Відео

13:34 This is a scare story about things you cannot see. To quote the Chief Scientist at the National Oceanography Centre, Professor Penny Holliday, "There hasn't been a slow down. There hasn't been a slowing of the AMOC." Actual observations using the RAPID-MOCHA array from 2004 to 2023 show, that although there can be a great deal of variability of flow in the ocean from month to month or even day to day, there has been no decline in the Gulf Stream, with flow oscillating around 32Sv (32 million cubic metres per second) throughout the period of observation. Continuous section measurements of the AMOC, available since 2004 at 26°N from the RAPID-MOCHA array, have shown that the AMOC strength decreased from 2004 to 2012, and thereafter, it has strengthened again. No relationship to CO2. MOC spanning the North Atlantic at 27°N derived from RAPID/MOCHA/WBTS, satellite altimeter, and Argo floats for 1994 to 2020 shows no statistically significant decline (-0.06 Sv per decade). Furthermore blended meridional overturning basin-wide circulation (MOC) trend estimates (Sv) based on combinations of satellite altimetry and in situ hydrography data exist for the South Atlantic for 1994 onwards: at 34.5°S (often referred to as SAMBA) is +0.48Sv per decade. This is a significant positive trend, so no decline, no tipping point, no correlation to CO2. (GLOBAL OCEANS G. C. Johnson and R. Lumpkin, Eds., 2021) The OSNAP MOC Timeseries of observations from Canada to Greenland and across to Scotland, although a shorter timescale (from 2014), show no decline in MOC with the flow fluctuating around 17Sv. "Florida Current transport observations reveal four decades of steady state" Volkov et al, 2024 (published in Nature). This paper shows that a key component of AMOC, the Florida Current, has remained remarkably steady for over 40 years. There is no climate crisis. The North Atlantic current has doubled its velocity over the course of a quarter of century (Oziel et al, 2020). This is based on actual satellite observations. The idea the AMOC is going to shut down is based on modelling. There is minimal real world evidence to support these outlandish claims. It relies upon climate models. You know, those Magical Truth Machines that keep making false predictions. It claims with 95% certainty that the AMOC with collapse by the end of the century. Come on! Really? Sea surface temperatures (SST) were trending downwards 2000-2018 (HadSST 4), and from 1950-1980, and from 1880-1910. The oceans warmed at a faster rate 1910-1940 than 1980-2010. Remember CO2 has been accumulating in the atmosphere at an accelerating rate all the time, so there is little correlation between the two. The North Atlantic ocean has cooled and warmed rapidly and repeatedly during the current interglacial with no correlation to CO2 e.g. 10,300-10,200 years before the present (y BP), 9,500y BP, 6,000-5,900y BP, 5,400-5,300y BP, 2,500-2,300y BP, 1,700-1,600y BP (Berner et al., 2008. See Figure 8 in the paper). There is a high frequency (18 events) of SST variability on the order of 1-3°C during a 10-50 year time resolution throughout the Holocene in the North Atlantic with no correlation to CO2. And Life just carried on.

Extremely interesting and informative. HEAL sounds like a wonderful organisation. Off to buy one square/s now.

What could possibly go wrong ?

This is such an interesting topic to discuss! Thank you for delivering such an insightful discussion

Thank you

Thank you this was very informative ❤

Can tropical peat like in Indonesia be managed as source of fresh water?

Great seminar, really good speaker; calm and clearly understandable. Thanks

🤣 "Promo SM"

we need air quality course in South Africa no such course exist I have taken some Air Quality Management 4 as part of my Environmental Health degree... now I want to create a course for air quality management

Do we really think rebranding multiple distinct and ignored crisis will be effective at this junction? All I can envision this line of reasoning will result in is animosity and memes. But not the good memes that help spread awareness. The re-fried ones that make people think they are having a stroke. But what could I possibly know, I'm just a hobo from the internet yelling at a dumpster fire.

Very appreciative efforts...

Technocratic Transhumanists for the Lose.

This helped me to decide! Great content.

😥 Promo'SM

Thanks for the information. It will help a lot for getting the accreditation

proper informative presentation thanks

We're burning through the 100 billion barrels of oil equivalent fossil fuels energy annually. Adding 51 billion tons of greenhouse gases pollution. These numbers steadily rising since Drake's well was drilled in 1860. Oil getting more difficult to extract and of lower quality. Once fracking occurs there's nothing left. Depleting wells and accelerating pollution if not addressed soon will make any plans obsolete.

Excellent overview. Im an EHP dealing with contaminated land and this has been very informative and useful. Thanks for uploading!

If around 80% of people will live in cities & towns then many eco solutions will need to focus on urbanism & sustainable city living. Cities & towns exist within a natural environment (not the other way around) just like ALL social systems exist WITHIN natural ecological systems on which all life depends. Thanks for this discussion.

Thank you.. needed this information

that "Peatmap" was extremely informative, thank you for showing!

🍀 p̳r̳o̳m̳o̳s̳m̳

Excuse me Sir/Madam Are you saved? If you died tonight are you going to heaven? Jesus loves you

Isn’t it just obviously true that the more industrialized a civilization is, the more mastery it has over climate? Rather than advise companies not to invest in fossil fuels, why don’t we empower the impoverished energy-starved people of the world so that they can be safer from climate?

This series looks really disappointing. Solar and wind make up how much of the world’s energy use? (3%? 4%?) And what about the billions of people living impoverished lives due to a lack of cheap, reliable energy? They aren’t clamoring for solar and wind (even though you say they are cheap and the technology to make them reliable already exist); they are begging for coal, the actually cheap form of energy, as they should if they want to live flourishing lives. If you really think climate change will destroy us all soon, then at least be honest about the misery your suggested policies will create and argue that that misery will be the lesser of two bad outcomes.

