Відео

Delightful. Thank you Michael.

At the end, Professor Krakauer mentioned a paper he was writing that wasn't published at the time. Is it available now? I'm curious about its content but haven't been able to locate it.

😆🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Best introduction ever "F'''Uck" as soon as the video starts. I love SEMF just the best of all time 💗

isn't a hypergraph where more than two vertices can be connected by an edge

Shape and function is information; where is the information stored? The question perhaps is how can proteins (made from the nucleus) effect the electromagnetic signals that direct shape and function? Also, what feedback mechanism informs the nucleus to shift protein generation.

Carlos Blanco es un ser educadisimo y super sencillo muy agradable me encanta escuchar sus conocimientos es muy inteligente .

The Body Electric, a 1985 book on bioelectromagnetism co-authored by Robert O. Becker

and yet the largest majority of Cell culture work is carried out in unstable EMF generating cell culture incubators at atmospheric oxygen tension (22%) versus physiologically 0.3-3% oxygen tension.

SLOW DOWN... don't let your mouth get so far ahead of your brain... Love your content, but presentation is tiresome.

I’m here cause I’m 5’9 and I wanna be 6 feet tall

Oh I love an aul debate Good luck Belfast Ireland 🇮🇪 ❤

1+1=3 Qed

Knot Theory uwu.

Interdisciplinary School 2024: semf.org.es/school2024/ 🕑 July 22-26 📌 Valencia, Spain + online 🎟 Limited places, get your ticket early! 🏠 On-campus accommodation available 📣 Spread the word!

Funding Campaign: opencollective.com/semf/projects/funding-campaign 🙏Support SEMF - every little helps 💸Any amount you give gets to us doubled 🗣Spread the word!

how can time's arrow be governed by causally connected events and entropy at the same time? which one is it?

The SEMF programme looks fascinating, but as I look around in wikipedia with the relevant keywords and find articles with titles like 'neuroethology', I realize that there has long been this field called 'Cybernetics' that lacks a 'popular' treatment of its foundational perspective, though I guess Wiener hoped his eponymous book might accomplish this; and I wonder why I've never met anyone who has read it ! Still, at least he managed to deposit his neologism 'cybernetics' in educated parlance - though maybe without the subtitle that defines it. I have long noticed, about the world, that there is scarcely any sense in the superb popular literature on evolution, of that essential empirical feature of living things, that they BEHAVE - the essense of which must be processing information from the other side of the semipermeable surface that de-fines them. Isnt it funny how our basic perception of any thing (organism or not) tends to bracket everything external to these *surfaces* that appear to us. Insofar as these appearances puzzle perception, the perceiver's curosity is almost strictly directed at what could be *inside* this surface, never thinking that the Main thing inside an organism is going to be its own curiosity about what is *outside* that surface.

'we made a picasso tadpole, scrambled . .' - How ?

'feet forward' (?)

Why don’t we mass grow those worms that can keep being cut up

🧑‍💻🍀🍀♻️creia q era @mrbet

Absolutely love this guy's and his teams research!

