- 43
- 61 164
Fred Sanders
United States
Приєднався 11 жов 2011
Theological Outline of Ephesians
Here's a handy outline of Ephesians that focuses on how the first half hangs together: three narrative hops, flanked by prayers and doxologies. The second half of Ephesians corresponds to it, teaching readers to "walk worthy," or proportionally to, the saving work of God, and most importantly, to God's revealed character.
Переглядів: 281
Відео
Psychological Analogy: Leiden Synopsis 8:15-17 (SPT15)
Переглядів 2806 місяців тому
The Bible's way of talking about the Son's generation suggests an analogy to the way a mind brings forth its idea. The Christian tradition of trinitarian theology develops this suggestion elaborately. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd explore the Leiden Synopsis's informed, Protestant position on the psychological analogy as a biblical, traditional, and helpful way of thinking. But note well that Leid...
Spiritual Generation, Not Corporeal (SPT14)
Переглядів 2146 місяців тому
The authors of the Synopsis of a Purer Theology (a.k.a. the Leiden Synopsis) are careful to explain that the Son's generation is spiritual, and therefore not something corporeal, nor even something to be understood using corporeal analogies. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd talk through this section of a classic Protestant Scholastic disputation on the Trinity.
Tenses of Eternal Generation (SPT13)
Переглядів 2737 місяців тому
The begetting of the Son is eternal, having no beginning or end. But what temporal tense helps us grasp it? Is it best to say the Son was eternally begotten, or is being eternally begotten? Sanders and Hurd talk through the Leiden Synopsis' account of these issues.
Eternal Generation Prooftexts in the Leiden Synopsis (SPT12)
Переглядів 2267 місяців тому
The Leiden Synopsis (Disputation 8, Paragraph 9) offers a number of proofs from Scripture for the doctrine of the Son's eternal generation. Sanders and Hurd discuss those proofs, exploring their arrangement, presuppositions, and connections to the long tradition of trinitarian interpretation of Scripture.
The Father's Active Generation of the Son
Переглядів 2538 місяців тому
What distinguishes the Father is his active generation of the Son. Sanders and Hurd talk through the Leiden Synopsis' way of stating this doctrine, considering its continuity with the patristic and medieval traditions and the Synopsis' attempts to say things more "purely" in 1625 on Reformed grounds.
Doctrine of the Father (SPT10)
Переглядів 2798 місяців тому
The Synopsis of a Purer Theology (Leiden Synopsis) treats Father and Son together in one disputation. In the first five paragraphs, Leiden establishes all that can be said about the first person without referring to the eternal generation. Sanders and Hurd dig into this doctrine, noting its biblical, doctrinal, and philosophical implications.
Trinity in the New Testament (SPT09)
Переглядів 2588 місяців тому
An overview of some of the most important testimonies to the triunity of God from the New Testament, as presented in the final paragraphs of the Synopsis of a Purer Theology (Leiden, 1625), disputation 7. Conversational commentary by Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd.
Trinity in the Old Testament (SPT08)
Переглядів 4128 місяців тому
The Leiden Synopsis considers how the Trinity is the God of the Old Testament, but is not as clearly or fully revealed there as in the NT. It works through six types of texts that adumbrate plurality of persons in the one God.
Trinitarian Theology from Scripture Alone! (SPT07)
Переглядів 6509 місяців тому
The Leiden Synopsis (Disputation 7, par. 33ff) argues that we only know God as Trinity because of revelation. This is not only the standard Protestant view, but the view of the mainstream Christian doctrinal tradition at large. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd talk through this section of the Leiden Synopsis and explain how it's helpful for keeping the doctrine of the Trinity from sounding like weird...
Appropriations (SPT06)
Переглядів 3129 місяців тому
Some of the Trinity's undivided external works are intended to bear instructive likenesses to the internal relations of the persons. The Synopsis of a Purer Theology (Leiden Synopsis) teaches this classic bit of theology without using the traditional term, and with a special emphasis on seeing it worked out in Scripture. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd discuss.
