- 132
- 11 634 023
Simulation Bros
United States
Приєднався 22 сер 2021
A-10 Warthog VS Scimitar Armor simulation.
Music: ua-cam.com/video/zYhzSxYT5Rc/v-deo.html
Program used is ANSYS
Discord: discord.gg/xm5kz8fJ
Program used is ANSYS
Discord: discord.gg/xm5kz8fJ
Переглядів: 4 916
Відео
Maus VS 150,000Kg Tungsten Cube
Переглядів 8 тис.12 годин тому
SQUASH Program used: ANSYS Music: ua-cam.com/video/ekY09M48Jvs/v-deo.html Discord: discord.gg/xm5kz8fJ
HELLFIRE MISSILE VS L3/33 Tank Simulation
Переглядів 6 тис.14 годин тому
The program used is ANSYS Music credit to C418 Aria Math music.apple.com/us/album/aria-math/739831644?i=739833005 Discord: discord.gg/qbbDnyrUh4
800mm Gustav VS 20 L3/33 Tanks Simulation
Переглядів 19 тис.14 днів тому
Program used is ANSYS Music is jetpack joyride theme Discord: discord.gg/d9YKu3JHhS
AR-15 VS Armored Vehicle (Remade)
Переглядів 11 тис.14 днів тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/46oYJSQlko8/v-deo.htmlsi=OLWByMmfzARDamO- Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3
Maus VS 800mm Gustav Cannon Simulation
Переглядів 19 тис.14 днів тому
Files used: www.thingiverse.com/thing:2884572 Music: ua-cam.com/video/jIyBYP8BMp8/v-deo.html Program used is ANSYS Discord server: discord.gg/tyyGV8bD
Tungsten Cube VS l3/33 Tank Armor Simulation
Переглядів 31 тис.14 днів тому
Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3 Music: ua-cam.com/video/63hoSNvS6Z4/v-deo.html Program used is ANSYS
Maus VS IS-4 Tank Armor Simulation
Переглядів 10 тис.14 днів тому
Files used: www.thingiverse.com/thing:2884572 Music: ua-cam.com/video/hpuzogNlqsQ/v-deo.html Program used is ANSYS Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3
World Of Tanks IS-7 VS E100 Armor Simulation (WW2 Scenario)
Переглядів 15 тис.21 день тому
Music used: ua-cam.com/video/eGEWsK1cTv4/v-deo.html Program used is ANSYS Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3
STRV-103 VS T-64 A Simulation.
Переглядів 7 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/hpuzogNlqsQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/8Mfhq4ODNVs/v-deo.html Video footage and images: tanks.mod16.org/2016/09/29/demonstration-of-the-elevation-system-on-the-strv-103/ ua-cam.com/video/fARGfVA7Mm8/v-deo.html Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3
USS-Iowa VS Yamato Simulation Part 2
Переглядів 64 тис.21 день тому
Image sources and 3d models: www.thingiverse.com/thing:2219854 en.topwar.ru/179345-jamato-boj-v-supertjazhelom-vese.html Music: ua-cam.com/video/T0BJCPrQ2SM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/M0cR_33PLGI/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/2bKvD-YE4i0/v-deo.html Discord: discord.gg/EQwSZbX3 Program used is ANSYS
ZSU-57 vs Sho't Kal Alef Armor Simulation
Переглядів 15 тис.Місяць тому
Range of engagement: 800 Meters Discord: discord.gg/7PPZa96k Program used is ANSYS Music: ua-cam.com/video/XqXouk97qBw/v-deo.html&start_radio=1
M26 Pershing VS Panther Armor Simulation
Переглядів 15 тис.Місяць тому
Thumbnail source: tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/germany/panzer-v_panther.php Music from Kevin Macleod (90% of all internet music comes from him check the playlists out) Discord: discord.gg/7PPZa96k
Backwards Ribbed Armor VS Frontal Ribbed Armor
Переглядів 302 тис.Місяць тому
Songs used: ua-cam.com/video/m_RMzXrGjGA/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/aBkTkxKDduc/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/3sfY1lRkEVA/v-deo.html Discord: discord.gg/PJaj5StG Program used is ANSYS
Abrams vs HSTVL Armor Simulation
Переглядів 18 тис.Місяць тому
Discord: discord.gg/fpAH2r8z Program used is ANSYS
Projectiles Made From Explosions. EFP Armor Simulation.
Переглядів 15 тис.Місяць тому
Projectiles Made From Explosions. EFP Armor Simulation.
