Відео

They didn't force convert Hindus

@@zaynkhan3431 200m dead Hindu's ofcourse they didn't convert cause your converted ancestors were killing them

brown hands wrote this

wasnt sayyid deecedent of mohammed how can it be native?

@@Dheeraj-y4f The Sayyida Dynasty is Native to India but Arabized

Rana hamir son also captured firoz Shah tuglak

​@@SanketSingh-s1c Lol

The borders of the region of bengal back was not the same as now

@@sadmanrakin sir, here bengal is shown west beyound koshi which is wrong

Yes Bengal was West of kosi, that's Seemanchal area of Bihar was in Bengal . One sultan Haji ilyas reached gandak river. Tirhut was not part of Delhi sultanate. It suffered some invasion by sultan of Delhi and Bengal. Only got conqured by Akbar rule

@@kumarankiteshwar9716 lol stop saying seemanchal Akbar only had it as a suzerain state

bro can you pleaset tell me the music name

@@insaneanwarff9475 check discription

It was a culturally persian empire ruled by people of turkic origin based in India.

@@hopeundertheblacksun Not true. It was an Indo persian empire. Aside from Farsi language, the culture was more north Indian than persian. Especially after the development of urdu and during Aurangzeb Alamgir's rule

@@musabahmed9094 Urdu developed in the late 18th century

@@hopeundertheblacksun Tell me you know nothing about Urdu. There's a rich tradition of Rekhta poetry from 12th century

@@musabahmed9094 I'm interested. Literally every scholar today believes that modern urdu developed in the late 18th century from various tongues like khadi boli brij bhasha and Persian influence

@shah_abbas_of_iran69 no bro Ghaznavids 🇺🇿 Ghurids 🇦🇫 Khalji 🇺🇿🇦🇫 Suri 🇦🇫🇧🇩 Mughal 🇺🇿 Mughals did not speak Mongolian but Chagatai Turkic, how can they be Mongolians. The ancestors of the Timurid family came from the Barlas, a Mongol clan, but the Timurids had long been Turkicized.

@@theheroickhan nah bruh u really saying mughal were spoke chagatai bro😭😭mughal offical language was persian who cause by shah babur from barlas tribe which his language was persian and by conquering southern india he bring huge loyalty to persian language in india, even many mughal kings namss were iranian origin such as babur, araungzeb, shah jahan and many others who had iranian roots mix. Official Histories: The Mughals commissioned the writing of official histories, such as the "Tarikh-i-Firishta" and the "Akbarnama," which were written in Persian. These chronicles provide valuable insights into Mughal history, politics, and culture. Personal Memoirs: Many Mughal rulers, including Babur and Jahangir, wrote personal memoirs in Persian, offering firsthand accounts of their lives and experiences. Many of the Mughal rulers themselves were fluent in Persian and patronized Persian poets and scholars. Persian literature flourished under Mughal rule, with famous poets like Amir Khusro and Hafiz being celebrated in the empire. even though mughal peoples and rulers believed that persian language was a language that whoever whose dominant on it have a higher position than other peoples. but yea they also had a wee amount of chagatai speakers population same as hindi, urdu and arabic, but they never bring it as official language.

@@theheroickhan Ghaznavid was afghan: Geographic Origin: * Ghazni as the Capital: The dynasty's name is derived from the city of Ghazni, located in modern-day Afghanistan. This city served as their capital for centuries, solidifying their connection to the region. Afghan Territories: The Ghaznavid Empire encompassed significant portions of Afghanistan, including the historical regions of Khorasan and Balkh. Cultural and Linguistic Influences: * Persianate Culture: While the Ghaznavids who were turk at first, they adopted Persian culture, language, and customs. This cultural assimilation reflects their close interaction and integration with the Afghan population. same as some others such as seljuk, timurid or khawrazmenid who later adopted persian culture. * Afghan Scholars and Artists: Many renowned Afghan scholars, poets, and artists flourished under Ghaznavid patronage, further strengthening their ties to the region. Historical Accounts: * Persian Chronicles: Persian chronicles, such as those by Al-Biruni and Ibn Battuta, often refer to the Ghaznavids as rulers of Afghanistan and the surrounding regions. * Afghan Oral Traditions: Afghan oral traditions and folklore often mention the Ghaznavids as part of their historical heritage. Genetic Studies: * Recent genetic research has shown that modern Afghan populations exhibit a significant genetic admixture with Central Asian population. This suggests that the Ghaznavids likely intermarried with local Afghan populations, contributing to their cultural and genetic integration But i completely agrees with the fact that ghaznavids also had some turkic roots, but yea like what i said they got persinazed after conquering parts of iran and adopting persian culture.

