Відео

W. Believed that human brains have an ability to structure logically organized perception, starting with word formation. This is thereby translated into meaning we vainly call games, without knowing what the rules are and without ever being able to describe the rules.My dog who does not know human language, has a brain that processes fetching balls, but does not know word ball

Chapter 1-9 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN?!!!!

Gonzalez Betty Martin Amy Miller Jeffrey

Very helpful summary, thank you!

Williams Carol White Frank Brown Timothy

FLO is one of the strongest arguments. Also animalism isn't exactly needed, it's OKAY to use but it's not needed at all. FLO is successful and is stand alone.

Jackson Robert Moore Matthew Young Betty

Thank you so much for these videos!

ohh just realized the other one is 1-9. Woohoo 10-19.

Where did anyone get the idea that the judge of a disagreement has to be "above", i.e. more powerful than, the parties who are trying to settle the disagreement? Conflict is always and everywhere more costly than peaceful settlement, and the more so as the parties to a disagreement are more powerful. The more power a party has, the more they have to lose by conflict. So the more powerful a party is, the more they'll be inclined to favor peaceful means. On the other hand, the more power a judge has, the more they have the potential to further their own whims or interests at the expense of the parties. So it's in the interest of parties to have a judge be as weak as possible. And it's easier to commit to a process that's expected to be mutually beneficial than it is to commit to one that has a high likelihood of being detrimental to at least one party. Commitment is still difficult. But people can do it, because hominids who couldn't make credible commitments didn't survive long enough to become our ancestors.

A dog who knows astrophysics can have half a dozen walls a day.

this is so basic for me to ask but may I ask what are the symbols to the left of each important 'fundamental' law? is that a phi? or just your style to indicate a important concept

If we are holding people responsible for their actions, isn't that determined as well?

The video goes dark at the end. But wonderful content, please continue!

Clark Daniel Walker Eric Hernandez Jason

Gonzalez Sarah Lee Elizabeth Taylor Margaret

Lee Jose Lee Melissa Perez Jeffrey

Gonzalez Elizabeth Jackson Mark Lee Margaret

Gonzalez Amy Taylor Brenda Johnson Karen

Thomas Matthew White Deborah Martin Cynthia

Garcia Ronald Hall Eric Jackson Nancy

Davis Anthony Young Brenda Harris Sandra

Johnson Robert Miller Helen Robinson Thomas

Have you never seen Ghost in the Shell? You really owe it to yourself to see one of the greatest films of all time. Note: I'm not talking about the Scarlett Johnson film but the animated film from 1995.

Young Edward Williams Sandra Lee Matthew

at the topmost level, the political state exists as a paradox. no group can exist without individuals and individuals won't exist without being part of a group which has at least as much power as any other group. from there we see that a Republic is the best possible form of government because it allows groups to duke it out for control within the government. the inherent problem with all governments is also a paradox - governments are corrupt to the degree they are allowed to operate in secret but it is impossible for a government to not have some level of secrecy.

Marquette?! Continental philosophy, is taught and practiced in so many graduate departments in the United States, that it’s a bit silly to pick out Marquette as a leading example.

ruling by divine authority doesn't end well because the king is a single easy target. its better to rule from the shadows by proxy. that's why the ones in the know prefer republics. also the different secret factions can duke it out for control in private and the public is none the wiser.

So glad to see someone talking about the philosophy in this book, it's got such interesting concepts and touches - I like the idea that everything Micky knows about science and the world is related to his fascination with history. But also the idea that Mickey 8 (who was only missing 6 months of Mickey's life) can have such different ethics and attitude to Mickey 7 I can't help but wonder how different this book would look from Mickey 8's perspective.

Master, please always share your knowledge here. Thanks.

Polybius provides government degeneration this way: aristocracy, oligarchy, democracy, ochlocracy(mob rule), monarchy, tyranny, then cycle repeats.

Why the constant Kripke bashing?

How is a moral statement false if it isn't propositional?

THANK YOU

Really excited to see the new lecture, thanks!

all political philosophy is either delusion or a narrative to feed the sheep

Great to see a new lecture!

I've always had a small interest in Socrates/Plato/Aristotle and those aspects of Ancient Greece, but I havent done much research on my own. Separate from that, I've also nevwr been interested in politics in our current landscape. But this video popped up on autoplay and i was sure that it's some super popular video and i was really invested and surprised at how well and eloquently the professor explains things, so i was surprised this was just posted a few hours ago aith barely any veiws. This is why i love UA-cam. Some random dude will post a magnificent, free college lecture full of interesting things and i get to watch all i want. Great video, thank you.

Johnson Kenneth Thomas Frank Robinson Sarah

These classes are wonderful, the teacher is excellent, thanks for making them available here!

Did he investigate Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems? They pretty much blow up the idea that language can answer everything.

So useful, thank you. 🙏🏻

There cannot be identical at the physical; psychological; or mental level. Humans can only find unity in a shared spirituality. Religions can, and needs to be, diverse but their shared spirituality should bond humans, not divide them.

Just to add to the praise that others have already given - this is a very cogent and accessible series of lectures covering stuff that as someone who lacks a philosophical training I have long been aware of but found difficult to know where to start unravelling - a sincere thank you to Simon

Love this for everyone who thinks philosophy is nonsense it’s perfect

Hi Simon, I hope you received my index.

Fantastic - thank you very much! One question: Which text is the example of the planetary orbit from? "Word and Object"?

I'm a nitpicker and just wanted to point out that anarchists don't reject societies but unjustified hierarchy. Anarchists fall into many camps but especially the more classical ones are perfectly happy with society so long as its organized without unjust hierarchy.

Oscar Wilde in The Soul of a Man under Socialism: "We are often told that the poor are grateful for charity. Some of them are, no doubt, but the best amongst the poor are never grateful. They are ungrateful, discontented, disobedient, and rebellious. They are quite right to be so. Charity they feel to be a ridiculously inadequate mode of partial restitution, or a sentimental dole, usually accompanied by some impertinent attempt on the part of the sentimentalist to tyrannise over their private lives. Why should they be grateful for the crumbs that fall from the rich man’s table? They should be seated at the board, and are beginning to know it. As for being discontented, a man who would not be discontented with such surroundings and such a low mode of life would be a perfect brute. Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion. Sometimes the poor are praised for being thrifty. But to recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less. For a town or country labourer to practise thrift would be absolutely immoral. Man should not be ready to show that he can live like a badly-fed animal. He should decline to live like that, and should either steal or go on the rates, which is considered by many to be a form of stealing. As for begging, it is safer to beg than to take, but it is finer to take than to beg. No: a poor man who is ungrateful, unthrifty, discontented, and rebellious, is probably a real personality, and has much in him." Analytic philosophy and ethics just don't mix well imo. There can be interesting points here and there (like Benatar's asymmetry argument) but it seems to me that trying to make sense of ethics in this manner is a losing battle.

Thanks for these