Відео

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler "called a charade", it's the House?

@@runarvollan No, I didn’t pick up on that. Good spot.

Yes but you've missed the entire plot line of the costume shop owner and his daughter knowing exactly where Bill was going, because they gave him the EXACT cape everyone else was wearing at the party and the kid gave Bill a tip on which cape to choose. They knew. And the shop owner was selling his daughter into child sex slavery. Make the connection between the two. A pedophile pimp guessed correctly where Bill was going. They were alarmingly threatening when he appeared at the house too, giving him a warning and the Red Cloak unmasked gave him the death stare. If it was just an adults sex orgy, why are they keeping it all so secret? Why are they killing people? Why were they immediately on guard when Bill turned up in a taxi rather than a limo (because he's an outsider)? Rothschild. Epstein. Henry Kissinger. All very powerful rich connected Jewish families with one major thing in common. The P word. And Kubrick knew. There's a reason Christmas decorations are everywhere in the movie BUT the house. Jews don't celebrate Christmas.

Haven’t seen it.. but from what I hissing it’s about love and understanding the person you are with.. but it also has a deeper meaning about elites in control and things like that

No he wasn't. He was the man on the balcony that nodded to Bill. The red cloak was the man at the gate who personally handed Bill the warning letter and gave him the death stare.

no

"Great party, isn't it?"

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler "calls a charade", it's the House?

They're not people at all. The whole movie is about Satanism. Those are demons. Nick is the devil and Zeigler is God and Bill is Jesus. The hooker who died was Mary

What an un-nuanced, simple-minded and un-intellectual opinion. Your username is accurate.

Funniest comment I’ve ever seen. You win.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler "called a charade", it's the House?

polar opposites attract each other. im also quiet and introvert and extroverted crazy girls like me. sometime i like it but in the big picture its a tragedy, because its always doomed...

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler "called a charade", it's the House?

@@runarvollan What you mean?

My theory? Mandy died of a drug overdose, no foul play, but their sick little elite group have indeed been responsible for other deaths and horrors.

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler calls a charade, it's the House?

The best scene? Better than the whole ritual, fidelio, esoteric music and “remove your clothes” bit? Naaaah

It wasn't the Party that Ziegler called a charade, it was the House.

I think ITV or Channel 4 but not sure of the year.

I think this is a movie about class relationships, as seen through both male and female lens. Middle class Bill and his wife can't handle the severity of power dynamics happening in the elite circles. Sacrifices, sex trafficking, drug trade, sex with minors, blackmailing, unimaginable wealth, seemingly otherworldly secrecy. They're equal amount jealous and repulsed by it. And in a realistic fashion, Bill doesn't even encounter the real elites, the old powerful families, he only encounters their hoffaktor Ziegler who runs a Masonic lodge for them. Because that's the extent to which middle class people can see that world. Speaking of Kubrick, freemasonry and conspiracy theories, Buzz Aldrin is a high degree mason. That doesn't help to shun conspiracy theories away, I say...

Dogmatic though isnt it? Everybody wants others. Its human nature. Doing everything one wants though is another story.

Yeah. The ritual might represent the desire of Bill for unholy things lol but then he is not ready and thus gets expelled - goes back to normal life. Btw it is known that freems blackmail each other into fkg other members wife to be sure of their devotion to the cause.

Ever noticed how it isn't the Party that Ziegler calls a charade, it's the House?

@@runarvollan maybe he thought tom cruise came because he wanted to talk about his wife ?

The main purpose of putting America's two fastest men on the 2nd and 3rd leg was to try and build some sort of a lead so that Ryan Bailey could hold off Bolt. That plan worked for half of the race until Yohan Blake cut into the American lead on the third leg. I believe the relay splits for each runner according to the order of the race were 10.15, 8.85, 9.12, and 8.92 seconds for the Americans and 10.2, and 8.90, 9.04, and 8.70 seconds for the Jamaicans. And based on the fact that Michael Frater ran a quicker than Ryan Bailey on the longest leg of the relay, it made no sense to put him on a leg Where he'd run even slower than Jamaica's fifth best sprinter.

@@eamparbeng great strategy until you get the baton at the same time. And now you’re asking a high 9.99 guy to putrun a guy who can run a sub 9.6 And even if Bailey received the baton earlier bolt would have caught him. Third leg and anchor leg are the most important legs. Simply because they can erase and make up for all the errors. We’ve seen teams get out to a great start then lose the race with this exchange. I think gay to gatlin would have propelled them. But it would have been very close

@@certifiedchaos4643 probably. But NOBODY was beating Jamaica that year. Even without Asafa Powell, they were still formidable. It was overkill having the three fastest men of all time in the same 100m final. This was later proven to true when Bolt, Blake and Powell were out of their primes, they still beat young and up and coming teams like Japan and Canada in Rio 2016

