Відео

Thanks

Glad I was able to help

wind shear got me ...lol

You are very welcome...I am glad you found it helpful

You have to actually activate the experimental version in your accounts menu I made the same mistake. If it’s already activated then I’m sorry i don’t know why it would do that

Very true SI feels more like being on vatsim with the voice realism. Thanks for watching

No i had the say intensions pre recorded background atc chatter on so the other departures you hear are prerecorded from previous users…they don’t have traffic yet

SI is the way to go. And they get better each and every day. Simply amazing

SI has that potential but I don't think the long time it takes to process it's instructions is going to cut it once a real world level of traffic is injected like BATC does now! I'm not sure BATC will ultimately work and it's processing time is about half that of SI. I'm not sure SI will be able to keep up with a realistic load of ATC communications at a busy airport such as Heathrow! It's hard to get an opening to communicate with BATC now,, and that's with only a traffic level of 5 it's going to be much harder to do with SI! BATC and especially SI has to improve their efficiency in response time, if they're going to work with injected traffic,

@@tf51d this is exactly what I thought up until I started using that little fantastic addon which has transformed my MSFS world. I don't care about the delays anymore, as they're at most up to 4-5 seconds. it's not that the human ATCs reply within a second in the real world either. But SI wasn't always like that, only a couple of months ago they had delays of 8 seconds. And now they've halved it. As the tech matures (they're using 19 different AIs!) they're bound to do the same when AI traffic is a thing. It may still be an issue in very busy hubs but it won't be elsewhere. VATSIM has exactly the same issue if you try and fly near Gander control on a Friday night you have to wait something like 30 seconds before you get your turn and perhaps 10-15 more until you get a response. SI is MSFS life, there's nothing that can compare to it.

@@captainzeppos I not saying it's an issue now, but when SI implements traffic injection like BATC, all during the time it's processing each Instruction both from you and the AI traffic around you more AI instructions are queuing up behind leaving little time to get an opening to make your requests at an airport like Heathrow or Atlanta at a busy time. I'm having trouble with BATC so I know SI is going to be even worse! What both need is some kind of queuing system, to slip in the user's requests. I think that might only work with auto-respond (or Copilot mode in SI) mode though!

@@tf51d In fact, SI AI response times have improved dramatically recently. Less than 4 sec.

@@tf51d But there's no cue in real life. You have to wait and jump in sideways on a busy freq.

It is a great product thank you for the hard work to make it happen

BATC is also procedurally more accurate in many ways, but SI is more dynamic.

I agree and SI's voice model is way more natural

I just did a flight with SI yesterday and it had been awhile and they have come a long way since i last used them. They’re vectoring algorithm is spot on brought my right into the IlS

Do you mean that they talk slow?…that might be by design so newer people to atc don’t feel intimidated would be my guess

They don’t really yell at you it is possible that it is an audio issue with my recording. There is a volume control in the options

Lol the race on, but the more I use both I think you are going to be right with this one si feels just a little more real when i talk to them. None of them beat Vatsim

Yeah, maybe, but here you have coverage always, everywhere, and no stress to upset the controller , for many a big plus😅

Thanks for watching and the kind words….I think this could potentially be a nice alternative for when those times there is no traffic or controller on Vatsim…it’s not even close to being better but it is new…it will definitely be good for those intimated by online ATC. Say intensions does edge it out being VFR capable but that is also on BATC’s roadmap although i believe pretty far down that road.

The voice answering atc is the basic voice set the only premium voices for auto response are youtube content creators. I don’t think its too bad a little wooden maybe

Lol i know it reminded me of the youtube videos of JFK ATC

You are very welcome…

The guy with the new york accent does seem a bit on the angry side

1.3.7 i believe is the version

Where did you get it? I don’t see it at MSFS store

One other question does the GTN couple on Approach now?

It was submitted but i don’t think the update has arrived in the marketplace yet…i got it from the simworks website

I use the gtn xi and it works perfectly with the pc-12

From my understanding VR hasn’t been implemented yet

Yeah it is a very early release…they don’t have conflict resolution yet and there are bugs, but it has huge potential

Thank you i am glad you liked it

Hi, This is with all premium voices

How many characters this "ate up"?