@@theheroickhan Mughal had some mongol roots: Genealogy: * Descendants of Genghis Khan: The Mughal dynasty's founder, Babur, traced his lineage back to Genghis Khan through his mother. This connection is a significant factor in the "Mughal-Mongol" association. Timurid Heritage: Babur also belonged to the Timurid dynasty, which was itself a descendant of Genghis Khan

@@theheroickhanGhaznavids were afghan: Geographic Origin: * Ghazni as the Capital: The dynasty's name is derived from the city of Ghazni, located in modern-day Afghanistan. This city served as their capital for centuries, solidifying their connection to the region. Afghan Territories: The Ghaznavid Empire encompassed significant portions of Afghanistan, including the historical regions of Khorasan and Balkh. Cultural and Linguistic Influences: * Persianate Culture: While the Ghaznavids who were turk at first, they adopted Persian culture, language, and customs. This cultural assimilation reflects their close interaction and integration with the Afghan population. same as some others such as seljuk, timurid or khawrazmenid who later adopted persian culture. * Afghan Scholars and Artists: Many renowned Afghan scholars, poets, and artists flourished under Ghaznavid patronage, further strengthening their ties to the region. Historical Accounts: * Persian Chronicles: Persian chronicles, such as those by Al-Biruni and Ibn Battuta, often refer to the Ghaznavids as rulers of Afghanistan and the surrounding regions. * Afghan Oral Traditions: Afghan oral traditions and folklore often mention the Ghaznavids as part of their historical heritage. Genetic Studies: * Recent genetic research has shown that modern Afghan populations exhibit a significant genetic admixture with Central Asian population. This suggests that the Ghaznavids likely intermarried with local Afghan populations, contributing to their cultural and genetic integration i completely agrees with the fact that ghaznavids were turk at first and by conquering parts of plateau of iran they adopted persian culture and got persinazed.

But the conquerors never cared they were turks,mongols etc they cared that they were muslims and ruled india using the "sharia" so it doesnt matter to be convert or not

​@@meme-e-lama and sharia is basically forced conversion and the cycle repeats

Proud of genocidal empires? Come say that in Punjab and see if you'll come out good. We will never forget the atrocities our ancestors had to endure.

​@@Naman0309Are you mad? Every person has a right to worry about themselves and everyone makes mistakes. We are all humans. Tell me what good work is BJP doing?😂

@@DEEP_THINKING_666 Why you obsessed with BJP? Did i even mention it? The fact that the Mughal empire slaughtered the native Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs is the truth and cant be changed. Its not even a mistake, they did it while putting all of their efforts, and seeing converts praising them is disturbing.

@@Naman0309 😂😂You are good at lying, it doesn't matter, it is in your nature, like you lie these days, APJ Abdul Kalam was a terrorist, Narasim Anand Saraswati

@@Naman0309 Though the Emperor's household troops (those under the direct command of the Emperor) remained small, the total size of the Mughal Army by the time of Akbar's death had swelled to about hindu soldiers 300,000 professional soldiers, which could be padded up to 900,000 by ranks of conscripts Go and check on Google andbhakt

Nice name

where women are not safe

@@syedzameer8022 Women are not safe anywhere, none is truly safe actually. Improvements could be made but I'm grateful for India. If not for our republic our condition might have been same as Pakistan…

@@PropioniBacteriumShermanii India is one of the corruption in the world. what democratic? that doesn't exist

Democracy is gay

Okkkk

They never came to India, or got defeated by the Rajput Kings, as far as i know

​@@Naman0309lol who conquered sindh in 712 by defeating raja dahir😂

@@insaneanwarff9475 Oh, i see. Still the Arabs were blocked by Lalitaditya Muktapida, Yashovarman of Kannauj and Avanijanashraya Pulakeshin to continue conquering Rajasthan, Punjab and Gujrat.

​@@insaneanwarff9475 you dont even look arab or Turk , you sre 100% indian , act as if they were your saviours , arabs never entered india , never left a big mark except sindh , which only lasted for some times.

@@Naman0309 As far as I in Tafseer Ibn kathir it is mentioned that Arab Governor of Sindh Junayd had conquered everything till Malwa his victory did not last long how ever

please history of morocco

song name please❤

Why does every Muslim related mapping video summon millions of turks

Thanks for the info Greek❤

@@MuhammadThakur-si9ot no problem arab

@@theheroickhan is that an insult?

@@MuhammadThakur-si9ot You called me Greek...

Turks not control long time south India .😂 Thanks to Vijayanagara Empire.😎🚩

Afghans? wdym?

@@Geoguy678 lodi dynasty and many other empires were afghan and ruled india

​@@pakistanimapperrlodhi were a small dynasty and a weak dynasty

@@Neel354 ah my bad i keep mixing up the khiljis and lodis

@@pakistanimapperr yes I forget