Відео

Just like biblical and historical evidence proves that jesus and his apostles were vegatarians biblical and historical evidence also proves that the trinity, atonement, original sin and hell are very late misinterpretations and are not supported by the early creed hence its not a part of Christianity I pray that Allah swt revives Christianity both inside and out preserves and protects it and makes its massage be witnessed by all people but at the right moment, place and time The secred text of the Bible says ye shall know them by their fruits So too that I say to my christian brothers and sisters be fruitful and multiply Best regards from a Muslim ( line of ismail )

Sometimes vain repetition quietens the mind. Like the Lord have Mercy Christ have mercy..there is a time and place for all kinds of prayer. I love Richard Rohr he is a quality beautiful teacher. Humble and very encouraging. Thank you Richard.

If some people listen to something they are confused with, then listening to it a few times more, yes, even listening to Richard a few more times on the Rosary, then you might get it/see it/ understand what he was truly saying. Repetitious listening! 👂

Looks like she's wearing a sling with maybe a baby in it.

ua-cam.com/video/JoXG5Ws49hA/v-deo.html

Yep. You knew it all along, but needed to hear it to articulate it.

good heavens--heresy where? how? what?

It is deeper than you are able to grasp due to your dualistic thinking.

Fifi Trixiebelle while I admit there is a great deal of truth to Fr. Rohr's teachings, I struggle with the "non-dual" mind. I don't think the non-dual mind offers a sufficient explanation for the existence of evil, nor does it allow for the mind to grow/learn. How can the mind/human grow/learn from mistakes if it can't critique itself? Also, how can the human race deal with the evils of the world if we don't have a dualistic mind? For example, just because I have a non-dualistic mind, doesn't mean everyone else will. Murderers will still kill people. So how do we create a system that will prevent people from doing that without a dualistic mind? A non-dual thinker says, we can't judge, let only God judge. However, if we don't judge there is a high probability this individual will kill again. While I agree, that we need to tone down our dualistic minds and stop passing judgement in many ways in our lives, I don't think it's possible to abolish it. I'm not saying we need to perfectly define justice, but we need some sort of justice system to stop clear objectively true evils in the world. Once you say you need to define objective evil, you need a dual thinking mind to judge what is good, and what is evil. This is necessary to create a society in which heaven can be present on earth.

you are missing out something. you might need someoneelse to explain how god and evil are even possible and what it does. I only have german speeking philosophers-theologian to reference to. they disclose it conclusively. I don't know anyone in english. the question is how to deal with sipmle dualistic trap thinking - how to overcome it - that is when a change in awareness comes in. no one says it is easy. we are dealing with a 3 dimensional world. as this dimension is only one part of the truth about reality, it cannot be, that all answers are only to be find in the dualistic thinking. to bring it to live may be hard, but if no one starts or tries, there is no way out of our traps. you will never be able to deal with evil in a dualistic consciousness. and you cannot go out and tell people about a different view, if you never leave it. if it would have been easy, humanity would have progressed much faster. it is not. but who is to say, that it will never work? the one with the bi-polar arguments? I don't think so. sorry, that I cannot reference you to other people that can talk about this subject in a much better was and detailed.

now I remember, that the quantum physicist, Hans Peter Dürr (or Duerr in englisch?) may have given lectures or interviews in english. he died 2014. he did work with Heisenberg. later he gave a lot of lectures and wrote some books talking about the consequences for our look to the 'reality' etc. very interesting. I would recommend to look him up and maybe listen or read a few of his presentations, because in some he comes closer to the topic that is addressed here than in others. so if you didn't find anything for you, try two or three more. maybe some interviews too.

Yy