- 88
- 500 541
Pro Home by Dodge Designs
Приєднався 15 кві 2024
This channel is all about the world of carpentry and DIY. From simple tips and tricks to innovative techniques and one-of-a-kind products, Greg Dodge brings his experience and knowledge in the fields of carpentry and engineering to show viewers a new way of approaching problems. Come along for the ride. Let's learn together.
EASY CROWN MOULDING SETUP to get PROFESSIONAL RESULTS #crownmoulding #crownjig
There are lots of elaborate setups you can buy or make for cutting crown in the nested position. There are attachments for your miter saw as well as adjustable homemade jigs that can be used for any size trim. But in this video I’m showing you a very straight forward, down and dirty, simple jig that can be used to cut crown moulding in the nested position and give you professional results. You can use scrap wood that you have lying around (as long as it’s smooth and straight). This jig can help you with how to cut crown molding corners. It can work for crown moulding around a room or installing crown moulding on cabinets. Stay tuned for more videos as we continue to expand on this series. Good luck on your projects! Feel free to ask questions. I’m here to help!
#crownmoulding #crownmolding #crownjig #mouldingtrim #wallmoulding
#diy #diycrown #handyman #trimcarpentry #woodworkingforbeginners #carpentrytips #howtocrownmolding #ceilingcrownmolding #ceilingmolding #crownmoldingcorners
Chapters:
00:00 Intro
00:30 Ways to cut crown moulding
01:08 Spring angle for crown moulding
01:49 Making a crown moulding jig
04:22 Test cut crown moulding
06:16 Closing
#crownmoulding #crownmolding #crownjig #mouldingtrim #wallmoulding
#diy #diycrown #handyman #trimcarpentry #woodworkingforbeginners #carpentrytips #howtocrownmolding #ceilingcrownmolding #ceilingmolding #crownmoldingcorners
Chapters:
00:00 Intro
00:30 Ways to cut crown moulding
01:08 Spring angle for crown moulding
01:49 Making a crown moulding jig
04:22 Test cut crown moulding
06:16 Closing
Переглядів: 850
Відео
Mini Shims - the BEST shims for PRECISION carpentry #plasticshims
Переглядів 7203 місяці тому
Mini Shims - the BEST shims for PRECISION carpentry #plasticshims
CURVED RANGE HOOD with ACCESS FOR DUCTWORK?? #curvedrangehood
Переглядів 2,2 тис.3 місяці тому
CURVED RANGE HOOD with ACCESS FOR DUCTWORK?? #curvedrangehood
SPECIAL COPING TECHNIQUE for PERFECT CROWN MOLDING #crownmolding
Переглядів 3,8 тис.4 місяці тому
SPECIAL COPING TECHNIQUE for PERFECT CROWN MOLDING #crownmolding
EXTENSION JAMBS for BEGINNERS! Fill those GAPS when the window doesn’t line up with the wall!
Переглядів 3,1 тис.5 місяців тому
EXTENSION JAMBS for BEGINNERS! Fill those GAPS when the window doesn’t line up with the wall!
WINDOW TRIM for BEGINNERS and PROFESSIONAL CARPENTERS using a few SECRET WEAPONS! #windowtrim
Переглядів 2055 місяців тому
WINDOW TRIM for BEGINNERS and PROFESSIONAL CARPENTERS using a few SECRET WEAPONS! #windowtrim
EVERY CARPENTER needs these tools and PACKOUT is the best way to store them! #milwaukeepackout
Переглядів 38 тис.5 місяців тому
EVERY CARPENTER needs these tools and PACKOUT is the best way to store them! #milwaukeepackout
SOLID WOOD FRONT DOOR with raised panel, etched glass, and marine varnish #customdoors
Переглядів 2015 місяців тому
SOLID WOOD FRONT DOOR with raised panel, etched glass, and marine varnish #customdoors
Extreme JOB SITE MITER STATION with PACKOUT STORAGE and set up in LESS THAN 4 MIN!
Переглядів 9 тис.5 місяців тому
Extreme JOB SITE MITER STATION with PACKOUT STORAGE and set up in LESS THAN 4 MIN!
