Відео

One would have to be and idiot to think this was a forgery.

What a load of rubbish.

It's FAKE

18:44

Maybe they rubbed food on his body to prepare it

The shroud is dated to the 1300's, that hasn't changed.

It's a medieval forgery. Sorry, it just is.

This is the time of Grace. Of the Gentiles. We must go into the world to preach the gospel of Christ. What a great way to start a conversation with the more “ intellectual “ type of friend. Praise Jesus!

The was a new test WAXS wide angle x-ray scattering and it dated the shroud to 50-70 AD……. Not sure of the percentage of +\- but that’s within 17 years of Christ resurrection

Really good idea to have a follow up chat with questions. I am looking forward to watching that!

To be honest the carbon dating is due to newer fabric sewed into the older fabric via French invisible weave. The whole nuclear thing is erroneous and in my opinion subject to religious bias for Christianity. the dating of the shroud can be proven to the roman empire by looking at the degradation of the cellulose fibers on main part of the shroud. Also authentication city of the shroud can also be proven due the type fabric the shroud is and also thinness of the blood stains (blood stains are 200 nm, far to thin to be painted). The blood samples are also AB+ which the same found in the sudarium of Oviedo.

So in the carbon dating of 1978, was there an error in the section they took to analyze?

I would love for your guest to analyze the image of the woman on the tilma of Juan Diego of Guadalupe in the 1500's.

These shroud studies are merely secular folly. The bible explicitly debunks the shroud of Turin as being the burial cloth of Jesus. Read the new testament accounts of the burial and resurrection. End of debate.

Interesting but boring. Good for nerds

I saw the Shroud of Torrent for the first time when I was a kid, and I am 62 years old today. I knew that it was Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Jason Brashear does an interesting analysis on his ARCHAIX Channel.

He made us listen almost to the end of a one hour video to propose the idea that nuclear fusion occurred to invalidate the carbon dating; however, the cold nuclear fusion and neutron emission is not explainable, it is not consistent with current knowledge. Hence by his own definition it does not satisfy the requirements for a hypothesis. He is saying that the image was made by divine intervention and that this intervention was done to falsely date the shroud to the middle ages. Why? If it was divine intervention, does it need a physical explanation? If there is a physical explanation that does place the shroud at 33 AD, this would mean it might be an image of Jesus but would not prove it or prove divinity. It would be historically consistent with historical records of Jesus but at the moment the carbon dating is an obstacle. Simple contamination would explain the inconsistent dating without resorting to fantasy. The problem is that in order to carbon date, more of the shroud needs to be destroyed and this has not been allowed.

Shut up and get the guest on.

Could the Shroud have been struck by lightning? ⛈️🎞️

It seems to be the case that The Shroud has two aspects, a record of the Passion by way of the blood and a 'negative' image of the Resurrection formed from a burst of energy, the former being the subject of chemical analysis spoken of in this video, the latter in Bob Rucker's video. In regard to the former it needs to be realised that Jesus had his kidneys destroyed during the beatings. Come his journey to execution he was therefore suffering uremic intoxication, with his blood having a very high urea content. On the journey he would have been nauseous, muscle cramps, breathlessness and cognition difficulties in addition to his wounds. The high urea content played a vital role in the formation of the enduring blood markers.

Watch this one at 1.5 speed, better still, find somethim else on the shroud.

Peace be to you, My Heavenly emaciate King of Glory. It's him. Model body too fat faced to reveal His thin ruddiness. I am Malachi Chpt 3 Happened 20th Adar 5777

1 Corinthians 15:51-53 "Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed- in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must be clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality.…"

Didn't they just find out though, that the shroud is fake?

The "rapture" , a falsely construed, non- Scriptural term, is not an in-time, "historical event". As typed by the antediluvian " Enoch", the "taking away", has been " happening" 24/7/365 . His "rapture" is mentioned in the 24th verse of Genesis Chapter 5, he was the 7th from Adam, and he was 365 yrs. old when God took him. Now, His Spirit, Christ In Him was ascended, not his vile, human , flesh body! No man has ever ascended to Heaven's Glory, not Enoch, or Elijah , or Peter, Paul or Mary, except the Son of man Jesus as The Christ, Who is in Heaven , The Omnipresent Reality of the Eternally Infinite Here and Now!

No one hath ever been Spiritually Saved by what he believes. Salvation that is of GOD requires the Certainty of The Knowledge of The Truth. And as We can read in Great Book if the Prophet Jonah , " those that observe lying vanities forsake their own mercy. " The Fundamentalist doctrine of "hell-fire" is a lying vanity. GOD Will Have all of US strayed sheep to be Redeemed.He sent The Son to be The Saviour of the world. And THAT One Will was accomplished at Bethlehem, Nazareth, Jerusalem, Gethsemane and Calvary/Golgotha, by His death , which He " tasted for every man", entombment, Resurrection, as proven by The Shroud of Turin, and His Ascension back to The Kingdom of Heaven, The Reality of The Paradise THAT He never , in Truth ever left.

