Oxford University Physics Society
Oxford University Physics Society
  • 36
  • 44 980
Prof. Steven Simon: The Story of Anyons | Oxford University Physics Society
In most quantum physics courses one learns that all particles in the universe are bosons or fermions. This turns out not to be true. In lower dimensions there are other possibilities known as Anyons. First theoretically conceived in the 1970s, they have been directly observed only very recently. I will explain this physics at a basic level and try to explain at least one of the experimental observations in detail.
April 2023 @ Oxford University Physics Society
Переглядів: 322

Відео

Prof Ian Shipsey: Bionic Hearing: the Science and the Experience
Переглядів 8123 роки тому
We hope you enjoy this heart-warming talk by Prof Ian Shipsey on how cochlear implants work. Please not that we had to mute the audio example at around 28min to avoid copyright violations. Cochlear implants are the first device to successfully restore neural function. They have instigated a popular but controversial revolution in the treatment of deafness, and they serve as a model for research...
Prof Thorsten Hesjedal: Magnetic Skyrmions
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
Magnetic skyrmions are magnetisation swirls with unique topological properties, leading to a number of novel physical effects such as emergent electromagnetism and non-trivial magnetic dynamics. The prototypical skyrmion-hosting materials are chiral magnets, in which the long-range ordered skyrmion lattice is found as the bulk state. Depending on the material, the individual skyrmion size in ch...
Prof Ard Louis: Physics and Information: From Evolution to Algorithms
Переглядів 1,3 тис.3 роки тому
This is a recording from last week's talk by Prof Ard Louis. Hope you enjoy! Abstract: I will explore some intriguing parallels between biological evolution and deep learning. The link between these fields is the coding theorem from algorithmic information theory (which really should be much more widely taught in physics!). It is a formalisation of the infinite monkey theorem, and predicts that...
Prof Andrei Starinets: Black Holes, Holography and the Quark-gluon Plasma
Переглядів 9513 роки тому
Hot and dense nuclear matter created in heavy ion collisions at accelerators such as LHC or RHIC is known as the quark-gluon plasma. Theoretical understanding of the quark-gluon plasma requires non-perturbative tools. One of them, known as gauge-string duality or holography, comes from string theory and relates spectra of black hole excitations to transport properties of theoretical models of t...
Prof Mason Porter: Opinion Models and Social Influence on Networks
Переглядів 2373 роки тому
From the spreading of diseases and memes to the development of opinions and social influence, dynamical processes are influenced heavily by the networks on which they occur. In this talk, I'll discuss social influence and opinion models on networks. I'll present a few types of models including threshold models of social contagions, voter models that co-evolve with network structure, and bounded...
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof Andrew Wells "The Physics of Ice Sheet and Glaciers"
Переглядів 5673 роки тому
Mass loss from the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets is a key uncertainty for predictions of sea level change over the coming century. The evolution of large glacial ice sheets depends on a number of physical processes, including the mechanical deformation and flow of the ice, and thermodynamic forcing from the atmosphere and ocean. In this class I introduced the key physical controls on the m...
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof Paul Fendley "A Theory of Theories"
Переглядів 4813 роки тому
The renormalisation group is the most profound development in theoretical physics in the last half-century. It goes beyond a theoretical understanding of only one particular phenomenon, instead enabling one to show that seemingly distinct physical systems have exactly the same behaviour. This correspondence is called ``universality’’, and the renormalisation group provides a precise framework f...
Oxford University Physics Soc: Prof Sonia Contera "Physics Underlying the Shape of Living Organisms"
Переглядів 2373 роки тому
To be alive, biological organisms must grow and construct structures that endure the pass of time in a complex environment, without violating the second law of thermodynamics. This is achieved by constantly creating shapes that both store and dissipate mechanical energy; this process generates the temporal scales that are characteristic of biological growth patterns at different spatial scales....
OUPS: Prof Hannah Christensen "Butterflies and Hurricanes: The Physics of Weather Prediction"
Переглядів 2893 роки тому
What the public often don't realise is that weather prediction is a problem in physics. Producing a weather forecast requires understanding the equations that describe the atmosphere, including the Navier-Stokes equations, and the equations of thermodynamics and radiation, among many others. But more fundamentally, it requires an appreciation of chaos theory, a special property of some systems ...
