Відео

O puma era o carro desejado por todos. Você até ficava mais bonito, dentro de um conversível. O puma GTB também eram muito lindo e poderoso. Mas ja era outro patamar, mais caro, mais beberrão de gasolina. Mas era bem invocado. Era o que desejávamos naquela época.

Was a way ahead of time every thing on beauty

so then why was the 55 new yorker extensively covered? and the 56 imperial early in the video? odd to say the least

0:10 The video starts off erroneously suggesting that the 2nd Generation Continental was designed to compete with Cadillac or the Packard Carribean in its day. However, that was never the case at least not in price that's for sure. It was designed instead to compete with customers more interested in expensive luxury imports and specifically targeted to consumers who wanted to buy American instead of foreign. The car though failed miserably in that area or it's likely Ford would have not retired the model in just 2 production years. The profit margin factoring in the cost each year to manufacture (hand build) it was just way too enormous. Even the list price of $10,000 was set way too low to recoup the initial financial losses associated with the design of the concept car to the eventual dealer showroom display. The entire design of the car was intended to give it a European appeal which is the reason for the lack of chrome unlike what was found on most lower priced domestic luxury cars in its day. Lincoln could have kept this version and called it something like the Mark II and still introduced the 3rd generation Continental calling it instead the Town car. However, it didn't. Ford wanted a vehicle heavily promoted to compete at around $6000 and that wasn't happening here. Ford was losing a large share of its domestic luxury market and this vehicle was certainly no loss leader to drum in more customers that's for sure. Don't get me wrong I love the car and wish a similar design had carried over to the 3rd Gen model of the Continental which sadly it didn't. If I had a choice of buying this car or instead buying a new home in 1956 my heart would have said buy the Car but my head would have said Nope buy the House instead. The car I probably would still have or at least I'd like to think so.

Chrome is still my favorite color

It looks so much like a Ford. Were they variants of Ford or did they have their own unique bodies?

The 56-57 was a Continental. Not a Lincoln Continental. Ford was determining if the Continental brand could stand on its own. History shows that result. The 56 & 57 Conti's were remarkable marques. I am so glad that quite a few exist to this day as they still make me crank my neck out of place to see one !

Great automobile one of my favorites, but I love the 1955 Packard Caribbean more

Too bad they didn't show the 55 Lincoln, my favorite.

Not a Lincoln for '56 & '57

Fantastic photography. Narration not so much

It was a fine car. You needed a big garage to fit this luxury boat. Lincoln was delightful. Mark IV brought it to a pinnacle.

I own two Continental Mark II's. They are NOT Lincolns. They were not made by Lincoln, they were never made by Lincoln, and the word Lincoln does not appear ANYWHERE on the car. Ford had Four Divisions in 1956: Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, and Continental. You don't call a Mercury Marquis a Ford Mercury Marquis...and you do not call the 1956 or 56 Continental a Lincoln, because it is NOT.

If you wanted to upgrade from the stock engine would the FE Medium block in say 445 cid or the 385 series big block in 557 cid be a better choice to maintain the character of the car as a luxury cruiser but go faster?

How did we ever drive cars this size? My first "Grown up" car when I was twenty, was a 1961 Olds Super 88 convertible - total chick magnet! Now a car that size won't make it into my driveway.

beautiful cars

These videos are really lacking in two specifics. The narrator speaks in glowing flowery generalities that lack specificity. Then he will be talking about a interior part of the car but the photos are of the exterior.

The narrator keeps repeating things over and over.

THIS IS LITERALLY THE DUMBEST MOST OBNOXIOUS & INACCURATE CAR VIDEO I HAVE EVER SEEN. TOTAL BS Fuel efficiency???? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 BS BS BS on everything you said.

The car is the star of this video. Same can't be said of the boring monotonous AI voice

I only made it halfway through this until I couldn't take anymore of the monotonous AI voice. Great car though. That's why I started watching it in the first place

It was 8th generation not 15th after that remark I decided to exit video

While repetitive, I found your production informative. However, you left out one of the most innovative features found in any car of its time. The Sure Track brake system. This system was a precursor to today's antilock brake systems. Found only on the back brakes, the system pumped the brakes automatically under panic stop situations. And was standard on all mark four models for the 1972 model year.

I had a 77 Biarritz!