FLOATING SHELF technique that’s CHEAP and SUPER STRONG
Переглядів 6 тис.6 місяців тому
FLOATING SHELF technique that’s CHEAP and SUPER STRONG
Comparison of the best GLUES, SEALANTS, AND SOLVENTS for all carpenters and handy DIY’ers
Переглядів 2146 місяців тому
Comparison of the best GLUES, SEALANTS, AND SOLVENTS for all carpenters and handy DIY’ers
Full door install using the Hinge Mortise System by Pro Home Products #diy
Переглядів 1377 місяців тому
Full door install using the Hinge Mortise System by Pro Home Products #diy
Hinge Mortise System by Pro Home Products ... Patent Pending Design
Переглядів 1417 місяців тому
Hinge Mortise System by Pro Home Products ... Patent Pending Design
Pro Bins by Pro Home Products - compatible with Milwaukee Packout 4 Drawers
Переглядів 3,4 тис.8 місяців тому
Pro Bins by Pro Home Products - compatible with Milwaukee Packout 4 Drawers
Handmade Movie Theater Doors w/ Custom Wenge Inlay
Переглядів 2548 місяців тому
Handmade Movie Theater Doors w/ Custom Wenge Inlay
Curved stairs outside??? What??? Time to bend some wood! 🤪
Переглядів 4,2 тис.8 місяців тому
Curved stairs outside??? What??? Time to bend some wood! 🤪
4 Drawer Milwaukee Packout storage bins by Pro Home Products
Переглядів 11 тис.9 місяців тому
4 Drawer Milwaukee Packout storage bins by Pro Home Products
Good stuff but you didn't mention at the adjustable square the beginning when listing the tools.
If you're ever worried about layer adhesion you can always print it on a 45° angle, requires support but the layers won't separate nearly as easily.
I also acetone vapor smooth my parts and they are always strong enough to hold up well (ABS)
People are out here 3d printing 37mm signaling launchers and m1337 hand crank gatling pews, but they think a small hinge base won't hold up? 😂
petg has some fairly impressive properties...
I think the actual criticism was about the print orientation, it looks printed from the wall side up, which is best for avoiding overhangs, but that puts the primary downward stress along the layer lines which is suboptimal. Finding or creating a surface off of which to print the mass of the part at a 45 degree angle would have been better regardless of material choice or infill percentage. I do agree with you that it’s probably fine though 👍
I use them for my handyman business too. But I only use them for like missing switch knobs and such.
Just some advice, infill isnt what you want to adjust for steength ideally. Wall count is better, and part orientation is king
What about this, "have sex"
That print video doesnt look like a solid print to me
It’s not. You’re right. That was a test fit. I always test fit with low infill to save time and materials. That’s not even petg in that video. It’s PLA. The final print was solid PETG.
I imagine comment section wanted to hear " upgraded weak part bruh yolo skibbadi " or something based on first row on mobile 😂
😂 😂 😂 probably! Maybe then my kids would understand it better!
"I do my best to avoid stress concentration" yet no fillets detected
Generally speaking, I use fillets a LOT. Very easy way to reduce stress concentrations. However, on this particular part the mode of failure would most likely be layer adhesion. Filleting wouldn’t really help in this situation.
where can I get that file
I don’t have that file available. But I am in the process of developing a website that will include a section for downloading STL files that I design. So stay tuned!
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with 3-D printing nowadays everything comes with the person behind the tool
👍
Have you tried ABS?
I have not worked with ABS yet. It’s on my list of things to do along with trying carbon fiber filaments. So far PETG has been sufficient for almost all my applications. But I have some product ideas that may require more strength. I’ll post about it once I give it a try! Thanks for the suggestion!
@@ProHomeByDodgeDesignsfair warning, you aren’t going to get far into ABS, CF composites, or PC, without a heated enclosure
Ah. Good ol keyboard warriors. 😂
Yep 🤷🏼♂️
Umm it's not %100 solid infill. At least not the print you showed.
You’re right. That’s was just a test print. I always print low infill for test prints to check the fit before making the final piece.
