Відео

Headphone outs work on first audio interface but not the second. Is there a way to get all headphone outs to work?

thank you! so many forums telling us what to do but never SHOWING us how to do it!

Well I didn’t know logic had this! 😮

I think I remember reading on Izotope site that you should use Neutron on buss or individual track but not on both. This could be why you’re getting harsh upper mids.

Awesome and very useful. Keep up the good work.

🔥

Is the instalment plan available in the uk? I looked through slates website but it wasn't purchasable when I went to checkout..

the randomness saga continues

Headline: “plugins you need” Video: “there’s no plugins you need”

I recorded rwong, the distence was not the same for both mics

Love the "Super counter" LOL

THANK YOU I ALMOST CRIED

I LOVE YOU

Excellent Teacher !!!! the method you transfer the datas to the minds is great.Thank you for this video efficacious lesson.

Turning things down makes everything crystal clear, wtf 😮 This is definitely one of those "why didn't I ever think of that before?" moments 😂

My mac os x cant read this plugin please 🙏 help

if you never worked on an actual SSL console... how do you know which plugin is truest?

Thanks for video! What you think about Melda Production Eq and Comp?

Hey man, thanks a lot for doing these videos. This is my new favorite channel! Keep up the good work.

Please remember that, you know all of this, and we don't. I come to listen to your knowledge and learn from a higher level than I am right now, I much appreciation that you are sharing your experience and knowledge. It would be nice if you would slow your delivery down and take a millisecond or two breath, for some of us that need that to obsorb what you just said. It would lesson the amount of rewinds. I understand that Time is Money but, but spend that extra 3 cents. Thanks. 😀

I've watched this video possibly a hundred times. I had an AT2020 mic, and no matter what I did, I couldn't get the sound I wanted. Finally, I bought a Shure SM7dB, and now I'm going through the whole process again. And I'm finally getting closer to the sound I want. This video has been critical in getting things to work. Every time I listen to it and make adjustments in Logic, things keep getting better. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR MAKING THIS VIDEO. Without it, I would have stayed forever lost. You're the best!

Maybe you should have started with tuning 🤔

thanks i needed this

Great video Sam, you’re very knowledgeable

Thanks Great Info

When telling about techniques use stock logic plugins ,otherwise I don't follow

I always make editing choices before any compression is applied. I’m not a fan of smashing vocals with a FET compressor. My personal thing is to put the vocal in melodyne and use the level tool first. I then bounce in place (mono) and see if I need to make anymore adjustments. I then use a compressor. I prefer gentle compression or even upward compression. Nice video

THANK YOU

So happy i found your channel dude

I like the Black on the SSL E. However I like the 4kb the best of all the SSL offerings. It just seams to have more junk in the trunk good or bad. Its just thick..

This

i want one

Всё правильно сказал! Полностью согласен!

😱😱😱😱Bro Bad terms of use ? what's up with this ? If I record an original song in this DAW I can't release the song recorded with this DAW (hitnmix) according to this term of use. whats up with this ? All copyright, trademarks, design rights, patents and other intellectual property rights (registered and unregistered) in and on HIT’N’MIX and all content (including all applications) located on the site shall remain vested in Hit’n’Mix Ltd or its licensors (which includes other users). You may not copy, reproduce, republish, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, download, post, broadcast, transmit, make available to the public, or otherwise use HIT’N’MIX content in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from HIT’N’MIX. Any other use of HIT’N’MIX content requires the prior written permission of Hit’n’Mix Ltd.

Can they be used while composing or writing new music?

I just got my distrokid. How does it sound with Techno and House music? 🎶.that's what I'm doing 👽

thats a really cool comparison of free and paid plugins

people like the fake one because they think they are "brighter", in reality they have terrible low end and their sensibility is higher because they are made poorly and dont have a real transformer.

Nice and simple! Hopefully 😎 thanks!

Ok but where can I buy a commuter pass to use the bus?

As a former electronics technician by trade and a hobbyist wanna be music producer when you made the analogy with series and parallel that opened a dimension of new understanding for me.

Thank you Sam!

Calm, informative, expert knowledge without carrying on like you're auditioning for a Hollywood action movie. Great work! Thanks much.

Bro the orders are wrong, on the brainworx version it's dynamics -> EQ, not EQ->dynamics, but you can basically re-order things. It might actually sound very different because of this. As these plugins are authorized by SSL themselves, they must sound accurate. This also true for the Waves version. Slate Digital I don't know, IK multimedia's british channel, idk either...

I have all three as well and I prefer BX for all of my SSL strips (I own BX versions of 4K E, 4K G & 9K J). Granted I'm more of a 9000 J fan but I plan on cancelling my SSL/Slate sub at the end of the year. I thought the SSL strips sounded great but I want to get out of the subscription business and I'm happy with the BX strips. Great comparisons!

Yeah you need to learn to run way less hot signals into these types of plugins, it'll sound a lot better

Absolutely clear as, thanks!

It's weird but I agree. SSL's channel strip doesn't do it for me. BX for me all day.

For a fair comparison you need to match the curves and boost levels not the settings. For example +9 @ 100 Hz Slate is boosting 90Hz and Brainworx is boosting 75Hz plus 3.5 db more than Slate. The 5k boost for Brainworx is 5.5K and Slate is boosting at 3K.

If you've had the opportunity to work on the 4000 series desks you quickly learn that the variations from channel to channel are probably the worst of any console ever made. Especially in the E and G series. Most consoles from that era, like MCI, Soundcraft, Neve, and so on are pretty much spot on the same from channel to channel but SSL would have these wild variations. Some of it was parts swapping and then the other was power supply issues and HEAT that plagued SSL for a decade. The biggest variations was always the filters. IC based consoles were great for features but bad for longevity as well as consistency. The orange EQ is so rare that I have only ever seen 3 of them and in 25 years of working in and around studios and 2 of them I own sitting in my rack. The orange 132 EQ was meant to be a "passive style EQ" and an answer to the Sony/MCI passive console EQ and it was marketed as a Pultec style EQ. Ironically Paul Frindle who designed the 292 Pink G EQ for SSL said the Orange Passive was a very rushed and really only sold well in Japan's very small market. Warren Huart had 4 of the orange EQs in his SSL console and didn't realize they were worth more than the entire console itself until after he sold it. The 132 Orange channels can sell for ridiculous prices on the open market. But its a passive solid state design with a make up gain that was actually noisy. The SSL is modeling the Black Can DBX VCA version "REV A" of the console which had no automation or computer recall and a very dark sound compared to the later revisions of the 4000 that SSL started making their own VCAs and moving automation for the console. They were vastly different from each other in workflow and sound and I think this is where the emulations really differ. There are a ton of VCA (No computer) 4000s out there, and there are even more 4000s with automation and computers. The parts for each are interchangeable but if you rack up a channelstrip from each one you will quickly find they are VERY DIFFERENT! My guess would be Brainworx modeled a 30/40 year old SSL console and the SSL 4K E is based off of the a channel in perfect working order (and how SSL wished it would have been). SSL's low end was terrible every channel actually rolled off at around 40ish hertz on North America's 60hz power and the more things you engaged on the channel the higher that roll off would be. So if you had the EQ and dynamics in the roll off would be around 45 to 50 hertz. It wasn't until the J/K 9000 series came along in the 90s that SSL really built a "good" desk with very little flaws. But the older desks have a sound that people like and still use today. I personally like the Brainworx versions as well its my preferred 4000 E channel.