Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Racist Paladin Goes Psycho Over Interracial Assassin & Cleric Romance | Narrated D&D Story
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 сер 2022
- A racist paladin? Tell me it isn’t so.
Submit your D&D story here: / allthingsdnd
Join our Discord: / discord
Follow us on Twitter: / allthingsdnd
Credits
Story Source (Reddit): bit.ly/Paladin...
Video Editor: Murtaza Bohari
Editors: Lonny Foran (written4reddit@gmail.com)
Narration: MyLo (Twitter/VoMylo)
Thumbnail Art & Channel Artwork: NalaFontaine (Twitter/@nala_fontaine)
#dndstories #dnd #dungeonsanddragons
A racist paladin? Tell me it isn’t so.
Submit your D&D story here: www.reddit.com/r/AllThingsDND
In D&D everything is Furry & other stuff though. ;)
We are no Lizardmen, Tabaxi and others.
So those stuff is wierd to look at as a _"normal"_ person. ^_^
Yeah he was racist, but it was well played it didn't seem like some internal hate for actual people.
You think a racist paladin is bad? Try having a sorcerer and a wizard in a party where they don't use magic period.
Lol my party is about to take on a paladin that is rocking custom weapons but the messed up part is being controlled by a brain
Well considering these are not the classical or original D&D version of a paladin, such is quite probable these days.
"my brother died the moment he drew his sword on the person i love"
That line is so good.
And he died as he lived...cold-hearted.
@@JohnnyOMalley22 and i thought the lizard-folk was the cold-blooded one.
Mic drop moment
With that kind of bad RNG, no sh*t
Chills
Ive played racist paladins in the past but they tended to be either grizzled old dwarf who doesn't like elves or "innocently insensitive" girl who doesn't know better
But the house rule is always "if I'm going to far then call me out on it"
I've had similar characters for RP purposes, the world's setting had us in a post-slavery society where certain species had been enslaved due to a xenophobic nation-state lead by a dragon cult of dragonborns leading a predominantly kobold army and all darkelves had been enslaved along with goblind and I was RPing a post-civil war goblin that was racist against anything lizard because "fascist dragons"...
Lizard-folk druid had to work my character through his issues by explaining lizard-folk is not dragon/dragonborn/kobold ... We had an Afro-Carribbean kid (18 y/o) at the table who had a very anti-Caucasian grandma, he actually used to help me think up ways to be more on brand for "the bastard child of empire" plotline I was going for, but also had to rein me in several times and I appreciate that about him (especially as he was the LF druid)!
Agreed; in fact racism as a character aspect is a very good thing for roleplay and growth but obviously has to be done in the right way
I've used racism and xenophobia as a plot point myself. Heck, in a recent campaign I ran, they were exposed to a fair bit of it in Menzoberranzan (drow culture isn't nice and it's kind of insulting to the average reader to try and sand the edges off of it in recent works, at least to me).
Currently playing a paladin that was raised in a nation that considers an enemy nation (both homebrew in a homebrew world) to be demons, so I play him as the most cheerful guy except when dealing with members from the other nation, since the divide is cultural and not race specific, it's near impossible to determime who's a foreigner unless they are specifically flagging it.
So it's a big part of the campaign that almost half of the party IS from the other nation and my character doesn't know yet, so I can't wait for my character to have to contend with his own prejudice when dealing with the people he trusts most. And possibly rethink or double down on his beliefs depending on how the story goes.
I feel like that's a much more interesting aproach to a xenophobic character.
@@Tarantio1983
Dude, I am sure we played the same game together seeing as my Dragonborn have essentially the same lore. If we truly were in the same game, I would like to apologize for My Amethyst dragonborn's shenanigans. The Goblin got on his Nerves, IIRC.
Communication is the key. I've played a racist paladin before but I usually asked if anyone is uncomfortable. Of course my character's view changed little by little during our adventures
same thing here
Yes, but playing a racist character is totally different from being a player with biased opinion on certain races or classes. Or fun, really.
It's one of those things that toes a really thin line, and definitely one of those things to *really* bounce off your friends. Good on you for making something on the better side of that kind of character.
@@How_Do_I_Set_a_Username it was a fun character to play really. That character ended up establishing a town/settlement where every races is equal. She and the party also brokered a peace talk between two kingdoms. Our group of friends normally communicate on what we want to play with.
