- 52
- 36 550
Law Vaarta
Приєднався 3 бер 2023
A Hinglish podcast that simplifies the legal profession and legal issues.
What clients want from their lawyer | Ft. Abraham C. Mathews | LitigationTalks Ep.5
Abraham is a qualified lawyer and chartered accountant. He worked as a journalist before his 9-year stint as a lawyer. Within the law, he has experienced both the litigation and corporate lives, only to learn that his preferences about the kind of work he wants to do have evolved with time. Like in Tennis, he says, many good lawyers will not be "successful" in the traditional sense of the term. But not all of us need to chase the dream of appearing on the Supreme Court's UA-cam stream.
Hear from him what clients look for in a lawyer. Hint: It's not the knowledge of the law.
Hear from him what clients look for in a lawyer. Hint: It's not the knowledge of the law.
Переглядів: 747
Відео
Running your own Chamber | Ft. Naman Joshi | LitigationTalks Ep.4
Переглядів 2,9 тис.2 місяці тому
In the fourth episode of Litigation Talks, Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj speaks to Naman Joshi - Founding Partner at Chambers of Joshi & Singh - on going independent within 3 years, maintaining a good office environment, getting your first few clients, landing the elusive 'retainer', arguing in court and much more. Tune in for a frank and meaningful conversation, and do like, share and subscribe! Leave ...
Being an AOR at India's Top Court | Ft. Anuja Pethia and Nishant Verma | LitigationTalks Ep.3
Переглядів 3,4 тис.3 місяці тому
Who is an Advocate on Record at the Indian Supreme Court? What are their roles and responsibilities? How much of the accountability do they shoulder before the top court? How true is the counsel-solicitor divide at the Supreme Court? What are some important traits to cultivate from the perspective of litigation? These and more interesting questions are answered by Anuja Pethia and Nishant Verma...
Building your Base | Ft. Aishwarya Nabh and Sahil Monga | LitigationTalks Ep.2
Переглядів 2,7 тис.4 місяці тому
Join me as I speak to two incredibly sharp lawyers - Aishwarya Nabh and Sahil Monga - and discuss their journeys, learnings and challenges in the legal profession. Aishwarya Nabh is an independent Delhi-based lawyer. She handles cases involving criminal law and commercial law, and has a deep interest in competition law. Sahil Monga is an Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court of India. He hand...
From Law School to Court | Ft. Niti Richhariya, Shivani Vij, Dacchita Shahi | LitigationTalks Ep.1
Переглядів 3,9 тис.6 місяців тому
00:42 Introducing LitigationTalks 1:30 Introducing Niti Richhariya 2:34 Introducing Shivani Vij 3:42 Introducing Dacchita Shahi 5:00 How did you end up litigating? 19:00 Are you happy? 21:10 Taking money from family 24:35 The Disadvantages: Gender, Lineage, University, City 26:40 Litigation after preparing for UPSC/Judiciary 30:13 How to choose a chamber? Why Delhi? 34:00 How women advocates ar...
Ep.24 | How Google makes money-by allowing trademark infringement
Переглядів 4517 місяців тому
In Law Vaarta's latest episode, Saral Minocha unravels the intricate details of Google's AdWords policy and its implications for trademark law. This episode is packed with expert insights, featuring an in-depth analysis of recent judgments by the Delhi High Court that held Google liable for trademark infringement. Join us as we navigate through the legal intricacies and the broader implications...
Ep.23 | Where the law disappears: Artificial Intelligence and Deepfake Technology
Переглядів 1787 місяців тому
What is #Deepfake content? How is it different from the simpler "Photoshop"? Is there a fundamental right to create Deepfake content? Is there any law governing Deepfakes in India? What SHOULD the law look like? What do we expect in the future? All these questions answered in this short episode with Sarvjeet Singh Moond, an independent consultant who has been working in India's Technology Law s...
Ep.22 | A whopping 75% seats RESERVED! Bihar raises eyebrows
Переглядів 6758 місяців тому
Ep.22 | A whopping 75% seats RESERVED! Bihar raises eyebrows
Ep.20 | Why firecrackers were banned by the Supreme Court
Переглядів 1818 місяців тому
Ep.20 | Why firecrackers were banned by the Supreme Court
Ep.19 | Same-Sex Marriages: Why did the Supreme Court refuse to legalise them?
Переглядів 5939 місяців тому
Ep.19 | Same-Sex Marriages: Why did the Supreme Court refuse to legalise them?
Ep.18 | "Cash for Votes": What is the Supreme Court deciding on bribes and parliamentary privileges?