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof Bence Kocsis "Black Hole Astrophysics"
Переглядів 6503 роки тому
Black holes are the ultimate prisons of the Universe, regions of spacetime where the enormous gravity prohibits matter or even light to escape to infinity. Yet, matter falling toward the black holes may shine spectacularly, generating the strongest source of radiation. These sources provide us with astrophysical laboratories of extreme physical conditions that cannot be realized on Earth. In th...
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof David Wark "Neutrinos - Ghostly Messengers of New Physics" 2
Переглядів 1853 роки тому
Here is part 2 of Prof Wark's talk on neutrino physics. Learn all about past and current beautiful, enormous neutrino detection experiments. Neutrinos were first proposed in the early 1930’s to explain some puzzles in some of the very earliest particle physics data. Their originator, Wolfgang Pauli, apologized for having proposed something that could not be observed (the last theorist known to ...
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof David Wark "Neutrinos - Ghostly Messengers of New Physics"
Переглядів 3163 роки тому
Neutrinos were first proposed in the early 1930’s to explain some puzzles in some of the very earliest particle physics data. Their originator, Wolfgang Pauli, apologized for having proposed something that could not be observed (the last theorist known to have made that apology). Luckily Pauli was right in his proposal and wrong in his fear, as neutrinos have now been detected from reactors, fr...
Dr William Barter: Testing nature by examining flavour (Beyond the Standard Model 5/6)
Переглядів 1123 роки тому
This talk was part of the 2021 Inter-University Conference: "Beyond the Standard Model".
Dr Jose Eliel Carmargo-Molina: Beyond the Standard Models (Beyond the Standard Model 4/6)
Переглядів 1443 роки тому
This talk was part of the 2021 Inter-University Conference: "Beyond the Standard Model". Full title: Beyond the Standard Models: Probing the intersection of cosmology and particle physics
Dr Kimberly Palladino: The State of the Dark (Beyond the Standard Model 2/6)
Переглядів 1593 роки тому
Dr Kimberly Palladino: The State of the Dark (Beyond the Standard Model 2/6)
Prof Jon Butterworth: News from the Energy Frontier (Beyond the Standard Model 1/6)
Переглядів 1703 роки тому
Prof Jon Butterworth: News from the Energy Frontier (Beyond the Standard Model 1/6)
Prof David Wark: Through a Mirror Darkly (Beyond the Standard Model 6/6)
Переглядів 1173 роки тому
Prof David Wark: Through a Mirror Darkly (Beyond the Standard Model 6/6)
Prof Matthew Wing: New Accelerator Technologies (Beyond the Standard Model 3/6)
Переглядів 2763 роки тому
Prof Matthew Wing: New Accelerator Technologies (Beyond the Standard Model 3/6)
Oxford University Physics Society: Ciaran Hasnip "DUNE: The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment"
Переглядів 4223 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Ciaran Hasnip "DUNE: The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment"
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof Vlatko Vedral "Modern Quantum Optics"
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Prof Vlatko Vedral "Modern Quantum Optics"
OUPS: Dr Jan Sbierski "General Relativity, Black Holes, and the Strong Cosmic Censorship Conjecture"
Переглядів 5603 роки тому
OUPS: Dr Jan Sbierski "General Relativity, Black Holes, and the Strong Cosmic Censorship Conjecture"
Oxford University Physics Society: James Read "The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics"
Переглядів 5 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: James Read "The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics"
Oxford University Physics Society "Quantum Field Theory, the Standard Model and the LHC"
Переглядів 1,8 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society "Quantum Field Theory, the Standard Model and the LHC"
Oxford University Physics Society "Supersymmetry A Lesson in the Physics of Mathematics"
Переглядів 1,5 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society "Supersymmetry A Lesson in the Physics of Mathematics"
Oxford University Physics Society: Christopher Beem "String theory and the Geometry of Spacetime"
Переглядів 2,8 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Christopher Beem "String theory and the Geometry of Spacetime"
Oxford University Physics Society: Professor Subir Sarkar "Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model"
Переглядів 4,8 тис.3 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Professor Subir Sarkar "Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model"
Oxford University Physics Society: Péter Juhász "Ultracold Atoms"
Переглядів 5793 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Péter Juhász "Ultracold Atoms"
Oxford University Physics Society "Why the Physics of Phase Separation Matters for Living Systems"
Переглядів 1,1 тис.4 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society "Why the Physics of Phase Separation Matters for Living Systems"
Oxford University Physics Society: Dr Nicole Robb "Rapid COVID-19 Virus Detection"
Переглядів 3694 роки тому
Oxford University Physics Society: Dr Nicole Robb "Rapid COVID-19 Virus Detection"

