts at refutation are held as TENTATIVELY true until new evidence is discovered to refute the claim. The Scientific Method is the best way that humans have found for learning how reality operates (i.e., Truth). *"We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress." -- Richard Feynman* *"Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt. I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned." -- Richard Feynman* *"The purpose of science is to improve understanding and one way to do that is to seek out the flaws in your current perception and correct them. You can't do that if you think that your current belief is already the absolute truth beyond all correction and that it cannot even be questioned." -- AronRa* Even children are harmed by indoctrination with false beliefs. Telling children that they will go to hell and suffer for eternity is very serious child abuse. Children cannot distinguish between empty threats versus real threats, especially when the threat comes from someone that they implicitly trust for honesty about the real world, and they depend on that person for their survival and well-being. Such threats leave permanent mental scars that impair their worldview for life. Do not tolerate child abuse. *"The Truth has nothing to fear from inquiry." -- Matt Dillahunty* The best preparation for living in the real world is teaching children critical thinking backed by the impartial analysis of independently verifiable empirical evidence to refute claims that are demonstrably false. Then they can analyze the reality of this world to decide for themselves how to live their lives.

*_What is the philosophical ideology of dualism?_* *ChatGPT 4o:* Dualism is a philosophical ideology that posits the existence of two fundamental and distinct types of reality or substances. The most well-known form of dualism is mind-body dualism, which asserts that the mind and the body are two separate and distinct entities. This idea suggests that mental phenomena are, in some respects, non-physical and not reducible to physical phenomena. Here are the key aspects and variations of dualism: 1. *Mind-Body Dualism:* This is the classical form of dualism, most famously associated with René Descartes. Descartes posited that the mind (or soul) is a non-material entity that is distinct from the body (or matter). According to Descartes, the mind is capable of thinking and consciousness, whereas the body operates in the physical realm and follows the laws of physics. This dualism raises questions about how these two substances interact, known as the mind-body problem. 2. *Substance Dualism:* This variation asserts that there are two kinds of substance that exist independently: mental substances (minds) and physical substances (bodies). Descartes' version of dualism is a form of substance dualism. 3. *Property Dualism:* Unlike substance dualism, property dualism suggests that there is only one kind of substance (usually physical), but this substance has two distinct kinds of properties: physical properties and mental properties. According to property dualism, even though the brain is a physical substance, it has mental properties that are not reducible to physical properties. 4. *Interactionism:* This is a form of dualism that posits that the mind and body interact causally. For example, mental intentions can cause physical actions, and physical sensations can cause mental experiences. Descartes' dualism is often interpreted as a form of interactionism. 5. *Epiphenomenalism:* This variation holds that physical events can cause mental events, but mental events cannot cause physical events. In other words, mental states are by-products (or epiphenomena) of physical processes in the brain, but they do not influence the physical world. 6. *Parallelism:* This theory suggests that the mind and body do not interact but run in parallel, coordinated by some means (such as pre-established harmony, as proposed by Leibniz). According to parallelism, mental and physical events correspond without causal interaction. 7. *Dual-Aspect Theory:* This perspective holds that the mental and the physical are two aspects of the same underlying reality. It suggests that every event can be described from both a mental and a physical perspective, without implying the existence of two distinct substances. Dualism has significant implications for various fields, including philosophy of mind, psychology, neuroscience, and metaphysics. It raises questions about the nature of consciousness, the relationship between the mind and brain, and the possibility of life after death. While dualism has historically been influential, it faces several challenges and criticisms, particularly from physicalist and materialist perspectives that argue for a more unified, monistic understanding of reality.

👻

God owes me money. He pretends he doesn’t exist.

I had a encounter with the Holy Spirit and was healed of brain damage,so yes, God is real!AMEN

Kant lived too early to know. And stop calling god “him”

Kant or won't?

Great video! The music was distracting, however. It would work if it was a less intellectual video, but the volume of the music is really loud, and I also had to listen several times to focus on the words once the music started. Could you edit it to reduce the volume?

Sometimes .. 😊

This is a phenomenal explanation!

God is phenomenal.. which we give it names such as Jesus or Allah etc.. And like zero that represents Nothing but its the origin of numbers which do represent things and items of beings while zero does not represent any beings ! Zero and infinity are both the same . They both represent Limits. This is a finite world and existance where its limits are at zero and infinity both of which do not represent anything. Thus how can anyone deny God ?! The fact that we and all that exist do actually exist within the boundaries of zero and infinity. eg. Length is infinite therefore it is outside of boundaries of existance and its existance can and is only defined within limits. in other words we and everything that does exist is manifestations of God.. ❤😇❤

19/10/2024 Yes, I do exist. Nietzsche was incorrect. I only don't care when you don't care about my existence and being on earth now. From portal of metaphysic

Getting mixed up in your own / Hume's categories ! 😵‍💫

I think it's very valid to ask, why should we believe something because Hume said it?

5:21. "God exits?"

maybe, perhaps, probably

But we can say some things about a radio wave. Not color or smell, but frequency and amplitude and wavelength and it variability over time. These are things we can't sense with our eyes or ears or nose, but thanks to other measuring instruments (like radios) we know them nevertheless. So the problem "Does god exist" isn't the same. It's harder: we have no way of knowing anything about a god (him? her? -- it) at all. Nothing. Including whether god exists.

I would say a radio wave was noumenal but is not anymore since we have radios. The same holds for cosmic rays, alpha particles, electrons and a whole bunch of things for which we have detectors. Will we ever have a reliable detector for God? Probably not. Then he will always remain noumenal --- a new word for me and apparently also for the spelling checker on my computer --- and he is of no consequence to us.

Is it just me? Aquinas seems to be drawing a very long bow to assume god.

Copernicus didn't have a different way of thinking! We actually do revolve around the sun.

as presented, it appears as if Hume sets the rules of the game, and wins by following his own rules