Yeah anyone complaining about the strength of the 3-D print has never 3-D printed anything functional. Tchotchkes break, easy things designed and printed for strength usually last. Especially petg My only functional 3-D print that has broken on me so far was a PLA hose adapter for a vacuum to my sander and the only reason it broke is because when I was pulling it off the connection to my sander, I accidentally did it at an angle like I was popping open a bottle of beer with a bottle opener and PLA is not flexible .
I’ve had some petg parts fail but it was mostly due to design errors. If you understand the weaknesses you can figure out how to properly work around it to design a better (stronger) part. Functional 3D prints are possible and are increasingly becoming more common. Thanks for the comment!
most 3d printed parts arent as strong as injection molded parts. Your mileage may vary. the question is, do you trust your childs life to the new part or the gate itself
If designed correctly, 3D printed parts can be very strong. It’s all about knowing the weaknesses and working around them. And as I stated in my follow-up video, the gate is to keep my dog out. My kids are older now. So I’m not worried.
PETG is a good choice but if you need a structural part with homogeneous strength and you are concerned about layer adhesion, use TPU. The 3D print community thinks of TPU as "the flexible filament" and with 1-3 walls and low infill that's true, but a solid TPU part is darn near indestructible and quite solid. Excellent layer adhesion, impact resistance, chemical resistance, UV resistance, low temperature resistance....
That is a great point. You're right, I've only used TPU for flexible parts. But with I higher Shore hardness and more infill you can make a pretty rigid part. And layer adhesion issues are almost non-existent. The only issue I find with TPU is how SLOOOOOOOW it is to print.
@@ProHomeByDodgeDesigns - If you print 8+ walls and/or mostly solid infill, regular 95A durometer TPU makes a solid part. It's a hard rubbery plastic, but you can, for example, put anchors in the wall and screw a solid TPU part to the wall and it'll only deform slightly. The old 30 mm/s wive's tale for TPU should be ignored. It doesn't print as fast as PLA or PETG, but solid objects can be printed at 50-100 mm/s, mostly depending on the extruder, part size and cooling. Sometimes faster is better. TPUs biggest problems are overhangs, bridging and stringing. Slicers have a setting that keeps the nozzle within the part whenever possible and that prevents stringing by keeping the ooze that would cause stringing inside the part. Another TPU wive's tale is no retraction. That guarantees stringing. You should use retraction, but you might need to retract slower and longer to prevent stringing, and avoid rapidly retracting and de-retracting (there's a slicer setting for that) to avoid chewing up the TPU filament for retraction intensive prints. You may need to spend more time fine tuning settings for optimal performance and you may need to tweak the settings with different brands of TPU, but for the simple part in this video, a generic TPU setting should work well enough.
Thanks for all the advice! I’m definitely going to explore working with some harder TPU, especially if I can speed it up a bit.
Yeah, the argument that 3D printed structures are "too weak to be taken seriously" simply falls flat with the slightest amount of effort. Like any engineering, it's all about optimizing around the unfavorable aspects of a given medium. I build large solar/battery systems, and I have managed to 3D print the most demanding of parts - like the 100% load-bearing handles on a 150lb battery enclosure, which requires two or three people to carry. No exotic filaments either! Just PLA+/PETG on a mostly stock Ender 3 Max.
Exactly! Just know the weaknesses and work around them!
there's some carbon filament that runs on normal printers and is really hard. You can print some pretty strong parts now
Yeah I haven't started using CF filaments. I plan to hopefully get into that soon. I've just been so busy printing other parts that I haven't had time to play around with it. But it sounds like it would be great. Is it tough on the printer?
I print guns with what they fuck are these people talking about you don't think you can use the shit on a gate?
Your into is why I want to get a 3D scanner. I suck at modeling, but I think I could fix a 3D scan and I have a lot of instances where a client needs a plastic piece for something fixed.
I don’t have any experience using 3D scanners but I imagine they are going to become quite popular. One day I’m sure I’ll try it out. The possibilities are endless!
Cool print, I want to comment on two points. You should focus on the number of perimeters when need strength over infill as most of the stresses are on the shell. Second generally you want to design from a solid block and cut out the features you want since thick parts don’t add that in time or material but add in strength and usability of the part. Also avoids stress concentrations easier.
