Hij Kib
Hij Kib
  • 55
  • 124 470
Smart Bombs - Documentary on Smart Bomb Technology
Smart Bombs A guided bomb (also known as a smart bomb, guided bomb unit, or GBU) is a precision-guided munition designed to
Переглядів: 5 553

Відео

Building Aircraft Faster Than Sound - Documentary (2001)
Переглядів 1958 років тому
Building Aircraft Faster Than Sound A half century ago, U.S. Air Force Captain Chuck Yeager successfully cracked the sound
A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) - Best US Ground Attack Jet
Переглядів 1358 років тому
A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) - Best US Ground Attack Jet The Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II is an American twin-engine
Jet Engines Documentary
Переглядів 1118 років тому
Jet Engines Documentary A jet engine is a reaction engine discharging a fast moving jet that generates thrust by jet propulsion in
DogFights of the Future - Combat for Fifth-Generation Jet Fighter
Переглядів 1158 років тому
DogFights of the Future Experience five future combat scenarios featuring modern 4.5 and 5th generation designs. First 4 F-22
Su-27 The best fighter in the world (Part 2/4) || Full Documentary
Переглядів 5348 років тому
Su-27 The best fighter in the world (Part 2/4) || Full Documentary Part1: Part2: Part3:
From MIG-25 to MIG-31 (Documentary)
Переглядів 3,1 тис.8 років тому
From MIG-25 to MIG-31 (Documentary) The Mikoyan MiG-31 (Russian: Микоян МиГ-31; NATO reporting name: Foxhound) is a
Multirole Combat Jet - F/A-18 Hornet
Переглядів 438 років тому
Multirole Combat Jet - McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet The McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) F/A-18 Hornet is a twin-engine
The Mi-24 Hind Helicopter
Переглядів 1398 років тому
The Mi 24 Hind Helicopter The Mil Mi-24 (Russian: Миль Ми-24; NATO reporting name: Hind) is a large helicopter gunship and
5 Most DANGEROUS AIRPORTS in the World (VNLK | LXGB | LFLJ | TNCM | NZIR)
Переглядів 688 років тому
5 Most DANGEROUS AIRPORTS in the World There are airports in this world that are too dangerous for regular travelers; in fact,
F-15 Eagle - The Most Successful Jet Fighter (Documentary)
Переглядів 1588 років тому
F-15 Eagle - The Most Successful Jet Fighter (Documentary) With its twin tail, the F-15 Eagle is probably the most recognizable
Amazing Aircraft Model Performance!
Переглядів 38 років тому
Amazing Aircraft Model Performance!
AeroMobil 3.0 - Car for Near Future
Переглядів 518 років тому
Ever wanted to buy a flying car? You only have a couple more years to wait, says a company that has built prototypes that can both drive and fly. This flying car
MiG-29 Tactical Fighter Take-off into the Future (Documentary)
Переглядів 4358 років тому
MiG-29 Tactical Fighter Take-off into the Future (Documentary) The Mikoyan MiG-29 (Russian: Микоян МиГ-29; NATO reporting
Su35 - Amazing Performance On The Sky
Переглядів 258 років тому
The Sukhoi Su-35 (Russian: Сухой Су-35; NATO reporting name: Flanker-E)[N 1] Also known as Super Flanker, is a designation for two separate, heavily
Aircraft Take off and Landing in Strong Winds
Переглядів 178 років тому
Aircraft Take off and Landing in Strong Winds
MIG-25 Foxbat The Legend in Cold War (Documentary)
Переглядів 78 тис.8 років тому
MIG-25 Foxbat The Legend in Cold War (Documentary)
Time to Remember - Grumman F14 Tomcat (Documentary) HD
Переглядів 1,6 тис.8 років тому
Time to Remember - Grumman F14 Tomcat (Documentary) HD
Aircarft Breaking Sound Speed
Переглядів 378 років тому
Aircarft Breaking Sound Speed
Spy Planes History (Documentary)
Переглядів 3,5 тис.8 років тому
Spy Planes History (Documentary)
Su-27 The best fighter in the world (Part 4/4) || Full Documentary
Переглядів 4808 років тому
Su-27 The best fighter in the world (Part 4/4) || Full Documentary
First Air War (NOVA Documentary)
Переглядів 14 тис.8 років тому
First Air War (NOVA Documentary)
Supercopters
Переглядів 288 років тому
Supercopters
Jet Fighters' Aerial Refueling Compilation A-10 B-1 B-2 B-52 C-17 F-15 F-16 F-18 F-22 F-35
Переглядів 1238 років тому
Jet Fighters' Aerial Refueling Compilation A-10 B-1 B-2 B-52 C-17 F-15 F-16 F-18 F-22 F-35
Eurofighter Typhoon
Переглядів 208 років тому
Eurofighter Typhoon
THIS PILOT IS A LEGEND. watch.
Переглядів 1428 років тому
THIS PILOT IS A LEGEND. watch.
Fifth-generation Jet Fighter - F22 Raptor
Переглядів 108 років тому
Fifth-generation Jet Fighter - F22 Raptor
Lockheed AC-130 Spectre Gunship
Переглядів 1858 років тому
Lockheed AC-130 Spectre Gunship
Harrier Vertical Takeoff and Landing
Переглядів 2298 років тому
Harrier Vertical Takeoff and Landing
The Boeing Dreamliner 787-9 performed vertical takeoff at the 2015 Paris Air Show
Переглядів 1048 років тому
The Boeing Dreamliner 787-9 performed vertical takeoff at the 2015 Paris Air Show