Переглядів 5079 місяців тому
Ep.18 | "Cash for Votes": What is the Supreme Court deciding on bribes and parliamentary privileges?
Ep.17 | Colonial or not? Criminal Law "Amendments" 2023 (Round 1)
Переглядів 1759 місяців тому
Ep.17 | Colonial or not? Criminal Law "Amendments" 2023 (Round 1)
Ep.16 | How Modi overturned Supreme Court's judgment on control over Delhi "services"
Переглядів 296Рік тому
Ep.16 | How Modi overturned Supreme Court's judgment on control over Delhi "services"
E.15 | Why Bihar's caste census was stayed by the High Court
Переглядів 362Рік тому
E.15 | Why Bihar's caste census was stayed by the High Court
Ep.14 | Why Poker and Rummy are banned in Tamil Nadu
Переглядів 279Рік тому
Ep.14 | Why Poker and Rummy are banned in Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court of India EXPLAINED! : लॉ वार्ता #12
Переглядів 554Рік тому
The Supreme Court of India EXPLAINED! : लॉ वार्ता #12
पाक़िस्तान में देशद्रोह अब जुर्म नहीं! Lahore High Court strikes down #sedition: लॉ वार्ता #10
Переглядів 295Рік тому
पाक़िस्तान में देशद्रोह अब जुर्म नहीं! Lahore High Court strikes down #sedition: लॉ वार्ता #10
Rahul Gandhi says "all thieves have MODI surname": लॉ वार्ता #10
Переглядів 914Рік тому
Rahul Gandhi says "all thieves have MODI surname": लॉ वार्ता #10
JAIL for being a member! The UAPA Judgment | लॉ वार्ता #9
Переглядів 599Рік тому
JAIL for being a member! The UAPA Judgment | लॉ वार्ता #9
Jail for slurs? #College #Romance and Obscenity | लॉ वार्ता #8
Переглядів 515Рік тому
Jail for slurs? #College #Romance and Obscenity | लॉ वार्ता #8
Supreme Court upholds #demonetisation | लॉ वार्ता #6
Переглядів 39Рік тому
Supreme Court upholds #demonetisation | लॉ वार्ता #6
How are Supreme Court and High Court judges appointed? The Collegium | लॉ वार्ता #5
Переглядів 43Рік тому
How are Supreme Court and High Court judges appointed? The Collegium | लॉ वार्ता #5
Can the State KILL? Death Penalty explained | लॉ वार्ता #4
Переглядів 100Рік тому
Can the State KILL? Death Penalty explained | लॉ वार्ता #4
Supreme Court v. Parliament: The Basic Structure | लॉ वार्ता #3
Переглядів 108Рік тому
Supreme Court v. Parliament: The Basic Structure | लॉ वार्ता #3
"Ticket to education"? Hijab issue SPLITS Supreme Court bench | लॉ वार्ता #2
Переглядів 121Рік тому
"Ticket to education"? Hijab issue SPLITS Supreme Court bench | लॉ वार्ता #2
Supreme Court upholds EWS Reservations by 3:2 thin majority | लॉ वार्ता #1
Переглядів 237Рік тому
Supreme Court upholds EWS Reservations by 3:2 thin majority | लॉ वार्ता #1
"Weak-kneed before the powers": The Election Commission Judgment | लॉ वार्ता #7
Переглядів 759Рік тому
"Weak-kneed before the powers": The Election Commission Judgment | लॉ वार्ता #7
Very helpful!
Glad to add value!
Well let me share something with you all. I'm a recent graduate from a tier-2 National Law University. I could have got a corporate job if I had pushed a little but I decided to pursue my passion and choose litigation. Now here started my tryst with the sad reality of this profession. I applied at several chambers and almost everyone asked me to apply again with atleast a year of PQE. Now how the heck do we get the PQE. Now I question my decision to do this. It has been more than 3 months and now I have even stopped applying. I am thinking to prepare for government examination now. I haa a decent CV and I was even shortlisted for few corporate placements at my university. Man this profession is really hard if you don't have any godfather in this profession.
Thank you very much for sharing your experience.
Amazing content !
Thank you!
Should I pay my law school fees to Law Vaarta?
Thank you for the encouragement! 🎉
Extremely relatable. Thanks.
So glad!
Excellent discussion.
Thank you for your support!
Good stuff man. Keep it coming!
Thanks! Will do!
Thankyou for the podcast! Keep bringing wonderful guests.😊
It's our pleasure. Thank you for the appreciation.
More sessions incoming?
Thanks for your interest! Episode 5 is up, and Episode 6 is in the pipeline. Stay tuned!
