- 14
- 428 849
LSATAdapt
United States
Приєднався 5 сер 2021
Welcome to the LSATAdapt UA-cam channel - your go-to source for top-notch LSAT prep! Our goal is to provide you with free, practical resources that will help you ace the LSAT and reach a 99th percentile score. Our video lessons break down each question type and reasoning structure, offering clear strategies and actionable advice you can use on test day.
Stay up to date with our new content by subscribing to our channel, and for an even more in-depth study experience, sign up for our course at LSATAdapt.com. With our course, you'll have access to our full library of lessons, analytics, and detailed feedback as you work through real LSAT problems. So why wait? Sign up today and take your LSAT prep to the next level with LSATAdapt!
Stay up to date with our new content by subscribing to our channel, and for an even more in-depth study experience, sign up for our course at LSATAdapt.com. With our course, you'll have access to our full library of lessons, analytics, and detailed feedback as you work through real LSAT problems. So why wait? Sign up today and take your LSAT prep to the next level with LSATAdapt!
Sufficient Assumption | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Sufficient Assumption questions are a large part of the Assumption family. They make up approximately 6 percent of questions in Logical Reasoning, but they test major concepts within LR and RC: sufficiency vs. necessity, validity, breaking arguments down into constituent parts etc.
In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by examining what we are looking for in SA questions, assumptions as a concept, the difference between linking and defending assumptions, the negation test, and then moved into some practice questions. This lesson is part of our LSAT Basics course, and is designed to be worked with the rest of the chapter.
Ignite Prep provides you with the most efficient, most advanced and up to date approach to getting a 99th percentile score on the LSAT. By combining decades of combined experience, along with advanced analytics we provide you with a daily structure, to bring organization and remove stress from your studying.
Get started with our free trial today:
www.igniteprep.com
Subscribe for more FREE LSAT Resources
If you have a question on this lesson, leave a comment and one of our tutors will respond to vou.
In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by examining what we are looking for in SA questions, assumptions as a concept, the difference between linking and defending assumptions, the negation test, and then moved into some practice questions. This lesson is part of our LSAT Basics course, and is designed to be worked with the rest of the chapter.
Ignite Prep provides you with the most efficient, most advanced and up to date approach to getting a 99th percentile score on the LSAT. By combining decades of combined experience, along with advanced analytics we provide you with a daily structure, to bring organization and remove stress from your studying.
Get started with our free trial today:
www.igniteprep.com
Subscribe for more FREE LSAT Resources
If you have a question on this lesson, leave a comment and one of our tutors will respond to vou.
Переглядів: 7 800
Відео
Necessary Assumption LSAT Logical Reasoning
Переглядів 14 тис.2 роки тому
Necessary Assumption questions are the head of the Assumption family. They make up approximately 10 percent of questions in Logical Reasoning, but they have a major impact in Strengthen, Weaken, and Flaw questions. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by examining what we are looking for in NA questions, assumptions as a concept, the difference between linki...
Intro to RC
Переглядів 30 тис.2 роки тому
In this LSAT Reading Comprehension Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by learning about the section as a whole, the timing. Start your LSAT Reading Comprehension studying here! This lesson is part of our LSAT Basics course, and is designed to be worked with the rest of the chapter. Ignite Prep provides you with the most efficient, most advanced and up to date approach to getting a 99th ...
Welcome to our Channel
Переглядів 9 тис.3 роки тому
Welcome to the Ignite Prep LSAT UA-cam channel. The goal of this channel is to provide free resources for those studying for the LSAT. Our videos focusing on giving you realistic, practical strategies that you can use to get a 99th percentile score. Most of our lessons are trial versions of those found on our site. They break each question type or reasoning structure, show you a strategy and ho...
Must be True | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 39 тис.3 роки тому
Must be True questions are the first of the question types we're going to cover in LR. They only make up 4% of Logical Reasoning questions, but they teach you many foundational skills necessary to do well in Logical Reasoning. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by examining the the concepts of validity, conditional logic, comparisons, causations etc. This ...
Intro to LR | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 30 тис.3 роки тому
In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by learning about the section as a whole, the timing. Start your LSAT Logical Reasoning studying here! This lesson is part of our LSAT Basics course, and is designed to be worked with the rest of the chapter. Ignite Prep provides you with the most efficient, most advanced and up to date approach to getting a 99th percenti...
Grammar | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 36 тис.3 роки тому
Grammar is a foundational concept on the LSAT. A lot of the time when you're reading a stimulus or a passage and you have no idea what you just read, grammar was what tripped you up. A mastery of Grammar will make your life so much easier across every single section on this test. In this LSAT Foundational Basics lesson we go through all the tools you need to start tackling that difficult gramma...
Identify the Conclusion | LSAT Logical Reasoning Question Types
Переглядів 14 тис.3 роки тому
Identify the Conclusion is a the most basic of Logical Reasoning Questions that we're gonna go through in this course. It tests a concept that you start learning in the 5th grade: What is my conclusion? Even though it's a basic question type, it's testing a concept that is super important for mastering the assumption family question types. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Question types lesson we...