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Graham-mu1ul
    @Graham-mu1ul 3 дні тому

    And tomcat is more maneuverable and has more weapons hardpoints,mig cant turn very well,f14 has exceptional turn Radius compared to the mig25 and the mig31

  • @woongah
    @woongah 12 днів тому

    I am pretty sure that the F-14 could target six planes at a time, a few years before the Mig-31.

    • @aris5921
      @aris5921 7 днів тому

      with much more limited cone of engagement and constantly moving head on updating the phoenix until goes active and forget about shoot down capabilities cruse missiles

    • @Graham-mu1ul
      @Graham-mu1ul 3 дні тому

      The mig25 and mig31 don't stand a chance in a Dogfight at Close Range,if it's missiles are decoyed or evaded,then All the mig has is speed,many mig25 aircraft of the Iraqi air force which were flown by veterans Of the wars,where shot down by F15 eagles Of The US air force , also more capable mig29 and mirage F1 were easily shot down

    • @woongah
      @woongah 3 дні тому

      @@aris5921 I see - I have no doubt the Mig-31 has a better and more capable system than the first F-14, still it was not an unqualified "first interceptor capable of tracking and shoot multiple targets". First in Soviet service, first at tracking ten planes, first at doing so in shoot-down situations, OK. It is a great system. If you omit the qualifiers, the assertion starts sounding a bit propaganda-ish. "The FIAT G-91 was the best fighter [ever produced by the Italian aeronautical industry, up to that point]" - the phrase as a whole is opinable but possibly correct (the MC-205 begs to differ), if I omit the part in square brackets I am left with a bald-faced lie.

  • @noel3422
    @noel3422 19 днів тому

    Stupid how they replay the first part of the video twice, oh well, was fun for a minute.

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain Місяць тому

    Probably the best doco on this aircraft that I've seen.

  • @TheUniverse50
    @TheUniverse50 3 місяці тому

    I watched this documentary on smart bombs a few years ago while I was absolutely tripping balls stoned, It was the best documentary I ever watched 😂 I loved it

  • @snakeriverscotto
    @snakeriverscotto 4 місяці тому

    You know where the Soviet’s really excelled? Eyebrows…nobody grows eyebrows like the USSR did.

