Відео

@@DarkTapes Thank you!

No. Is an audio mixer. TC Helicon.

@@adsrsynth Ahh nice.👌

Thank you. The MC707 sounds great. It can be a bit hard to make good sounds but with patience you can make a lot. B the way, your setup is great too.

Thank you very much. Glad if you can find motivation for use it.

The mixer internal is for their eight channels, yes.

If i use DAW do i benefit from MC 707 in any way?@@adsrsynth

@Chris-vc1dh it's depends what you want. But you can sequence with daw (the steps per tracks have no limits as in MC707, or you can add plugin sounds. Personally I prefer a dawless setup

@@adsrsynth in dawless how do you record and mix and master?

@Chris-vc1dh I have an external mixer focusrite and a digital recorder tascam, so each sound channel is going to mixer and from it to digital recorder.

Thank you so much Rich. I haven't words. About midi, in thos video I don't use midi between both synths.. wavestate has here a sequence with latch, and hydrasynth is playing in live. I never connected both synths, but I have used keystep pro, MPC One, Deluge or MC707 sending midi to wavestate and never I had problems. I would say you, try to find all cc that hydrasynth is sending because it seems that some of CC is changing pitch or decimal or something like this. Be free to say me if you don't find anything and I can test between both synths

What do you mean? Mc707 is synchronised by Midi as master. Then, I have a mixer where all devices are sending sound.

In fact, it is not like this. I forgot keystep pro in this track. KS is sending midi, and MC707 only has clock. This 3 channel in MC707 are sequenced internally.

Thank you

Thank you. I'm glad that you like it

Hello. Thank you for your comments. I appreciate them and I'll pay attention next tracks.

Thank you

Thank you!

Thank you for your words mate. I love playing music and sharing my music, feelings a my humble knowledge with other people. About your doubts I understand them. You always will find in all devices the lack of some feature (sequencer, effects, modulation routes...) and of course I agree that roland sh 4d must improve and can improve. All depends if Roland want to take care about their products or they only want sell more nada more. What I feel with roland sh4d is that is very funny and in spite of some needed improvements you can use very easy and sounds great. MC707 for example is more capable, but making sounds here is a pain for my opinion. You must dig too much for obtain what you want. In Sh4d is more immediate.

About other hardware yes, I have others grooveboxes, and synths. Roland sh4d is for me in the middle of one synth and one groovebox. The sound that you can obtain is not so powerful as you can obtain with hydrasynth for example. The effects are OK, but is not a reverb like a novation peak for example. I think that roland sd4h is very balanced. But you can find opinions from people that don't like this device..

@@adsrsynth appreciate your reply! Yes I currently have a peak (my fave) and a Hydrasynth that i got recently. Didn't like the hydra on my first play (the tone didn't wow me) but there's lots of time to get into that in the future. Sh4d makes me wanna have something I can really have on me a lot and design as opposed to say, grooving. I also just love the way it looks. The colored LEDs, the knobs, the black paint job. It's gorgeous I appreciate reading all your replies and I hope to see more videos pop up on this synth soon but it's not looking super popular in the synth world right now from what I have seen

@Danny Molns give you time with hydrasynth... is very powerful synth, believe me!. About sh4d, some synthesis motors are powerful. The possibility to draw the wave is amazing. The sh4d motor with 4 oscillators... I think that you will enjoy it if you buy it. And the possibility to use it with batteries is really great for me, but the taste with sounds is something very personal. Yo must decide bro. Yes I want to upload some vid with this early

@@adsrsynth appreciate your words again. Yes the drawing really intrigues me! I think that is super forward thinking and well done by Roland! I'll encourage more videos from you on this synth, as you are able! Not even just for me but I know there's gotta be other people feeling the same way. All there is mostly are intial review etc on it - no sound design, hardly any jams etc So you are really helping us. Thank you

Thank you!

Thank you!

Thank you Carlos. I'm trying to improve the miércoles, because I'm not very glad with the result. I hope that next videos will sound better.

Thank you very much.

Thank you Carlos

Thanks!

Hi JaBig. Mmmm, maybe. But the workflow is different, because in electribe you can mute unmute some parts. Here is for track

Thank you Sam.