M8 Greyhound VS Tiger 2 Tank Armor Simulation
Переглядів 21 тис.2 місяці тому
M8 Greyhound VS Tiger 2 Tank Armor Simulation
Japanese Lunge Mine VS M4A3 Sherman │Tank Armor Simulation
Переглядів 31 тис.2 місяці тому
Japanese Lunge Mine VS M4A3 Sherman │Tank Armor Simulation
Tiger 1 Barrel Explosion│Tank Armor Simulation
Переглядів 21 тис.2 місяці тому
Tiger 1 Barrel Explosion│Tank Armor Simulation
DONT put ERA on a BMP │ Explosive Reactive Armor Simulation
Переглядів 28 тис.2 місяці тому
DONT put ERA on a BMP │ Explosive Reactive Armor Simulation
ISU-152 High Explosive VS Panther Armor Simulation
Переглядів 45 тис.2 місяці тому
ISU-152 High Explosive VS Panther Armor Simulation
Tiger 2 VS Sherman Jumbo Armor Simulation
Переглядів 14 тис.2 місяці тому
Tiger 2 VS Sherman Jumbo Armor Simulation
P1000 RATTE VS T95 Armor Simulation
Переглядів 35 тис.2 місяці тому
P1000 RATTE VS T95 Armor Simulation
Tiger H1 VS Sherman Jumbo Armor Simulation
Переглядів 60 тис.2 місяці тому
Tiger H1 VS Sherman Jumbo Armor Simulation
STRV Ribbed Armor VS Solid Armor Simulation.
Переглядів 238 тис.2 місяці тому
STRV Ribbed Armor VS Solid Armor Simulation.
Armor Piercing Shell VS Spaced Armor Simulation
Переглядів 74 тис.2 місяці тому
Armor Piercing Shell VS Spaced Armor Simulation
Can you ever show more than one angle of impact?
The Japanese struggled to properly harden her thicker plates, it pushed the limits of their armor industry. I suspect her armor was loaded with defeats and unequal hardening.
don't need to penetrate just eff up her turrets so they cant turn, elevate or target. Just a change of tactics. The Iowa's were faster and had better targeting. Short of mass the 18 vs 16 inch guns are slightly larger slower shell vs slightly lighter hi velocity shells. Use a combination of AP and HE rounds in succession to jam up machinery and cause trauma inside the turret or ship. Target her steering gear and lighter armored parts of the ship outside the armored citadel. To cause damage and take on water causing the sip to slow or become unbalanced. getting hit with a shell would seriously wound or incapacitate the people in the turret probably kill people near the point of impact due to plate spalling creating a shotgun effect inside the turret.
E-100: "Rotates the turret 45°" IS-7: What did you do? E-100: I balanced the game 🤷
I really don't want to be behind that armour, especially if multiple rounds hit in a short time. But the mentioned angle from the manual is not the only way of attacking or even the optimal angle to attack armoured vehicles. If you can, you go for the roof. If you can't do this, you attack from the sides, especially if you have to fly low. The A-10 is not a magical creature and at least its pilots know it.
hey, um, this isnt an attack or anything but please dont use the ai generated voice, it gives a cheap feel to your videos...
Like the video but the reality of such an engagement would have been plunging fire of main armaments on the deck armor. The RN couldn’t sink Bismarck even point blank and the she only sunk due to being scuttled.
New soviet bomb:
For her pleasure
So is the armor homogeneous or face hardened? If memory serves, the IJN armor was about WW1 standard as they wanted more elasticity in it. Also the shell didn't normalize on impact. Just 2 things we need to know about the sim.
The worst thing you can hear before going on parole... "The Americans will be providing the close-in air support"
I was not expecting that. Although I do wonder what would happen when that deflected core hits the turret.
The crew if wearing helmets would reasonably survive getting hit by a 1 ton steel projectile... neat
"Il mitragliere è privo di sensi!" tbh I think he's a bit more than unconscious
Are these HEAT shells?
as i know in wot e100's turret armor 270mm
0:53 будь здоров
Guys, I think the Maus took a minor hit
I loved the part when the Doom music beat dropped and the cube started slowly moving towards the Maus
Its not a tank killing gun
5 people got injured and one person, L/CoH Matty Hull, got killed in that friendly fire attack. The Warthog pilot did 2 runs, with guns and rockets, after the first, most exited the scimitars and took shelter underneath their vehicles. L/CoH Matty Hull died in the Scimitar.
Ive always thought it ironic to name a warship after the state of the union that is farther from the ocean than paris is from moscow.
I am once again asking for l3 dropped from lancster at around 7-8km, while moving at 376kmh, onto panzer 4
Asking again for you to try am l3 falling from a lancaster cruising at (something something 8000 ish something something)meters at about 364 kph, onto a panzer 4
Yo bro is friendly fire on? Idk let me check
The crew was dancing on the edge of death
Lets see a plastic apfsds round doing 10km/second vs abrams cheek
It would be interesting to see the reverse what the 18.1 inch rounds could do to the Iowas
The Scimitar has an armor of 12.7 mm not 35mm so the shell would have passed through and not ricocheted.
its 25mm we just wrote it wrong, nowhere on the scimitar it has 12.7mm
The round also would not have impacted at 79.5° lol, these guys just have no clue what they are doing lol
Half expected to find Spookston in the comments lol
Who wants the tungsten cube? I do! I do! Alright, HERE YA GOO!!!
I'd bet the guinsu version of hellfire would poke a hole in that sucker.