Agreed, although this player was taking something from outside of game as evidenced by his new character making a beeline after the same player character immediately. The previous behavior could have been explained as a paladin with a hatred for non human races up to the blatant attack once they were alone. That part would have justified stripping Paladin status until repented to their gods satisfaction (Atonement spell) as a dishonorable and evil action in the editions through 3.5 not sure on 5th edition though.
I wasn't at all surprised he tried immediately to kill OP when bringing his next character. I also imagine his "reasoning" is complete crap
i agree monster races are the best to roleplay, even when playing with stereotype, or the opposite of them.
for exemple i love playing gnolls
I feel like the paladin is a furry hater
@@taluca8474 I just think he plays lawful stupid and he just dislikes things that go outside what he thinks is the realms of acceptable player races. I don't think furries tie into this, but I'm interested to hear your reason that you think so
@@jamesmahon6788 i guess you have a point, the reason being that Kex was a anthropomorphic lizard and the paladin said he doesn’t like playable monster races, so I think he could be a furry hater. But yeah, your explanation could work
Not surprised either. Was in a game once that I joined later. An older player returned and slmost first thing he did was attack the rogue for actions he had commited that his character had no way of knowing. was claiming he had found out and stuff but had never gotten okay from DM or anything about it. He attacked the rogue and when the rest of the party helped the rogue he kept attacking . than the rogue got a crit that would have downed the character and the player left the call. So because he didn't get his way he quit. WE booted him from that and any other game from that point on
I remember seeing some post saying "Ugh why does every party these days have a freaking dragon in it? You should have to roll to play the more exotic races."
To that I say "You know, spellcasters are supposed to be pretty rare. Why does every group have like, two or three of them? You should have to roll to play the more nonmundane classes."
Grogn(t)ards and OSR stans whose only interaction is /tg/ are such a borish bunch.
You kinda do have to roll to play a wizard if you roll for stats in order.
@@greasysmith3150 same goes for any class
That's a failing of 5e, truth be told. At this point, I'm relatively sure *every* class has a spellcasting option to it.
So honestly, unless the DM has a specific setting idea in mind and puts restrictions on character creation ahead of time, it's entirely possible for the party to be made up of six freakish monstrous races and each of them a spellcaster.
D&D does really bad at low fantasy now lol
@@Syenthros In all honesty? D&D's never really been very good at low fantasy unless you ban a bunch of things. (Including severely nerfing spellcasters.)
...There have also been rules for playing those "Freakish monstrous races" since AD&D. In fact? A player favourite (drow) was a monster-only race.
You're better off using something like Symbaroum, Song of Ice and Fire, or some Burning Wheel games for low fantasy.
The sister letting him watch her put the diamond away was the real cold-hearted play here.
Cold-hearted, but the paladin deserved it.
Amen to that lawful stupid paladin he was
“The Paladin said that harvesting bones and making weapons out of them was bad.”
Uh yeah, no shit lol.
As someone that loves my precious monster races, this would really sour my day.
Add salt and pepper. Should balance out the sour 😂🤣
I need my Tiefussy
Lizussy
All the ussy
I love the monster races people like that tick me off
eh, I tend to be confrontational and love some drama here and there... especially with a happy ending like this one.
We have a player in my group who is very also loves monster races and I enjoy their antics very much
Paladin in a party where the lizard is turning sapient people’s bodies into weapons and making holy symbols out of them
I can see a Paladin considering that evil and an affront to the gods
Honestly? It’s kinda not. The lizard folk isn’t raising the dead, taking part in any demonic ritual and they were hobgoblins trying to kill us…by my books it’s all above board
I mean, not using every resource for survival is counterintuitive to Semuanya’s dogma, so the paladin’s proposal of leaving the bodies alone goes against lizardfolk customs. Besides, it’s not even evil as it has no negative effects nor is done with malicious intent.
The P in Paladin stands for Pussy which is why you are better off blowing their miniscule brains off with Raulothim's lance or Yeeting them with Grav magic. Paladins are more like Dumb Quixote and not in any way like an Astartes.
@@AshtonMonitor Have you seen what religions are like?
@@DeviantDespot I’m a bisexual furry, what do you think?
I hate it when players can't get it through their heads that this is a game! BS mentality has no place in it. I could chalk the Paladin's player's behavior with the Paladin as trying to RP what he thinks his character would do. Some Paladins can be judgmental from time to time. However, attacking the Assassin as the next character he played. That was uncalled for. He deserved to be booted for that.
