Відео

No only the najdis nd the followers of the man from najd are ahlus sunnah

They shouldn’t have disputed and listen to prophet Muhammad and not write nothing very simple but now they’re making excuses

Please give the full reference of the book of nasiruddin

You are a liar when did we reject attributes other than 7,we also affirm attributes other than 7. Pseudo salafis are bound to lying😂

Barrak Allah ou feek

Wahhabis will never stop trying to malign the Ilya. The can't stand the contrast between the Imam's work and their primitive teachings. Here's the correct opinion, relayed from the great hadeeth scholars of his age and those who followed in the pre colonial Era. ua-cam.com/video/v0C5hzBf0C4/v-deo.htmlsi=HzZ59pGWkqYvscC3

What a bunch of ignorant wahabbi followers...over the many hundreds and thousands of scholars throughout history you idiots know nothing but to brag and discuss about ibn taymiyyah, bin baz, and albani etc...the majority of the ummah do not even use these ppl as reference let alone even boast about them nor even know them...

So ignore other views of Islam aside from your own because why?

If you don't debate the innovators and disbelievers what they call to stays unchallenged and gains followers 🧠 people come back to islam from many religions and sects because of debates.

Ibn Jawazi & Ibn Qudamah Maqdisi reworked on Ihya in Minhaj Al Qasidin to eliminate weak and disputed ahadith, it was not an issue of autheniticity, as stated within Ibn Jawazi's 'Minhaj', in addition to this Imam An Nawawi states, "Were the books of Islam all to be lost, excepting only the Ihya, it would suffice to replace them all." May allah's rahmah be upon them all. So Ihya is not unauthentic, its the greatest work on revival, written by the Hujjatul Islam who single handedly revived the 10th Century Sunnism from Shia heresies of all kind, when your salafists movement didnt even exist. May Allah bless Hujjatul Islam

Mawlid is a beautiful deed ... الحمد لله و الشكر لله رب العالمين

Bidah in 2 side brother this celebrating in bidah hasana in shafi (r) related in in kithab

If ist disliked to write knowledge then why quran was written😂😂😂. Such a wahabist way of thinking.... He saw clearly said no to write hadith thats what he meant is clear.

It's funny how the people here think that he's insulting al-Ghazali.

What a stupid methodology

Wahabis are out of the realm of Islam and part of colonial construct

Milad-E-Nabi is must for all Muslims to celebrate. Those who dnt do so are not Muslims

Initially invented by the Ismaili Fatimid dynasty in Egypt in the 5th Hijri century and IMPORTED into Sunni Islam by Muzzafaruddin Zangi, governor of Mosul (in present day Iraq) in the Hijri year 630. Let's not talk about good or bad but about the ORIGIN of the innovation. Whose sunnah are you following? The sunnah of the Ismaili (Aga Khani) community? READ YOUR HISTORY OF YOUR DEEN TO AVOID BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE BY INCAPABLE "SCHOLARS".

That is how you know Ibn taymiyyah was mistaken. Going by "mujtahid" Bukhari you can't even pray one full rakat of salah, you have jo azan, janazah prayer, eid prayer, etc. The only source material we have from Bukhari doesn't answer any of these questions. The second question is who followed them? We can accept that he never prayed salah, perfomed Azan, etc, or whatever if you like🙄

lol so the students okay to read فتح الباري thats full of تعطيل that ibn baz keep correct ir, but not تلبيس الجهمية dude

Ibn Taymiyyah >>>>>> Bin Baz

imam tahawi says, there is no 6 direction which can catch allah azza wa jal in aqida tahawiyya. A Knockout for you mujassim.

ua-cam.com/video/v0C5hzBf0C4/v-deo.html

In case anyone is searching for the book mentioned by the Ustadh, in English it is "Clarifying the Evidences for the Categories of Tawheed" by Sheikh Abdurrazzaq al Badr. I don't know if it's a full translation.

Shafaee and hanafees fought lot It is Reality.. Some people just can't Digest Reality Read Zad al-Ma'ad of Imam Ibnul qayyim, you will understand the level of their Disputes and Fights