  • @theophanesantoniou8539
    @theophanesantoniou8539 5 місяців тому

    by far the best production aircraft of all times

  • @marcdunord
    @marcdunord 6 місяців тому

    The mig-25's 3.5-mach+ record speed, record 38-km+ ceiling, record climbing prowess, instant scrambling time, and its quartet of huge AA rockets (not missiles) forced the US to cease and desist from flying sr-71s over the CCCP.. The sr-71 had to be retired soon afterwards because suddenly useless while abominably expensive to both build and fly [on top of endless 24-hr 'scrambling' time, sic!]. It was the mig-25 that stopped the sr-71's ** crass violations ** of CCCP air space. This was why the mig-25 was built and it was a job perfectly well done, but one has to say that of course the glorious polikarpov I-16 can out turn the mig-25 (and yamato) like a joke. Note that the mig-25's top speed is 4k km/hr vs. 3.5k km/hr for the sr-71 only that the mig-25 cannot keep the 100m altitude corridor required by the morons at speed records inc. so they don't accept the mig-25 as faster. See the data and plots here: ua-cam.com/video/YDN9wv9bois/v-deo.html The mig-25 has the world record of altitude of 37,650 meters (123,523 feet). The mig-25 carried four huge AA missiles (rockets rather) with an 80-km reach that guaranteed the sr-71 would be shot down. PS. the mig-25’s engine is not "destroyed" after a 3,5-mach+ flight; the engine needs only minor part replacements. See also the data and plots here: ua-cam.com/video/vSn9_6Vnft8/v-deo.html

  • @betterhadit1144
    @betterhadit1144 7 місяців тому

    3000 kilometers = 1864.114 miles

  • @danielmendricks7205
    @danielmendricks7205 9 місяців тому

    The MiG 25 was truly a masterpiece of Soviet Technology, however it was never on par with tech in the west and the Soviets never had Kelly Johnson!

  • @WesWaters-dz4sk
    @WesWaters-dz4sk 9 місяців тому

    So why is there not a bomb that floats slowly down and has multiple weapons that can be released individually or all at once and each individual weapon has its own personal target and after all weapons have been deployed from the floaty thing either the floaty thing becomes the final bomb, or just self distrucks

  • @WesWaters-dz4sk
    @WesWaters-dz4sk 9 місяців тому

    If one could figure out a way to fly a weapon with equal accuracy but not using any satilight systems

  • @WesWaters-dz4sk
    @WesWaters-dz4sk 9 місяців тому

    Wow 1944 the idea of using cameras inside the weapon was not only thought of, but built and completed into working order, plus the Nazis had weapons a pilot could fly it with a hand held remote control, absolutely amazing and awesome

  • @faithful_foal1
    @faithful_foal1 9 місяців тому

    2:06 first air war RIGHT NOW ON NOVA!

  • @afmoney161
    @afmoney161 11 місяців тому

    H.. G.m

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine Рік тому

    It’s nice to see a bit more context about the use of the plane. It was mocked for being useless as a fighter, but that wasn’t its purpose at all. Sure, the US had planes that were better for the job, but they cost about 50x as much.

  • @xxseanthepoopxx8496
    @xxseanthepoopxx8496 Рік тому

    Maybe the next plane will be named B. U. T. T.

  • @GamingBoy-oe2jr
    @GamingBoy-oe2jr Рік тому

    The legend

  • @anouarbensaid9908
    @anouarbensaid9908 Рік тому

    2:25 2:57 3:16 3:25 5:40 5:45 9:20 9:48 15:36 17:10 fin 16:07

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    It’s a clown car in the sky

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    Apparently it isn’t the best but I love this 80’s documentary However Ukrainians and stinger missile would disagree with its air supremacy It’s like a clown car except in the air and it explodes and Russians die

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    Communist crybabies 😭😢😂

    • @Spooky_32
      @Spooky_32 Місяць тому

      Which part are you referring to?

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    🙄👎

  • @ramasharock671
    @ramasharock671 2 роки тому

    some places sound is missing

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    Poor British haven’t made a decent aircraft since the BEGINNING of wwII

  • @adamscease4126
    @adamscease4126 2 роки тому

    SR-71 was better not even any comparison.

