Відео

@@freedomdst If we're talking about official n native implementation of upscaler n framegen, for sure yes, Lossless Scaling can't compete with for example native implementation of DLSS or FSR 3.0, n also AMD or Nvidia native framegen solution. I never said it could either in the video. All it is, is a tool that can implement both of those function (upscaling and framegen) universally. And at the very least in my own opinion, some of the software offering such as LS1 Upscaling are very good and it can compete with the likes of FSR (the old version such as 1.0 / 2.0) or Nvidia old universal scaling NIS. And yes, Indeed, the use case are ideally on game where either function are not natively supported. Or if you're trying to cut down on gpu and cpu usage in order to keep your device temperature low, usually for laptop user (which I am) or portable pc user such as ROG Ally or Steamdeck. For example these days I mainly use lossless on Dirt Rally 2.0 and Borderlands 3, the software works wonderfully on those. The purpose of Lossless Scaling are not to compete with native implementation of upscalers or framegens from tech-giant such as AMD or NVIDIA, it is to give consumer more option to increase their performance in games where before there wasn't any to begin with.

you kind of missed explaining that then, since the video looks like its hyping he software and not clarifying on what point it stands. The video was good and detailed, but people can ask themselves later "ok, but when do i use it then". If it was said i apologize, i stopped at frame gen +upscaling since it was a long video

@@freedomdst No need to apologize, It was a long video and I may have perhaps missed that exact explanation. When I made the video the point that I wanted to make was just "Here, there's a software that can do upscaling or framegen universally, and here's how to use it". I don't feel the need to say "hey this program are worse than this or that and better than this or that" as that is never the main purpose of this video to begin with. Just like you, you can be the judge of that yourself, right? whether people think that the software is the worse implementation of DLSS or FSR n such that's for them to decide and test by themselves. This video main purpose is a demonstration of the software, its function, and how to use those function. My narrative may sound like I'm "hyping" the software but that is never the intention, hence why I even included my own experience of failing to use it on videos (that's past the lossless+frame gen part so you probably haven't watched it). As the software can be applied universally to any game (atleast so far from my own experience, even emulators), then it is up to each individual on "when" they want to use the software. Sure there is an "Ideal" situation on when you might want to use lossless, but I don't feel the need to point that out when I was making this video. Cheers!

It was an editing mistake on my part, I cut the screen in that part while DLSS was still picked in the option menu. But no worries, you can check on the benchmark result that the native one had DLSS disabled as anti aliasing are set to "TAA", which is NOT possible if it was still using DLSS as the anti aliasing would show "DLAA" instead.

I've got a friend that had both integrated and dedicated gpu in his laptop, their screen gets dim when they used any capture API other than DXGI. Try setting the GPU to your integrated gpu and then your capture API to DXGI to see if it solve ur problem.

@@jagadhie Actually the problem was with my display setting I had "Automatically manage color for apps" option on which led to the display getting dimmer Thanks Now it's solve Nice tutorial too!!

Nope, checked again today and can confirm the Steam Installation of my Lossless Scaling are exactly 5,86 MB. Properties of the folder said so too.

15 FPS Game wouldn't work well with frame generation so I don't think I will do those. As a base the minimum is 30 fps at the very least.

I am sorry but personally I haven't encountered the problem, I highly suggest you to ask in Lossless Scaling discord server to see if they have a solution for your particular issue

I'm sorry for the late respond, If a game already have built-in support like FSR 3.0 or DLSS, then it's better to use those as it'll almost always perform better than any scaling type available in Lossless Scaling, don't use them with LS. And also no, it's not really the same. For example DLSS are trained by Nvidia's supercomputer so that it will perform better and greater than any LS scaling option.

@@inconspicuousboar3177 2560p would be much preferred, as yes, you guessed correctly, the lower the resolution = more artifacting / visual loss.

@@jugurthaacab518 Yup very much so, especially in story games where you won't care that much about input latency (one of the main downside of lossless scaling especially for frame gen). I also mainly use it for story games rather than competitive games.

Frame generation not so much, but for scaling purpose yes. I think FG need some headroom in CPU usage.

@@SleepyMortal Thank you bang! cheers!