Imagine having an eye on ur tail....if you had a tail....Dont start me Pondering

Haven't tune in .....in ages ....always good fun

Information and Life The Age of Life The ability to carry out actions differentiates inanimate matter from living matter. In turn, every action involves the management of Information. We do not know what Matter is or what Life is, and we assume that all life forms that currently inhabit the planet descend from a common ancestor (LUCA), an organism whose complexity is evident if we consider that it is attributed the ability to reproduce. Due to the above, it is reasonable to assume that “seeds of life” existed prior to LUCA. Assuming that the “seeds of life” emerged together with the Big Bang is a bold postulate, and as such requires a solid empirical foundation. When observing Evolution considering the information that our ancestors have managed, and that currently managed by humanity, it is possible to distinguish seven evolutionary milestones; Its analysis allows us to postulate that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe, and the existence of an “evolutionary pattern” is evident, which turns out to be the Golden Ratio. Evolutionary Milestones -Emergence of ”Seeds of Life”(1) (thirteen thousand eight hundred million years ago). -Emergence of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) three thousand eight hundred million years ago -Emergence of the brain (five hundred and fifty million years ago). -Emergence of what was the precursor of human language (2) (twenty-seven million years ago) -Emergence of the language that characterizes us(3) (around two hundred and twenty thousand years ago). -Emergence of “the information age” with the transistor (1950) -Evolutionary Singularity(4) proposed by Ray Kurzweil, who postulates that humanity will access a Singularity as a result of the exponential growth of information management (year 2045). Evolutionary sections Among successive evolutionary milestones we can distinguish the following six “Evolutionary Tranches”, with the duration indicated (in years): Tranche 1: 10,000,000,000 (13,800,000,000 - 3,800,000,000 = 10,000,000,000) Tranche 2: 3,250,000,000 (3,800,000,000 - 550,000,000 = 3,250,000,000) Tranche 3: 523,000,000 (550,000,000 - 27,000,000 = 523,000,000) Tranche 4: 26,780,000 (27,000,000 - 220,000 = 26,780,000) Tranche 5: 219,905 (220,000 - 95(5) = 219,905) Tranche 6: 95 (95 - 0 = 95) The particular variation experienced by the Evolutionary Sections over time suggests using the logarithm of said sections (LT) to analyze their behavior over time. The logarithms in question are as follows: LT1 = 10.0000 LT2 = 9.51188 LT3 = 8.71850 LT4 = 7.42781 LT5 = 5.34224 LT6 = 1.97772 The lines between two successive logarithms have the following slopes (P) P1 = -0.48812 (9.51188 - 10.0000 = -0.48812) P2 = -0.79338 (8.71850 - 9.51188 = -0.79338) P3 = -1.29069 (7.42781 - 8.71850 = -1.29069) P4 = -2.08557 (5.34224 - 7.42781 = -2.08557) P5 = -3.36452 (1.97772 - 5.34224 = -3.36452) After searching for an “evolutionary pattern” we will determine the variation between successive slopes, which is given by the Ratio (R) between them, that is, P2/P1; P3/P2; P4/P3; P5/P4, and is the following: R1 = 1.62538 R2 = 1.62682 R3 = 1.61586 R4 = 1.61324 The above values differ from the Golden Number (1.61803), a number also called the golden number, the number of God, the extreme and average ratio, the golden ratio, the golden mean, the golden ratio and the divine ratio, by 0.45%; 0.54%; 0.13% and 0.30%, respectively. In turn, the average of the sum of the ratios is 1.62032. This value differs from the golden ratio by 0.14%. The results obtained allow us to postulate that Evolution follows a pattern that is a function of Information and the golden ratio, and that Life goes back to the origin of the Universe. (1)The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is the putative common ancestral cell from which the three domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, originated. The complexity that LUCA is assumed to have does not give rise to affirming that it arose by “spontaneous generation”, it being valid to postulate the pre-existence of “seeds of life” prior to the emergence of LUCA; It is postulated that the origin of the “seeds of life” dates back to the moment when Matter arose in the Universe, that is, around thirteen thousand eight hundred million years. (2)“We find that the anatomical potential to produce and perceive sounds differentiated by their formants began at the latest by the time of our last common ancestor with Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea) about 27 Ma ago”; " Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech” (Science magazine) (3) The last change in the position of the hyoid bone in humans, which would have allowed access to the language that characterizes us, took place approximately two hundred and twenty thousand years ago, and its data is based on archaeological evidence and anthropological studies. There is no scientific source that records this change on an exact date. (4)Due to the exponential growth of information technologies, Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Technological Singularity will occur in the year 2045, at which time technological growth will be so rapid and so profound that it will be impossible to predict what its consequences will be. (5) It is the time between 1950 and 2045, the latter year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Singularity will take place.

Funding Campaign: opencollective.com/semf/projects/funding-campaign 🙏Support SEMF - every little helps 💸Any amount you give gets to us doubled 🗣Spread the word!

Hello, I analyzing your UA-cam channel and found your content to be good but there are many problems in your videos due to which the video is not going viral like thumbnail is not attractive, tags are not given properly and other problems.I want to talk to you about your channel growth if you are interested.

i can't express how amazed i am. especially with xenobots. thank you🙏

So, you used the Dirac's Belt Trick in music?!? That's insane, man.

