Відео

Valid point! Do keep in mind, however, that everything full frame is significantly more expensive, especially the lenses 😮‍💨

will your camera need to move or would it be in a fixed/stable position?

@@marcrodet4900 95% of the time it would be on a tripod filming me

@trouble2732 - Hey legend, In my opinon, the decision I would make in your cicumstance (assuming the A6700 really is a $800 difference.. I would first look at the second-hand market, If I'm unable to find an A6700 for closer to a $400 euro difference, then I would get the ZVE10-II assuming you're only going to be using it for Live-Streaming in 4K and nothing else. In my opinon, however, the problem still lies in the fact that I believe the resell value for the ZVE10-II will be absolutely horrible. Whereas, the A6700 will be extremely value for years to come. In addition to that, since you're in a studio environment, the likelihood of the A6700, or any camera for that matter, overheating is very low. If it does become an issue, you could literally just buy a ulanzi fan for heaps cheap, and attach that to your camera to prevent overheating. When you travel, and as your develop in your content creation journey, you would've wished that you purchased the A6700 instead, since it can literally do everything. You could use it for photos, graphics, promotional content, vlogging, etc.. etc. Hence, for me, I'ld still purchase the A6700 (ideally on the second-hand market).

I’m not too familiar with Canon cameras, but what I can say, is that-unless you personally feel you’ve outgrown your current camera and can no longer continue developing your craft and learning new intuitive ways of bringing your visions to life (with your current setup), then you should ideally work towards an upgrade/investment. However, make sure you select the correct option and don’t ‘downgrade’, which I believe (with my use case), I’ld be doing with the ZV-E10 Mark II (with both pricing, no mechanical shutter and no IBIS). I’ll be saving to invest into the A6700 (this’ll be a camera I use for the next 5 years-easily)

Thanks for the support as always legend! I currently only have access to the Mark 1 Kit Lens, I've legit never taken it out of the box hahah But when the Mark II lens kit becomes avaliable in physical stores, perhaps I could drop in to test it and let you know my thoughts vs the Mark I kit lens!

I know right, it’s quite sad really 🤷‍♂️

The best decision to make mate! I approve 💪

You’re a legend mate hahah Thanks for watching and supporting bro 💪

You’ve raised a really clever point here man, this didn’t even come to mind. But it’s strange that America don’t already include their Tax as part of the disclosed price (Like Australia), and also strange that the tax is different depending on which American state you’re from 🤔 This I believe, could clear up the price discrepancy, but despite this, it doesn’t change the fact that the price itself is absurd!

@@EdwardChlela Relax, it's not all bad news. You're a lucky man, you get to live in Australia !!!!

Very wise mate! This is true, it's a blessing to be able to live in Australia!

Hahaha, yes, 'astronomical' relative to the other cameras in the line-up, and compared to competitors, in addition to the lauch of the Mark I too. (The Mark I current price is $890 brand new [Body], near-new second hand is $600-700 [Body]). But the price is only half of the argument too!

@@EdwardChlela I mean like you said for US market the price is $999 with the newer sensor it makes sense because the mark i uses a very old sensor. But for your market being 1800 USD that makes absolutely no sense I hope they listen to you all and fix the issue

100% mate! For me, the A6700 is the most sutiable, and considering it's the same price in australia (brand new), then purchasing that is the way to go. (The FX30 is an additional $600 or so). As for the those 3 reasonable upgrades, it's definitely individual dependent I'ld say, as neither of those change much for my use cases (maybe other than the dynamic range), on top of the addition of 10-bit 4:2:2. Mark I is it, up until I can invest in the A6700!

I didn’t follow that launch to be fair! I’ve never really been into action-cameras like go-pros or the dji version

@@EdwardChlela😊

Yes, we are in the same boat my friend! Nice mate; yes, the FX30 for professional use is undoubtedly the Goat, especially if you’re planning on running it for business purposes (with the dual SD slots and build-in fan for super long recording times, etc). 10-bit and s-log 3 will be what I require soon too, when I’m able to also save up for the A6700, as I literally do this full time now, on top of my coaching and training business (using it multiple times per day-as discussed!)

take panasonic s9

This is the perfect comment that outlines how everyone who was waiting for this camera is currently feeling; especially in your shoes where in your mind, you were making the correct financial decision by waiting for an “upgrade” (which never came to fruition). Take it from me mate, the ZV-E10 with the sigma trio (or in my case, the 16mm f1.4) is only 10% off of the current Mark II, with astronomical savings too. Every single video on my channel, including all the Thailand videos (which is why the majority of people purchase this camera for too-to travel with), were all shot with the same setup you see in this video!