I honestly think it was more than just the player not wanting other players to play monster races, but that's just me.
Should of been booted, right as he started the conflict. Once, a player causes conflict it will be guaranteed to happen again. Even if it wasn't Intended.
Not just a game for some people it's a attachment and a get away thing.
@@NiceOCGuy1981 In game conflict as long as it isn't derailing the game is ok but there was clearly something out of game going on with the Paladins player. Snubs and hostility while working with a character can be interesting but the ambush attack on a fellow party member is not in character for a paladin so highly suspicious. The revenge character in the next session removed all question on it being an out of game issue.
Yeah, at first I thought it was just unwise RP. Paladin's stereotypically don't get along with assassins nor monsters, so I can definitely see tension between a paladin and monstrous assassin (and that could even be the basis of a neat character arc). But as soon as he brought the same mentality over to the next character that crosses a line.
Oh no, he might be named arkham but he goes full red skull doesn’t he? *never go full red skull.* getting racist over fictional stuff along with irl bigotry..i’m not sure if that makes sense or is just redundant! Ughhh nothing about racists make sense YIRBEL LIVES!
Nazi.
"Nothing about racists make sense."
You ain't kidding.
The paladin's player clearly had more personal issues going on, but I got the idea that if I was him, I would've maybe talked with the DM about turning my paladin into a villain and let me roll for a new character. It just sounds like such a juicy add to the romance to have a delusional, racist paladin brother-in-law tailing the party, looking for chances to take down the Lizard-Folk that "corrupted" his sister.
I've played a tempest lizardfolk cleric named Deli who was an open cannibal and once he led a slave revolt on a ship that carried Lizardfolk slaves he set them free and devoured the crew
Eat the rich!
@@DokuroHeartvore nah he would eat anything he could get his teeth on Kobolds and Gazers where his favorites
Reminds me of a pathfinder campaign I was a part of. I was playing a tiefling alchemist, who dipped into gunslinger. Our human cleric was a bit unsettled by my characters penchant for blowing things up, using mutagens, and blowing enemies away with his rifle. At the start of the campaign the cleric was fairly openly racist towards my PC, while my PC was always genuinely friendly and helpful to the cleric. Over time the cleric eased up and pestered my PC less, it actually became a running gag that my PC was covered in scars because he kept getting injured because he kept protecting the cleric. Eventually the two of them became regular drinking buddies and great friends, who always had each others back. At one point we were given a mission from the Cleric's church, we went to their church where all the NPCs were generally unfriendly towards my PC due to their beliefs. The paladin of the church and their highest local authority asked my PC to wait outside the church while he briefed the rest of the party. The Cleric got livid and told him that if my PC had to wait outside then he would wait outside with him, and this ruffled some feathers since the party was picked for the job specifically because the Cleric was in our party. The NPC paladin relented and let my PC stay in the Church for the briefing so long as I covered myself to hide my race.
When the GM asked Arkham, "Are you sure you want to do that?", I was expecting the bigoted paladin to end up becoming an oathbreaker.
Very appropriate with how that "cold-hearted" attempted murderer died.
I don't think they'd straight up become a Oathbreaker. Oathbreaker implies you go the full 180 to the side of evil. Like making deals with dark gods or evil outsiders. Just breaking your Oath doesn't make you a Oathbreaker ironically IMO. I honestly hope when a version of Oathbreaker makes its way to 6E, they name it something else.
If I was the DM I would just strip away his magical powers until he either joins the forces of evil fully(Oathbreaker) or redeems himself. Either way I'd throw this player out of the campaign regardless.
@@placeholdername3818 Nope.
Oathbreaker doesn't not go full evil, necessarily. A Conquest Paladin who doesn't squash the light of hope, is STILL an oathbreaker.
@@WexMajor82 I disagree I'm talking about the subclass Oathbreaker. Yes a already evil character can make the transition quick but a Devotion Paladin that recently lost their powers isn't at that stage already. Unless a DM is VERY lenient.
"An oathbreaker is a paladin who breaks their sacred oaths to pursue some dark ambition or serve an evil power. Whatever light burned in the paladin's heart been extinguished. Only darkness remains."
The subclass can create undead which mechanically is seen as a evil action outside of homebrew rules. They can also get abilities like Hellish Rebuke, Bestow Curse, Blight, Aura of Hate and Form of Dread abilities. You can't deny this subclass is evil. At the time this was released this was the only real evil Paladin subclass. The other options were Devotion, Ancients and Vengence.