Such a genuine and honest introspection from the speakers
Thank you very much for your support.
This is very helpful..I am a father whose son is pursuing law..there is a clarity being gained like such podcast.. which will help anyone set their goals...thnxs
Thank you for your appreciation. If your son has any specific questions, please let him know that he can always write to us directly at lawvaarta.sb[at]gmail[dot]com.
Gud desion
26:17 how junior are selected
A superb no-nonsense session. Honest, upfront and from the heart. Keep bringing more of such content. Lots of love and power to you, Shatrunjaya, and also to the production team. .And you're doing a great job at LAOT too.
Thanks a million. "No nonsense" is the best compliment we look for. Thank you for your support.
Could someone shed light on what is meant by “filing advocate”? Tried looking it up online but appears it’s a colloquial rather than formal term. Thanks!
Hi Anushka. Some lawyers stop filing cases after a point. They only act as "counsel", so that other lawyers file cases and engage them to argue. Lawyers who shift to "counsel" practice usually do it to increase their appearances in court, when they feel they are close to the age when they can become designated senior advocates. So, a "filing" lawyer files cases in their name, while a "counsel" does not. From what I hear, in Bombay (as opposed to Delhi where I practice), this categorisation is quite rigid. From the word go, lawyers either choose to become "solicitors" - dealing with clients and filing cases - or they become counsel.
@@shrutanjaya Hi Shrutanjaya - got it! Thank you for your response
This was such a fun and insightful listen. Will be joining a corporate firm out of law school but this made me extremely intrigued towards litigation and all it has to offer.
Thanks Anushka, glad you found it interesting!
You must display thumbnail only listen and see hindhi belt people
We deeply regret our inaccessibility to the non-Hindi speaking members of the audience. You are correct that our episodes at the moment are consumable only by members who at least have a working knowledge of the Hindi language. Nonetheless, we encourage you to watch Episode 4, and in future episodes, we will try to make the language more and more a mix of English and very colloquial Hindi. We appreciate your patience in this regard.
Why the conversation between the members in hindhi
It's clear that they want it to be accessible, informal and relatable.
Liked everything about Naman but I respectfully disagree with his probation policy. 2 months is way too soon to judge anyone's caliber - let alone freshers who need time initially to come up to speed. How are they supposed to deliver their best work under the constant fear of losing their job, that too right when they are just starting out in the profession? I think this model might work for interns but its unsuitable for freshers who've already graduated and may be looking for both mentorship and job security. Naman should consider subjecting his fresh hires to a more forgiving learning curve initially.
That's an interesting view. Thank you for sharing it. The adequacy or otherwise of the 2-month period may also depend on the stringency of the standards which one is evaluated on! We understand Naman to mean that the 2-month period is for the fresher to show a bare minimum level of commitment to litigation and the office.
I know this was the first episode, but a slight note on camera positioning - pls ensure that the faces of all the panellists are in frame and clearly visible (to the extent possible). In this one, we could only see Niti's side profile throughout the video.
Thanks Dhruv - this is a concern we share. We have tried to improve this in our future videos and are constantly working to improve the production quality with our team. We notice that you have patiently left suggestions for us in every video, for which we are extremely thankful.
Wonderful initiative, Shrutanjay! I've been binging all episodes in descending order of chronology. Have you considered expanding the scope of the podcast to include lawyers from other practice areas as well? Only litigation lawyers might get a bit too repetitive after a point, and since you are such a patient host - it would be nice to see you interview a diverse range of practitioners.
Certainly, thanks very much Dhruv for your suggestion, which we have noted. Please stay tuned and expect a more diverse range of guests in the future episodes!
On the specialization conundrum which many litigators go through, here's a question that I've pondered over for sometime - is litigation in and of itself not a specialization? There is simply so much to learn - not just substantively - but also in terms of procedural nuance and posture. And the complexities vary across fora and stages of a matter (original, appellate, etc)- perhaps this by itself should be regarded as a specialization.
We can connect deeply with your perspective. Litigation is certainly a specialization in and of itself - and yet there is a constant race to be super (even hyper) specialized - perhaps because of the needs of the market. Thank you for the comment!
Aishwarya's journey as a first generation lawyer and the 'hit and trial' method had deep personal resonance for me. If we haven't been born with or inherited mentors - lets help each other out as first gen professionals!
Well said!
