Відео

Excellent, fascinating content.

dont try at home where would i even get an electron gun if i cant get a normal one

great video thank u

So particles are what happens while different waves are interacting in certain ways. What are those ways? Some kind of harmonic resonance?

If it WAVES,....it xprobably wants ATTENTION 😂😂😂 Laws of ATTRACTION, and a messy bunch of "OTHER STUFF" turn into to be quite ORGANIZED ❤

None of the above. Electron particles do not exist.

Could light and matter in the form of electrons be wave over a ‘period of time’ and have particle characteristics relative to the atoms of the Periodic Table when we have the absorption and emission of light? Is the exchange of light photon ∆E=hf energy continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future unfolds?

Is electron round? Get quick answer to more such fundamental questions in science on MinuteChemistry : ua-cam.com/video/KTUcj3aamnA/v-deo.htmlsi=OFxRFGdBUq5Z7C3g

Wave is distortion of field, electron is source of field

People even youtubers dont understand why electron is represented by a cloud of probability . Not because they are waves, but because they are moving very fast, at the speed of light. They instatntly pop in and out in every point in their allowed space.

In CRT, we know where the electrons are. So they make good picture.

Can an electron as a particle do a wave motion??

I have a question because i think im wrong. I think that electron has a partucle nature and a mass . When it has the wave nature , the mass energy (E=mc²) is given to a form of an electron wave . That's ehy in the double slit experiment the electron wave goes at two slits at the same time . Because in this case there is no particle . Just a wave with the electrons mass energy . Another example is the two gamma rays colission. Energy stored is those rays turns into matter with mass . Please if anyone knows to explain this to me i will be thankful , because i think that im wrong

Just stumbling on this video and I have a question. Doesn't the fact that the electrons position changes between our measurements just mean that it is in constant motion, and not literally in two or more places at once? In my mind, it's a bit like the tree in the forest with no one around to hear it. It makes a sound even though there is nothing there to measure the sound. It seems like electrons are similar, just flying around doing their thing, but not being everywhere at once. Am I off on this?

Mate where have you been

How far apart are the slits ? How accurate can the electron accelerator be at hitting a target. For example shooting an arrow at a slit in the wall? If there are 2 slits and I aim only at one slit. I will get most of my arrows going through one slit. Or what am I missing here. How close are the slits together how big are the slits compared to the slits the arrow is shot through. Where do I find these answers.

Electrons are neither waves nor particles. To say they're understood at all is to utter a falsehood. Protons aren't understood either. No one knows what's inside a proton. The dogma used to be that it's two up and one down quark, but that model has recently been shot down in flames.

Really good video, thank you for your time and effort

Electron is a particle but when in motion it is associated with a Space wave.

You have a talent for explaining.

"Quantun physics doesn't tell us what exactly is going to happen." When you don't specify the intial conditions exactly, you can't expect to predict the final condition exactly. When you do specify the initial conditions exactly in quantum physics, you can expect to predict the final condition exactly. The UA-cam is playing a fancy word game, not talking serious physics. The problem is that to specify the initial condition exactly, you need a suitable setup. For that, you usually need something such as a singlet pair, one to identify the initial condition exactly, the other to be left untouched so that you can exactly predict its final condition. Of course, if you interfere with the other electron on its trajectory, you effectuate an unpredictable change in the true 'initial condition', and so make its final condition again unpredictable. An electron is a particle, but an ensemble of electrons moving independently through a diffracting object can create a wave-like diffraction pattern. No one in his right mind would think that showed that the electron was a wave, but, as far as I can see, some people insist on that mistaken interpretation. You don't know right now where I am, but that doesn't mean that I am not in a definite place. It just means that you don't know. The basic purpose of this UA-cam is to mystify the watcher, not to enlighten him.

The flower of life is the boss. 🌼🔥👀

ÕMĞ é PôWéŘ-PhÛľĽ Orrrsé-Strâylêans BáQúÔř-bÉâĐ 😟😟😟😰😰😩😩😰😟😰😩😩😰😰😧😧😦😧😦😦😧😳😶😶😵😳😳

It's neither. It's a quantum of energy, momentum, angular momentum and charges. There, solved it for all of you. How hard was that? ;-)

lmao!

Really makes you think about the phrase: If a tree falls in the woods. does it make a sound?

electrons move in waves, yet the particles are so fast via the speed of light, us humans do not have the technology to calculate its movements... Yet!!!