@@placeholdername3818
I hope they rebrand the "Oathbreaker", Tbh. A regular oathbreaker, that is, a paladin who just broke their oath merely loses his powers while an "Oathbreaker" be refered to as a Blackguard or Hell knight, maybe illrigger. That subclass would simply be a paladin who swore an oath of evil, to be the meanest, most unhinged jackass in the land.
Depending on the oath the paladin took if they took such actions especially against another PC, if I was DMing I might tell them that they can continue this but have access to none of their paladin powers, could not smite etc, because their god had forsaken them as they broke their oath or such.
This kind of reminds me of playing a teifling in my last campaign. people were nasty to him, unkind because of his demonic appearance, but he was also a very "Jack Sparrow" esque rogue. he wasn't the typical edgelord rogue, no. He was cheerful, suave and clever, and his tongue was as sharp as our bards. He took everything in stride, and occasionally used his Thaumaturgy ability to great effect in scaring off or terrifying those who got especially aggressive, preferring not to fight when he could. He considered people who treated him that way based on his looks to be morons, and were not worth his attention beyond what entertainment he could get from digging into them with insults n return for their attitude and laughing at feeble attempts to push him around. He just was very devil-may-care and gave zero craps about what others thought of him. The world was a stage to him, and he was there to enjoy the show.
In a campaign I played the "racist" Paladin, actually had an arc where he learned that his attitude was actually against his deity's wishes and that he was supposed to learn that not all "evil beasts" were in fact evil. Granted he stuck with the racist attitude for quite some time, and it did put a chip on the shoulders of some of the other players which lasted, at least I felt, for far too long. Finally, his character got over himself when he saved a pack of innocent kobolds from execution by a village of angry racist villagers. One of the kobolds was later returned by a player as his character (which wasn't planned) and followed our Paladin as a father figure. At first annoyed by "the little guy" and his accidental antics, the Paladin soon warmed up to the Little Guy (the Little Guy actually being the kobold's name after a time since the player never actually named him). The Paladin saw the error in his racist attitude and turned a new leaf and started training the Little Guy in the ways of being a Paladin. At the end of the campaign Sir the Little Guy was a well-respected member of the Paladins and our formerly racist Paladin was like a proud father.
To be fair I too would be deeply proturbed if my sister was like "hey I brought a boy home!" and brought back a literal alien.
I would be jellos .
This reminds me of someone I played with who always played monster races. He talked about how playing Humans was boring, and lumped Dwarves, Elves, and such as just Humans with different features. Short Human, pointy eared Human, bearded Human, and such. I don't have any story about his character being met with suspicion or anything, but I remember him as the "only monster races" player.
Personally I have played a Tabaxi rogue, and plan to play a Dragonborn paladin in the future.
I out right love playing as a Minotaur.
I'm actualy going through all the trouble of creating a Minotaur as a playable race in Rolemaster Standard Rules. This is not easy as rolemaster is a great deal more completed than DnD is. It's not as simple as giving states and abilities as DnD is to create a new playable race, but I love Minotaurs so much that I'm putting the work into it.
I'm currently playing a "half-civilized" Lizardfolk Barbarian. The rest of the party consists of a Dragonborn Paladin, a Tortle Wizard, a Tabaxi Rogue, and two Halflings: a Druid and a Cleric.
None of them can figure out why my Lizard-guy *always* orders pork when we're at the tavern...
As someone that plays Drow a lot I rolled my eyes hard. Thankfully my tables jive and quickly accept that Lolth don't have a hold over all Drow and Eilistraee is a kind and loving goddess, whom all of my Drow characters worship
Eilistraee is the best.
best goddess is best
I honestly don’t get it. To my experience, the monster races are the ones that are more popular to play. There may be an elf or some other human looking race, but I rarely see humans themselves, even variants. This is just my personal experience though.
I guess people pefer to not play their own race because options. Or maybe because they hate wanting to be human. I dunno.
@@georgemeyers7172 I think it's peer pressure beacuse people are always saying "WhY YoU PlAY HuMaN WhEn YoU CaN bEe AnYthInG!!!"
Well according to an older (2020) D&d beyond study, ~25% of all created characters are human with the "monster" races having less than 6% each.
It also showed that fighter was the most common with 13%
People are less creative that you think, not to mention the munchkins who want the extra feat.