A REPLY TO ABDUL RAHMAN HASSAN QUOTING IMAM AL-TIRMIDHI TO REFUTE ASH'ARIS (m.ua-cam.com/video/PkTBWcDQAw4/v-deo.html): There is no problem with what Imam al-Tirmidhi has said. I can agree with his statement. The issue lies with ARH (and his ilk) misrepresenting the spectrum of Ash'ari views. When it comes to attributes such as Yad, Saaq, Wajh etc., there are basically 3 views (as summarized by Imam al-Sanusi): 1. Imam al-Ash'ari's: These attributes are besides/in addition to the Sifaat Ma'ani (i.e. Qudrah, Iradah etc). They subsist with Allah and Allah knows best of their reality. 2. Imam al-Haramayn's: Interpreting them, e.g. Yad means Qudrah. 3. The Salaf's: Knowing that the literal meaning is not intended, but leaving the appointment of its meaning to Allah. Note: Nowhere does Imam al-Tirmidhi state that the apparent meaning is affirmed (not in the original Arabic anyway). I'd further like to turn your attention to two Hanbalis - Ibn Qudama and Ibn Kathir. Ibn Qudama states in his book ذم التأويل (regarding how the Salaf dealt with Allah's Atrributes): بل أمروها كما جاءت، و ردوا علمها إلى قائلها و معناها إلى المتكلم بها Rather, they passed them on as they came and they deferred cognizance of them to He who said it and their meanings to the Speaker. He also says: و علموا أن المتكلم بها صادق لا شك في صدقه فصدّقوه و لم يعلموا حقيقةَ معناها فسكتوا عما لم يعلموا They knew that the One who spoke of them is truthful without a doubt, so they declare Him to be truthful. They didn't know realities of these meanings, so they refrained from speaking on that which they didn't know. Ibn Kathir states in his tafsir regarding the verse ثم استوى على العرش: والظاهر المتبادر إلى أذهان المشبهين منفي عن الله فإن الله لا يشبهه شيء من خلقه The apparent meaning that comes to mind to the anthropomorphists is negated from Allah. For no thing from creation resembles Allah. There were Imams that disagreed with interpreting these verses and attributes and they have valid reasons for this, fair enough. It is further clarified here: ua-cam.com/video/pvaQL5Q6s4E/v-deo.html But if the view of Imam al-Ash'ari is taken, then the statement of Imam al-Tirmidhi falls in line with our school (except that he forbids ta'weel, but early Ash'aris didn't do that anyway - but they didn't forbid it either). Note: Other big Imams like al-Nawawi validated the approach of ta'weel, are they now Jahmiyyah too? --- Are we Jahmiyyah then? As for this entire Jahmiyyah thing, I have explained this prior. It's a misnomer. There are a few statements that we both make, but they stem from different theological grounds - that DOES matter. I have clarified that here: t.co/bqxSugGm5q?amp=1 The proof for the fact that this is a misnomer also lies in what transpired between Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal and Imam al-Karabisi, as documented by Imam al-Dhahabi in his book Siyar A`laam al-Nubala: “There is no doubt that what al-Karābīsī innovated and explained in the question of the pronunciation is the truth. But Imām Ahmad refused it in order to pre­clude the extension of the ques­tion to the Qur’ān itself, since one cannot distinguish the pronunciation from the pro­nounced (which is the Speech of Allāh) except in the mind.” The reason why this is relevant is because when Ash'aris say that the recitation of the Quran is created, they get labelled as Jahmis by Salafis. Whereas here we read that Imam al-Dhahabi validated this same view (albeit when stated by Imam al-Karabisi). The Jahmiyyah come from a different theological position when they make this statement and we also come from a different position. Thought I'd just sent this over from the kaafiyah channel

the hashiya is even greater

Imam Dhahabi said " He is proof Islam" You missed it ?

what of the ban of hadith during the 4 caliphate talk about that

‎اللهم أنت ربي، لا إله إلا أنت ، خلقتني وأنا عبدك، وأنا على عهدك ووعدك ما استطعت أعوذ بك من شر ما صنعت أبوء لك بنعمتك علي، وأبوء بذنبي، فاغفر لي فإنه لا يغفر الذنوب إلا أنت

The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The best supplication for seeking forgiveness (Syed-ul- Istighfar) is to say: 'Allahumma Anta Rabbi, la ilaha illa Anta, khalaqtani wa ana 'abduka, wa ana 'ala 'ahdika wa wa'dika mastata'tu, a'udhu bika min sharri ma sana'tu, abu'u laka bini'matika 'alayya, wa abu'u bidhanbi faghfir li, fa innahu la yaghfirudh-dhunuba illa Anta. (O Allah! You are my Rubb. There is no true god except You. You have created me, and I am Your slave, and I hold to Your Covenant as far as I can. I seek refuge in You from the evil of what I have done. I acknowledge the favours that You have bestowed upon me, and I confess my sins. Pardon me, for none but You has the power to pardon).' He who supplicates in these terms during the day with firm belief in it and dies on the same day (before the evening), he will be one of the dwellers of Jannah; and if anyone supplicates in these terms during the night with firm belief in it and dies before the morning, he will be one of the dwellers of Jannah." [Al-Bukhari].