There are some flags which tell me this guy is far from unbiased. And also makes assumptions which are questionable. Firstly- his language- repeatedly refering to this as 'the body' shows he is thinking in the paradigm of acceptance this is caused by a body. As opposed to object or process. Second- he is accepting of the passsion narrative in all gospels. There are different passion narratives, containing disfferent details across the literature. Much biblical scolarship accepts that this is to do with addition of elements to fulfil aspect of prophecy over time. And indeed, if it contains all elements- as opposed to some slightly off - this would point to a forgery to fit the narrative as opposed to the other way around. He sees things others don't see- teeth- colours- which back his hypothesis. He makes the assertion it could not be made by forgery without examining means by which forgery could have produced the know effect. He 'starts with the evidence' then jumps to a dead mans body radiating. As opposed to, say- a cloth used as a shroud placed around on a hot metal object (say brown body radiating statue fresh from forge). Technology easily avaiable to the eastern romans. This is just me making up a hypothesis based upon three minutes of thought. But its more likely to fit with the known laws of physics and therefore more scientific than anything this guy says. He says its veritcally projected- ignoring the fact shrouds were wrapped like a fold flat on top and bottom (even noted on his own website) Overall he just sounds like a guy trying to tailor evidence to preset conclusions. Im still totally intrigued- but want real analysis which is possibly too mich to ask in relation to the shroud of turin

How can this guy smile and giggle throughout his description of the death of Yeshua Adonai 😢

Seems like host gives lots of information…and guest is very slow to give much information 😢

It hurts me every time I think of what Yeshua Adonai went through for us…and to compound that He is The Son of God who did this huge sacrifice for us…wow it blows my mind. God didn’t need to do this. But He did because He loves us so much. ❤ always thank God for everything because we all don’t deserve anything, but He has given us eternal life with Him❤

It is almost certainly a genuine artifact from the lifetime of Jesus Christ. I once saw a ghost of a lady, she was about my height and was floating a few inches above the ground. What was odd was she was transparent like those models of the visible woman and gave off a soft violet glow of light. This in about 1993.

Hi from England. God bless ur work.

Well I don’t understand it all, but I would love to hear a panel discussion into Rucker’s theory with multiple physicists on both sides of the Christian faith. Perhaps we could also have Rucker address any peer review of his various papers. In any case, I think we are comfortably beyond any credible forgery argument.

A perfect example of beginning with a conclusion and weaving lies, myths and a few facts together to support it.

"A Canticle for Leibowitz" has profoundly resonated with me, compelling me to revisit its pages twice during recent Great Lenten seasons. The novel's depth continues to reveal new layers of meaning with each reading. Your observation regarding self-harm is particularly poignant, especially within the context of Eastern Orthodox theology. The discourse on suicide within Christianity dates back to its earliest days, as evidenced by the remarkable passage from The Shepherd of Hermas. The text, composed in the second century AD, offers a surprisingly nuanced and compassionate perspective in Parable 114/10.4: "And so, whoever helps such a person out of his misery obtains great joy for himself. For the one who is vexed with this kind of misfortune suffers the same kind of torment as one who is in prison. For many who experience this kind of calamity, when they can no longer bear it, take their own lives. And so, whoever knows that someone like this is suffering calamity and does not help him out of it has committed a great sin and bears the guilt for his blood." This ancient text demonstrates a remarkably progressive understanding of mental health struggles and establishes a profound moral imperative for communal support and intervention - a perspective that was centuries ahead of its time and remains deeply relevant today.

Jesus Reigns In Glory In Power With Love

The Purest Hogwash.

Thanks for sharing this video.

I don't have a clue what this guy said, but I know Christ rose!!

The c14 test was already debunked because they botched the statistical and didn't see the cotton fibers interwoven in the sample. The one and only clipping was a repair patch and not representative of the entire image area

You can carbon date the shroud, but the primary question is, how was the picture created ? We don't know and we can not reproduce it. So what are you proving with your carbon daring ??

More and more I am of the opinion is that the Shroud was intended for us, for our time, and for the future. In the past people possessed easy belief in God and Jesus; nowadays, people are more cynical, less inclined to believe in God and the existence of Jesus. The figure formed within the Shroud was not that obvious to people in the past; however, with modern Science, the image is properly revealed and the mystery of Jesus' resurrection made clear.

I totally believe it's real, but what is more powerful, in my opinion, is the fact that a lot of those who had seen Jesus reserected ended up being persecuted and went to their deaths confident of salvation. Happy, many with no fear. Only seeing Jesus reserected makes sense.

To jjohnson : I am also a Gematria/ Anglomatia expert. The Shroud gives proof of JESUS' non Jewish Name in the Greek Gematria of 888. His ht. Was 5 ft. 11, 71 inches, 7+1=8; His wt.was 170 lbs. , 1+7+0=8,and being crucified in 31A.D., born 4B.C., He was 3 5 yrs. Old, 3+5=8, so We have 888 , JESUS numerical Identity. And with the 8 of GOD 'S Anglomatia G=7,O=15,and Dis 4=26=2+6=8,We have The Ate IAm of Exodus 3:14 =8,and The 4 Eights of the Holy Quadrinity of The Godhead of The Father Mother Son and Holy Ghost!

No more tests are needed on the Shroud, for two or three true Witnesses us enough.I AM One ! Who will walk with Me in perfect agreement? The Shroud of JESUS/Turin is as Real as He is! And so let US forgive the benjghted sceptics and Bible totin' naysayers, for they will change their carnal minds when they See The Light!

The fact that the front and dorsal images have the same characteristics implies that the body floated above the lower shroud and was not in touch with it when the photograph as it were was created

Imagine the first photograph ever was that of Jesus!

I used to criticise Catholics for their reverence of relics. But just imagine had the reformation got the upper hand and all the relics were destroyed. Just think of that. And Dieci e Lode (Kudos) to Rucker… I have seen countless presentations and I think this beats them all.

We used to believe utterly in Jesus and everything he said. Now we no longer believe we know.