@@SleepySlann I’ll admit that even I have one human character but I designed them that way because I wanted an Alice in Wonderland inspired character. I took Wizard initiate feat and the Eldritch Knight subclass. I do get the appeal to some degree but this is literally my only character I have made, that is human out of maybe 50 or so. And I did say this was my personal experience. The actual statistic is interesting to know. It’s just not what I have experienced. Most people I know like to play with the interesting cultural backgrounds of the various monster races. But like I said, this is my experience and it carries that bias for that reason. It’s a pity more people don’t like the monster races. I’m personally looking forward to a design I have in mind for the new plasmoid race. I find the various races are fun to be creative with, especially in justifying why they are where they are for the story and why they join such a ragtag party.
Most of my players have been non monstrous races. Normally the monstrous race players are doing it specifically to fulfill a gimmick or are, and I'm not saying this as a joke, literally furries.
I find playing with inhuman characters to be fun. What becomes tedious and a real story killer to play with is the overly difficult due to being a projection of one's own belief character. If he didn't want to play with a monster character then he should have left the group. Not tried to run the guy off. It was also telling that he assumed no one else wanted to play with a monster character player when they were obviously RPing with him.
...strangely enough...the overwhelming majority of my characters have been human. Now...I've never taken it off the table like the cretin in the story...but I've played a few that held a bit of bias. After all...we can't expect everyone in a fantasy world to be completely open minded to working with those he's had to fight regularly. However...it becomes more about what kind of story a little drama in the RP can flesh out...and the character building...a character that believes themselves on the side of good coming to the realization that their noble aspirations and righteousness is really just a mask for their own narrow minded ideals and thirst for glory...makes for quite the effect in RP.
I blame any and all elvish devilry.
There isn't any?
That's just what the elves want you to think.
"Had him roll.persuasion" ...you mean deception...because he was lying... i doubt the paladin had proficiency/points in deception
Honestly, everything sounds ok, until the paladin died, and the player just uses his second character to try try to kill him for only meta reasons. As long as everyone was ok with the PvP, that is.
Yeah it seemed fine until then.
If the player was made uncomfortable by the human -- inhuman romance I wouldn't have blamed them. If that was the case he could have voiced his opinion.
Gunning after another player just because they chose a inhuman race has to be an all-time low. One of the great things of D&D is how creative you can get with your character, and you shouldn’t be faulted for that.
That's why when I was a Paladin who was biased against Infernal creatures like tieflings/demons/imps/etc. I gave her a choice for the exorcism to not work to give her that freedom and so that my Paladin would be chill afterwards, believing that "A pure soul would want to have evil rid of themselves. So from simply trying to have the exorcism done was enough to prove she's not evil."
She keeps her creative character, my paladin is content with keeping a "pure soul" safe
I also like playing as the more unusual races, especially if they clash with typical fantasy norms. Glad to hear that for every one a-hole, there are at least three to four decent people.
This episode was quite lovely. I always love a happy ending. :)
I am a lover of monster races too, but not for maybe any noble facts or curiosities, nor even for the looks (although it has a small part in my selection), but I am just thrilled to bring to my comrades an hero who wasn't supposed to be one, someone you weren't supposed to trust and that now is your best pal, someone that against all odds by mere chance of fate ended up with you and is willing to kill to stand by you, or just because I wanted to create a silly but not completely stupid Backstory which implied the monstrous race aspect to be a part of it. This is not to say that they're better than normal races, as I've created dwarves, humans and the like, but that I find them more of my liking.
Some of the last characters I brought up are: a kuo-toa with family problems, an orc painter with rage problems, a grung in need for hugs, a kenku with PTSD, a Slaad with depression and... Ok too many.
"Treat others with fairness" - Oath of Devotion
"""""good""""" racist paladins should fall, full stop
yeah I think as the DM I would have let the combat continue but inform the paladin he lost all paladin powers or something
@@SteamTitan situations like these are one of very few reasons why alignment should still be taken into consideration even if it is a bit of an outdated system
I once had a Lizardman character who wrote a cookbook through out the campaign. "To Serve God" It contained recipes for cooking various monsters.
The title came from Zepth'thar'alax the black dragon his tribe worshipped has a god... until they ate him. The bones of Zepth'thar'alax were then laid to rest among his predecessors in office. His godly medallion then awaited his successor,(the medallion was secretly a command word activated necklace of strangulation)
Moral of the story Make sure your party is ok with your paladin bull and if you wanna pvp…ask the human sitting in front of you
I played with a lizard man character for a full 1-20 campaign. He was hilarious. I still play with the player, but his new character is a dragonborn.
