Global Compact Network UK
Global Compact Network UK
  • 85
  • 39 993
Transitioning to a Circular Economy: Fashion & Textiles
This session explored the main barriers delaying the transition towards a circular economy in the textiles industry. Best practice case studies were highlighted to demonstrate practical action taken by companies to reduce the environmental and social impacts of their textile products (e.g., clothing and household textiles). The opportunities presented by different business models in the fashion industry were also explored.
Speakers included:
- Catherine Loader, Sustainability Specialist - Circular Economy, John Lewis & Partners
- Ciara Cates, Lead Material Developer, Patagonia
- Yoann Regent, Head of Sustainable Sourcing & Nature Initiatives, Kering
- Tamsin Lejeune, CEO, Common Objective
Resources referenced during the session:
- Common Objective - Circularity Hub: www.commonobjective.co/hubs/circular-fashion
- Common Objective - Circular Fashion Summit: www.commonobjective.co/hub/brand-leaders-summit-hub/about-the-summit
- Kering - REGENERATIVE FUND FOR NATURE INTRO: ua-cam.com/video/OR2LKSCQOgs/v-deo.html
- Kering - REGENERATIVE FUND FOR NATURE - FRENCH PROJECT FOCUS: ua-cam.com/video/z0YcNcthvVU/v-deo.html
- Kering - REGENERATIVE FUND FOR NATURE: www.conservation.org/fund-for-nature
- Kering - REGENERATIVE FUND FOR NATURE: www.kering.com/en/sustainability/safeguarding-the-planet/regenerative-fund-for-nature/faq/
- Patagonia - Why Recycled?: www.patagonia.com/why-recycled/
- John Lewis - Sustainability: www.johnlewis.com/content/sustainability
The 'Transitioning to a Circular Economy' webinar series was hosted by the UN Global Compact Network UK in Spring 2023. Interested in gaining access to all of our newest learning and engagement opportunities? Find out more about becoming a member on our website: www.unglobalcompact.org.uk/how-to-join/
Переглядів: 343