The best decision! Facts man, I’ld legit rather invest in 3 ZV-E10 Mark I cameras, since that’s the same cost of 1 Mark II in AUD

@@EdwardChlela thats insane, i followed the rumors, i was kinda excited i really though we would get the fx30 in a zv-e10 price range as in my mind that would have been the natural advancement in tech everyone was waiting for in the price range.

Likewise, I followed the rumors for well over 6 months, hence why I'm so triggered in this video haha! I genuinely thought we'd get a 'baby' mix of the FX30 and A6700 too. Unfortunately, we got a camera that'll be redundant and forgotten by the end of the year.

Hahahah! Then all I’ll be missing is the Redbull sponsorship 😂

Thanks legend hahah! Exactly the same appeal and use case as myself; making the A6700 the only plausible upgrade option. Also, another point to mention, is that the resale value of this MK2 version will absolutely plummet, while the A6700 will retain its value for years to come.

Big facts; yeah you’ve got the right idea! Legit the only thing that’ll get me back into playing games is most likely GTA6 (they’ve set the gold standard)

I see where you're coming from; in that chronic excessive drinking has the most significant impact on testosterone levels. However, even moderate alcohol consumption has measurable effects. As such, alcohol can disrupt our endocrine system and alter our hormones, even at moderate levels. Also, while it's true that any substance, including water, can be harmful in excessive amounts, alcohol has specific effects on muscle growth and recovery that are really important to highlight and consider for those serious about their achiecing their health and fitness goals. My aims simply to provide my knowledge, reasearch, experience and opinon to help people make more informed decisions!

@@EdwardChlela There are no studies to demonstrate moderate alcohol consumption negatively impacts testosterone though. The individual must consume alcohol daily, and typically in large amounts as well, before free and total testosterone are even slightly affected.

@@Ribcut even if that was true, all the other dangers of alcohol still exist.

@Ribcut - Buddy, I don't know where you've come to your conclusion, but I'll provide some study summaries and references: 1- Both these peer-reviewed studies (Recovery Village & MDPI) show that alcohol disrupts our endocrine system, leading to hormonal imbalances, *even at moderate levels*. For instance, alcohol consumption can increase cortisol (a stress hormone known to decrease testosterone synthesis​). 2- This study (Recovery Village)​ also concludes how alcohol consumption affects the 'Leydig Cells' in our testesticals, which are responsible for testosterone production. This damage occurs not *only in chronic cases* but can *also happens with regular moderate drinking*.​ Regardless if these effects are more pronounced with heavy drinking, the conculsion is that even moderate consumption has significant negative effects on muscle growth, recovery and gains. First Study - Title: Alcohol and Testosterone: Risks, Side Effects & Treatment Source: www.therecoveryvillage.com/alcohol-abuse/alcohol-and-testosterone/ Authors: Jessica Pyhtila, PharmD Second Study - Title: Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Male Fertility Potential: A Narrative Review Source: www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/328 Authors: Renata Finelli, Filomena Mottola, and Ashok Agarwal

@@EdwardChlela The recovery village link wasn't a study. They are independent blogs written by people who may or may not have been paid $10 per hour to write them. The second actual study you linked does in fact reference alcohol consumption being linked to lower testosterone, but does not specify the amount. Luckily, we can safely conclude the amount must be chronic and daily, because the only actual data we have to confirm impactful reductions in testosterone include chronic daily consumption, and currently no studies on Earth reference moderate alcohol consumption to significantly reducing testosterone levels. Ironically, the study you linked specifically claims the only significant observable clinical impact on testosterone involved alcohol *abuse* which is highly vague, but at the very least implies chronic usage. There are no quantifiable metrics in these *studies* or references to the amount of alcohol consumed. That was a round about way of saying what I've originally said in my comments already.

Oh, priorities! Will you be watching the game with that?

This is the real BS. It's even contradictory.

@southpark159753 - While it might work for you, the scientific research consistently highlights that alcohol consumption tends to exacerbate, rather than alleviate chronic muscle tension. You need to consider exploring other non-pharmacological approaches like working out, physical therapy, etc.. anything that is an addictive drug. These will provide you with longer-term benefits for managing this chronic muscle tension of yours.