The lizard is a genuine gigachad
-Interracial- Interspecies
*fixed
Rules lawyer disclaimer:
Lizardfolk can harvest bones from beast, construct, dragon, monstrosity, or plant creature of size Small or larger, NOT humanoids!!! (Which is probably to not upset the other players but still.... )
Secondly the Paladin broke his Oath when he was lying to the Party, about who started the fight, amoung other missteps. (Also bad DM IMO for using checks amonge the party)
I've killed party members before, had a rogue that couldn't keep his hands off others property. I noticed and didn't mention it. We split up to explore a cave and I beat him to death and tossed his body into a ravine. Succeeded my bluff check and the party believed he died in an accident. Continued that character for years and the DM eventually transitioned him into a major antagonist for later campaigns the DM made.
Current party (once we resume) consists of Dhampir Tabaxi Rogue, Orc Fighter, Bugbear Artificer, and Mountain Dwarf Paladin - one of these is not like the others.
That being said, I'm the Dhampir Tabaxi, my real life brother is the Orc - I also have all the books, so we can plan things out, so that we can overcome his inexperience, and I can learn new things. Bugbear has 20+ years of experience, and likes doing Min-Maxed guys anyways. Mountain Dwarf is not only new, he doesn't have ready access to any sources, so they don't mind being basic.
Well my Barbarian is not fond of orcs seeing how they killed his bear companion in combat. Later events force him to work with a half orc and he learns his lesson about judging a book by its cover.
I'm finally going to get to play in a campaign with some friends, and my first character is going to be a Lizardfolk Ranger, who also cooks for the group.
“Unfortunately, the remains mean you will be followed by the tracke-“
No.
“What do you mean, n-“
*Lizardfolks all of it into loot*
I said no.
I'm the kind of guy who enjoys playing monster races as much as non-monster races. My gnome wizard and goblin artificer can vouch for that.
Us Lizardfolk gotta stick together :') too many Zealous Paladins out there these days.
I have yet to meet anybody that racist in my life. I'm wondering where all these people are. The humour and entertainment I miss out on....
You are so incredibly lucky, to have NEVER heard anyone say anything racist in your presence. I hope you understand how truly, insanely fortunate you are.
Ah, the innocence of thinking it's humorous or entertaining to to know if you accidentally drive into a "sundown town" that you may not make it to tomorrow.
Or not having to experience being called a "dirty n****r" and refused service at gas stations and grocery stores just because you took a job in construction engineering and got sent to "the bad part of Texas" while being just a little too tan with black, curly hair.
Please don't wish to find racist people. It's only funny when you have enough people around to smooth over the experience. It's not funny to feel threatened by a network of people who value your life so little they don't think twice about targeting you wherever you go to get you out of their state.
@@K_i_t_t_y84
I'm not lucky, racism isn't as present as "victims" want it to be. Plus, what is racist changes depending on the person doing said action.
Example, Trumps wall = racist.
Biden extend Trump's wall = good.
Trump saying Mexicans are grapists.
Biden saying "you're not black if you don't vote for me" or "black kids can be as smart as normal kids"
Somehow those statements were let go pretty fast. Considering half a decade later people still won't get over Trump.
And no I'm not right wing, I am 100% left. I will vote Jacinda Ardern in New Zealands next election. But I also don't have double standards. I like consistency.
@@K_i_t_t_y84 by the fact that, I, my family, my friends and my work colleges have never had it happen either. which is a sizeable amount of people. Tells thats its the norm to not see racists. One would have to be lucky to find one seemingly.
@@TrixyTrixter lucky? everyone I know is racist.
The closest to human any of my characters have been was when I played a Mimic Rogue, she had a human-ish form when not in the form of an object. Otherwise I've played a Kobold Potionsmith, an Aracokra Artificer, Goblin Bard, Drider Sorcerer/Paladin, and a Floran Druid.
a long time friend and I are working on a concept as our game stagnated.
One of us is a kobold who dresses like a goblin, and the other is a goblin who dresses like a kobold.
The kobold says he's a tiny orc, and the goblin claims he's just a small dragonborn. Both are afraid to be smushed, so they lie.
But naturally, their costumes are horrendous, and everyone's just going along with it.
