Відео

Volcanoes have caused many extinctions 😊

Myth, AI will provide solutions to our climate crisis. Not just the same old, same old ideas that the powerful can easily block.😢

great video concept! "state of the climate address"

PROPAGANDA. The volcano idea came up over a decade ago and was squashed by both AGW believers and skeptics alike. Skeptics have not been talking about volcanoes and serious ones of us never did. You're trying to cover up the failures of climate science by inventing a failure for the other side.

Debunk the myth that we're in a predicament that can't be solved and anything we do to try and solve it will only lead to more environmental degradation and loss of life on Earth. Therefore, even though Plimer is wrong, if his actions help speed up the inevitable collapse, he will be helping the rest of the life on Earth. Dan Miller of Climate Chat YT channel calls that a "pro-doomer" position. He doesn't subscribe to it. The title to the video is called :"Discussion with a Climate Doomer: Interview with Prof. Eliot Jacobson"

I'd honestly not heard of this myth, but the author's misuse of statistics to further his agenda is infuriating. Get dedunked on foo

Imagine all the benefits that the western world would benefit from stopping illegal migrants.... But look at this glacier...OH NO!

Amazing editing

probably the main determinant of how feasible CLT is as a concrete alternative: how cost-efficient is CLT compared to concrete?

a bunch of random Qs from watching the video: how strong is CLT/can it support multi-family houses? could it replace other common uses for concrete, such as sidewalks? also, how much of a fire hazard is it in construction? my impression is that wood is already used in home construction, and that CLT would be safer in fires due to its density.

You deserve way more subscribers than you got atm. under-rated channel. Fantastic Production Value.

Another myth is that extreme climate change wont be a problem till 2100. This is false. It is likely that rapid global heating will collapse agriculture and civilization by 2040, because of the accelleration of global heating, recently reported by James Hansen.

Another myth to consider, is the myth that if we stop burning coal and dirty fuels, the planet will cool down. This wont happen, because ghg's are recalcitrant, and dirty emission reduction will reduce global dimming, and more sunlight will strike the earth, heating the planet. If humans stop putting particulates into the atmosphere completely, the earth will heat up by 2.5c within a few months.

Im looking forward to this. By the way, i read a while back that we discovered the hest-trapping properties of CO2 (in a lab) all the way back in the 19th Century. Earlier that smae century, a scientist surprised rven himself by proving that the Earth "should" be -100 degrees (I dotn remeber if it was Celsius or Fahrenheit- probably Celsius, but I dont want to spread misinformation) given its distance from the Sun. He concluded that there must be something in the atmosphere that's keeping the Sun's heat from escaping it. The science on this goes waaay back.

One myth to be aware of is the myth that the climate will heat up a few degrees and then stablize at a workable level. The reality is that a dozen climate feedbacks have been triggered, and the planet is going to heat up and keep heating and it will get hotter faster, and it wont stop heating up until the oceans evaporate and atmospheric pressure doubles, resulting in a temperature similar to that on Venus.🙂😎❤👍✌💯

The world has been aware of climate change since the 1980s. People don't believe in climate change because (a) it's profitable for them not to accept science fact (b) they don't want to (clashes with world view or religious beliefs), or (c) they just aren't bothered (caring for the Earth for future generations is of no interest to them). I'm amazed that when talking about tech (physics, engineering, gadgets, inrastructure) that are very technical in nature no-one questions anything, but BIG opinions when it comes to climate change!!! All of a sudden scientists don't know anything completely ignoring the fact that just about every aspect of human society is based on science... funny that. Tech has altered our lives in unbelievable ways - some good, some bad. Our response to climate change will require changes too, but in a few years we won't even notice just like with the adoption of lifesyle habits, tech & gadgets in everyday life. Brushing our teeth every morning or shaving or doing chores or taking out the trash is monotomous & boring, but we do it because it's better for our health or quality of life... we do it anyway. Caring for the Earth needs the same attention because it's better for our general quality of life awa cuture generations. Still looking forward to the series though! Good luck

NEW SERIES LETS GOOOOO

Thanks so much for citing your sources! I've been meaning to dive deeper into how different types of EVs stack up against each other for awhile now (obviously, smaller battery is usually better, but comes with obvious drawbacks) but haven't got around to it. Naturally, I was intrigued by the statement that a Leaf could be better than a Tesla, so I decided to look at your source. That Carbon Brief article was awesome! One complication which could be added to your tier list is that plug-in hybrids can actually be lower-carbon in some areas than EVs (though obviously higher in others). The Carbon Brief article you cited mentioned this and gave a solid break-down of that effect, so I won't dwell on it. It's something I've been thinking about for at least a few months now since I watched this video from Engineering Explained (pointing out how EVs are *not* worse for the environment than gasoline-powered vehicles): ua-cam.com/video/6RhtiPefVzM/v-deo.htmlsi=QVf-ePBwonUSTDZr

Good point about the LEDs - there is one reason why some might be wary of switching, and that's because they're more expensive than filament bulbs (this might be inherent - I don't know whether or not they can be made any cheaper). Of course, they do save money over the long term and - though more expensive than the older equivalent - both are quite cheap. On another note, there is one other problem with LEDs, but it's not an *inherent* problem, so don't take this as a criticism or even a nitpick, just an addendum: these days we're receiving too much blue light, which not only messes with circadian rhythms, but also worsens light pollution as it travels further than "warm colors" (red, orange, yellow, etc.). Of course this is easily fixable, with an appropriate coating. Companies sell LED bulbs now in warmer colors, and individuals and industry ought to take advantage of this.

Thanks for pointing out that some things which reduce pollution don't reduce CO2 emissions that much. It's really important that people don't mix up one environmental problem for another.

The Sixth Great Extinction is not a question of if but when. So much for the human era....

You are still here so I guess it was not to pee your pants Charlie

What will happen ? Nothing. N O T H I N G . Nothing will happen. NOPE. But a global banking collapse ? Or an EMP explosion over the USA ? Then.... We will ALL STARVE TO DEATH !

That ship has sailed.

Ooops ,,, there goes the cork in the bottle. Nevermind let's turn Gaza into a 5 star resort...

If?

Worrywart. Adaptation is the solution to pursue. Tipping point you speak of is years away. Its cold on Antarctica.

Didn't Al Gore say all polor ice would be melted by now,and he won a noble peace prize for it,smh

I bought a fuel efficient car because it saves me money I burn wood for heat because it saves me money. I ride an electric bike because I don't want to pedal. I'm doing it the American way!

Superb video! Very focused, comprehensive, and professional. :)

Bruh.. why is there PFAS in paper straws?!!