Funny thing is from 1st Gulf war to the War on terrorism all footage has the A10 coming inat a steeper and higher angle 🤷🏾
they mentioned it in the video bro
@matthelord7695 Wasn't worth watching whole video, once they started out with the 1970s data I tuned out. I know they make these videos unnecessarily long for advertisement purposes
@wilinstonthompson1352 you do realise you can only place extra ads after you reach the 8 minute mark right? And also it was mentioned at the start of the video before it simulations started
@matthelord7695 I watched 1st simulations and commented but thanks for carrying their water. They still took 8 minutes too long to get to the point.
@@wilinstonthompson1352 bro the video is 3 minutes what do you mean 8 minutes too long
That single round may have bounced, but as they say, there's more where that came from! 😬
Day 2 Asking for a child on a bike going 700m/s Vs L3
Make it happen
The happy wheels kid and bike preferably
Yes@@rock_man
@@rock_man The only way the L3 could stand a chance: If the bike were plastic
The scimitar is cool but I don’t understand why it has tracks as a recon vehicle. I feel like having wheels would increase speed and decrease maintenance time
Greater cross terrain ability. Wheeled vehicles get stuck easily
@@joenuts5167 Especially when it went to the Falklands in 1982....miserable weather...tough terrain
There were 2 recon vehicles Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance Trackef ( Scorpion/Scimitar) and CVR Wheeled Fox. Pros and cons for both. Ground pressure of CVRT is lower than a man so Scimitar can go where men on foot can’t
@@jyralnadreth4442 yeah much better off which tracked vehicles in rough terrain. As we saw with Afghanistan, tracked vehicles are better than wheeled APCs when in rough terrain. Wheeled vehicles are superior in grasslands and deserts, relatively flat terrain where their superior ground pressure stats matter
But also not all wheeled vehicles have better ground pressure. 6x6 or 8x8 will, but ones with only 4 wheels suffer in basically all terrain(think Max Pro or HMMV) where their high weight makes them suffer all around off of paved roads.
Did not expect that to ricochet off aluminium
The plate in the video looked like a steel plate. Maybe it was modeled incorrectly?
@@boomchacleKSP its aluminium that had proper testing done and based off of real life data, the angle is so extreme especially for HVAP round they tend to bounce so its not unexpected
@ huh OK. I wonder what would have happened if the DU penetrator was turned backwards.
I don't believe that the scimitar armor can block a10 rounds. It weights only 7.5 ton and the armour is light. The simulation is wrong.
Amerimutt coping
Its all about angle dumbass Also whats the matter? That thing shoot hundreds of such round per second it will pen anyway
Most of it can't. It only held up here because this particular plate is at such an angle.
bloack a10 round.*
damm gun ho yanks
Have a feeling if it had been 1 degree higher it would've penetrated
Nwooo the skrunkly☹️☹️☹️
"Oh god damn it here comes an A-10 Warthog. I really don't understand how that flying piece of shit can stay up in the air half of the time. They call it a gun with wings on it, I call it a flying war crime just waiting to happen. There's nothing impressive about that flying tub. Here's a fun fact about the Warthog! The '10' in the name is the amount of friendlies that are risk of getting hit in a gun-run, because the pilot can't control their trigger finger, firing more rounds than Rambo did in his third movie, honestly it's whole existence is a joke, it was built in the wrong era. It's just as slow as a P-47, you can't climb because you'd be shot down the moment you popped up on radar, and there other aircraft that can fill the same role miles better, here I even made a list: F-4 Phantom, F-105 Thunderchief, F-111 Aardvark, F-16, F-18. I could keep going, but I think I've made my point clear. Go back to the dirt road you took off from, since you claim to be "built different." Give me a fucking break, what you really are is just annoying with that 30mm going off."
Ooof bro took that seriously
Dude, you forgot to take your meds.
@Harikuu thank you for your input Hoshino from Blue Archive
Even though im not a expert i can say the following: The A 10, unlike a lot of other fighters. Can take a lot of damage. It can survive multiple Hits by AA guns and even a rocket if lucky. The A 10 has a lot of flares making it very resistant against thermal missiles. The A 10 is very slow. However, this is not necessarly bad because it is able to react much faster when a attacked thanks to this. Furthermore the A 10 just has legend Status what makes it a feared danger when the enemy heares its gun, its the same Effekt with the Ju 87. So no, the Warthog has its pros and cons. Not only cons as you say
@@dreamy150 the only things that shivers in fear is friendly troops
Surprised the armor held up so well, though having multiple rounds impact the same plate would be... unfortunate.
Or one round hitting almost any other part of the vehicle. Most of it isn't this slopey!
@@DecidedlyNinjatrue but the a10s aoa is part of the extreme angle
@@Tsarbloonba Isn't angle of attack something else? In relation to aviation I mean, we understand what you saying tho
Warning! Friendly fire is TURNED ON!!
Now this is my kinda simulation
Surprising! Guess those rounds landed at less steep angles
The 10 in the name stands for the amount of friendlies in risk of being killed in a gun run by the trigger happy A-10 pilots.
You arent american so I see why you would think this is funny
Could you simulate the frontal upper armour of the TAM against 20, 30 or 40mm AP round? Good video :)
Uhm… Well.. I… it was a Chinese knock off!