Distinguishing the Persons by "Notes" (SPT05)
Переглядів 5129 місяців тому
The distinction of the persons of the Trinity is shown by certain notes or distinguishing characteristics, which reduce to relations founded on origin. This is the real stuff. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd explore the trinitarian theology of the Leiden Synopsis (Synopsis of a Purer Theology)
Distinct Persons Shown by Names and Actions (SPT04)
Переглядів 2779 місяців тому
Synopsis of a Purer Theology Disputation 7, par. 15-18. Lots of great biblical argumentation here as the Synopsis (main author of this disputation: Polyander) considers how each of the persons of the Trinity is shown to be personal by the names ascribed to them, and the actions they undertake. Fred Sanders and Ryan Hurd continue their conversation about the Leiden Synopsis's trinitarian theology.
Definition of a Person (SPT03)
Переглядів 60410 місяців тому
Synopsis of a Purer Theology Disputation 7, par. 8-13. In which our 17th-century authors define "person" in general and begin to explain how the term applies to God. Sanders and Hurd discuss the Leiden Synopsis's trinitarian theology, focusing on the definition of person in disputation 7.
First the Words: Trinity, Person, etc. (SPT02)
Переглядів 50710 місяців тому
Synopsis of a Purer Theology Disputation 7, par. 2-7. Is it legitimate to use the non-biblical word Trinity? What about person? What about deity? Sanders and Hurd discuss the Leiden Synopsis's trinitarian theology, focusing on the early moves of disputation 7.
Introducing the Trinitarianism of the Synopsis of a Purer Theology (SPT01)
Переглядів 1,1 тис.11 місяців тому
Introducing the Trinitarianism of the Synopsis of a Purer Theology (SPT01)
Ephesians Explored & Explained: 1:1a
Переглядів 1 тис.2 роки тому
Ephesians Explored & Explained: 1:1a
8:07 😂😂 wow I didn’t realise it it was good
Thank you Dr. Sanders! That was very helpful! I have greatly appreciated your work on the Trinity and this outline is a great resource for considering Ephesians!
Hi, I’m Aditya from ADYIME. I’m a video editor and graphic designer, and I really admire your work. However, I noticed there’s an opportunity to enhance your video editing and thumbnails to better capture attention and engage your audience. I’d love to help take your content to the next level!
I’m 68 years old. In college I studied history and philosophy because I wanted to understand the world. Now I’m retired and still want to understand the world. I am now making a concerted effort to study the classics.
amazing thank you! do you perhaps have tips on how to note down poetry books?
Drivel.
Good solid outline, Professor! I haven't seen you in a while. It's good to have you back. Of course, I am a fan of your camera work on Phoebe's channel!
HE IS BACK!
No books were meant to be skmmed.
I remember reading it in intro to Xenophon that “Every schoolboy knows the tale of 10,000”. Now, no kids do. Ahhg, progressive
illy-add, not illyerd!
What the speaker doesn’t realize is that even those of us who AREN'T Torrey Honors Students can see this video! He literally just gave out this knowledge FOR FREE! LOL
Since the Iliad begins with the assumption that kidnapped women are considered approved war prizes to rape and fight over, it is very difficult for me to find value in it.
you should still read it because it offers an opportunity to critically evaluate it from a feminist perspective
@@feltfroglol no that's stupid
War brides are legitimate booty.
This is excellent advice. The Iliad is one of those books that is best heard aloud. While it is a slow process, listening to at least part of it on a good audiobook pays dividends.
One more tip-avoid Emily Wilson's translation like the plague. Richmond Lattimore might be a better choice if you are reading for school. On a first pass, if you are reading for pleasure, Robert Fagel is a better choice.
Why?
@@utkarshdubey5830@utkarshdubey5830 I speak Greek, so I understand Homer's intent and voice. You might prefer a translation that captures his soul rather than some attempt to re-invent him for some modernist women's cause celeb. Emily Wilson made a name for herself by throwing Homer's work under her bus. I accidentally purchased her book. To be fair, I read it cover to cover. I was appalled at the liberties she took under the guise of translation. If you want Homer, read Fagel.
Did the Trojan War have anything to do with the Greeks attacking because Troy controlled the Dardanelles (Hellespont) and charged Greeks large tolls for crossing?