Ah, the eloquence of a well-reasoned counterargument!

Hahaha, fair enough.. sounds like a weekend ritual! Whatever floats your boat mate

Exactly, that's because alcohol has no benefits. At the end of the day, you're entitled to do as you please, but understanding the broader health implications helps us all make more informed choices. Edit: I'm passionate clearly!

@@EdwardChlela stfu just because of that I start drinking again

Cheers legend!

Yeah, I get your point on the social aspects and occasional relaxation alcohol may provide some people with. But it's important to recognize that any perceived 'benefits' (these are usually personal) of alcohol are overshadowed by its scientifically proven detrimental effects on our liver health, mental well-being, and its role as a carcinogen (just to name a few). This video is solely about raising awareness of these risks, not discouraging social interaction. At the end of the day, everyone's entitled to do as they please, and 99.9% of people will continue on indulging in the drug regardless.

I'm not gonna lie, I have no idea what this means, but cheers to you hahah

Yes 100%, I'm solely referring to the consumption of alcohol in this video. Alcohol absoutely as a long list of benefits in the field of medicine For example, it's used as an antiseptic to prevent infection, as a solvent in medications, and as a key ingredient in hand-sanitizers, just to name a few!

@@EdwardChlela Well, I think you really need to emphasize that on the title. Without saying it, it feels like you're saying alcohol has no use in any field whatsoever.

I understand your point, but the consumption aspect should already be assumed by the context provided in my thumbnail, and within the first 5 seconds of the video. I make it as clear I as can from the beginning that I'm discussing the recreational use of alcohol!

@@hellblizzard8043I think its pretty clear he is talking about consumption

Because I don't like things on screen during my videos, but if you want some examples of studies I was referring to during this video, here are three highly researched papers you can look into: 1- Title: Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31464740/ Authors: Michael Roerecke, Afshin Vafaei, Omer S M Hasan, Bethany R Chrystoja, Marcus Cruz, Roy Lee, Manuela G Neuman, Jürgen Rehm. 2- Title: Alcohol consumption. A leading risk factor for cancer. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33010221/ Authors: Jürgen Rehm, Kevin D Shield, Elisabete Weiderpass. 3- Title: Pathophysiology of the Effects of Alcohol Abuse on the Endocrine System Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28988577/ Authors: Nadia Rachdaoui, Dipak K Sarkar.

Alcohol is horrible for you I dont even know why this is a debate

​@@user-rq8sx1xj8s If you had more than 2 functioning brain cells, you would know that I wasn't debating anything but asking for sources for his study statements. So what do you even want from me?

Thanks for watching legend!

Thanks legend!

The OG game! I believe the Old School version even has more players than the newer version with significantly more microtransactions and P2W elements. (Go Figure!)

@@EdwardChlela haha yeah way more players, i play the old school version and its in its golden days right now. we hit a player record off 220k+ players a few months ago. there is basicly no mtx or p2w. you can buy bonds to sell for gold but thats the full extent off it. you should try the game out again!

This definitely doesn't apply to Rockstar games; they're the GOATs! I reckon GTA6 is going to be game of the decade.

@@EdwardChlela that's cool, we all sold our souls to them long long ago

I don't believe I've ever owned a handheld since the Tamagotchi 🤣 But yeah, Multiplayer is toast until GTA6!

I'm going to have to agree with your comment here, very well spoken mate! We most definitely had more time and fewer responsibilities back in the day, which contributes to those more memorable experiences. I've lost touch with the gaming industry since quitting, so the only games on that list that I'm familiar with are Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur's Gate III. I haven't played either though, so I can't comment, but it's good to hear that not everyone shares the same sentiment as me, and are still able to have a good time playing games nowadays!

Yeah, those were definitely the days! I also can't lie, Helldivers is top tier for sure, but not enough for me to enter the gaming scene.. GTA6 will definitely do it for me though when it releases!

Damn man, that sounds like a nightmare to have had to deal with. And goodluck getting through to their 'customer support'-who's most likely just an AI prompt bot at this point.

Thanks for the support legend! I'll get there in time and with consistent content God willing 🙏

Thank you legend!

Facts! Everything is slowly turning into endless monetisation and predictable, profit-driven formulas. These high-quality, rewatchable, and replayable gems are becoming harder and harder to find though, which is exactly the point I'm trying to make. I also rate the retro gaming idea-reminds us of the passion and creativity that once defined the industry.