Відео

Transitioning to a Circular Economy: Food and Agriculture
Переглядів 3737 місяців тому
This session explored the ways that different stakeholders involved in food and agricultural value chains can support the implementation of regenerative agricultural techniques, reduce food waste, and improve sourcing and ingredient selection to create a more circular and sustainable food and agricultural system. Speakers included: - Cees Jan Hollander, Global Farming Expertise Manager, Danone ...
Transitioning to a Circular Economy - Packaging
Переглядів 3407 місяців тому
This session took a deep dive into the challenges that businesses face around reducing the environmental and social impacts of their packaging. It highlighted practical actions that companies can take to eliminate problematic/unnecessary packaging from their business, improve the design of their packaging for recycling and reuse, encourage the adoption of reuse models among consumers, and imple...
Transitioning to a Circular Economy: Electronics
Переглядів 2357 місяців тому
This session explored the opportunities and practical actions that can be taken to incorporate the principles of a circular economy into the electronics sector. We highlighted the risks of continuing with the current production and consumption patterns and demonstrated how the transition to a circular economy can benefit businesses, the planet, and society. Speakers included: - Thea Kleinmagd, ...
Transitioning to a Circular Economy - Critical Metals and Minerals
Переглядів 3987 місяців тому
This session explored how actors in renewable energy and automobile value chains have maximised resource efficiencies, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions and pollution levels by implementing circular economy principles. Speakers included: - Ke Wang, Program Director, Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE) - Bryony Clear Hill, Manager - Standards, Reporting and Circular Economy,...
Transitioning to a Circular Economy - Built Environment
Переглядів 1,3 тис.7 місяців тому
This session explored the benefits and roles of key actors in a building’s value chain in implementing the principles of a circular economy. Best practice case studies were highlighted to demonstrate how buildings can be designed, constructed, managed, and maintained to minimise the environmental impact and resource use of a building over its entire life cycle. Speakers included: - Kisa Zehra, ...
Climate Action Summit - Debating Nature vs. Technology
Переглядів 1877 місяців тому
Two teams of three debaters deliberated on the role of nature vs. technology as our most effective means of tackling climate change. Speakers included: - Dan Wells, Partner, Foresight Group (Chair) - Stuart Hayward-Higham, Technical Development Director, Suez - Mattie Yeta, Chief Sustainability Officer, CGI - Claire Brady, Head of Strategy & Innovation, Bioregional - Mathew Frith, Director of R...
Climate Action Summit - Investing in Nature
Переглядів 767 місяців тому
To support the global need for expanded investment in nature and conservation, this session explored how and why businesses should mobilise capital for nature-based solutions. It looked at the benefits that companies may experience in investing in natural capital connected to their operations, and how this builds business resiliency. The event also examined growing investor expectations and req...
Climate Action Summit - Implementing Nature-based Solutions for Net Positive Business
Переглядів 1377 місяців тому
This session focused on how to identify and implement credible, effective Nature-based Solutions (NbS) schemes, and how these can not only be used to offset remaining carbon emissions that cannot be addressed with mitigation, but also move a company towards net positive. It featured presentations from companies taking part in the Net Positive Project for a conversation on what it means to be ne...
Climate Action Summit - Frameworks for Managing Nature-related Risks
Переглядів 1337 місяців тому
This event featured presentations on how businesses can measure and report on their impacts and dependencies on nature, as well as how they can incorporate this knowledge into decision-making, planning, and risk-management. The session introduced frameworks like TNFD and the Natural Capital Protocol and how these fit in to regulatory elements like the new UK Environmental Act and sustainability...
Climate Action Summit - Finance Mobilisation for the Circular Economy
Переглядів 1497 місяців тому
In this session, a range of financial actors and businesses discussed how they see the circular economy as an opportunity to create long-term value. The role of different actors in scaling up financing for a circular economy and how to overcome current barriers was also explored. Speakers included: - Gary Kendall, Head of Climate Strategy Implementation, NatWest Group - Lisa Lange, ESG Engageme...
Climate Action Summit - Circular Products and Business Models for Emissions Reductions
Переглядів 1337 місяців тому
The third session in the UN Global Compact Network UK's Climate Action Summit explored how products, systems, and business models can be designed to eliminate waste before it is created and maximise utilisation of energy and materials to reduce emissions and pollution. Speakers included: - Harald Friedl, Cement and Aluminium Lead, COP27 Climate Action Champions Team - Sokhna Gueye, Head of Pack...
Climate Action Summit - Preparing for a Circular Economy and Measuring Business Impact
Переглядів 1557 місяців тому
This session explored the various metrics, tools, and methodologies available to support companies to understand their circularity performance and areas where they can improve to minimise waste, utilise and keep products in use longer, and subsequently reduce emissions and pollution. Speakers included: - Jacco Verstraeten-Jochemsen, Business Solutions Lead, Circle Economy - Wouter van Tol, Head...
Climate Action Summit - Holistic Climate Solutions for a Resilient Future
Переглядів 1577 місяців тому
The opening session to the UN Global Compact Network UK's Climate Summit provided a high-level overview of practical solutions for reducing emissions and supporting a just transition to net zero, including nature-based solutions, the principles of a circular economy, and other low-carbon/green technological advancements. Speakers included: - Sanda Ojiambo, Assistant Secretary-General and Chief ...
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Leased Assets
Переглядів 7297 місяців тому
To support companies to reduce carbon emissions across their value chain, the UN Global Compact Network UK hosted a series of topical and interactive webinars exploring how companies can tackle Scope 3 emissions categories as defined by the GHG Protocol. Participants heard from climate specialists and business leaders as they shared best practices for identifying, measuring, and reducing their ...
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Sold Products
Переглядів 7407 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Sold Products
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Investments
Переглядів 7687 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Investments
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Fuel and Energy-Related Activities
Переглядів 8117 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Fuel and Energy-Related Activities
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Waste-related Emissions
Переглядів 9277 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Waste-related Emissions
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Transportation & Distribution (2022)
Переглядів 1,3 тис.7 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Transportation & Distribution (2022)
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Purchased Goods & Services and Capital Goods
Переглядів 1,9 тис.7 місяців тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Purchased Goods & Services and Capital Goods
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Accountability
Переглядів 6988 місяців тому
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Accountability
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Action
Переглядів 5988 місяців тому
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Action
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Ambition
Переглядів 1,1 тис.8 місяців тому
Creating Impactful Climate Transition Plans: Ambition
SDG Flag Campaign - UN Global Compact Network UK
Переглядів 33111 місяців тому
SDG Flag Campaign - UN Global Compact Network UK
Measuring Up on Climate: Reflections on COP27 (2022)
Переглядів 119Рік тому
Measuring Up on Climate: Reflections on COP27 (2022)
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Business Travel
Переглядів 2,1 тис.2 роки тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Business Travel
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Employee Commuting and Homeworking (2022)
Переглядів 3 тис.2 роки тому
Reducing Scope 3 Emissions: Employee Commuting and Homeworking (2022)
Children's Rights in Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence
Переглядів 2133 роки тому
Children's Rights in Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence
Kick-off: UK-Norway Sustainable Finace Action Platform
Переглядів 1373 роки тому
Kick-off: UK-Norway Sustainable Finace Action Platform

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 25 днів тому

    It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 4 місяці тому

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 4 місяці тому

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 4 місяці тому

    This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @jeancollins8578
    @jeancollins8578 6 місяців тому

    *Promo SM*

  • @chrisgale5634
    @chrisgale5634 7 місяців тому

    Very interesting discussion 👍 😊

  • @DavidDavida
    @DavidDavida 7 місяців тому

    Saying hello From #CampSerenity ~ GardenCity..