The Earth is cooler w the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require "extra" energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG heating, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.

Prof Steve Martin A hugely important seminar we need much more interdisciplinary in policy and practice - a timely and engaging series of conversations.

This is absolutely toxic, misandrist, and racist. Scratch the surface of the ideology behind the DIE philosophy and you find anti-science, para-morality, and deeply racist and genderist beliefs. You are building a known barrier to solving climate change into your curriculum. Shame on all of you for supporting this. Genuine environmental sciences reject Race Marxism and Gender ideology.

ua-cam.com/video/koxzCsjsbeM/v-deo.html

Good work

Why is this always an after thought? What is the point when we are still sending the majority of our waste to landfill sites just like this, albeit abroad.

Simply put, factories don't need greenhouse gas emissions. Do not emit air pollution, reduce air pollution. stop greenhouse gas emissions, stop greenhouse gas emissions, - ua-cam.com/video/11ykdPfGUUc/v-deo.html

With Robots 🤖 this will become more feasible AMP Robotics is a good firm to look at.

🤝🎬🇧🇷

An excellent webinar guys!! Fantastic to be a part of it.

It was a pleasure working with you on this one! Some really good content!

I don't know if this will get answered but ill ask away. Do we know if future generations are capable of dealing with the waste generated are they getting taught the relevant material or is this again a stab in the dark just like nuclear flue waste and fossil fuel waste. Another question i have is that is the current workforce even prepared for this transition. thanks.

WOW, you've come a long way DR! Kat! My high respects and congrats. Chris Goulet, Amazon 2005.

Appreciate the video!

Excellent stuff - can personally attest to knowing how committed you are to improving ecosystems big and small!

A fantastic talk Pete!

-- *Weather* = flash flood + flash drought + flash mob + flash infection -- *Climate* = 30 years of bad weather -- 4% of mammals are wild by weight -- 4% of energy is renewable -- 15% of energy will be renewable by 2040 -- 28% by 2050 -- 2% of energy is solar & wind -- 0.8% of vehicles are electric -- With 23 billion chickens on earth, if one sneezes we all get the flu *100% Renewable Electricity = 20% of Energy* -- 20% of energy is electricity -- 24% by 2040 -- If batteries were 6X more efficient we would use 60X more of them -- Over 60 yrs jets are 68% more fuel efficient and fly 60X more passengers -- 2.63 billion air trips were taken in 2010 -- 4.4 billion trips in 2018 -- 8 billion by 2050 -- Earth is heating by 400,000 Hiroshima nukes / day -- 1968 - 1992 = 1 nuke / sec -- 1998 - 2020 = 5 nukes / sec -- 1971 - 2018 global heat forcing averaged 0.47 watts/m² -- 2010 - 2018 it went up to 0.87 watts/m² = 46% higher -- Greenhouse gases went up 45% in 30 yrs -- 2050 AC demand requires new energy = US + EU + Japan combined -- Renewable energy cannot stop heating in time to avoid runaway change -- Right now we burn fracked gas to charge our EVs in a megadrought -- Small farms grow 80% of food -- 1% of people run 75% of farmland -- 66% of people will live in water stressed areas by 2025 -- 4 billion people live 1 month / yr in severe water stress -- 20% less fresh water per person is available over the last 20 years -- 50% of thermal & hydro electric power will be threatened with water stress -- 40% of coal mines are water stressed and so are 30% of planned hydro -- We kill trees 2X faster than we plant them -- A net loss of 1 football field per second -- Trees grow faster die younger in heat fire flood & drought -- Battery & Bio-energy extraction destroys native land water & wildlife *Vaclav Smil says:* -- North Euro offshore wind turbines work 30% of the time -- North Euro onshore wind turbines work 22% of the time -- One of them offshore Texas would work 35% of the time -- North Euro solar panels work 11% of the time *Green Energy Harms Global Native Freedom Land Water & Wildlife* -- Europe burns 80% of the globe's wood pellets for renewable electricity -- Europe burns 40% of its recycled plastic & paper for electricity -- Europe burns 65% of its palm oil cargo for green bio-energy -- Dams destroy river wildlife up and down the rivers -- Shipping trees and palm oil overseas for green energy credit is criminal -- Europe's carbon credit system is corrupt -- Europe's global carbon fund is rife with corruption *Support James Hansen's monthly private carbon dividends* -- 100% to you 0% to governments & corporations -- That's why both governments and corporations hate it -- That's why both socialists and capitalists hate it -- Monthly Private Dividends = *Real* Climate Racial Justice ( not the academic kind ) 26 Nobel Prize winning economists support James Hansen’s monthly dividends, including: 3,589 U.S. Economists, 4 Former Chairs of the Federal Reserve and ALL 15 Former Chairs of the Council of Economic Adviser Like parents, you don't get to choose your energy -- you work with what you got Without nuclear power there will be no green renewable energy The US has 300 years worth of energy in its nuclear waste 300 years worth of low emissions baseload energy -- the backbone of any grid Wind turbines and EVs are made from oil coal and gas Next year's oil gap means we will have to burn more gas coal and trees Nuclear waste doesn't clean itself up, you need nuclear tech to do it You can find facts, sources & links at Loki's Revenge blog on wordpress under Green Energy Fraud zzz zzz zzz

Such a fantastic webinar thank you!

I find Baroness Parminter looking much younger and sounding much younger than her actual age. Its like she's in her mid 20's. Perhaps, she'll get along well with younger people and be an inspiration.

Great Content, thank you

Aspirational building, wonderful example of high performance futuristic buildings (when budget is available)

Thoroughly enjoyed your webinar - read Primate Change back in 2018

Very interesting, thank you

Missed this live, so thank you for recording and uploading. Interesting presentation.