While getting older might change how we experience games, the core trend issues i've pointed out are industry-wide problems that affect everyone, regardless of age. Yes, the 'WOW' effect' fades, but so has the quality and passion behind many modern game releases.

I both agree and disagree with you here. Modern AAA gaming is the main culprit because they have the largest fan base, and are the most marketed and played. So, although it's true that indie game studios are on top, the majority of the industry is clouded and dragged down by the practices of big corporations prioritising greed and profits. We agree that indie games are carrying the industry ATM; but let's not forget that Indie studies have there bad apples too.

@@EdwardChlela I don't see the "majority of the industry" getting dragged down when I have around 150 games in my wishlist on Steam, none of them with those bad practices. Modern gaming is doing fine, better than ever really. I've been playing games since the Nintendo 64 and I can say for certain that the quality and creativity of modern games are on another level. Now that games are easier to make than ever there are more games developed by people who put love on their creations. There are more trash as well but those get filtered really easy.

That's quite the hefty steam wishlist! It's easy to overlook the negative trends when you're excited about new releases, but are you sure 'none of them' employ exploitative monetisation, or any of the other unethical pradatory practices I spoke about? While I don't doubt that more developers are able to create games of higher quality and with love, how many of those actually get the attention they deserve amidst the flood of other popular titles that have these negative trends in them? Finally, in your opinon, do you think the industry as a whole is prioritising the positive aspects over profit and monetisation? Just some food for thought!

@@EdwardChlela I can't say for sure that 'none of them' do, because they are still in my wishlist. But I doubt it just by the fact that most of them are from indie dev studios. And it also probably depend on the genre as I enjoy more automation and puzzles than anything else, tho I have some variety as well, including metroidvanias and some survivals for example and Outer Wilds. As they are indies they for the most part don't focus on the graphics but on the gameplay. I don't remember ever paying more money after buying the game. I also play a lot of "early access" who are "not completed" but still gives me 100s of hours of fun and new free updates just keep coming and making the game even better, and those games don't cost more than 30$ and most of the time they don't even cost 20$ (for example, Satisfactory , Dyson Sphere program, Raft). To this day I feel bad for paying so little for Hollow Knight. In my opinion, the industry is doing both, the big studios are prioritising profits and monetisation, indies meanwhile are discovering new lands of gaming experiences, they are going beyond the limitations of "what's going to sell well", game development becoming more accessible resulted in individuals being capable of working on their dream projects. I think instead of calling modern day gaming "souless" we should sent that criticism to, for the most part, to AAA games, while also recognizing the love indie game developers are putting on their titles. Redirect those people who are giving up on gaming to the good part of the industry, the might enjoy the bangers indie game studios are bringing like Hades, Valheim, Manor Lords, etc

Yeah, not gonna lie, you raise some very solid points and I agree-very well spoken mate! Indie dev studios, more often than not, do indeed focus on good gameplay, community, and creativity rather than greed or monetization schemes. Personally, I'm not familiar with any of the Indie games you've mentioned, but I'll take your word for it since you're well-versed in the genre. And yes, it's fair to say that most AAA titles are to blame for the massive shift and trend towards these negatives practices in the gaming industry. They were the catalyst that trickled down the pipeline to each branch and genre within the industry too. Redirecting those who are still keen on gaming but can't find anything 'playable'-to Indie games is the way to go too, so I also agree there.

It sounds like we share the same sentiment. I'd argue your re-invigoration with music is 100 times more meaningful and worth-while than what todays gaming industry offers. Plus, the albums and music collection have a timeless quality; especially considering the rise of AI in music creeation lately.

Thank you Sir

Big facts, solid point!

Sheeesh! Now that's a long gaming history, surely the true golden era? It's also interesting how many long-time gamers have transitioned to PC only too. And you're right, much like the greed and certain ideologies in the gaming industry, it's present everywhere.

Yeah, Rip, Cyberpunk 2077 was the biggest flop by far. And yeah, that indie gams are, for the most part, much better ATM. God Of War was insanely good, I must agree, but I didn't play it, only watched a playthrough. I'm probably until GTA6 to give that a whack.

Looks decent, haven't played it or seen gameplay, can't comment on it

Yeah, modern AAA gaming is the main culprit, so I do agree that indie gaming is, for the most part, much better ATM. However, It's still not enough for me to return to the gaming scene. Probably until GTA6.