Dumb argument. You can say the sahaba weren't hanafi maliki or shaf'i

He just didn't have high IQ

What is this guy talking about? These kind of people I run from as a revert. They confuse and Complicate an easy religion. He answers his own question.

Ibn taimiyah was a nasibi.

❤

did you do your research khawarj

Being excellent in hadith, has no bearing on being excellent in Uqaid. Bin Baz knew that he would have doubt because ibn taymiyyah's arguments may not be solid rather lightweight attempts to counter the groups. It's important to bear that in mind.

It's permissible.

Comeon bro, leave gazali alone.

i dont understand , so why didnt ibn baz read from taymiyyah ??

- Imam Muzani is student of Shafi and maternal unc of Tahawi. - He was hard on Tahawi who left shafi mathhab to be a hanafi & said you will never a faqih. - Tahawi wrote mushqil athar reconciling sahih hadith which appear to be contradictory based on hanafi usul. - Tahawi said if my unc were alive he'd have to do kafara for his oath as now i am a faqih.

The real reason, he was involved in shirk

1st Kharaji/Rafdi/Munafiq Mawiyah bin sufiyan in Muslim ummat who abused Khalifa Rashid Maula Ali (as) in religious & political gathering sahih Muslim 6220 Amir b. Sa'd b. Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya b. Abi Sufyan appointed Sa'd as the Governor and said: What prevents you from abusing Abu Turab (Hadrat 'Ali), whereupon be said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) having said about him that I would not abuse him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. I heard Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Aaron was unto Moses but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me. And I (also) heard him say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (the narrator) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Holy Prophet) said: Call 'Ali. He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: Let us summon our children and your children. Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family. sahih Muslim 6229 Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.

Mawiyah bin sufiyan the 1st hip-hop artist who murdered innocent Muslims & robbed them to keep his hip-hop life style going such as prostitutes Gold jewlery silk clothing animal skin clothing etc Sahih Muslim 4776 It has been narrated on the authority of 'Abd al-Rahman b. Abd Rabb al-Ka'ba who said: I entered the mosque when 'Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-'As was sitting in the shade of the Ka'ba and the people had gathered around him. I betook myself to them and sat near him. (Now) Abdullah said: I accompanied the Messenger of Allah ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) on a journey. We halted at a place. Some of us began to set right their tents, others began to compete with one another in shooting, and others began to graze their beasts, when an announcer of the Messenger of Allah ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) announced that the people should gather together for prayer, so we gathered around the Messenger of Allah ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ). He said: It was the duty of every Prophet that has gone before me to guide his followers to what he knew was good for them and warn them against what he knew was bad for them; but this Umma of yours has its days of peace and (security) in the beginning of its career, and in the last phase of its existence it will be afflicted with trials and with things disagreeable to you. (In this phase of the Umma), there will be tremendous trials one after the other, each making the previous one dwindle into insignificance. When they would be afflicted with a trial, the believer would say: This is going to bring about my destruction. When at (the trial) is over, they would be afflicted with another trial, and the believer would say: This surely is going to be my end. Whoever wishes to be delivered from the fire and enter the garden should die with faith in Allah and the Last Day and should treat the people as he wishes to be treated by them. He who swears allegiance to a Caliph should give him the piedge of his hand and the sincerity of his heart (i. e. submit to him both outwardly as well as inwardly). He should obey him to the best of his capacity. It another man comes forward (as a claimant to Caliphate), disputing his authority, they (the Muslims) should behead the latter. The narrator says: I came close to him ('Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-'As) and said to him: Can you say on oath that you heard it from the Messenger of Allah ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ )? He pointed with his hands to his ears and his heart and said: My ears heard it and my mind retained it. I said to him: This cousin of yours, Mu'awiya, orders us to unjustly consume our wealth among ourselves and to kill one another, while Allah says: O ye who believe, do not consume your wealth among yourselves unjustly, unless it be trade based on mutual agreement, and do not kill yourselves. Verily, God is Merciful to you (iv. 29). The narrator says that (hearing this) Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-As kept quiet for a while and then said: Obey him in so far as he is obedient to God; and diqobey him in matters involving disobedience to God.

🤡 to 🤡 Communication

Salam uztadz,you are seem to be so confident with your aqeeda(Salafi),,now it seems that you lost in the" Istighatha" debate against Shiekh Asrar Rashid ..In that debate you were looking arrogant and behave in that manner,while Asrar were humble in looks.????????????????

please link the hadith, i cant find it when I search

MashaAllah

Salafis 😂😂😂