Відео

The sensor is not half the size its only 26.1%. Thus the advantage of your f5 smulders completely away compared to the full frame. Furthermore the background blur of the f5 on your micro four third is the equivalent of f11.

is there ONE REVIEWER out there showing the camera in action without talk and WITHOUT MUSIC :)

Nice, straight forward explanation of how to use the GND. Thanks. I recently started using my 40-150 in a similar way, to isolate an image. I find, for me, somewhere around 75mm to 100mm helps me isolate a nuanced image that would be distracted by other elements if I had photographed between 12mm and 25mm.

I have no problems. I find this lens as sharp as my RF 70-200 f2.8. I love this lens and keep it on my camera most of the time unless I am doing something that requires f2.8 or better. Given the ISO performance of an R6 MKII, I see no downside.

Thenks... helpful.

certainly with the 1.4 extender, I'm not overly impressed with the Canon 200-800's sharpness (as compared with the larger Canon EF500 f/4 IS ii, also with the same extender, and also on a Canon R5.

2 minute into a got to go

What a bunch of garbage. Why the hell would Canon owners care what you think about Olympus gear? I have used Olympus gear and will take my R5 and the 200-800 over your Oly combo any day.

perfect

dewey used to be a very nice person

I have the 100-400 and am looking at getting the 70-200 thank you for the comparison

I have a Nikon DSLR that I don't use much any more. I do almost everything with my OM-5 now. A couple weeks ago I got tripped up when I tried to switch lenses on the Nikon. I couldn't understand why the lens wouldn't go on. Finally I realized I was trying to turn left to right to put it on, when I should have been turning right to left. Mental mix-ups between camera systems happens to me every so often. 😂

Nice video. Thanks for sharing your experience. Happy weekend Dewey.

Personally I think paid photography gigs have started to dwindle. So many people want "filtered" shots today. That being said, as a hobby, or passion, I think it's stronger than ever.

I've been using OM Systems for a little over a year. Started with the PEN E-PL 6 (used, originally released mid 2013). Loved it. I bought the OM-5 new. Had never used ND filters or focus stacking. The OM-5 made this so easy to learning and experiment with. Paired with the 12-45 f/4, wonderful. Almost a year later, I take the OM-5 everywhere. Looking forward to trying the OM-1 mkii.

Thanks for the discussion and sharing. The bison photo turned out nicely.

I've had my OM-5 for about a year. Love it! And paired with the 12-45 f/4 or 40-150 f/4, amazing. Small and light. I've used the 12mm f/2 for astro, but my favorite fast prime is the 20mm f/1.4. The OM-5 and the 20mm and 12-45 f/4 and the 40-150 f/4 make a great travel pack. All weather-sealed, so wet weather photography is worry free. Perhaps an OM1mkii for Christmas. Unless a surprise OM5 mkii shows up.

Its truely said.

Utter nonsense.

Welcome to NC!

Thanks for the video, a nicely balanced opinion. I am in Western Australia and we get a lot of very bright sunlight, so smaller apertures are not such a problem. regarding the 200-800, it is tempting but I have the RF800 f11 with the R8, very rarely feel the need for a shorter focal range, but I do have the EF 100-400 L series mkii for those occasions, plus I have seen a few video’s that say the RF800 gives a sharper image..

Great images of those deer

I really enjoyed my stay. I drank too much but that’s the best part of vacation. I will post a video with several of the images from the trip. I used my OM5 along with my 12mm F2 lens.

Yep. Just finishing a river cruise. I’m heading home in the morning.

Thanks for the comment. Will do. I’m having a beer in Amsterdam right now.

Nice… greetings from another OM-System user from the Netherlands… keep posting 😀👍

i think the om images look better

all the same reasons i switched and love the system

Completely agree with everything you say! This was why I bought an OM1-N in 1979 and why I have just bought the new OM-1 Mk2. I was tempted by the OM-5 because it is even more compact and reminds me very much of the original OM1 but, in the end, the extra features of the newest OM-1 won me over. Might end up getting an OM-5 too at some point.

Very nice, it's been hard to find reviews on the 14c model. I hike a lot and use a 200mm lens as a maximum, I'm also only 5feet tall. I'm looking to buy this one, and hope that it does well in wind and reduced micro shakes on the zoom lens, (and not have to upgrade to the heavier models) do you have any opinion on that?

Really cool setup. I love my Canon R6 and my 24-105 f/4 but its a brick of a rig, especially for travel.