    • @ronjeremy5826
      @ronjeremy5826 2 роки тому

      Better in what? Taking photos? Are you actually comparing a flying camera to the fastest fighter jet/interceptor, that carried the largest air to air missiles? Go back to watching cooking shows

  • @mystyle_jm8997
    @mystyle_jm8997 2 роки тому

    Question, will JDAM Work without satellite or GPS and rely on Laser Guidance?

    • @pleuston9221
      @pleuston9221 2 роки тому

      Originally, JDAM was a GPS/Inertial navigation-guided bomb. Later versions like the GBU-54 use a laser to assist with targeting, and newer versions of laser guided bombs use GPS/INS to assist their targeting. They all have their merits, the Laser-guided one is the most accurate, but is useless without clear skies. Optically guided bombs are flexible but useless at night, and GPS/INS is capable under any conditions but the least accurate of them all.

    • @mystyle_jm8997
      @mystyle_jm8997 2 роки тому

      Because in 32:42, there's an Incident that the GPS JDAM has struck the Chinese Embassy, as if the JDAM has a Guidance Error compared to Laser-guided Bombs. Also, especially in 34:01, the worst Friendly Fire Incident. JDAMs with GPS Guidance has a drawbacks than Laser-guided Bombs right?

    • @pleuston9221
      @pleuston9221 2 роки тому

      @@mystyle_jm8997 yeah Laser guided are most accurate. Those two situations were error on the human rather than the bomb tho. The embassy was faulty intelligence and the friendly fire was an overconfident bombardier.

  • @willgibson9718
    @willgibson9718 2 роки тому

    Can you please make a video about nova dam busters?

  • @douglashagan65
    @douglashagan65 2 роки тому

    So Russian make 25 bucks test

  • @miladmoshayedi7514
    @miladmoshayedi7514 2 роки тому

    Two Mig-25 were destroyed by Iranian pilots, one with F-14 and the other with F-5. American engineers were not asleep.

  • @photonsearcher7303
    @photonsearcher7303 2 роки тому

    Man this needs more appreciation

  • @mikecoshan3752
    @mikecoshan3752 2 роки тому

    It still remains the fastest production fighter/interceptor ever flown, it was an amazing aircraft back in the day.

    • @billenright2788
      @billenright2788 2 роки тому

      Fast with really short range and antiquated avionics and weapons. F-15's/14's would have shot them all down.

    • @richardpluim4426
      @richardpluim4426 2 роки тому

      @@billenright2788 Actually the F14 is a hanger queen. 30 hours in the shop for every hour in the air.

    • @ZCasavant
      @ZCasavant 2 роки тому

      ​@@billenright2788 LOL sure, if they could ever catch one with a missile. They are entirely different planes with different purposes. The Mig 25 is a high-speed, high-altitude, very short range interceptor with an extremely specific purpose to its design: countering the B-70 strategic bomber. It is NOT a fighter, nor was it designed to be. The Su-27 or Mig 29 would be a better comparison to an F-15/14.

    • @EdmontonRails
      @EdmontonRails 2 роки тому

      @@billenright2788 Right after the US figures out where their air force is after MIG-25s shoot down comm satellites.

    • @robydual4438
      @robydual4438 Рік тому

      @@richardpluim4426 That's exaggerated nonsense. The F-14 was an amazing plane, and better than anything the Soviets have ever produced (to this day).

  • @mrs6968
    @mrs6968 2 роки тому

    I've never once heard of oil leaking and hitting the pilot from this era of aircraft so is this a true rarely documented fact or did this modern rebuild just have shotty craftsmanship?

    • @paulburton8264
      @paulburton8264 Рік тому

      No that was the way it was.