However, if there are only two holes and the first layer acts as a barrier (with the hope that it prevents electrons from passing through), where does the additional electron come from? I mean, why did it also move in the opposite direction instead of creating two lines of electrons at the back? Can electrons only be emitted from the space left in the center, or can they pass through the first barrier? Also, I'm not sure if my question sounds silly, but if we fire, let's say, 1000 electrons, will the resulting wave also consist of 1000 electrons, and not more, since nothing can be created or destroyed? i mean i just didnot gete how the heck electron shooted straight created a wave like pattern

It only changes when you observe it

After searching a lot about what an electron is a particle or a wave .... I found this..... really kudos to your efforts ❤... what an amzinggggggggg explanation I still have confusion about what a wavefunction is but at least it's clear to me now that an electron can be anywhere we can't exactly tell where it's located at a particular instant

Explained very well, thank you 🙏🏼

I know i am dumb 😂but how exactly they shot Electron 😁if they dont know were is 🤗they put to gun only posibility of location?... So cloud with unknown is bullet🤭

Better not invent an electron microscope, according to you, one would get a blurry image

💜🙏🕉️♾️🍁

I subscribed immediately after the basketball ball😅 Well, so does the electron have dual nature like light?

What if there is no higgs field, instid of it local concentration of EM field (like two gamma photon) can create time dilation gradient and EM waves localy trapped into this zone - here is electron which creates concentric waves in the EM field. This tiny EM trap travel throught one slit but due to it wave nature can interfered with own influence. The probabilistic nature of the electron comes from the fact that you cannot accurately measure the gradient of the electromagnetic field on a femtometer scale, but only see the result of the interaction of the electron with other particles.

i here some where that if you want to know about the space than see it in form of energy and wave so i have a question i mass can band the space and mass is energy than if i want to band the space so i needed too much energy but we don't have so i think weight less or like electron only follow the path of wave like up and down or spinning insted going in straight line or in another path

Has there ever been a time where someone has measured the same electron at the same time but got the measurement on all possible outcomes for that instance? My theory is that the hole world could be made ou of waves and if so then when these waves colide or have a certian value when they are measured would then apear to be in this there form. For example we only measure the strength of an electron at 5 but anything lower than that wouldn't be measured as an electron, or even have deffernt properties. Each wave could maybe even colide with a completely different type of wave and those interactions would be seen irl. Like electron wave colliding with a proton wave at a certian strength would resalt in a radical fenammena. This is just a thought don't take me a some lunitic like you would see in hystory books. But you never know i could be wright, since the only way to prove it is if we could prove that every partile is actually a wave. In my opinion the universe is made of waves is actually seemingly possible, it just would mean we can't measure it yet but with this video it proves that while it isn't a fact, it proves that we can measure at least some part of it, even if its just yhe cerface level of it

This so called boss is just how it works. Like a machine can only do what it is built to do. Or a computer program runs only what it is programed to run. And gravity is what gravity is because of mass(pretty much, untill we find out what actually gives a particle its mass) and does what gravity does thats how it works in this univeres laws. Like a math problem always it is only a matter if time to find out what that missing function value is, then we might know what causes these wierd physics. But then we'll start questioning why does it happen again and we just go on this loop untill its literally impossible to know the origin of everything.

Atomic wave for the roof? Try again lol

It's weird because the entire field is a psychotic episode. A child's imaginary vision that was written on paper. Has no place in the function of natural beings. the phenomenon is real, but the explanation is in error.

This is broke my brain 🧠 🤕

Hey,i have a confusion if anyone can answer please. An atom is 99.9% empty and the electron is a transverse wave which requires medium so where does that medium comes from?

I have questions about the experiment. First did the gun fire one electron at a time or did it fire plenty of electrons at a time. Second what happens to the electron who collide with the detector. Third can we know how much intial electrons we fired vs how many where detected. Fourth is this experiment conducted in a vaccum??

I guess nothing is solid or static

I believe that the electron going through both slits is an inference on your and others part. It cannot be shown with certainty that it behaves as described and it is kind of silly if you think about it. A spread quantity of something needs energy to get back to a particle (which the screen at the back always detects, either if you detect the electron at the slit or not. At the back it registers as a particle). Where is that energy coming from? We don't even know what an 'observation' constitutes of, is it the photon that collapses the wave function? A human eye? Something else? We don't know for certain. Also the photons going through the double slit behaves entirely different and should be treated as such. No one has seen a collapsed photon, makng the light going through the slits act as a particle. Yeah, it is time to come up with a better explanation, and stop the quantum mumbo jumbo presumptions

Materialists don’t know what do with this information so they dismiss it as weird. They won’t acknowledge that we’re create our own reality. We literally lay down the scaffolding with our minds outward projections into 3D. 🍄

Great video, keep up the good work!

Why we are studying it?

Doubts: Using the debroglie relation for wavelength of a particle and it’s momentum can we find the wave nature of an electron and will it be same as the probability distribution wave mentioned in the video What does the actual physical motion of an electron look like? We know that they have a spin but is it possible for them to have a fixed path at all? Larger objects are said to have a wavelength as well according to the same debroglie relation mentioned before. So does that mean that a chair or a table actually vibrates in a very small wavelength and that our eyes are just not able to comprehend such small oscillations?