@@jagadhie would love to talk about the video editing bang if you don't mind. I want to learn those smooth editing haha

@@SleepyMortal It's simply about mastering the one effect "Transform" on Premiere Pro, play with the keyframe curve and learn to ease in, transition, and ease out. Experiment with it a lot till it became 2nd nature to do the animations and you'll be good in no time, I learned it in abt a week or two, I'm sure you could do the same. There are also quite a lot of tutorial materials on YT that covers the topic of smooth animating with premiere, you should check those out! These kinds of editing definitely take time though, so patient is also a big part of the game 😅

@@TrepTheSnake Before activating frame gen of LS. 60 is the base recommended for X3/X4 though, 30 works just fine for X2 frame gen.

@@jagadhie i had different answers here 😬

@@TrepTheSnake I think there might be a bit of a misunderstanding due to the wording of "after the frame hit" in ur question, care to explain more on what you mean by that? do you mean your FPS before activating frame gen, or do you mean your fps after getting the performance hit (higher gpu usage) that might occur after activating FG?

@@DeanT. Depend on your screen size, the bigger your screen size the more noticeable it gets. For example if you have a 32 inch screen then it'll be more noticeable in comparison to 27 inch 1440p screen. For my use case, which is in a 15'6 inch 1440p laptop screen, I don't see any noticeable difference.

@@jagadhie i have a 27 inch 1440p monitor and thanks for answering. Now my question is does that LS1 scaling type with sharpness set to 1 really scale 1080p to 1440p?

@@DeanT. Sharpness doesn't determine what resolution you're scaling from. It does exactly what it says, determine the sharpness of the scaling just in case some game are more blurry than the others. In order to determine the resolution you're scaling from, set the game to windowed mode in the resolution that you desire, in your case, windowed mode 1920x1080. Then press the scale button, it should automatically scale towards your native resolution which is 1440p.

​@@jagadhiethanks for answering I'll look up the difference at my own

Sorry for the late reply but I don't think I know sorry, I kinda just.. randomly search for sprites

@jagadhie no worries, I actually managed to find it. Its called Adventure Ponies and apparently theres a sequel. The more you know i guess lol

You won't get banned since LS doesn't modify the original game files

@@ZER677 Lossless scaling works best on mid-end hardware that's already capable of running the game that's getting FG'ed in 30 FPS. The Frame Generation requires headroom in your GPU VRAM, if you're running the game in 15 FPS already, that's a pretty good sign that there isn't much headroom in your system to do the frame generation. For guidelines, you should use FG when you're atleast getting a base framerate of 30, so 30 x 2. and if you wanted to use x 4 then 60fps is the good base frame rate for it. Unfortunately it isn't the magic tools that can save individuals that is getting very low framerate to an acceptable one, it's purpose are more towards making an acceptable framerate into an enjoyable one. Try using it on games in your system where you're already getting 30 fps at the very least.

Use integer scaling since it's the light weight scaler. Also check on your monitor refresh rate. See if a certain resolution can get you a higher refresh rate. Example, if your monitor supports 120hz and your games can barely get 30fps. You can play in 120fps because the monitor refresh rate is doing all the work. Do a little research on how integer scaling works because you can use it in many different ways. Here's a couple examples. If your game is 640x360 in windowed mode but your windows display is set on 3840x2160. 360p will scale up all the way to 4k without any GPU or CPU power. 360p can also scale up to 1080p display. Integer scaling works a little different in lossless scaling so always leave it on scale factor 1 and remove "Fullscreen" in the settings. This is the correct way to use integer. You're not supposed to manually scale integer. It works based on your display of choice. 720p windowed mode cannot upscale to 1080p but it can scale up to 4k.

Yes absolutely. Just go in the Nvidia Control Panel and then find "Manage 3D Settings" in the left menu and you'll have "Max Frame Rate" somewhere which applies globally to all applications. Alternatively, there's a tab to switch to "Program Settings" Where you can set it individually for each game/program.

Yeah, I did exactly that; it's an easy way to save battery and (hopefully) extend the hardware longevity by not forcing the GPU to bleed all the time.

I did exactly that for _Transformers: War for Cybertron_ (the game is capped at 30 FPS 💀); it is an absolute blessing. I did just that with NFS '16, but from 60 to 240. It requires me to use the _performance_ version of the FG algorithm, but *DAMN* doesn't it do wonders to the game.