These are good tips! Just watched this after reading the Iliad for the 2nd time. 1st time was 20 or so years ago in college for an introduction to Greece course. This time I got to really enjoy reading the book at my own pace and actually did some of your tips intuitively (I did a paragraph Summary for each book) and got a lot more out of it this time with the rereading. Made me want to go back to college 😅!
it's kind of funny, I'm reading through the Iliad because of a personal fascination with Greek mythology but I do think these tips will help me enjoy it more.
That's great advice. I've found it hard going but a good story. Had to work hard to get to follow who's who and the general direction of the story and I'm not far in! Gonna start again and do it your way. Thanks
Nts 0:27
1:50 Dr Sanders, which annotated translation/edition is best for Iliad and for Odyssey? [Preferably paperback]
Believe. Gratitude 🤲 Your Way.
Lord, simply explode my mind that it may be large and humble enough to enjoy this revelation of yourself. Lord, what else is there if I'm not included in your guys' feast 🎉🎉🎉
I love early- and mid- twentieth century translations.
No point without Greek.
Thanks for these. I really enjoy the careful discussion. How about doing John of Damascus on the Trinity? Boethius? some of the older things?
#1 Learn Greek.
The Iliad changed me as a person and as a reader. It opened the door to the ancient world for me and I only continue to fall down the ancient literature rabbit hole.
in what ways did it change you? did it change you because it gave you insight to ancient literature or is there more to it? i’m asking because i have the book and i’ll be reading it soon too! i’m really interested in this kind of genre of books right now
read it in greek I did a translation disloves the original as David Ferry observed for example line one menin means anger but it is different from say xolos which also means anger menin is a divine anger -- never comes through in transation
This is all Greek to me , but I’m fascinated.
I'm having a very hard time following the meter and cadence of the work. When I took a class that covered Homer and Virgil in college years ago, it was made much easier for me to follow along, but without the assistance of a professor, I can't seem to find that flow alone. I'm reading Fagles' translation.
I'm so thankful for you posting these, leading us into deeper thoughts about and appreciation for our God.
The thing that helped me finally read the Illiad was reading the beautifully illustrated graphic novel by Gareth Hinds along with the real book. I would read the graphic novel chapter which was shortened but actually not by too much first. Then I would immediately read the regular chapter. And it made reading the prose so much easier. I didn't feel lost, because I could literally remember the images from the graphic novel which helped me know what was going on better. It was shocking how fast I got through it. Not because I was rushing, but just because it didn't feel painful at all. I also put some Game of Thrones music by Ramin Djawadi (Winterfell Snowfall at Dusk) in the background while I read both. Helped my brain a lot too to not get bored and to focus more.
Thanks for that tip!
Ty
The sad misinformed Protestants can't you scripture language can you
You make a mockery of scripture
No such biblical phrase as eternal generation
Nor does the Bible contain the phrase: "biblical phrase". The bible describes the Son of God (i) as eternal AND it describes him as (ii) begotten or generated from the Father. (i) + (ii) = Eternal Generation.
@@Rhuanjl Amen.
My personal tip is to annotate as you go. Find small bit of comedy sprinkled in the misery of war. Diomedes trading his shitty armor for expensive armor while the recipient is none the wiser comes to mind. But if you can’t find much comedy from Homer’s words, annotate comedy yourself! As the story goes, find a favorite character. They may live, they may die, but either way they’ll give you a checkpoint of enjoyment as you go through it. Keep in mind I am not a professional, nor am I a classicist. I’m just someone who really enjoys these stories. Happy reading! ❤
♡
Why. I have no idea why anyone would read this stuff ?
for fun or to be like informed, he also said that many students need to read this book before going into university, and books like this provides more insight to this topic and broadens your vocabulary etc
Read St. Basil the Great's Address to Young Men on Reading Greek Literature.
I have only read the Samuel Butler translation. Any others recommended?
Loving these videos. And especially the video thumbnails!
I would like to emphasize the 'read out loud' part. The Iliad is full of BEAUTIFUL words and sentences. Really imagine you're an epic poet, and recite it out loud once in a while. It's powerful. "Elphenor Calcanthida, magnanimous King of the Abantes."
you reading it in greek? thats a big task.