FYI. The base ISO on Olympus/OM cameras is 200. You'll lose info of you do below that (or above).

Fine comment I use the brand Olympus and now OM system for over 40 years and never had a problem with the results. For outdoors the system is and was small and lightweight in all those years, consistent to the filosofie of mr. Yoshihisa Maitani. I use the OM-1 mark II now for several weeks and have great fun and perfect pictures.

Nice video and cruise! I may have missed it. What camera/lens were you using to video the bridge segment? The R6 you have listed in your info? Thanks

Been with Olympus/OMsystem for years now and love it. I shoot wildlife with the 150-400 pro and after lumping the canon 600 f4 about this is awesome . Im 61 yrs old and it's a stroll in the park. Just my view but I never go below ISO 200 as that is the native ISO, not a criticism. Great video.

I just picked up the 12-100 f4 pro…so sharp! MFT is the best for a hobbyist IMO. I have full frame too, but I tend to reach for my Oly 99% of the time.

Hi! I would love to know if you can notice any image quality differences between those two lenses when CROPPING..! Cause I have heard not to crop the image when using the 100-400 lense due to the image quality issue... Do you have any idea on that?

Hi nice post. I do low to ground shooting. Do legs splay horizontal? Thx

Seems like you're enthusiastic about reviewing the camera. Kudos! I'd love to follow you, as it seems like you're a straight shooter. My advice, FWIW... Be prepared, be specific, give people the answers they're looking for right up front. Don't say things like, "I'm not really sure what this is for, let's try it." That's genuine (I appreciate it), but that's not why people will subscribe. If you have the gear, and I don't, I want to know what you think of it from personal experience, not live experimentation. Sorry. I offer this as, hopefully, constructive comments. You can do great! I'd love to hear more from you1

nice video and landscape

Thanks for sharing your honest opinion on this lens 👍

Well, I guess some people are born the just contradict. You could have done this about any other similar lens on the market, Sigma or Tamron150-600mm for example. It is obvious that you haven't even tryed the 200-800mm so why are you talking about it ? I have the 200-800mm and the R6 mkii and I can tell you that even at F9, there is no lighting conditions you can't use this lens. The R6 mkii is simply incredible for managing ISO. I often go over 12,000 ISO whitout any noise and with the help of a good noise reduction software 20,000 is not an issue. You will never ever get close to those results with your kit.

Your thinking, to me at least sounds a bit confusing if you don’t mind me saying so. You’re using a tripod for the cityscape and you’re shooting at F8. The 200 to 800 would give you serious flexibility for your cityscapes mounted on a tripod and shooting even at F9. For 1800 US dollars you get greater flexibility and if you want wider aperture lenses to do the same thing the cost is enormous. I don’t have the lens yet but it’s my intention to buy it and I have viewed the same reviews on you tube you mentioned and the overall message is far more positives than negatives with the lens. Keep up the good work you do and thanks for sharing your video and your thoughts.

I was at Davu back in May. Did not realize you could get in there that early. I would suggest people look at using different ISO settings. Especially in low light. I'm no longer wedded to shooting at 100 ISO. During the when the light is bright, sure. One of the faults I have with Canon is you can't drop ISO lower than 100, which would be great for harsh mid day light. Thanks for the video. Love to see other shots you have taken, I live up the road from you in Springfield and find this area challenging to photograph. (From a landscape perspective.)

Thats possible with nearly every lens with good results. Birding at sunrise maybe more interesting.

#23?!? It might be a year until it comes in. Nice pictures of the city and Ohio River. Cheers, Ted

I thoroughly enjoyed your video and your honest chat. Regards from Ireland

Haha Comedy. APS-C is nothing for you an you prefer a Olympus with a smaler Sensor. Sorry this ist a bad Joke..... It's smaler...ok this is correct...the only thing...🤣

I am becoming increasingly frustrated with Canon's philosophy when it comes to this RF system. I've been a Canon shooter since 1995. While I was fortunate enough to be able to purchase a new EF 500mm f4 L IS USM II a few years ago, I was hoping for something a little more user friendly in the f5.6 range for situations where it is not feasible to lug out that massive lens. The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM just doesn't seem right for me. That f 7.1 at 500mm just sounds terrible and at $3,000 with tax, it puts it beyond what I want to spend for it. I feel like I would be throwing away money for less performance. The RF 200-800 feels equally compromised in performance in all but the brightest and harshest light.

Even on the R7, I haven't had much issue going fairly high on the ISO. The combination of IS with the high ISO performance makes this combination just fine.