Відео

So you decided to start in the mountains of Ararat in western Turkey? Call them Noah and Fam (8 people). Adam and Eve started in the garden of 4 rivers....

You got a 5 man bro?

whip? nae nae

Yeah, that's his passive.

Everything

Love the series, I had seen the movie years before and I definitely liked it UNTIL I read the books I really loved the magic system and how its basically self contained with "well if you just cast a spell without knowing what your opponent is up to you might fall for a trap they set. Gotta read their minds first"

For me Eragorn was one of those perfect mistakes imo. Everything about the trailer as someone who didn't read the books seemed a sign to not watch it meanwhile of you read the books you'd probably get excited aside from some of the choices then see it and hate what they did to the story.

It was adapted TOO LOOSELY... Way too loosely... I actually watched the movie BEFORE I read the books... and they kinda RIPPED THE STORY TO SHREDS to make the movie. It really was missing a LOT that needed to be there, to BUILD on... But all in all, the movie was a good "stand alone dragon movie", I do wish they would have made a sequel.

Dang, its been way too long since ive read these lmao

so i enjoy the movie but that is only because unlike many other adaptation i was able to separate the movie from the books in my mind and enjoy it as if it was its own thing... which to be fair the shorter list make is what ISN'T the same so maybe that is why.

Thanks for the video! I always thought it was a shame that the chance to have the saga adapted died with the first movie, bc the book had great potential to become a classic even with its own issues

Great video, thanks for sharing :)

Out of mana! Out of mana! Out of mana!

I feel like voice chat would cool down a lot of the toxicity. It's a very tilting kind of game but often it's because you had bad coms. For example, "attack fangtooth" doesn't explain that the enemy are on it or that the enemy have backed/died. If someone throws up. "negative" with no explanation, it can be infuriating.

I always thought the book was for queers too

Cool video, thanks man!

#5 yeah people picking bad characters for their roles lately. I was recently Support, I thankfully noticed our carry picked argus, so I picked Murdock in the last few seconds.

Man serath did not need a nerf. She already struggles in the early game laneing phase in offlane

They buffed crunches left crunch and nerfed both of his other crunches. And buffed the mana cost of right crunch. More reliant on left crunch dmg and basics.

Does anyone know of a discord where I can find people to play rank with?

Narbash getting the most unnecessary nerfs every 💀

Grey is not broken losses the one on one every time and get killed to cc every time

thats insane lmao 😂

I´m a historical player and I would be open to Star Wars or Elder Scrolls fantasy TW. But I don´t get the appeal of Warhammer at all. I bet it wasn´t their first choice.

Nigga this is just hide and seek with this prop

Coulda just done that from the beginning by laying him back while holding his legs so his knee caps wouldn’t catch

Props should be slower, but hunters should only have bolt actions

Bro that is fucking hilarious lmfao I have to hop on prop hunt.

I think you've hit the nail on the head. CA's kind of painted themselves into a corner by effectively splitting their (already quite niche) playerbase between fantasy and historical. Ever since Warhammer came out every historical release (ThroB, Troy, 3K, and Pharaoh) has been underwhelming at best. They don't seem to understand that dumbing down the core mechanics (which works for a fantasy game with like 50+ different factions each with their own unique mechanics) largely turns off the historical playerbase who like super in-depth, gritty, and realistic mechanics, and the historical settings they've been using lately just haven't been interesting enough (or well executed enough) to pull people away from Warhammer Fantasy games. I love both kinds of games (leaning more toward fantasy) and I haven't fully enjoyed a historical TW since Rome 2 so it's been sad to see them fall off so sharply. Theoretically I should've loved ThroB because I love the setting but it was so broken and the mechanics were so unengaging. Troy outright made me stop buying CA historical titles. Conversely so much love and passion has been put into the Warhammer series, and I don't think it's entirely corporate greed that's driving it. Rumour has it that they're working on a WW1 game which will act as a test bed for a 40K game, which is great news, IF they can pull it off. But that's in danger of suffering from the same problem - either the WW1 game will be too dumbed down, or the 40K game will be too complicated. Hope they can do both well. 40K is likely to be an absolute cash cow - and a gateway drug for a lot of players into TW games - for them if they execute it well since it's orders of magnitude more popular than WHF.

Dude ,this game was epic and nobody know this game and I dont know why.

I think for me one of the things I really hate about new games is the garrison system and your inability to split troops off of a generals army to have them ride off by themselves

After playing Bannerlords... total war Is dead. All The Mount and blade devs need to do is a ps5/x box and pc co-op campaign in a historical or lotr setting.. and they win forever.

If you ask me, Total war wants to be 2 things at once, Fantasy does great, even better than any historical game, therefore they will focus on them, The games are doing good, have a good playerbase and with another good ID pull it will be even better, If you ask me the age of "hystorical" games is over

My biggest complaint about newer Total war games is that you no longer have bodyguards guarding your general. Instead, your general is a demigod who doesn't even need an army

it dropped off after shogun 2 good morning, welcome to the real world

Yeah Attila was the peak, it was all downhill from there.

agree the new games are to arcadey and fast paced, shogun was perfect

I'll summarize this 33 minutes video in one sentence: Everyone cheats and companies refuse to develop anti-cheats because it would make the vast majority of cheaters quit and never come back.

Big yes on the first one. I don't think a mana potion would devalue the river buffs either

I doubt you're playing against the 1000 hrs players all the time in Apex. I have more hours than some of these people I see in Apex and I quit for two years. People are just that good, if you even call that good by the standards. Apex is just the kind of game where people are looking to kill half the lobby. That's what casual looks like in that game.

I don't play multiplayer games anymore because of them issues in a few years now

I’ve been using Stasis when playing Kwang offlane against Shinbi. Any thoughts on it?

Ur 100percent correct🎉

1 and 2 are garbage takes that have minimum thought put into them. 3, 4, and 5 require a larger player base and would be nice to see. Atleast you dodged instead afk'ing. Afkers deserve to be smited by someone's god

these games suck compared to alien, which they're making a new one

Maybe SBMM with like 2-3 broad categories (with feathering on the edges of each category), where the top 50% plays against each other and the bottom 50% plays against each other. Instead of really tight categories we put the super noobs with the noobs, casuals and above average casuals in the bottom 50%, where every lobby still has a mix of everything within that bottom 50% And on the other hand, put the top 50% in another category with everything from pretty good to the absolute top ballers.

Getting rid of SBMM will fix them lmao. The games feel sweaty because you’re always playing against clones of yourself every game. There is no variance to lobbies. AT ALL.

My opinions on yours; #2 would make games a lot longer as well, that isn't a good addition I don't think. #3 Agreed, like smite, have a pre-set prefered role. #4 After 2 games, I'd wait for 5/10 mins before matching to hopefully stop it happening. The game really does need more players, if it took off in terms of numbers this game could be great. The extra money and development would be awesome for it.

it sounds like maybe you just aren't that good at shooters, which a lot of people aren't. i am 45 and play a decent amount. I absolutely wipe the floor with kids left and right. if people are cheating in games, i havent really seen it much. when i play apex, i normally get 1-2 wins a day, sometimes more. rarely will i not get a win. in cod, my k/d is about 1.5. i am on controller. ps5 for apex, xbox for cod.

the whole sweaty thing doesnt seem valid because players will always try to play their best.