Відео

You want a pre-built view counter for a blog post? Why don’t you just build it yourself? LMFAO 😂

but he's right, rust sucks lmao joke lang for soydevs

Adonis ??

what about Adonis ?

If we have to write in same line of H1 tag without using css

Hi, I just want to ask if I can create a rail project on different drive like Drive D even though I install the ruby, rails, and other things in my C drive. I am running low on my C drive which is why I ask. Thank you in Advance.

Probably the worst video I have seen today...

First time google searching how to mute a channel on youtube

it's not that difficult to have the back button work. define which params are to be tracked and have hidden fields for them. if you post back, that's what you post back so you keep full track. you post forward, you still have it.

I saw that league client, wanna play a game sometimes 😂 ?

Such a well made tutorial, very appreciated that you repeat the same information to make sure we get it !!

THANK U FINALLY WORKED, ALL THIS IN 5 MIN VIDEO

"Why nobody wants to do the work for me ? I just want to make the 4563th twitter clone and change the world you know. What ? WDYM learning by doing ? Why ?" A lost youtuber

Bad video! In that case you should use Python either right ? Anyway Ruby 3.3 introduced significant performance improvements, concurrency optimizations especially with the CPU heavy task

You forgot to change the variable name from bye to number in your sum expression, so you got an undefined variable error rather than an error regarding adding an integer to a string. I get the idea though ;)

This is supposed to be satirical, right? You sound like you weren't even alive in 2004. Rust wasn't even around in 2004.

Hey... MAD 😅, have fun with other things, the world needs Svelte

That's not what liveview mean. You described Hot reload.

The title is misleading.

Why tf y'all got lot hates for rust😂

Hummmm

What a shift to the past 😂

Did we time travel to 15 years ago?

Really appreciate your videos, excellent work! What site do you use to find freelance gigs?

I don't see why nestjs is not good

I love laravel , the only case where i find it slow its when the db is not optimized or utilizing laravel on shared hosting which are both not the ideal environment for laravel

1:37 of total waste of time

I'm a backend dev, but if you have issues implementing a view counter with svelte because there is no package for it, it's definitely not sveltes fault 🤣

You are wrong when describing LiveView

yo laravel inertia with vue is better

what about now after 2 years , what do you think about it ? thanks

Rust launched in 2015 and fu@k you learned it 2004 batches

Angular ans nestjs are made for each other

I like your editing and voice 🙂 sorry you’re getting haters in the comments

oh boy yet another node framework

Cool summary. I would love to see you provide more personal examples of the framework from a small personal project instead of just reading the documentation. One thing that's not explicitly mentioned in the documentation is that when routing middleware in the "App" class, you can use regex to act as a path filter of sorts. For example: this.middleware.addMiddleware({ path: ".*\/find.*", middlewares: [] }); This should apply the middleware to all routes that contain "/find".

Because the rust syntax sucks balls

I attended a talk about ExpressoTS earlier this year in Australia, and we decided to give it a try. So far, it’s been a positive experience. There are definitely some opportunities for improvement, but the development workflow is really smooth. I’m looking forward to hearing more about the framework’s progress.

This was the worst video I have ever seen. Is this a showcase, a review, a tutorial, or what? Why are you hyping the most basic features like they are groundbreaking things? Your video didn't provide any value. It was nothing more than a waste of time. Nest.js is doomed because a similar library got 7k installs? If you want to talk about this library, why did you use a lie title, why did you hype the most basic features, why did you talk about what if offers like a poor advertisement. I can't say a single good thing about your video. Do better next time. (hope this helps, it's not my intention to make you sad).

You talk in a good way and very understandable. I like it, it fits UA-cam style content very well. This said, I think showing way more code will be much better, since we are software engineers, examples, real implementations in your editor instead of showing the documentation. Providing a plus-value and a concise way to go through the library with a simple app built from start to finish that shows all what you talked about Showing >>> Telling, especially in tech.