Had 2 61's, twins, Black/White top, Red/Black int.,,,

I really love❤️💕💗 the profile and style of The 1956 Packard Carribean Convertible Fully Equipped, Fully Loaded and Fully Powered with that beautiful huge 5.8 Liter V8 Power Plant under the Hood. It’s a shame they had to help out Studebaker because at that time the executives at Studebaker was in financial trouble already before the executives at Packard decided to help Studebaker out the executives didn’t mention to Packard just how bad and much dire financial trouble they were in. It’s a shame Packard had to find out the hard way and before they could bail themselves out it was too late for them. The next 9 or 10 years Studebaker went belly up. What a Masterpiece that 56 Packard Carribean Convertible was just like 👍🏾 the other Big Three at that time was. Ford, Chrysler, GM. Compared to what they are making and manufacturing today, I still would pick the Antiques, Classics and Vintage Cars of back in the day at least you knew what you bought, had, drove and appreciated that’s my honest opinion. To me what a horror Show try getting comfortable in these new cars today especially when you call 📞📱☎️ for an Uber or a Lyft ride share. Sincerely Yours Truly Ivan I J

Get the Facts Straight! It is my pick for car of all time, Fantastic!

The 61 Electra was a sleek automobile. My father had one, so many features like rear heat and air, electric wing windows, rear window defrost, vibrosonic radio, before stereo was invented!

If you can show me a piece of factory-installed wood on an 1960 Buick Electra, I’ll eat it!

A I is like voice mail where it saves money for tge c e o but puts the customer through hell and takes a job away.

People are sure complaining about a I. There is something about the voice that seems abrasive. Well and we feel like a I has a deceptive effect.

To bad anyone can post a u-tube video.

Y’all beat me to it!

Next time use an actual 1961 Lincoln, not a 1964.

Ridiculous! Show the proper.year of you are going to do respectful homage.

Elegance taken to its best! Love this car 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

I don't know... I see this car and it's a pimp's car. The overdose in "luxury" went wrong with this one and ended up being kind of vulgar. I'm aware it's a classic, and an expensive one, but it's a car not meant for your average joe.

Ugliness

Why the 1960 Buick Electra 225 is a Classic Car Icon: ua-cam.com/video/2uB6BfeHNJc/v-deo.html The 1961 Lincoln Continental: A Journey Through Design and Technology: ua-cam.com/video/konpYJ7rd3A/v-deo.html Dream Car: Why the 1953 Cadillac Series 62 is an Icon: ua-cam.com/video/_ecM1o8dNVw/v-deo.html

The pictured car is a 1954.

Is UA-cam concerned about the takeover by all these Bot channels? Quality and accuracy going out the window. Perhaps it's time for a new channel called HumanTube.

Thats a 61

If someone can show me one inch of factory-installed wood trim, I’ll eat it!

Duh, the thumbnail is a 1961 NOT a 1960.

why are they flashing back and fourth from a 1960 to 1961 as if they were the same model. This video is all screwed up

The car in the THUMBNAIL is a '61, and the mistakes snowball from there. I got so irritated that I stopped watching less than halfway through.

Gracias por excelente video. El Cadillac serie 62 de 4 puertas que muestran en el video (verde con techo blanco), tiene cja Dyna Flow, lo que indica que fue fabricado entre Septiembre y Diciembre de 1953. La planta donde GM producía las cajas Hydra Matic se incendió en Agosto de 1953.

There were no chrome trim pieces that ran the length of the car.

I’m sorry to leave a negative but…this was a bit of hyperbole. This car doesn’t need such over-the-top descriptions, some of which were not true. For instance: the power seats did not offer each passenger the ability to select a position that was most comfortable for them; unless you meant each driver, but a driver is not a passenger. The driver was the only person that had this luxury, and besides, a bench seat made that statement an impossibility. The heating and ventilation could not give optimal comfort regardless the weather unless one had the optional air conditioning. Another mistake is the non-existent wood dash/interiors. Unless I’m mistaken, there was no wood used in the ‘53 62 Series; possibly in the Sixty Specials, but not the 62vSeries. And finally, the sound system with one speaker was rudimentary at best. All these errors left me thinking that this was compile by A.I., descriptions that could apply to any luxury car, well, any luxury car post-1965. There were so many repeated descriptions that the video could have been reduced in length by at least a third. And the generalizations did not stop with the car itself. When relating that the car was used by certain actors/actresses, politicians, etc., not one person was named, which would not be that difficult to research. I love the ‘53s, they are my favorite of the 1950s, but I don’t like them misrepresented because that calls into question all the other accolades that the car so richly deserves.

Bavo! I subscribed.