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @BilelMnasri13
    @BilelMnasri13 4 місяці тому

    A wonderful meeting!

  • @hanswurst2490
    @hanswurst2490 4 місяці тому

    I'm "only" an "interested amateur". But I know to use my brain. Took 10 years watching/hearing physics lectures to find such a substantial doubt. All physcist claim to be of that mindset, but surely not in public. The newest "fight against conspiracy theorys" doesn't make it better. And also collecting money by claiming to have found "the truth" is pretty sneaky. Many questions/doubts came to my mind ever since, and nowhere answers. E.g. various possibilities to craft a SN 1a. I found only one article, whithout further explanation, saying "not a big difference". HERE was the first (short) explanation. And why you are still trusting such candles. To say "we don't know", "we have problems" is not a shame, and could surely take off grounds for those crazy conspiracy ideas! I bet! They also come out of the (correct) thought, that we CANNOT know everything... and scientists are not admitting it.

  • @vladkuchkin2577
    @vladkuchkin2577 5 місяців тому

    www.youtube.com/@Skyrmion-magnetic

  • @thorebergmann1986
    @thorebergmann1986 8 місяців тому

    Please donor some food to this guy and give him holiday

  • @mountainc1027
    @mountainc1027 11 місяців тому

    my favourite physics society talk!!!

  • @gauravkulkarni9723
    @gauravkulkarni9723 Рік тому

    Well explained, basic intro up to first half hour. 👍🏼

  • @jamesoleary9475
    @jamesoleary9475 Рік тому

    May I use some of your figures in my Bachelor's thesis? I'm writing about Magnetic Phases in CeAgBi2, (centrosymmetric not quite the same phenomenon- RKKY & Heisenberg frustration, no DM interaction, but will compare it to other materials which are more as you describe). Could I just cite it like this? Hesjedal, Thorsten. “Magnetic Skyrmions.” Lecture, Oxford University Physics Society, Oxford, May 24, 2021.

  • @valeriusevanligasetiawan6518

    do you have any video that explains magnetic hopfions?

  • @phillustrator
    @phillustrator Рік тому

    "I hope this is legible" Nope. It's not. But cool lecture nonetheless.

  • @abhirishi6200
    @abhirishi6200 Рік тому

    Good video!

  • @abhirishi6200
    @abhirishi6200 Рік тому

    Interesting Physics yo!

  • @karimshariff7379
    @karimshariff7379 Рік тому

    Thank-you for this general lecture.

  • @muskduh
    @muskduh Рік тому

    Thanks for the video presentation.

  • @websparrow
    @websparrow Рік тому

    Seriously, where has science gone?

  • @RoulDukeGonzo
    @RoulDukeGonzo 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this. Can you list all the udemy courses I'd need to take to understand this ;-)

    • @SubTroppo
      @SubTroppo 2 роки тому

      With a "handle" like yours, you might need additionally a list of all the "stimulants" required to understand, but perhaps the lack of an 'a' in the first part makes all the difference. For my part I would need what amounts to a new brain too.

    • @RoulDukeGonzo
      @RoulDukeGonzo 2 роки тому

      @@SubTroppo Thanks Palo, not sure what you mean though

    • @SubTroppo
      @SubTroppo 2 роки тому

      @@RoulDukeGonzo Are you aware of the character Raoul Duke in Hunter S Thompson's "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and the character's prodigious consumption of illegal substances?