👏👏👏👏👏🤩👍

Many thanks! This is the page:track in the song Mode. You have 8 pages with 16 tracks for page, so you can create up to 128 tracks. In song mode, you can jump from one track to another for make a entire song

@@adsrsynth Wow, that is great! Somewhere I heard there was NO Song mode but that is exactly what I want to do... I guess the tracks can be in any order you press... they don't have to be in numerical order? Thank you very much!

@Valdis Krebs This mode allows you to play tracks in the order that you press. so yes, you can use it in this way.

The machine does not have a song mode and will never get one. The numbers on the screen indicate the selected and next pattern in terms of bankID:patternID. The machine therefore has storage for 128 (totally independent) pattern. That‘s all. A song mode would allow you to create a list of pattern to play and other parameters in advance. Anyway: excellent song/performance. Very contemplative. Please, more videos like that. :-)

@@Beatprisoner So, we can play a song by choosing the next bank/pattern ID in a performance... we just can't record it ahead of time... right?

Thanks Mike. I'm sure that you will enjoy this machine.

Many thanks!

Thanks. Yes is a powerful and most of all, funny "toy"

Thank you!

I think that is very interesting synth. You can read my answer in another comment. Taste for one synth or groovebox is something very personal. But what I can say is that this synth help me with inspiration more than others.

Thank you!

Thanks. Interesting question. I think that SH 4D has several things that make it great machine. First of all, and for me very important is the portability. You can play with it for hours with batteries. This give me much freedom for use it everywhere. Second is the workflow. You don't need press more of two buttons for access to all options. With all these knobs you can change everything. (For my opinion still needs some updates, like metronome, count in, can load your own wavetables, length for notes in sequence (you cannot put the length for duration). So, if you want to play one note or chord and the duration is more of one step, the synth refill as much steps as you press. The sound tie each step so you don't listen nothing strange, and it sound like only one long note but is not usual for me. And another thing important, you cannot save the project entirely, you must to save each part separately, tones,patterns...and is a little pain for me opinion). I hope Roland listen the community and can make some interesting and important upgrades. Is not a big machine, but even with this size you have keyboard (buttons) for play. 2 octaves, so is another plus very interesting and useful. Modulation matrix is not so powerful like novation peak or hydrasynth for example, but with so many font options I think that you can generate a lot of sounds. Effects are decent, and for example shimmer reverb well configured can be amazing reverb (I will try to upload one video with this). Maybe peak has best effects, but as I say you, enough if you use them well. Roland SH 4D has not entire zen core, but the variety is big. For me this synth is like Roland JD XI but muuuch more powerful. I hope that my comments can be helpful for you.

@@joanmarval I did enjoy your elaborate answer!

@@pureeschaapThank you. A pleasure!. by the way. I must correct myself... you can define the length of one note pressing the step that you want modify and press as times as steps you can make long with page/tie button as much as you need.

Thank you. You will enjoy it!

Thank you!

Thanks!

Привет Максим!. Конечно!. Really peak has 8 voices, but what you are listening here is the same sound but in different octaves. With this, you can find the wave of lower sound like more... long (even seems with more attack but is only for this soundwave). And then, with the higher sound, you can listen more short and seem two different sounds. You can use this trick for multiply possibilities.

thinking of doing the same 😊

Большое спасибо Сергей. Я думаю, что эта машина очень забавная.

@@joanmarval ,купил себе такую,в ожидании доставки

@@spyka очень хорошо. Тебе понравится её использовать.

Thank you Laird. The sound is Retro choir pad. Playing with filter, effects, attack and release.

@@adsrsynth, You're welcome. :) Thank you for your reply! This choir sound is totally addictive!

Thqnk you very much Tibor. The truw is that MC707 is very funny

Thank you Rick.

Thanks!

Thank you man

Hi Vincent. Thanks. Yes all sounds are from MC707. In fact they are standard sounds. I mean, no change in oscillators, only change filter, attack delay, effects and not much more. The first sound is Retro choir pads. With long attack, long delay, and cutoff low pass bit not much with a bit of resonance

@vincentfinch9522 FYI both the 101 and 707 have something like over 3000 presets! All the classic Roland synth, bass and drum machines…