Some questions or ideas for next video - 1. Suppose a young lawyer wants to work under top supreme court advocate in an year- what are the steps which he can take- 2. Various cases are based on simple logic-then how can a young lawyer create a position for himself? Or How much scope for creativity is there in the legal field? 3. Senior- junior relationship - what to expect and how to take the maximum gain from internship/ work? 4. Interesting and comparatively easier to get in- litigation fields for young lawyers 5. Building your base in your home state or going to Delhi for working under some popular chambers. Your opinion 6. Whether AOR certification will help in building practice and income inflow or it has merely a symbolic effect like degree from top NLUs or abroad? Is it true that only a few AOR get work and rest don't make any thing? 7. How to assess yourself in this field?
Thanks Mahim for these fantastic suggestions. These are immensely valuable for us and we plan to include them in the questionnaires for our future guests.
What an amazing session, Naman Joshi is great❤❤❤
He truly is! We particularly liked the frankness and transparency with which he answered questions.
@@lawvaarta Yes that's true
Very insightful!
Glad you found it to be so! If you have any suggestions for us, please do let us know.
@@lawvaarta Would appreciate if you can elaborate in detail from foundation to case study regarding competition law & IPR law
@@kirtighulanawar7290 Thank you so much for the suggestion. We will incorporate this input in our future videos.
Content is very good. Need better mic for guests. Overall audio improvement required.
Thanks Udit for your kind feedback. We have taken note of this and will be discussing it with our production team.
What a insightful talk!! Subscribed 👍🏻
Thank you very much. We really appreciate your support.
Thanks sir! Another solid podcast. Would really appreciate, if you can bring lawyers from non metro cities to like P&H High Court, Chandigarh etc. It would be interesting to learn about the problems and scope of growth in such HCs.
Noted, thanks again Kartikeya! Will hopefully get to this very soon.
Hey Shrutanjaya! Wonderful podcast. A request from my side, Can you bring lawyers from non metro high courts like P&H Chandigarh, Allahabad High Court, Himachal and the likes to talk about the reality of practising in non metro cities/states.
Hi Kartikeya, thanks very much for your suggestion. We are working on getting someone from these and other places very soon. Do stay tuned!
Best lawyer Naman Joshi!!! ⚖️
Truly!
Remembrance
It is always heartening to watch the innovatively formatted views of Shritunjay. The comprehension of subjects introduce his academically sound background and extremely rich family culture🎉
Thanks very much!
gooood my brother 💕
Thank you!
Love the Series Sir ✨
Thanks very much Rohan for your kind feedback. If you have any suggestions, please do let us know.
Shrutanjaya apart from being an extremely qualified lawyer is also an absolute killer on Court (pun intended), The Basketball Court, with his precise 3 Point Shooting Skills, he is truly a threat to any opponent.
Thank you for your kind appreciation. Hope you enjoyed the video, too!
Very insightful! Please get Gopal sir on your podcast!
Thank you! Will interview seniors after a few episodes, but have noted your suggestion. Thank you for your support.
Great work!
Thank you so much.
Patna wale bhai , i pray god to more power to you.❤❤
Yes, he's amazing!
The law teaches us about equality of opportunuty ,but in the field of law itself , there is no such equality when comes to opportunity.
Truly.
Outstanding.....👏
Thank you so much Mohit!
So realistic and unscripted interview in much needed legal profession🙌
Thanks so much for your feedback, we truly appreciate it. If you have any suggestions, please do let us know.
6:55 Interesting
Thank you for the tag!
Shrutanjaya never disappoints. (◽️🍰)
Thanks for your support!
Being illiterate in Hindi language is a great drawback for brighter minded youth of South India, especially the Tamil.
Thanks for the comment! The converse is true for those in North India - there is so much to gain by learning the various Indian languages.
Insightful, cleared lot of confusions. Hope someday we will have Gshanks on counsel practice 😅
Glad it was helpful! We hope so too! We intend to invite senior lawyers at a later point.
I do refer with u to new law graduates to go first with District courts learn basis procedure filing cases, what is suit, what is petition, what is contempt petition, how to prepare w.s, how to file replication, Basic procedure guides CPC, Cr.P.C nd evidence act nd than move to higher side to practice with renowned advocates in District courts, high courts nd lastly in Supreme court's Regards from Kamal Bhardwaj Advocate Panipat.
Great job dear shritinjay, we proud on u. Law field is very tough for new comers law graduates to settle in profession. Much learn for new law students to see nd nodge in firstly to learn. I also advise to new law pass Student pls go firstly to learn basic procedure.
nice brother 👍
Thank you! Cheers!
A great, show. The anchor Shritinjay Bhardwaj is really a great articulator if issues. He is capable to so in different sectors and formats. His contribution to society us appreciable🎉
Thank you very much for the kind words.