This dead that dead... Deno killed node, remember

Doesn't look bad at all. But does it outperform Nestjs tho?? Coz at the end of the day that's all that matters.

blah blah blah, I would rather stick wth NestJS,if i want to use a typescript based very flexible framework, I would rather use ExpressJS with typescript, why waste time on immature framework.

Your voice or the way you pronounce words, is weirdly soothing and gratifying, like the click of a mechanical keyboard key being pressed or pumping gas and stopping it exactly at a whole dollar amount.

i just want to need remember a littles things because I got a lot year that I did not use Ruby on Rails. Great video for my case, you rock, man.

« Rust doesn’t have a run button » *spills coffee everywhere laughing* Ah JS kids these days

I've already watched four videos from your channel and I just can't get enough of it

"there is a gem for everything" mostly for what you dont need (activeadmin from the top of my mind), giving you the illusion that you're gonna save time but destroy your productivity as soon as your project becomes something else than a stupid phpmyadmin. Same goes with webpacker and other stupid ideas to build gems for js dependencies Same goes with turbo and other "ruby-js" frameworks (rjs was a total failure, why the fuck did they try to replace it with something even more retarded in the first place) Same goes with the rails "scaffold generator". Real applications rarely something that looks like a collection of CRUD on your db tables. Take a look at aws API if you dont see what I mean "gem for api authorization" yeah, the thing you can implement quickly and clearly with stupid PORO objects but instead people prefer to install a very badly conceived gem with unreadable config like cancancan or a couple millions LOC gem for authentication (if that's what you mean by "authorization") like devise that can be implemented in a 100 LOC with full control over the code (ie: tests) and without the hassle of debugging this pile of shit as soon as you want to do something that slightly deviates from the original intent of the gem. As far as im concerned, if a gem as "rails" as a dependency and the dependency is not ONLY to attach some hooks into the framework lifecycle (like loading config at server start / reloading config when code change in dev mode etc...), it means the gem is shit and should under no circumstances be added to the project. In 17 years, I've seen too many projects being dead stuck because if shitty gems like haml and friends.

1. "slower than other languages" for 99% of projects, it doesn't change anything. If you reach the point where you need this extra performances, well either you're rich and you can afford to rewrite because your project grew outside of rails boundaries (but most of your scaling problems are NOT language related, ask twitter) or you have extremely specific needs and you made a bad choice from the beginning, shame on you. There is also the possibility that your code is garbage because you wrote it "the rails way" (and "the rails way" is garbage) 2.1. "limited low level operations" a) as stated previously, in 99% of projects you dont need it b) rails is built on top of ruby, ruby has a decent cover for low level operations (would be nice if you could actually define what you mean by that) c) ruby is built on top of C and is super easily extensible through the C API (you can also use C++ actually) precisely for edge cases where you need functions that are not avaiable or very high performance but you're not ready (or dont need) to sacrifice your whole stack to a less convenient language (this applies to 1 as well) 2.2 "this can make it difficult to interract with the OS" LOL. Ruby, as many modern languages, is quite portable (lacks windows support i admit, but just dont run your servers on windows. I mean, we are in the docker era for 10y+ already). Actually, i find it harder to interract with the OS in java. And again, ruby is extensible so build the missing bindings in a small gem and you're good to go. 3. "limited concurrency support [..] GIL" first of all, *ruby on rails* is not using a GIL. The MRI is. That's why we run multi-process servers, each process being multi-threaded to give way to another thread while the current thread is waiting (which happens a lot in 99% of applications since they're heavily relying on database queries, ie syscalls that interrupts). Also, jruby (and many other interpreters) are an option. Again not an argument. Running too many threads in the same server in web is not a good practice anyway. I prefer to have many containers with each 5 processes of 5 threads and scale my containers up than having 1 or 2 instances with hundred of threads. Especially if they run into an orchestrator, small containers are easier to do bin packing And to add to 1 and 2, if you use jruby, you have access to all java libraries in your ruby code to have interractions with the OS that might be missing (or .NET if you use ironRuby, or ...) There are a lot of critics to address ruby on rails, but I keep hearing those ones since 2007 and none of them have actually proved valid (again, ask twitter).