@@eamparbeng true u.s didn’t put their home run hitter on anchor gatlin. That leg is important because u need a100 guy who can catch ppl or extend the lead. A lot of teams make this mistake in relays hoping the anchor can maintain. Even in the 4x400 for example team gb women put their best 400 meter on second leg and they usually finish fourth or fifth. But if they put her on the anchor leg I’m sure they would grab a medal especially in the 2019 champs 2021 Olympics

@@certifiedchaos4643 you can say that again. In conclusion, if you want your relay team to win or put a good fight, you need to have a decently balanced squad in terms of speed and well drilled in the baton exchange. This is exactly why Japan has been able to hold their own against the Americans, Jamaicans and British for more than a decade at major championships. they hold the Asian 4x100m record of 37.43 seconds set in Doha 2019 world championships, which is very quick. I watched that race. Though that quartet didn't have the speed of the Americans and British, the way their baton exchanges were so smooth and fluid that they held their own. And because of that, this is the why the Japanese track coaches want each of their runners to run under 10 seconds each at a possibility of winning gold one day.

World's top dogs aren't gods either. They think they are. That's not a good thing. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

its in a league of its own in a way. One has a hard time drawing one conclusion of it. The article announcing the dead women in eyes wide shut was written by the same reporter (apparently Kubrick hired him to have authentic newspaper writing) who wrote his death announcement article. They are written in the same way. Both state that they were seen before their deaths happy and in good moods, and that their death wasn't suspicious. Obviously we know the girl was killed to protect the secret society, was Kubricks article coincidence? One thing seems true; Kubrick baited the audience in the build up to the the movie with a sex filled orgy type movie featuring Nicole Kidman and tom cruise, a look into the sex life of a sexy couple. what we got was more a look into the sex world of the super elites and the secret society's power that runs them. He makes this clear in the only scene Kubrick himself is in. When the piano player is telling tom about this crazy sex orgy he should come to see, Kubrick as an extra looks directly into the Camera and at the actors as they come in. This is a no-no for extras. Kubrick is nothing if not meticulous in his movies, and was dressed in the same color suit as the piano player was to make the point. He was the piano player in this sense, we our tom cruise. You know what's crazy? i think he's making two equally disturbing points in this movie. The other is about the jealousy that exists in relationships, how sensitive we men are to our women wanting other men(it's profoundly painful when you are truly committed to a women as a man, it demascilates you along with other things ) and how women seem powerless to not feel this way eventually. Its like he's saying as long as you base self worth on sex your going to be tormented for it, and he shows us two extremes. One the elites, the other ideal looking families.

Trained by Ziegler to do this. Who btw did not lock his bathroom door, but pretends to wanna keep cheating secret.

?????

@@caeserornothing *I agree. I’m not too certain on my assessment of Owen Wilson’s performance. I guess time will tell how his portrayal holds up to the test of time.*

@Brian.N Dude are you OK

@@caeserornothing *On second thought, I reckon Mel Gibson gave the best portrayal of a closeted homosexual father any man can do. The emotional scene during the sex change procedure had me crying. Do you concur?*

Well, he's pretty much saying to him that the police is under their control (whoever they are) and bad things aren't happening to Bill only because of the kindness that has been extended to him. And that this kindness can stop if he won't stop acting foolish.

It wasn't the Party that Ziegler called a charade, it was the House.

Bill is Afraid

Thank you

He made a movie that people were not meant to see

@@chucktempalski2572 Kind of, but its in a league of its own in a way. One has a hard time drawing one conclusion of it. The article announcing the dead women in eyes wide shut was written by the same reporter (apparently Kubrick hired him to have authentic newspaper writing) who wrote his death announcement article. They are written in the same way. Both state that they were seen before their deaths happy and in good moods, and that their death wasn't suspicious. Obviously we know the girl was killed to protect the secret society, was Kubricks article coincidence? One thing seems true; Kubrick baited the audience in the build up to the the movie with a sex filled orgy type movie featuring Nicole Kidman and tom cruise, a look into the sex life of a sexy couple. what we got was more a look into the sex world of the super elites and the secret society's power that runs them. He makes this clear in the only scene Kubrick himself is in. When the piano player is telling tom about this crazy sex orgy he should come to see, Kubrick as an extra looks directly into the Camera and at the actors as they come in. This is a no-no for extras. Kubrick is nothing if not meticulous in his movies, and was dressed in the same color suit as the piano player was to make the point. He was the piano player in this sense, we our tom cruise. You know what's crazy? i think he's making two equally disturbing points in this movie. The other is about the jealousy that exists in relationships, how sensitive we men are to our women wanting other men(it's profoundly painful when you are truly committed to a women as a man, it demascilates you along with other things ) and how women seem powerless to not feel this way eventually. Its like he's saying as long as you base self worth on sex your going to be tormented for it, and he shows us two extremes. One the elites, the other ideal looking families.

@@allencampbell1058 so why did they release it?

@@billyjesus5442 hiding in plain sight?

This comment makes the most sense. The best way to maintain anonymity is to 1) not kill people and 2) convince people who they suspect can't keep secrets that they are capable of and willing to kill people who don't keep quiet.