    • @mrs6968
      @mrs6968 Рік тому

      @@paulburton8264 OK Cronkite "and that's the way it is" lol all love no hate

    • @FredBednarski
      @FredBednarski Рік тому

      Not shoddy, more like a "best solution we have right now" The early aircraft engines were rotary - meaning that the whole engine was spinning inside the fuselage. This kind was chosen because it can cool itself as it spins, unlike cylinder engines that needed water to cool (and water is heavy, so a big no-no for those early machines). But, you need to keep the engine spinning smoothly, so you need oil. Oil on the engine will move as the engine spins, spitting out the front due to centrifugal force. Now you *could* create some kind of enclosure to limit the spitting, but then your engine won't cool as well (again, the fact that the rotary engine was exposed to the air allowed it to cool so well) and you also end up with a lot of flammable oil coating something else easily flammable (the enclosure would have to be wood/canvas because of weight) near a part that gets hot (engine). That's a very bad idea - fire was the worst case scenario in those machines. So the best solution was to let the oil coat inside of the engine (metal, so a fire could be contained) and just let it "air out" during flight. Some will sputter on the pilot (as they're flying into the oil they just spat out), but most of it will just go into the empty air.

    • @mrs6968
      @mrs6968 Рік тому

      @@FredBednarski thanks pal that was a very fun engineering read

  • @eriktruchinskas3747
    @eriktruchinskas3747 2 роки тому

    As much as I love the tomcat the intruder should have gotten the "anytime baby" motto for its all weather capabilities

  • @questofknowledge8788
    @questofknowledge8788 2 роки тому

    That is some amazing building process for the fuselage.

  • @dani-ri6xg
    @dani-ri6xg 2 роки тому

    عاشق پرواز با میگ 25 جم تا حالا همچین هواپیمایی ندیدم

  • @blackout6403
    @blackout6403 2 роки тому

    Pretty Smart Bombs Dumb humans

  • @stevemilitaryvideos3331
    @stevemilitaryvideos3331 3 роки тому

    This is full Part 4 with a portion of Part 4 attached to the end.

  • @stevemilitaryvideos3331
    @stevemilitaryvideos3331 3 роки тому

    This is full Part 3 with a portion of Part 3 attached to the end.

  • @stevemilitaryvideos3331
    @stevemilitaryvideos3331 3 роки тому

    This is full Part 2 with a portion of Part 2 attached to the end.

  • @stevemilitaryvideos3331
    @stevemilitaryvideos3331 3 роки тому

    This is full Part 1 with a portion of Part 1 attached to the end.

  • @sundelight8230
    @sundelight8230 3 роки тому

    This was one badass Jet back in the day!!

  • @alexwest2573
    @alexwest2573 3 роки тому

    So the Mig 25 used special jet fuel? So it wouldn’t be able to run on the same fuel as other jets?

    • @benmodel5745
      @benmodel5745 2 роки тому

      As did the SR-71, you need all sorts of additives at high altitudes

  • @parapsychologist5402
    @parapsychologist5402 3 роки тому

    2 Saturn 5 engines to get it off the ground.

  • @markward2436
    @markward2436 3 роки тому

    Russia man amazing hey..im a musician and Russia makes great valves for guitar amps and they came up with a pedal called the big muff ..sorta the MiG 25 of distortion. Built so well compared to Asian products. Actually built a bit better then leading USA brands.so there jets must be super solid

  • @pistolgrip44mag
    @pistolgrip44mag 3 роки тому

    Nothing Ugly about this great aircraft. She is a Beauty capable of carrying thirty 500lb bombs. Also carried Harpoon and Shrike Missiles. Also many others. ✈

  • @eccmassive9641
    @eccmassive9641 3 роки тому

    We need more shows like this....and less like Maddow&Hannity

  • @rhetthart9311
    @rhetthart9311 3 роки тому

    how much fuel did these absolute big boys use?

  • @kennethnewton7931
    @kennethnewton7931 3 роки тому

    Who made the planes what was the name of the group I'm interested in purchasing an re8 or an albatross

  • @gazof-the-north5708
    @gazof-the-north5708 3 роки тому

    The MiG-25rb was my favourite version