Відео

There's not much to say here. You're dominating the play. Since the very start, you haven't had any other civilisation try and land on your big continent and they haven't really taken as much land as I originally thought.

All of the other civilizations get paranoid when you cross their land for a split second "Why are you on our land." At this point in the game with the amount of cities and resources you have, you could push them to give you things. If the peace treaty breaks, what's the worse that will happen? You could probably take all 3 on at once and still come out on top. Spain seem to be a light blue colour which is difficult to see if you're colour blind, but the dotted lines are marked out. I can see when you've walked onto their land straight away.

You always mention performance issues at the start of each video. The game just take time to properly load each part/section of the map and then after 5 minutes, it's speeds up. You've got a whole continent to yourself for resources. 4 Civilizations (including yourself) sharing parts of the slightly bigger continent than yours, but it's really divided, so good advantage to have all angles at your disposal.

You just need to start building loads of offensive units on the big map and fly them across by ferry or cruise. You can easily overwhelm them.

Musket men are perfect. Remember defensive and offensive together gets the job done. If you lay up on the island with just offensive in such a small space, they will easily counter with attacking units. If you put defensive up front first, they're forced to attack you and that's when you hold the advantage.

Well, you're very secure owning the big land, so no matter whether you attack a civilization and lose, you'll still have the big part of your country to fall back on. The disadvantage is that we don't know how big the rest of the world is; either way it's looking good. I think the first little island was a great place to set camp, but I wouldn't bother populating the tiny islands, it's barely worth it.

This mirrored track is messing with my brain, because I know how it's supposed to look.

This game is going extremely good now, you've found a fairly good hold within the location where you're. This game will get better over the next 2-3 play throughs now you have a foothold.

Well, you pulled that back around. This is where the game gets really interesting, watching the different countries coming in to the same area to try and take dominance....so far, so good. It's hard to tell how well you're doing, only being able to see so much of the land undiscovered. It's hard to read, but you are doing pretty good.

This Civilization is predominantly about getting cities built quickly.

Just remember that people will still watch your content and credit you for winning a game on a medium/middle setting. You dont need to prove you can beat the game at the hardest setting. If people play a game in easy settings, then yes, it annoys me. Don't make your games so difficult to compete; we will still watch and will be more interesting as you won't be beaten 10 minutes into the game.....your audience wants to see you win.

If you're going to insist on playing it hard, you'll need a HUGE map, so there's more space in-between you and the other Civilizations and maybe play the game on a middle (medium) setting as the Hard on Civ 3 isn't as forgiving and almost neon impossible to get a good start. It seems on hard the other Civilizations trap you quickly in to submission. This game to me seems like it's more about building a big army and scouting the map as a group. Individually, they don't really cause a threat. What I mean- in relation to the science of a good army is to move out slowly and together. If there's plenty of army, your Settler can safely build cities around the defence.

not the best version of civ 1 but theres a super Nintendo version that is much easier to play. because of emulator save states can reload for better rng for winning battle or goodie hut boost of choice.

I'm going to guess that you are an Aquarius.

The lack of settlers are disturbing 😅

You need to start this game again, they've bordered you in and grabbed all the land around your 2 cities. Maybe edit the map size, go larger map, so you have breathing space, my game wasn't like that, your location start wasn't great. Angrod "This isn't the best start.".......no, I'd say you're trapped in a corner and surrounded by 2 civilizations.

Is your microphone sound playing back through speakers? There's a lot of reverb

You've left the reverb on your mic

I didn't understand what's the problem by picking greeks. Can I play the game on windows 11 somehow?

Having Barracks definitely holds the fort longer than in previous games. Sometimes you've got to drop the building structures for a while and have soldiers scattered over the map that are defensively minded. I always say there's a time for building wonders and a time for defending your land. BTW, did you knock the reverb on your microphone towards the end? Was quite funny that you didn't notice. Civilization 3 is far more forgiving and a huge upgrade on graphics, that will be awesome! They use more hexagon shaped character select visuals, instead of square in Civ1 and Civ2.

Sicyon is apparently a Greek City, so I think it borrows names from other countries. It'll be interesting if you have an alliance with another country this play through. The Germans might be useful to you. I think you might need to start irrigating as food storage is low.

After playing Civilization II for quite a while now yourself; do you consider it better than Civ 1?