DM and group of players are all in on it, because we make sure nobody is going to be offended, angry, or make a racist character who wont come around quickly. Because that would just ruin the game.
Lord, reminds me of when the party I was with in no small terms enslaved my changeling PC.
Edit: For those wondering, this later led to my changeling betraying the party after they decided to engage a silver dragon. It was the first campgien I ever played in, and I still have mixed feelings about the whole thing.
Appalling, I'm sorry to hear that. FWIW if you're ever put down or made to feel uncomfortable (out of character) then you aren't with the right group. Full stop. D&D has never been this for me and my friends
In two of the three D&D campaigns I play in, I play monster races- a kobold bard and a bugbear rogue/cleric. It’s fun playing hard against stereotype.
I love the more unusual races. The weirder the better. Simic Hybrid, Kobold, Thri-Kreen, and Changeling have been some of my favorites so far in 5e, but I was a real fan of Shadar-kai and shades in 4e (I was a stupid edgy high schooler) and Killoren in 3.5. I've been wanting to try out a lizardfolk for a while now, but I haven't had a good opportunity to break out my Dark Brotherhood/Shadow Scale inspired "tax collector."
I know this is supposed to be a horror story, but I have a very unusual perspective on the game, so to me, this sounds like great drama & I would have loved to have been there!
The player's next character carrying on the same prejudices, though, was a problem, & the D.M. made the right call booting them at that point.
Some of the most important rules in all of D&D: You are not your character & your character is not you; real-world & game-world do not affect each other whatsoever; & your previous characters are not your current character or visa versa. None of my characters ever shared ideals; most of them wouldn't have even liked each other.
Never roll persuasion/intimidation between players. It sucks out player agency and steals good rp moments. Hell, if it comes down to it, even a coin toss is better than rolling dice. Because at least that doesn’t wildly favor the characters with high Charisma scores.
Attacking someone over Volo's Guide to Monsters ... no one should have a restrictive view of how this game should be played.
I disagree. I can't understand the rationality behind players who take a look at an exotic race and think to themselves "This sounds awesome, I can't wait to play one. But first, let me toss out every bit of lore and personality I just read about them, and replace it with my own!"
@@Nyrufa Same here, too many people play characters that are just humans with animal bits stuck to them, they don't even try to make the character stand out from a baseline human.
@@insertname3977 If I ever play a Minotaur, they're not gonna be one of those domesticated, medium sized cow folk. It's gonna be a roided up, balls out, demon worshiping cannibal!
@@Nyrufa
Homebrew settings or Chadberron, You have heard of them, yes?
@@SkoomaGodDovahkiin666 I'm not sure. Chadberron sounds vaguely familiar, though.
Nice animation on the hands
yeah this one sound like a fanfic
Roll Persuasion. IS. NOT. MIND CONTROL. you don't roll persuade other players, and you don't need to roll a counter or save against a persuasion roll. persuasion is like trying to get someone to see something from your perspective, it doesn't force or compel them to do what you want them to or make them agree with you. jfc
Monster players for the win!!!
This is a prime example of how to have fun roleplaying, you must remember that you're roleplaying. I guess some people just can't do that.
Ew crit fumble tables and chances for revives to fail. Sounds like a fun roleplay group but those rules are pretty awful for any game I'd play in. And let's also add in persuasion checks against pcs. I'm curious what other toxicity exists in this group that we don't get to hear about.
The cleric's line was far more brutal than the way the paladin went out. He couldn't look past his racism to see the complex person that was the rogue and thus, suffered the consequences of his misdeeds. Makes me wonder if he had succeeded in killing Khex, if he would have lost his paladin status from his god, as punishment from the DM.
Probably.
i mean i made a racist paladin but he was a Kobold who hated gnomes, but in my defense the gnome god did bury the kobold god under a city or something soooo....justified?
I've played racist characters. Every single time, I made sure that the racism was from a source of tragedy, never a sense of superiority. Out of all the rules I set for myself when it comes to giving characters flaws, this is the one rule I absolutely refuse to break. It's led way to some of the most badass BBEGs I have ever seen in a game since it drives home that the BBEG is so rotten to the core and influential that they make the rest of their race look just as evil as them, not that the BBEG actually cares and very definitely need to be stopped before their actions bring about something catastrophic.
I think the good thing about that form of racism, is that the character can change. If a dwarf has bad memories about Elves, and that drove them to hate the race as a whole, then it can bring about for a great arc when he meets (Or hell maybe falls in love) with one.