@tiefenrausch8565 50000 characters

@@macklaa thank you, that's much. Like to see how batc compare to say intention, when both are out of alpha and beta. The costs seems to be equal when you gonna do about 10 flight a month

Yeah I personally didn’t like Say Intensions didn’t have a good experience with it. With Batc i wll be setting the traffic to basic voices and only use premium for the controllers that will extend it significantly and i will be posting a test video on character usage based on different configurations

Hi, I had this problem too, I thought it just automatically activated when you purchased it. But you have to go into the account option and physically switch from early access to expérimental. It is in the top right section. Hopefully this helps

@@V_F_Diaries i found out just before your answer. But thank you very much for your help. That was the right answer to my question. Super nice video by the way! Congrats!

You’re very welcome…i’m glad you were able to get it working. Thank you also for the kind words.

There was some degradation iI noticed but they are pretty clear most of the time

there is a radio degradation option in the settings

I used level 5

I haven’t be able to try them out with traffic…the premium will get costly i think. This was a short flight and it used 50000 characters that will equate to about 5 flights for 9.99 but if traffic is set to basic i don’t think it will be too bad.

Lol right …i think it was my fault though atc gave me a vector of 085 and i thought it was 185…the only thing is that in real life ATC wouldn’t have let me go so long in the wrong direction

@@V_F_Diaries I can't say I've looked into it but I kinda doubt that they'd have cleared you all the way to 16k, then sent you barnstorming into class E, then out over the Atlantic when going from JFK to PHL. :-)

You probably right also I thought it was weird that phl was landing 9R and 27R at the same time, it is alpha stage so somethings can be forgiven

@@V_F_Diaries no way they'd have head on approaches like that. They won't even land on both runways at once as they're too close. They might use a smaller runway for regionals or general aviation though. The vectoring for intercept wasn't quite right, but I think the regular version also has that glitch. You can't intercept an localizer 30 miles out, and that one NPC plane was given a 065 heading to intercept 27L which is like a hairpin turn, and it was out of sequence aside. I think a lot of the problem was with clearance delivery though. They should have amended your flight plan from the start if they were going to land on 27L. They'd have some standing MOU or whatever for short routes like that so that there is minimal coordination between the nearby approaches, but they'd also minimize how much time you're down in the VFR soup. Maybe clear you up to 6k until you're in the class B approach space or whatever. Still, it is very nice to see them making progress!

They do but if you listen to JFK controllers in real life they seem angry and annoyed too so it fits.

I just clicked on store in the login window and it gives you the option to buy it there

Definitely worth it

@@V_F_Diaries Just generated a flight from Gold Coast to Brisbane Int with the new experimental traffic and it all worked perfectly. So impressed. It's been a while as I was waiting for this to drop as I found the empty skies to be boring. Route was not a busy one, but there were a few jets taking off with me and I could see/hear more traffic heading down the coast at cruise, plus a few departures at Brisbane.. Really enjoyed the whole flight.

It was so nice to see the TCAS lit up with traffic with this program. Went back to vatsim cause just couldn’t stand the empty sky

Same

Thank you I’m glad you enjoyed it

It is a premium.

Hi yes all premium accept for the copilot and the flight used 50,000 characters

I only really saw a 5-7 fps drop during the flight and a couple of stutters all and all it was not bad at all

I noticed the occasional stutter and i had about 5 fps drop it might be cause it’s alpha and not completely optimized yet would be my guess. I am getting better performance then when i used the FSLTL traffic injection

​@@V_F_Diaries I would say the FPS drop for me with the alpha traffic injection has been similar to that of FSLTL, about 6-8 FPS, a bit disappointing as this was supposed to be a big positive of having the injection offloaded from the sim, but of course, it's alpha and early. I find that even static planes cause a 4-5 fps drops at big airports, so in the grand scheme of things, this is pretty good performance.

Yeah it is FSLTL

@@V_F_Diaries I thought they were gonna use their own traffic injection?

They are using their own injection. FSLTL is for model matching. You can use others like AIG etc

I don’t know …they don’t seem robotic

They seem annoyed and angry at times.

@@schulz_gaming5707 Have you ever listened to JFK-ATC? 😂If not, you really should! Time well spend!

@@jip5873 Lol yeah that one AI guy kind of sounded like Kennedy Steve