I have read the whole iliad and oddisey out loud. Take more time. But you alsso enjoy it more. PD: sorry for my syntax, not a native english speaker
Thanks, really helpful video.
You provide your students with some great tips for a first complete reading of The Iliad, but, as a literary scholar and author of Pitiless Bronze: A Postpatriarchal Examination of Prepatriarchal Cultures, not to mention having taught college students for 34 years, allow me to recommend one particular critical idea not often recommended to first time readers of the poem to incite some added interest, but also one tip for reading the poem that has recently become a tool that many are not aware of. First, the critical idea: Rage, that muse called upon in the very first line of the poem, is a goddess, a minor goddess named Lyssa, but still a goddess. She's one form of battle goddess because rage enables human beings to pitilessly murder other human beings. Why would Homer start with her and ask her to focus on Achilles? Hint: think school shootings in America. Second, your professor wants you to read, which is commendable, but reading the whole thing is missing the experience that HOMER INTENDED. Remember, he came from an oral tradition, and the poem, which would have been recited for decades if not centuries in various bits and pieces prior to the poem being written down, was PERFORMANCE ART. While you can find various actors reading bits aloud on UA-cam, I recommend you open one of the other translations of the poem available for free here, www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2199, and copy the text into Word, then use Word's Read Aloud reader to LISTEN to the poem AS YOU READ IT. Listening to the poem read aloud (even by a bot voice) while you read it will not only enhance the overall experience, but it will also make the story much more dynamic and interesting, so you can, truly, imagine yourself at a public forum in ancient Greece listening to the epic poem performed aloud. This kind of experience was their tv or online streaming--entertainment--and all the Greek listeners, and many of the non-Greek listeners, would have also known a lot about the characters in the story, so some would have noticed, for instance, that the goddess Hestia, goddess of the hearth who was honored every time someone lit a flame and cooked food (such as when the hecatomb of cattle are sacrificed toward the start), IS NOT MENTIONED at all in this story, something I discuss in my book, Pitiless Bronze. I've read 8 different interpretations of The Iliad, and the interpreters' biases creep into their translations, and Latimer has his, so be certain to question everything as you enjoy the story.
The Father is the ONLY true God and God’s spirit testifies that fact in our hearts. 1 John 3:21 Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence before God; If you want to see proof do this: Begin an earnest prayer with “Father God” and pay attention to your heart as you speak the prayer. Now begin an earnest prayer with “Son God”. See the difference. Finally, begin an earnest prayer with “Spirit God”. Now you have evidence that the Father is the ONLY true God, as Jesus told us in John 17:3 For those of you that say, they felt no difference. The next time you have an opportunity to pray aloud with a body of believers, start the prayer out with “Son God“ and see how that goes over with the other believers. Now go re-read 1 John 3:21. May the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of Glory, open the eyes and ears, and hearts of the truly humble to hear the words God put in Jesus’ mouth.
How can one be so delusional to think he can expect young adults to meaningfully read the Iliad in full as preparation ? Only a school teacher.
I believe the four Gospels are one monomyth in four variations. In Exodus the "threshold" is crossed as they go through the Red Sea. In the Voyage of Argo, they cross the conceptual threshold at the Clashing Rocks. Jesus' baptism would an analogous representation of that. They are the same if interpreted. What happens after the Israelite's cross the Red Sea? 40 years in the desert. After Jesus Baptism, 40 days in the desert. There are repeating patterns due to a repeating template sequence. The path to enlightenment, nested in Arks. Not a Christian. A seeker of Righteousness.
Thanks for these videos. Very instructive
Here is the Trinity-DE:ST-RO-YI-NG testimony of Jesus. “And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.” John 17:3 👉 *WORSHIP THE FATHER (SINGLE PERSON)* 👉 *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* WE (ME Jesus and YOU) WORSHIP 👉 *THE FATHER* (SINGLE PERSON) 👉 “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* (NOT HIM & I only) 👉 *MY GOD (SINGLE PERSON), AND YOUR GOD (SINGLE PERSON)* 👉 *YOU (THE FATHER - SINGLE PERSON) THE ONLY TRUE GOD*
These videos are l13s and d3c3pt10n.