  • @ranjanmishra4441
    @ranjanmishra4441 7 місяців тому

    ua-cam.com/video/Yyg9Y3m23HM/v-deo.htmlsi=rGttIDIJz9dmFAp2

  • @chadcollier6964
    @chadcollier6964 7 місяців тому

    *promosm*

  • @valevalientevalita
    @valevalientevalita Рік тому

    So, there are ENOUGH materials under the ground to achieve a 100% energy transition but there is not enough infrastructure yet to obtain it ........ Should we aim to this? Circular economy means reducing extracting materias, this means not only fossil fuels, but minerales too. A 100% renewable energy transition will not be a CIRCULAR ENERGY TRANSITION. For circularity we need to insist on energy efficiency, heat pumps, modern nuclear with uranium recycling, reduce our energy intensity (user's behaviour, economy behaviour)

  • @sarakabdana4085
    @sarakabdana4085 Рік тому

    Interesting but please work on voice annoying sometimes

  • @maruharsh1
    @maruharsh1 2 роки тому

    thank you for informative session

  • @letiteca
    @letiteca 2 роки тому

    Hi, where can I find the slides with the links to the resources websites? Thanks

  • @Laughy-Flaaffy
    @Laughy-Flaaffy 2 роки тому

    Woke garbage

  • @thebrutaltooth1506
    @thebrutaltooth1506 2 роки тому

    interesting

  • @jonlaban4272
    @jonlaban4272 3 роки тому

    90% are Scope3 GHG emissions

  • @jonlaban4272
    @jonlaban4272 3 роки тому

    Scope3 GHG emissions are 87%

  • @erickasimonewat
    @erickasimonewat 3 роки тому

    I wonder why only few ppl know about this? @CNN why no coverage?

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    There is a lot of really helpful information in this webinar. Opeyemi gave a great suggestion of hosting an event for your company and bringing in successful black women in tech to talk about what they are doing - making a space where black talent can come, interact with the organisation and become way to recruit more diverse talent. She also made the good point that no matter how small your organisation is, it is everyone's responsibility to be intentional and find ways to create opportunities. Hannah's point of replicating what has been done with gender is also really important. She also addressed key issues such as using the lack of data as an excuse to make change, and black people feeling the need to defend themselves in the workplace due to poor culture/ stereotypes.

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    This webinar was really useful and touched on many points such as mentorship vs. sponsorship schemes, role models, the term "BAME", culture, data, responsibilities of white employees, and micro-aggressions. Thank you Marcia, Dennis, Naomi and Warren for your thoughtful points and knowledge.

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this webinar! Cynthia provides really useful ways of how to move forward and explained that black talent IS out there and the right ways to recruit black talent, and how to create an environment that is actually welcoming. Do not put the impetus on your black employees to drive change. "It is not about lowering the bar, it's about widening the gate so talent can come through." Thanks very much Cynthia for providing concrete actions employers can take in order to improve the recruitment process.

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    Great webinar. Sandra's simple point of just asking your colleagues what they want to be called might seem obvious but is probably often overlooked and really important. I took away that first it's really important to be comfortable having conversations about race in your work environment and identify what the motivation would be to doing deeper training. Also Russell's point about including lived experiences in trainings stood out to me - that helps to open people's eyes. It was also really useful to hear Emma's plan behind collecting data and acting on it. There was so many important points included in this - thank you all for contributing.

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much for this incredibly useful webinar series. I really appreciate Keji, Chris and Orion who took the courage to share their experiences. Lola the Baroness of Young Hornsey made many good points, particularly that stereotypes feed into everything we think and we do. Jo also did an excellent job of moderating. Not taking action absolutely means apathy.

  • @amandaweilenmann
    @amandaweilenmann 3 роки тому

    Really great webinar, thank you so much to everyone who contributed. I especially like the point from Samuel Okafor about the culture in how you deliver your targets being key. Without the right culture your targets will be pointless. Thank you.

  • @mk5435
    @mk5435 3 роки тому

    Very Impressive presentation

  • @someguy3176
    @someguy3176 3 роки тому

    So I guess this is how you prove that your company kneels. Cowards.

  • @ikkaidoinclusion-empowerme5146
    @ikkaidoinclusion-empowerme5146 4 роки тому

    Sorry I couldn't make it and thank you so much for putting this online