Відео

@@samlazar574 awesome!

@@ErickLuzong-kq1nr Thank you sir much appreciated!

Thanks for the encouragement!

@@VFD3_games really? I am curious about how

@@LinuxInvictus for start, there was a lot of issues with display flickering, dots all over the screen and stuff like that plus a lot of stuff just was not working some time later I tried arch and everything worked out of the box and better on a worse device.

@@VFD3_games Must've been some configuration acting up with your hardware that isn't in arch or something like that. Weird issue.

Hope you enjoy

@MrBoboka12 hrm, it has a real capacity of 64gb so I might look. I don't really care if I break it

@mcwolfbeast But it was not, because for 13 dollars I got decent youtube content :)

@LokisBeam Nope. Bewarned though I found the tracking sucks

@@LinuxInvictus Ok, Thanks

@dylanhammond1442 Well let's just say no, I was really expecting to just get nothing in the mail, or a shell that didn't do anything. I basically saw this purchase as gambling. The idea of faking the firmware however that really did take me by surprise.

@MagikGimp Guilty as charged. Still better to wear a flat cap then show off the huge balding patch.

thanks

Thanks

@jorge86rodriguez your distro is ready milady. Sorry I had to.

2:45 Wrong. The comparison is more like if you've been a life-long (motor)bike owner, but now you decided to get a car. In which situation, you should look up the most superficial things: I want a fast one I want a safe one I want a pretty one I want a cheap one And then get the first thing that loosely matches your criteria. Because you _do_ have a reason to switch. What makes you hate your current bike? Is it too dangerous? Maybe get a Volvo. Do you like the You _do_ need to make a bit of an effort. Because if you care about looks the most, then you will be scarred _for life_ if you buy, say, a Daihatsu Materia, just because some random dude on the internet told you is the best car. And you will never have the patience to look at even Lamborghinis ever again, as you will just go back to your bike-for the rest of your life. You NEED to feel an improvement if you are going to switch.

3:33 No. It really isn't. I've been on Fedora full time for the last 9 months or so, and the water is still cold. I can elaborate on the specifics of how and why it is causing me immense amounts of trouble in various different ways, but I wasted enough time on writing comments for now.

@@hundvd_7 Maybe because you picked that a distro that is basically a upstream for red hat, and thus is essentially a permenant beta test? There is a reason I never recommend fedora to new users and hate it when people do.

@bradleyp3655 the message your thinking of is different because the none ad one will saying something like "use dist-upgrade to upgrade these packages" and that's generally for kernel level stuff, not ffmpeg. Or it's because of dependency issues which the error will also say.

The first line reads: "The following *upgrades* have been deferred due to phasing:" (my emphasis) then lists the packages that have been deferred. Again these are system upgrades not ads. I have also seen them on Linux Mint - that is deferred packages. Even the not upgraded line at the bottom has a count of what looks like 15.

@@bradleyp3655 And the phasing is not having Ubuntu pro.

​@bradleyp3655 I have privated the short till I can verify

@pupip55 Yes, that's fair, but I doubt very many people will have a good time installing as the first distro. For example I don't expect someone to know to configure a bootloader when they don't even know what a boot loader is

I will say that if your at a point where you can run debian as a daily driver, that's a pretty solid choice as it is very light and very stable

@@Kurotama_STR KDE is the best desktop

@Aoitori365 My issue with any of the ùbuntus is that they have ads in the terminal and that alone is enough to not even consider them. Also I disagree about new users not caring about snaps. They can make Uninstalling default programs a pain, and the overall privacy issues with snaps and canonical I actually think does matter because a major reason many people ditch windows is privacy concerns.

@postiemania that's actually quite strange because under the hood mint is basically just a Ubuntu lts without the crap. Either way I won't recommend Ubuntu period. It has ads in the terminal

@@LinuxInvictus Ads in the terminal? I don't see them.

@postiemania I actually have a short linked in the description that shows them. It's usually when you run apt upgrade it shows them something like these following packages have been held back because you need Ubuntu pro

​@@LinuxInvictusYes I watched the short and I have not upgraded to Ubuntu Pro although I may do for one of my computers. Decommissioning Windows 10 took 2 days and this was mainly taken up because of poor internet connection speeds. 176Gb of files backed up and I even emptied One drive. Next I suppose it may be time to try Arch. Thanks for your videos they are quite interesting.

@robotron1236 There is no reason that anyone should be using manjaro anymore because endeavor OS is everything manjaro is suppose to be but better because it cause dependency hell when you try to use the AUR. And there is no reason someone should be using either if it's there first time. Someone literally installing linux for the first time just doesn't yet have the skillset for a archbased distro and fixing the issues you may encounter in it.

@@LinuxInvictus Manjaro was my first distro. I actually still use it in my hacking VMs with the blackarch repo and them holding back packages works out really well for me, even with the tools I’ve installed from the AUR. I was using arch for my hacking VMs and switched back to Manjaro for them because it was too up to date and tended to break some things. I honestly like that Manjaro holds them back just in general and have had 0 dependency issues with AUR packages and think the outrage over that is seriously overblown.