Good stuff fellas!
Here is the Trinity-DE:ST-RO-YI-NG testimony of Jesus. “And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.” John 17:3 👉 *WORSHIP THE FATHER (SINGLE PERSON)* 👉 *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* WE (ME Jesus and YOU) WORSHIP 👉 *THE FATHER* (SINGLE PERSON) 👉 “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* (NOT HIM & I only) 👉 *MY GOD (SINGLE PERSON), AND YOUR GOD (SINGLE PERSON)* 👉 *YOU (THE FATHER - SINGLE PERSON) THE ONLY TRUE GOD*
@@Truth-Is-a-Hard-Pill 😂
The Trinitarian FAITH made a H.E.R.E.T.I.C of Jesus of the Bible. The Bible testifies. Jesus gave the Trinity-DESTR-OYING testimony that THE FATHER (SINGLE PERSON) IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD but Trinitarian Christians testify that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit (The Trinity) is the true God. John 4:21-22 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, *WORSHIP THE FATHER* . Ye worship ye know not what: *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* : for salvation is of the Jews. Have another look: *WE WORSHIP* (The Jews INCLUDING ME - Jesus) Here is the Trinity-DE:ST-RO-YI-NG testimony of Jesus. “And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.” John 17:3 John 20:17: “Jesus saith unto her, ...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and TO MY GOD, AND YOUR GOD.” Have another look! ".... *TO MY GOD and YOUR GOD* " ME and YOU 👉 *WE* *WE WORSHIP* THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER who is THE GOD OF ME (Jesus) and YOU 👉 *OUR GOD* And Jesus answered him, THE FIRST OF ALL the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord *OUR GOD* is one Lord Mark 12:29 Jesus teaches: “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* shalt thou serve” Luke 4:8. Notice the words: “HIM ONLY.” Jesus did not say “US only,” or “Him and I only.” How could he possibly i it more clear than that? Jesus told to worship ONLY THE FATHER - who is THE GOD of Jesus too. Of course the term Father in the J3-w-1sh context. It's NOTHING more than a term for endearment NOT that God has a Son. God has got Son by the Ton in the Bible.
@@RobertDryer The d1sh0nest d3n13rs of Jesus during his ministry also used to make fun of him and laugh and mock because they didn't want to correct their fa-lse ways. The Trinitarian FAITH made a H.E.R.E.T.I.C of Jesus of the Bible. The Bible testifies. Jesus gave the Trinity-DESTR-OYING testimony that THE FATHER (SINGLE PERSON) IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD but Trinitarian Christians testify that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit (The Trinity) is the true God. John 4:21-22 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, *WORSHIP THE FATHER* . Ye worship ye know not what: *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* : for salvation is of the Jews. Have another look: *WE WORSHIP* (The Jews INCLUDING ME - Jesus) Here is the Trinity-DE:ST-RO-YI-NG testimony of Jesus. “And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.” John 17:3 John 20:17: “Jesus saith unto her, ...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and TO MY GOD, AND YOUR GOD.” Have another look! ".... *TO MY GOD and YOUR GOD* " ME and YOU 👉 *WE* *WE WORSHIP* THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER who is THE GOD OF ME (Jesus) and YOU 👉 *OUR GOD* And Jesus answered him, THE FIRST OF ALL the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord *OUR GOD* is one Lord Mark 12:29 Jesus teaches: “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* shalt thou serve” Luke 4:8. Notice the words: “HIM ONLY.” Jesus did not say “US only,” or “Him and I only.” How could he possibly i it more clear than that? Jesus told to worship ONLY THE FATHER - who is THE GOD of Jesus too. Of course the term Father in the J3-w-1sh context. It's NOTHING more than a term for endearment NOT that God has a Son. God has got Son by the Ton in the Bible.
@@RobertDryer Your "😂" is just a d3sp3rat3 attempt to hide your discomfort. You're basically laughing at the preaching and practice of Jesus of the Bible.