Bout matches are much fun

YAY Civilzation 2!

I think you are undervaluing barracks. Veteran units get a 1.5x multiplier to attack and defense and units heal 100% in cities with barracks. The barbarians at the end was a tough break though.

This game is completely different with the bigger map. It's good to see every civilization being involved, open up the opportunity to join forces against other nations. I prefer the bigger landscape, makes it more competitive.

One big mistake was exchanging all technologies with the Greeks, as it gave them the same units type as you. Instead, you should have exchanged technologies with different civilizations (by contacting many with an exploring boat) to gain a technological advantage. If you get one technology from five civilizations, you only give one to each in return, but gain five new technologies, ending with a 4+ technology advantage over all. Also, the AI obviously founds cities close to you in order to rob your land, impede your passing, and disconnect your cities' roads. This is one of the reasons why you should not space your cities too far apart. 25:52 NO. Don't irrigate. Make a new city. At this point, you made the same mistake than in the former game: wasted too many turns moving settlers too far away instead of founding cities. In each turn you lost production, science and gold.

I'm always learning more about how to play this game the more I watch you. I think the Phalanx floating about but not attacking is working. Archers and Phalanx are great at holding ground and they just stand there intimidating the offensive units, whilst you use the offensive to attack them from behind. Maybe the key to this game is to attack the Greeks early and start taking their assets. Still ironic how you saw the Greeks first AGAIN! We are yet to see the American, even from the previous game.

That annoying bugle announcement: Go into your C:\Game Folder\Sound. The offending file is call NEWONDER.wav Delete it, then take another one of the files that is less annoying, such as GUILLOTIN.wav, make a copy, and rename the copy to NEWONDER.wav Should do it.

I think I've got it. Maybe, have 1 offensive unit and 1 attacking per city travelling together, that way when they go to defend and attack, you'll have a better chance of holding ground. Move all the defensive units in front as bait and then a set of offensive units sitting behind. The idea to cross the water from Cosa to Athens on the other side might put pressure on them from other angles, like you mentioned. Stop putting your attacking units 1 space away from your opponents units, it's like fire Vs water in Pokémon, you'll always lose (even if your unit is strong at a certain trait.) Let them close the gap closer to you and avoid getting a unit 1 space away from being taken. It's ok with the defensive units, they can kind of sit there fortified. Think of it like this: a line of Phalanx units and 1 space behind is your chariots. The chariot then can stand on the same tile as the Phalanx and then attack (2 moves). Once the opponents go to retaliate, you'll be standing on top of the Phalanx. Maybe play it on King mode, it doesn't seem quite as forgiving as Civilization 1.

You are founding too few cities, and they are too far apart. Think more in terms of how many cities can be placed on that territory, rather than how to avoid territory overlap. At this moment you should had colonized the entire continent. Also, consider the attack and defense strengths of the units. The catapult attacks with a strength of 6, but defends with only 1. If you stack a phalanx with a catapult, it attacks with a strength of 6 but defends with 2. The catapult can take advantage of roads to approach and attack on the same turn. Moving a catapult next to an enemy unit or city and ending the turn is suicidal.

Really great episode. Watch out that another civilization don't try landing in between the two small start-up cities on the bay. Just make sure that's locked down. The Greeks you got to early, there's a push back, but I don't think they have anything left other than their capital Athens. It'll take a few more attempts to weaken them, but they are just surrounding their own city to defend. It looks like you aren't winning, but whilst they're busy building more offensive units, they're falling behind in building structures and they're also probably paying to get the units out quickly.

It doesn't matter about the high council, it's random animations anyway and they all contradict each other anyway. Just remember that Athens was right next to another island and you kept creating battle units and moving them away from the city, leaving it completely exposed. You used your only defensive unit to try and take a Settler; that was not clever as Phalanx is terrible at attacking, I saw that coming a miles away. Your safest city is Corinth, because it sit's in-between everything. When I build cities, I just throw in an attacking unit and defensive and never (under any circumstance) move them. If I want to attack I create more units, the attack/defence unit inside the city don't exist to me as playing units, they just defend. It seems like the French want revenge from Civilization 1.

I found a patch for this game for free, it's called 'Civ2X64Patcher', it completely resolves the problems and runs extremely well. Just Google it, run the application and then it fixes everything.