Causal Reasoning | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 54 тис.3 роки тому
Causation is a major reasoning structure that is found in the two largest question types in Logical Reasoning: Weaken and Flaw. They’re typically difficult for most people because the LSAT tests causation differently from how it is used in day to day life . In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we go through how to recognize causation, different causation patterns, and then go through so...
Arguments Lesson | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 31 тис.3 роки тому
Arguments are the bread to the LSAT’s sandwich. A solid understanding of how arguments are tested is necessary to score above 160, and recognizing and utilizing different argument forms is necessary if you want to be a lawyer. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we start our journey into LR by examining the structure of stimuli and defining conclusion, premise and reasoning. This lesso...
Existential Quantifiers | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 32 тис.3 роки тому
Existential Quantifiers are the one of the most overlooked basic skills on the entire LSAT. They dictate the terms of relative and absolute arguments and are absolutely necessary to master if you want to be a 99th percentile scorer. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we go through all of the existential quantifiers you need to know, teach you how to use them practically and then apply...
Validity | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 19 тис.3 роки тому
Validity is a concept covered heavily in all three sections of the LSAT. Any question that involves a Sufficient Assumption, Must be True, or Most Strongly Supported is dealing with Validity. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we'll give you everything you need to master the concept of Validity and start gaining points. Ignite Prep provides you with the most efficient, most advanced a...
Universal Quantifiers | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 27 тис.3 роки тому
Universal Quantifiers are the bread and butter of Conditional Logic which is found throughout the LSAT. They tell you how to structure out your sufficient and necessary conditions, and make contrapositives so much easier. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we go through all four groups of Universal Quantifiers and give you what you need to start mastering Conditional Logic. This lesso...
Conditional Logic | LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics
Переглядів 87 тис.3 роки тому
Conditional Logic is found on about 20% of your Logical Reasoning Section, and dominates Logic Games. Mastery of sufficient and necessary conditions, contrapositives, and formal logic will jump start your score. In this LSAT Logical Reasoning Basics lesson we go through all the tools you need to start mastering Conditional Logic. This lesson is part of our LSAT Basics course, and is designed to...
Thank you for this : )
this is helping me with MBT. thank you
GAME CHANGER!
oh yea, ive been looking for info like this
terse. precise and helpful
helpful content !!! thank you
I understand the example but can't help my skepticism of the example given because my car is push-start; therefore, the keys aren't in the ignition while I drive.
impossible to enroll in your course. impossible. what and where do we enroll? The lsatadapt takes me to a page that is " not safe" an my computer does not allow me to proceed.
brilliant. I'd like to ask if your course has only LR and RC. Thanks
i was not able to enroll in the course. it's not available.
Amazing
Excellent
where is the practice you've mentioned in the video?
Correct me if I'm wrong, I recall you saying 'the only' is a necessary condition indicator whereas this video states it's a direct sufficient condition indicator. Whether 'the only' is nec. condition or suff. condition, is that situational?
Thank you SO much for this video. Very clear and helpful
so helpful, thanks man !
thank you for this going to law school as a speech pathologist to help out in areas that have been in my life with huge influence with a big need. thank you
THIS IS SO HELPFUL THANK YOU!!!
I have been struggling with necessary assumptions for 3 weeks and found your video! This helped so much!!!!
Love from India ❤
Hi this is an urgent question! At 12:22, you mention that the negation of 'none' can include 'some', 'most' and 'all'. Why can't it include many? Many is subjective, but it's still more than 'none' so would that not also be the negated form of 'none' ? Also, when tackling a question that requires you to negate 'none', would you negate none in all of its forms? How would that work?
🎊 p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶m̶
Thanks very much.
This helped a lot!
These videos have been so helpful thank you!
At 5:00 you said all implies most, most implies many, many implies some and that you can’t go up the ladder. But then at 8:39 you said some implies most ? Please elaborate
Hi Jen! Definitely a confusing topic. At that point in the video (8:39) I'm actually trying to explain why you can't go from some to most to all on the ladder chain. This is mostly gonna show up in questions that deal heavily with structure like Parallel Flaw questions where the conclusion is based on some kind of overlap between groups. Just to clarify I thought I'd do a little breakdown of these: I have 'All' implying both 'Most' (51-100%) and Some (1-100%). That's because 'All' is encompassing. Most can imply Some, but not in reverse. When we say most, we mean that the amount is going to be at least 51% and at most 100%, and anywhere in between (I.e. 55, 73 etc). So Most will always fall in the range of Some (1-100%). The only thing that doesn't fall in the range of Some is 'none'. But going in reverse, Some cannot imply Most because we would have to make the assumption that whatever the amount Some is would be at least 51%. Which is not true. I hope this helps, and good luck with your studying, Alex
@@LSATAdapt You said Most at 3:10 is 51% to 99% now your saying it is 51% to 100% - Plus doesn't most leave room for the some that isn't ??? Which is why we stop at 99% because some would be the remaining 1% if that.