I definitely agree about the perimeter walls. That's always my first go-to when trying to increase strength. However, I don't discount the value of infill because it helps to effectively increase the layer adhesion (by increasing contact area). So if layer adhesion is a concern for a specific part then I find increasing infill to be appropriate as well. Your second point, I'm not sure what you mean about designing from a solid block. Do you mean: make the part as large as possible instead of focusing on all the curves of the design? Because aesthetics is also a factor for certain designs. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point.
Thank you for providing more details and nuance to your process. A lot of times we all jump to conclusions based on limited information. Keep designing cool stuff! P.s. I like constructive feedback for those times when I can learn more from others.
I couldn’t agree more. My entire career (and life) has been about learning as much as I can from others. I love teaching others but I will never stop learning. I wish UA-cam could just be filled with constructive feedback. Obviously that’s not reality 🤷🏼♂️
And easy, though expensive change, would be to copy the part but make it solid. Could possibly just have added a support or two underneath.
Not sure what you mean by “copy the part.” You mean with a 3D scanner?
It could have been better to print at an angle, to avoid those layer line/adhesion concerns. It may not be needed, but if you have a failure with that extrusion breaking off, this is what I would do next.
Yeah printing at an angle could definitely help. Vertical would be ideal if it weren’t for those screw holes. But a 45 deg or so angle could be the best compromise. I’ll see how it goes.
I can tell you’re using Sketch Up Pro.
The only way to go IMO! Been using it for 10+ years!
Its a lot of extra work but it looks good thats all that really matters
Exactly! I’d rather spend more time to make a better finished product. Gotta take pride in your work!
did you print it via normal layering or via bricklayer printing which is ALOT stronger?
Normal layering. I just looked up bricklayering. Seems like a good idea. Do you have to modify the G code to do that?
@ProHomeByDodgeDesigns depends on your printer and Software. I have some cheap Chinese Modell with proprietary Software, hence I use a python Script to adjust the gcode. Haven't looked into cura tho
hmm. something to look into. Thanks!
Amazing. Wait till we can 3D print metal on every mechanic will be an engineer
That would be crazy! Maybe one day 🤞
Got curious this morning and googled 3D print in metal.... wow! It exists! It's called Wire LMD Technology. crazy! Still seems like more of an industrial application than an at-home system but I bet we're not far off!
100% is kinda overkill NGL you're better off going more walls and at most 60%
My first move is always to add more walls for structure. For this part, layer adhesion was a concern, so I increased the infill to effectively increase the layer adhesion (due to the larger contact area).
I was writing a comment saying that it wasn't 100% infill and looked closer to 25% and then I got to the end of the video 🤣. I agree the 3d print will probably last longer than the original unless something weird/extreme happens.
Yeah I often print parts with low infill just to check the size and fit before I print the final piece.
When I replace broken or lost parts that aren't to complicated I 3D print them and use it as a pattern to make a mold in sand, and then cast it in solid Aluminium. But that is just me being a metal head! 🤘
That's very cool. The possibilities are endless when it comes to 3D printing! My only experience with metalwork is some mig welding I do for furniture (simple joints for table legs, brackets, etc.). I have a cheap mig setup. I wish I could work with aluminum. Metal is awesome!
😂look at the wall they’re gona call you back for sue
Well considering it’s my gate I’m not too worried 😂
Your moulding isnt plaster based?
Don't read comments.
Probably a good idea 😂
Don't justify yourself to the internet. The goalposts are just going to shift to space
So true
This is great
Thanks!
Solved every issue I dealt with in the beginning with one video. Cheers 🍻
Thanks!
Hi, I have some academic and industrial experience with additive manufacturing. Anything over 40% infill is usually a waste of materials, energy, and time. Find a good infill pattern for your purpose and run with it at around 30% to 40%. Some are with less. You can modify stress points in the CAD work that you can't do with traditional injection molding.
I partially agree. It’s often unnecessary to have a high infill. However, this assumes that layer adhesion is not an issue. By increasing the infill then you effectively increase the layer adhesion (by increasing the surface area between layers). So yes, if the printer is perfectly dialed in and the filament you use has great layer adhesion then the infill will be less important. But I wouldn’t say more infill is a waste.