    • @RoulDukeGonzo
      @RoulDukeGonzo 2 роки тому

      @@SubTroppo OIC, I thought you were saying I needed stimulants because of my typo! Now I get it. I'm serious though, I want to learn more about this.

  • @rahuls2111
    @rahuls2111 2 роки тому

    G’day Subin Sir, it’s time for Physics community to challenge norm, exactly how you are doing. We have been “stuck” for the last 100 years glorifying theories of the past, that are clearly struggling present day. The World needs Thought Leaders & Challengers like you 🙌🏼 Thank you & all the best ✨

  • @Zayden.
    @Zayden. 2 роки тому

    Mathematics is a human conceptual tool. It is subordinate to human thinking, reasoning, evidence, physical reality. What we see with Lambda CDM Model is mathematical dogma, mysticism. Why should there be a single set of equations describing the whole large scale history of the universe? Can you do that with earth's history? Or the solar system's history? Or the Milky Way's history? This is nothing but placing mathematics up on a supreme pedestal. Just because the math can do things doesn't mean that's what's happening in physical reality. Some of these so-called physicists need to get educated, they really do veer into the territory of being a priesthood at this point, worshiping abstract mathematical symbols and telling the rest of us we're too stupid to understand it.

  • @edmundwoolliams1240
    @edmundwoolliams1240 2 роки тому

    Andrei Starinets is brilliant!

  • @michaelaristidou2605
    @michaelaristidou2605 2 роки тому

    Terrible lecture

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 2 роки тому

    Symmetry is dual to anti-symmetry -- the spin statistics theorem. Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- atomic duality. Time symmetry (Newtonian mechanics) is dual to time asymmetry (thermodynamics, increasing entropy). -- time duality. Space translation symmetry is dual to time translation symmetry. Time is dual to space -- Einstein. Time duality is dual to space duality! Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Duality creates reality!

  • @VictorE1030
    @VictorE1030 2 роки тому

    Well done! Fantastic talk

  • @darrenjurme7231
    @darrenjurme7231 2 роки тому

    Whoever thought the white board was acceptable here was wrong. Software is needed instead.

  • @stefanschleps8758
    @stefanschleps8758 2 роки тому

    Excellent. Question: If information can be stored in this way, can't force/ or power be stored as well? Seems to me it could. Are skyrmions twisted, or compressed, or neither, or both?

    • @spiralofinspiration3653
      @spiralofinspiration3653 2 роки тому

      Yes. Force is stored as the potential scalar which acts as the eigenvalues to the circular polarization vector. Skyrmions are compressed physical matter which exerts strong "winding" exchanges of energy in a potential field.

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 3 роки тому

    Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 3 роки тому

    Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio

  • @Brewbug
    @Brewbug 3 роки тому

    26:52 🤭

    • @TheArtiKle
      @TheArtiKle 3 роки тому

      “i want to kill myself” lol

  • @pseudolullus
    @pseudolullus 3 роки тому

    Pretty good

  • @eishuno
    @eishuno 3 роки тому

    Is it possible to get the deck he was using?

  • @eishuno
    @eishuno 3 роки тому

    Subir Sir ekhon amar favorite science related lecturer UA-cam ey. This kind of scientific scepticism and challenging the status quo is very essential.

  • @alirezamoghtader2307
    @alirezamoghtader2307 3 роки тому

    perfect

  • @emeraldeyes9565
    @emeraldeyes9565 3 роки тому

    Nobody can read your scrawl. Prepare slides or don't bother.

  • @nulliusinverba5354
    @nulliusinverba5354 3 роки тому

    At 12:02 I have a question. How is it a totally random process when we start with RNA? Aren't these experiments on RNA showing a previously unknown property of RNA molecules?

  • @cashkaval
    @cashkaval 3 роки тому

    My brain gave me the blue screen error when I found out he holds christian creationist beliefs. This explains the subtle ways he manages to dodge all the sensitive questions about life on other planets, conciousness computability, etc. And instead of the term "creationists" he uses the "anti-evolutionary literature" euphemism 58:16, when referencing and constructing his arguments. Pretty lame. I had pretty high expectations from Oxford.