@WHAT-GRINDS-MY-GEARS Telling a brand new user to use arch is basically guaranteeing they will never actually linux. Arch is great, but do you really think someone who never installed linux before knows how to configure a boot loader?

@@Puzzlers100 I think it is adept because cars are designed with particular ends, but yet it's still subjective

Lfs and Gentoo, also minimal Arch or customised Debian - you buy a mix of parts and complain when they do not fit together

Please don't take these seriously, I might try these sometime. NixOS - you buy a frame and engine of a car with no interiors. Void - you buy a classic east european car, that needs special parts to run MX Linux - you buy a Jeep, with minor repairs needed. Open Suse - you buy a farmers car that's last been cleaned 4 years ago Alpine Linux - the italian classic that needs both metric and imperial bolts to run properly, inferior parts for modern use. Any minimalist distro - you turn your lawnmower into a go-kart.

@ottolehikoinen6193 Mx linux. You have never heard of this car before and never driven one but for some reason every car mag calls it the most inquired about car in the country so you call the dealership to ask about it

@svan71 Yeah I am a big Wayland supporter, but I do not think it's where it needs to be completely new users yet. As for Gnome. Well I hate Gnome and would never recommend it.

@@LinuxInvictus I understand, but Cinnamon is less popular than KDE or Gnome, for a reason, wouldn't you agree?

Yes but that reason may not be what you think. Gnome was already quite entrenched when gnome 3 came out

@1.harendra my machine is even older. I have a i7 3770

@spthepero2282 I will say yeah, your a pretty niche case. If your comfortable with linux and reading and following instructions, I would recommend trying a minimal install of debian, or arch if your a little more ambitious.

I've never used it, but a lot of people recommend GalliumOS for Chromebook

@@LinuxInvictus nah, I want a distro based on debian not arch family, (as a beginner) I just want something simple from the debian family.

@@spthepero2282 In that case I would look into debian directly. Debian can very light.

@@LinuxInvictus Welp I was looking into Lubuntu and stuff, bcz I would also like some customization liek desktop cool wallpaper, and widgets and stuff, as it is for my personal laptop

@iplyrunescape305 Yeap. Once you get your feet wet then you play around with different distros

@arthurrock4979 first of all its linux mint. The necessity to use the terminal in the modern day is quite rare unless your tinkering with stuff. 2. Linux is actually much easier to use then windows. For example installing a program. I can use the terminal and type one command. Or I can go to the software center and just type the name. These days pretty much all you have to deal with the software center and flat packs Where as under windows your going to have about a bazillion steps where you have to go to whose what website and basically hope the button you clicked is actually the program and not a virus. Not mention how much i wish windows had a equivalent to lspci and lsusb. No windows isn't popular for ease of use. That wad true in the XP days. The reason windows is popular is oem deal and brand recognition

@@LinuxInvictus I'm not gonna argue with you. You people had so many decades already to wake up and smell the coffee what's up. Facts are, tons of IT experts don't lose sleep over the Linux terminal, cause it's such a niche system (2.2% users?). Microsoft is doing everything to make people ditch Windows, and all PC Linux distro developers gotta do, is get rid of that damn terminal. Normal people don't suffer from the Linux fanboy obsessive-compulsive disorder of having to constantly type in the Linux terminal, and type in their passwords in the password prompt. They even leave their homes to go on dates, and stuff!

@arthurrock4979 Don't lose sleep over the linux terminal? You have no idea what your talking about. Linux is huge in the server space, and one of the biggest reasons for this is the command line. In fact the IT experts lost so much sleep over this that they created windows subsystem linux to run the command line on windows. But that doesn't have anything to do with linux desktop. It's linux mint, the times you will have to touch a commandline are almost nil unless you want to.

@@LinuxInvictus I'd like it to be just as necessary, as the Windows terminal. But theory and practice are two totally different phenomenons (one is fantasy, the other reality, just like Communism proved), that you're not gonna need the terminal for even the stupidest problems, to be taking whole weeks of insults from the stuck up, snobbish Linux community anyway. All of this blabber about freedom of use with Linux, until people wanting to avoid the greatest pain in the ass with the system, the terminal! Linux - terminal = success, what Android proved. Microsoft, Apple, Google got nobody normal wants to deal with terminals, except PC Linux distro developers.

@@LinuxInvictus You're not gonna fix the stupidest problem on Linux, without the terminal, cause non of these geniuses bother to even create troubleshooting GUIs. I wanna use my PC when I wanna type, not type when I wanna use my PC, like everybody else with better things to do.

I haven't used fedora in ages, but I will say confidently that mind does tend to be easier if only because it's more stable and less bleeding edge.

I 100% Agree with this. Though I want to add that even back the unity debacle where they pushed that garbage fire on us they, they still had a tendency to push out releases at 80%

It's actually kinda funny how linux mint is actually a pretty heavy linux distro but it will still often run easily on old hardware

@insert.coin_here it's a pcie x1 card. Goes in the little slots generally under or just above the gpu slot.

Yes the mirrors of Linux most Linux distros are quite trustworthy. The one I picked there is one of the most important universities in Canada.

Thanks