❤🧡❤🧡❤

Life has been present since the beginning of the Universe One of the characteristics of living beings is their ability to store and manage information. Considering such a characteristic, it is possible to distinguish the following seven evolutionary milestones from the origin of the Universe: -Emergence of ”Seeds of Life”(1) (thirteen thousand eight hundred million years ago). -Emergence of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) three thousand eight hundred million years ago -Emergence of the brain (five hundred and fifty million years ago). -Emergence of what was the precursor of human language (2) (twenty-seven million years ago) -Emergence of the language that characterizes us(3) (around two hundred and twenty thousand years ago). -Emergence of “the information age” with the transistor (1950) -Evolutionary Singularity(4) proposed by Ray Kurzweil, who postulates that humanity will access a Singularity as a result of the exponential growth of information management (year 2045). Evolutionary sections Among successive evolutionary milestones we can distinguish the following six “Evolutionary Tranches”, with the duration indicated (in years): Tranche 1: 10,000,000,000 (13,800,000,000 - 3,800,000,000 = 10,000,000,000) Tranche 2: 3,250,000,000 (3,800,000,000 - 550,000,000 = 3,250,999,000) Tranche 3: 523,000,000 (550,000,000 - 27,000,000 = 523,000,000) Tranche 4: 26,780,000 (27,000,000 - 220,000 = 26,780,000) Tranche 5: 219,905 (220,000 - 95(5) = 219,909) Tranche 6: 95 (95 - 0 = 95) The ratio between consecutive evolutionary sections gives rise to what we will call “relative evolutionary speed between sections” (RES), resulting in the following five relative evolutionary speeds. RES 1 = 3.076923 ((10,000,000,000 / 3,250,000,000) = 3.076923 ) RES 2 = 6.214149 ((3,250,000,000 / 523,000,000) = 6.214149 ) RES 3 = 19.529499 ((523,000,000 / 26,780,000) = 19.529499 ) RES 4 = 121.779859 ((26,780,000 / 219,905) = 121.779859 ) RES 5 = 2,314.789474 ((219,905 / 95) = 2,314.789474 ) The logarithms of the relative velocities are as follows Log(RES1) = 0.488117 Log(RES2) = 0.793382 Log(RES3) = 1.290691 Log(RES4) = 2.085575 Log(RES5) = 3.364511 The ratio (Ri) between successive logarithms is the following: R1 = 1.625394 R2 = 1.626822 R3 = 1.615859 R4 = 1.613229 The above values differ from the Golden Number (1.618034), a number also called the golden number, the number of God, the extreme and average ratio, the golden ratio, the golden mean, the golden ratio and the divine ratio, by 0.45%; 0.54%; 0.13% and 0.30%, respectively. In turn, the average of the sum of the ratios is 1.620326. This value differs from the golden ratio by 0.14%. The results obtained allow us to postulate that Evolution follows a pattern that is a function of Information and the golden ratio. (1)The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is the putative common ancestral cell from which the three domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, originated. The complexity that LUCA is assumed to have does not give rise to affirming that it arose by “spontaneous generation”, it being valid to postulate the pre-existence of “seeds of life” prior to the emergence of LUCA; It is postulated that the origin of the “seeds of life” dates back to the moment when Matter arose in the Universe, that is, around thirteen thousand eight hundred million years. (2)“We find that the anatomical potential to produce and perceive sounds differentiated by their formants began at the latest by the time of our last common ancestor with Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea) about 27 Ma ago.” Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech (Science magazine) (3) The last change in the position of the hyoid bone in humans, which would have allowed access to the language that characterizes us, took place approximately two hundred and twenty thousand years ago, and its data is based on archaeological evidence and anthropological studies. There is no scientific source that records this change on an exact date. (4)Due to the exponential growth of information technologies, Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Technological Singularity will occur in the year 2045, at which time technological growth will be so rapid and so profound that it will be impossible to predict what its consequences will be. (5) It is the time between 1950 and 2045, the latter year in which Ray Kurzweil postulates that a Singularity will take place.

Funding Campaign: opencollective.com/semf/projects/funding-campaign Interdisciplinary School 2024: semf.org.es/school2024/

A way for DNA molecules to communicate: ua-cam.com/video/B3jf_d_TVc8/v-deo.html

7:29 - in fact um I think all intelligences are collective intelligences in the sense that they're made of parts and we really need to understand how

this problem is nuts. I only seeing it work with tFHE. but still, how can solve for a dispute like the one (mentioned below) with just a model this way? It seems like more of the same "key holders" who can skew an interpretation any way they wish. Where is the signing?

is he not mischaracterizing the concept of a "latent" space by applying this specific terminology at scale? isn't it more than a latent space in terms of the nearly infinitely multi-variant systems he's describing?

😥 "promosm"

ARRIVED AT 777

Sounds to me like memory is stored in the blood..... The DNA.

1800s a person named "Juelz" too with binary zeros and ones quntaputive algorithms

MAGNIFICENT

can debrided deep tissue be rebuilt and innervated that was cut out of a pilonidial cyst ?? i need a new butt cheek

This is awesome.

this is all boomer rumors

Good stuff ...thanks for sharing! Would be interesting to hear about or delve into graphics vs words as communication tool at societal scale in terms of prevelance, categories, gender, tech level, as well as the corespondence or not re words/graphics in terms of thinking (internal) vs communication (external) and why there is such an overwhelming bias to words as the primary external/communication mode/tool (ease/simplicity/familiarity/skill set requirements perhaps). Temple Grandin has touched on some interesting things re individual variances in inclination to visual vs word thinking modes/tendencies. Excited to read Tversky's book! The "motion" aspect/emphasis is particularly interesting and surprising.

"...at one point the frog embryo turns around and goes back to the beginning of the maze, no one knows why..." Baby frog: "yup, been there, done that!"