    • @nulliusinverba5354
      @nulliusinverba5354 3 роки тому

      A logical person does not consider that an ad hominem fallacy shows any statement to be either true or false. Perhaps you should address his statements instead of creating boogeyman euphemisms. If your belief system is the self contradictory philosophy that only physical matter and energy are real (which sadly is all too common amongst atheistic elites) then perhaps you should reconsider what you hold to be true (also an abstract concept).

    • @cashkaval
      @cashkaval 3 роки тому

      @@nulliusinverba5354 you know, using fancy words won't make you logical or smart, just makes you appear one. Superstition and mysticism don't belong in the 21st century, not 50 years after we stepped on the Moon. Of course they're are consistent with a certain Cro-Magnon world of view that still persists to this day, but luckly the religion indoctrination nonsense is an ongoing receding pile of bull sh*t.

    • @nulliusinverba5354
      @nulliusinverba5354 3 роки тому

      @@cashkaval Please tell us how you really feel :) But you see, the scientific method doesn't depend on what ever anyone believes which is why your continued ad hominem adds nothing more than to make you feel better. But I can understand your preference to attack the person which does protect one from actually dealing in the statements being presented. If you prefer not to address the substance of an issue - such as whether you believe only physical matter and energy are real (materialism) - then there is no discussion at all. Mere invectives does not show anyone to be logical or wise. I bring up materialism as it is often what is behind such ad hominem attacks as you make. This argument from incredulity fallacy often seems to be based on ones belief in materialism.

  • @RadicalCaveman
    @RadicalCaveman 3 роки тому

    "Our usual modesty as physicists"? I never heard of that!

  • @JanischMaximilian
    @JanischMaximilian 3 роки тому

    26:52 😅😅😅

  • @schmetterling4477
    @schmetterling4477 3 роки тому

    OK, there is another person who doesn't understand quantum mechanics. But why make a video about it?

  • @aslankaranlik589
    @aslankaranlik589 3 роки тому

    ***** Lord Jesus messiah DARK DAYS IS COMING Woe to you, O religious scholars, experts of [God's orders and prohibitions]! You took the key to the information door away. You did not enter this door yourself, and you prevented those who wanted to enter. (Luke, 11:52) ..VERY IMPORTANT.You will soon find out that these words are real..When the war starts, if you ask God forgiveness, it won't be accepted.. Very important information. You say they took us to hell in the presence of God . why don't you use your mind ? .All beauties are waiting for you, you will be very happy . nothing will be the same as my words may sound like a joke to you i'm god's revenge sword..They will learn this too .THE Wrath of God has come. you need a mind to understand Damn those who slander God and deny their words . Except for those who believe in the words of God and obey her commands .There are many who want to go to hell. I only report the facts . fame, money won't save you . obedience to god only saves . You are waiting for God's punishment, you will love it very much.. the punishment is too close I guess nobody wants to get rid of.I am doing my duty The knowledge given by the devil is .Nostradamus's prophecy is frightening 3rd World War and Turkey. watch with subtitles It also describes the expected savior ua-cam.com/video/h5cw0jaLtfI/v-deo.html If religious scholars had knowledge, he would not remain without faith.. imam mahdı the cats get precise information about the existence of god.undeniable evidence ua-cam.com/video/l0HrgNxpqRk/v-deo.html.. I warned the devil side before people...they obeyed what I said..they do whatever I say..they fear god.Can you think about what to do?.the enemy of god is my enemy..give up slandering god..don't say she didn't say. scholars of religion you are waiting for god's torment, don't worry too close ...you will learn the cost of slander god MATTA 24-27 Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You look like whitewashed graves that look beautiful on the outside, but are filled with dead bones and all kinds of filth. 28 You appear outwardly towards people, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and malice..Let those who do not obey what I say burn in hell forever.. I am your order . obedience to me is obedience to god You are an enemy of God, as long as you don't do what the god says.. Angel writes what she does .. the end of many is very close..you ignore the facts... are you ready for the torture of god... scholars you are going to hell..you are taking people to hell..ask god forgiveness..tell people the truth..otherwise wait for god's punishment..I am the light of god..I show you the way of salvation..I was written in the scriptures..She brought out a powerful savior for us from David's line (Luke, 1: 69-71)save your loved ones and yourself..god will take revenge. I am the savior written in the scriptures.. God's punishment has come, you don't even realize, the world has cheated on you ua-cam.com/video/_smQUFCKUX8/v-deo.html estas llevando gente al infierno .no ocultes los hechos .Soy el ultimo estímulo.. .Jesucristo no está muerto, dijiste ¿por qué está muerto?.aprender los hechos ..mensaje del salvador..sálvate a ti mismo y a tus seres queridos del tormento eterno ua-cam.com/video/oOZYj5lmuTA/v-deo.html Jesus não está morto..a chegada dele está muito perto ua-cam.com/video/rFl0Cb1C7ks/v-deo.html Иисус не умер, его прибытие очень близко..3 мировые войны и факты.сообщение спасителя ua-cam.com/video/jXdbOAGo6sg/v-deo.html Ісус Христос не помер, написано його від'їзд..3 світові війни..факти, які ви знаєте ua-cam.com/video/hbbv2IbzxeU/v-deo.html GREAT ANGEL ua-cam.com/video/rnS8Ynxgq9I/v-deo.html