The health bars on the units make it easier to see how much health they have left, which is useful. I really like the look of this game, the irrigation is less time consuming and it's much closer zoomed in, so you can see everything more clearly. A much better start this time, considering you're slowly moving forward with caution. I notice that there's a really narrow part of where France and Greece separate; keep that Elephant there and surround that area, so that you can peacefully build another city. The only way they can get to you then is by forcing their way through or sailing across. Stack a load of Archers behind the elephant if possible, formation of x3 just holding the line behind. Just guard that area between you and France and then they can't slow your progress down.

The economy grows exponentially (like compound interest), so the best strategy is to start producing benefits as early as possible. Do not found early cities too far apart, because you'll lose productive turns, and ultimately end up founding fewer cities. One city is worth more than one square for another city. The cities will not compete for territory until the late game, so distancing cities does not provide benefits at the start, but wasting turns causes a loss of a lot of early production. For the same reason, it is not worthwhile to spend turns enhancing a tile before founding the city. Also, it is worthwhile to stack the settlers so that improvements start producing early. Also, consider sending the settlers to the same city initially, so that city becomes stronger earlier and can support other cities. There is a patch to fix problems on 64 bit PC.

Bros pc cant handle that, fps dropping

It was a good test run to see how the game works. In Civilization 2 you won't be able to leave your cities exposed. Expansion needs to be done cautiously, taking a few units along with the Settler to build further up the map. Founding a city right next to your opponents isn't always sensible. I figured out a great strategy the other day. Once you've created a few cities with a bit of space surrounding, create a few weaker start up units and block the opponents from crossing onto your area without breaking a treaty on both sides. If the map is narrow in certain places then it's easier to block to path.

10:39 That's an ideal location to establish an isthmus city. By connecting two oceans, such a city enables ship passage and allows for effective defense; with just half the fleet, both oceans can be protected. Additionally, it's also possible to found cities connected tucching along a diagonal, allowing boats to cross the land. If overpowered, vessels can evade pursuit by escaping to the other ocean or through the canal-city. Isthmus also block enemies on land, allowing to deny them territories. You can also stack settlers on the same square, to finish the job faster, so it starts producing earlier.

Well, that's complete in full. I was hoping for a final battle between Romans and the French, Well done completing it on hard mode. Worst 2 empires were the Zulus and the Egyptians, because they were around a long time, but they made no impact. The British and Americans were obviously at war with each other at the same time you was against the Chinese. By the time you reached the British, they were already being taken by the Americans, which helped you as they were both distracted.

do not put on one music for whole live

Aahh from which game is the music? I played it so so much and I can’t remember the name. Please tell me so I can go back to sleep.

Nice game

Please make 2 endings for this game. One game where you beat the French and one where you launch the rockets. That way you have completed both parts of the game. I don't mean from the start, but load that game and create another save file separate, that way you'll be able to play the last part of your existing game twice.

Looks like I'll be watching your content again. Your Civilization 1 content was really good, I reckon this will be even better with the slight graphics upgrade.....highly recommend to new viewers.

Put a diplomat into Rouen to check how much the AI cheat. For the lol's.

Great episode again. There's not much push back from the other remaining Civilizations.....France should've moved a settler to that tiny island you just discovered and built a city to give them a hope. I think you fought mostly against the British. This series of games is fun to play/watch every time, it's not like a Playstation/X-Box game and it gives you more chance to talk, because the games are strategy time based, so you can just talk freely without it ruining your game progress and because you play the games on tough modes, it gives the subscriber or viewer the fun knowing your journey won't be easy; makes it just as fun to see you lose sometimes, same as when people watch Formula 1 or Nascar racing and they go to see the crashes, but ultimately we still want to see you win.

40:37 Rebase an unit should be the menu Orders>Home City. The manual I found says: Menu Orders Home City: The name of the city that is supporting the unit and normally the city where it was built. You may transfer a unit to another city by moving it there and pressing the Home City key (the H key on the IBM). This may be useful when one of your cities is threatened with capture because all units supported by a captured city are destroyed.

Were you trying to change the home city of a unit? I think that's H when the unit is selected.

Egyptions only ever had 11 Phalanx, haha. You have to lose a lot of units to gain ground on the map, so 84 Knights being destroyed in battle over thousands of years of battling isn't bad. Your enemy's still don't have Armour/Mech units, so easy victory.