If you want a strong part, you increase the amount of walls, not increase the infil. You also really shouldn't ever use 100% infill. This makes the part far more fragile as the print doesn't have any room to flex. When things don't bend, they tend to break
I agree that increasing the # of walls is a great way to increase strength. I use that method all the time (especially when I have holes or thinner walls). However, I don’t agree with your point about the 100% infill. You’re assuming the material is isotropic. Then, if properly structural design is performed, you can plan for a ductile response to flexure. FDM printing is anything but isotropic. There are weaknesses all over the part. So to compensate for that then sometimes 100% infill is appropriate. At least that’s my opinion.
@@ProHomeByDodgeDesigns a fair point and something i will consider in the future
FACTS! 👏🏻 SHUT THOSE IGNORANTS that like to talk without knowing about the subject! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Gotta be informed!
People commenting with nonsense complaints and the man SHOWED HIS WORK. A+
Got tired of responding to the same comments 🤷♂️
Wasn't nonsense if he made more money and put out more information because of it.
@@railroaded1991 dont shorts like idk not make money?
@zman91510 your reply makes no sense at all. Did he make more money and put out more info with his reply or not?
Bro is using sketch up!
The only way to go! Been using it for years!
3D printed parts can have massive added benefits over 3D molded parts like having more infill or having geometry that reinforce the stress points that isn't possible with injection molding. Also I find that most people are printing at too low of a temp to get good adhesion which is why they complain about the strength of parts. I recently did a part in PETG but found the finish of the plastic to be matte and very easy to break. I was printing at 230 like the roll said to do but I found that my printer was too fast for the filament to hit the correct temperatures so I had to bump the temps to 280 to get the glossy finish and strength of PETG.
Absolutely! I had the exact same thing happen to me. I couldn't figure out why my PETG was looking matte. I have to admit I kind of liked the look of it. But then I noticed it was breaking (which was abnormal for this piece). I finally realized I was accidentally using my PLA settings (which is a much lower temperature). I didn't realize I switched it. Ooops! Switched it back ... it went right back to shiny and strong!
Yes! A while ago I accidentally printed PETG on a PLA+ profile (215°C), and it printed just fine, looked good even, but WOW the layer adhesion was weak... I had no idea people printed PETG at 280°C though!! What's the advantage of going that far over the standard ~240°C upper bound that most manufacturers list for PETG??
@@evanmayer744 I think the problem is that the printer I'm using goes so fast that the PETG isn't heating up to 230 or 240. It's probably getting around 200 and leaving the nozzle not hot enough to adhere to the new layer. I've actually been bumping up my heat for all my printers and I find that the increased heat helps a lot with quality
I print my PETG at around 250 deg and get good results.
@@evanmayer744 HF PLA profile in bambu lab ramp up to max 270°c. Because it was print to fast to melt probably with normal temp. Same thing can happened for other filament
Hatters will always hate
So true
People complaining about how he's replace a plastic hinge with a plastic hinge...... No one's taking about the fact the manufacturer shipped it with a plastic hinge. 3d printing "What if it break" Wellll that's the reason why it needs replacing it broke....
@@JackTalyorD I actually don't care if someone made mistake or sale defects. I don't tell people on the internet what to do; I'm dealing my own F business and just enjoy the good content.
@dolby360 well you got a point there. View it for enjoyment. I was more thinking along the lines of get some prospective....dose it really matter.... Different sides of the same coin maybe
@ 😘
Broken widget? I can fix that for you in 7 hours!
Not sure where you get 7 hrs lol. Took me 10 min to design. Then click print!
what filament did you use there?
PETG with 100% infill
Are you sure it's as good as new? I'm not. It may look the same, but it isn't. I suspect your printed part was far weaker than the original. I think a wood block would have been quicker to make and far stronger than your part. Heck, a small piece of bent metal would do as well.
The video is a little misleading. The finished part is actually much more solid. The original part was cheap hollow plastic. That being said, I don’t advise using printed parts for safety situations. This was for my own personal use. I wouldn’t chance it for a customer. This was just to show how versatile 3D printing can be.
I would not trust that.
I get it. The piece in the video wasn’t the final piece, just a test fit. The final piece was much more solid.