  • @christineliang4670
    @christineliang4670 3 роки тому

    Great!!

  • @abhishekchatterjee7184
    @abhishekchatterjee7184 3 роки тому

    Very nice lecture, Quantum Mechanics is one of my favorite Subjects/Topic.

  • @abhishekchatterjee7184
    @abhishekchatterjee7184 3 роки тому

    Nice

  • @JCO2002
    @JCO2002 3 роки тому

    Will they be required to return their Nobel prizes once shown to be wrong?

    • @RadicalCaveman
      @RadicalCaveman 3 роки тому

      No way to do that. But of course, the evidence that led to the idea of an accelerating universe is very important regardless of whether or not the universe really accelerates.

    • @JCO2002
      @JCO2002 3 роки тому

      @@RadicalCaveman How so? If it's not really evidence, why is it important?

    • @RadicalCaveman
      @RadicalCaveman 3 роки тому

      @@JCO2002 It DEFINITELY is evidence. It may be that it's indirect evidence for an anisotropic universe rather than direct evidence for an accelerating one. That's what Subir is saying, if I'm understanding him correctly.

    • @JCO2002
      @JCO2002 3 роки тому

      @@RadicalCaveman Good point. I stand corrected.

    • @JL-fh4qw
      @JL-fh4qw 3 роки тому

      @@RadicalCaveman The data is the only thing that provides insight into an anisotropic universe (and only if you look at it clearly), but the interpretations and statistical methods employed by the Nobel Prize winners were completely wrong and begged the question. Subir's team had to recorrect the data manipulation to retrieve the original data.

  • @Asasnol21
    @Asasnol21 3 роки тому

    starts 8:00

  • @pedrogarcia7102
    @pedrogarcia7102 3 роки тому

    Very interesting talk, thanks for sharing 🙂👌

  • @clarkkent7999
    @clarkkent7999 3 роки тому

    It would be very helpful if you could type your notations rather than write them. The handwriting is totally illegible to me.

  • @subhashishbarik4319
    @subhashishbarik4319 3 роки тому

    I enjoyed the talk. By the way, your handwriting looks nothing less than a noisy signal!

  • @MediaSLSecondLife
    @MediaSLSecondLife 3 роки тому

    unbelievable 😜

  • @vincencohan3626
    @vincencohan3626 3 роки тому

    Im here of tenet

  • @mashinacs
    @mashinacs 3 роки тому

    Greetings from Serbia!

  • @davidwright8432
    @davidwright8432 3 роки тому

    Good talk, but that whiteboard has to go. Completely unreadable.

  • @tonywhitcombe8357
    @tonywhitcombe8357 3 роки тому

    can you actually show space time in reality instead of a drawing showing pseudoscience , not real , hoax, con job , your hijacking real science into a joke