@@Gamer_G33k Exactly, that's also a major boon. Tragedy-induced racism makes for a much better and far easier to write character arc. And in a game like D&D, you WANT to give the DM something easy to work with.
A racist sense of superiority can also lead to good characters for a campaign. you just don’t play them
@@michaelalvarez8112 No. No it does not. I've had plenty of friends attempt this, and all it did was make them inflexible and "immune" to character development.
@@StarforceOnAir then you don’t know how to play it. I’ll sum it up, when you play trauma racist. Your racism is founded and you’re character is somewhat right. Still a good character to play. But playing a superior racist, it’s unfounded. Your character can come to learn and respect others he looks down upon. An example off the top of my head especially if you have a other player, play the other race your character hates and no matter what they will save you, can have your character slowly stop looking down on them. it’s a very slow build up but a good character to play. Or you could do a mix of both. A superior racist who’s views are supported by past traumas.
Aw snap, here we go again
Sometimes I miss D&D 2. Not because Lizardpeople were not really playable then. A racist Paladin would have easily been dealt with back then. "Bang, your charakter is now an fighter, you broke your code to often." I like to play Paladins, but this behavor is unthinkable to me. Gives the class a bad rep too. I remember two friends who were extremly cautious when I wanted to play a Paladin because of players you did want the powers but played no champion for good but giant d.... .
I mean, I’m not the biggest fan of playable monster races personally. Often it stretches credulity. But like… this is a social game and other people have other tastes. If the DM is willing to accommodate it, then either let the player have their fun too or… leave if you gotta be that petty
Arkham's player would have a conniption if he were in my current Pathfinder 1e group. None of my players have a human character. There is a NG female musetouched aasimar druid with a mountain lion companion, a N old male rat folk investigator, a CN female hobgoblin barbarian, a CG male gemsoul oread arcanist, and a genderless CG hombrewed slime race dragon disciple (homebrewed into a full class instead of just being a prestige class).
The closest thing to a human would be the CG female werebear brawler NPC they picked up along the way. But she came with a CG female kitsune ranger, a N werecrocodile female lizardfolk shifter, and a LN male hobgoblin slayer. Arkham would probably have a stroke travelling in such a company.
Running a campaign with a Genasi, Dragonborn, Half-Elf, High Elf, Minotaur, and Kenku. When they got to a human city, all eyes were on them.
My favourite class to play is Paladin, so I hate players like this. I could understand a Paladin being hesitant to party with a more monstrous race, but that should only be an early game thing. By the time you get to Level 12 like OP said they did, then that apprehension would have been long since gone.
Enforce alignment and this would never have happened.
i could see this being someone genuinely playing a paladin corrupting themselves,until the next character became a BS excuse to chase the narrator
Had a party with a racist paladin before, but his character arc was really cool.
At first, he was very racist to a dragonborn and it did make the party a little uncomfortable. The only reason none of us left was because we knew each other and knew none of this was true to Irl.
Then, as he interacted with the party, his attitude changed slightly. He was still racist, but he was softer in it toward his party.
The big change happened when our Dragonborn was hit hard and on death saving throws. The Paladin threw his sword to the ground and charged to help him "Why..." was all that was asked. "You may be a damned Lizard, but you are also my comrade. If my order saw me ignore a comrade in need, no matter the race, they would turn their heads in shame."
Afterward his interactions were different. He was still a little racist, but in a way you could tell it was the former racist learning how to communicate properly
i will stand in my point that the top 3 classes to most likely be problem players are paladins, rogues, and wizards from 1 to 3.
Players like this are why I'm a firm believer in the rule that if you perma-die in a PvP scenario, your killer gets to dice roll what your new race will be.
Helps shows a LOT of true colors from players who aren't playing 'racist characters' are are just 'racist players' who are happy to harass people for choosing demi-human or unpopular races.
Ooof he wouldn't have liked me. I've only played a human once. A variant human.
That's so... wtf. Coming from a Pathfinder/Starfinder player perspective, I love my goblins, Iruxi (lizardfolk), Gnolls, monstrous humanoids types etc.
I also love misleading the party with assumptions they make (I have a Starfinder Mystic who worships Nyarlathotep, but used to be like a LG Mary Poppins figure, and she still likes kids because she feels that they are the ultimate chaos, but people be like "keep her away from children, she'll sacrifice them to evil gods". And it's like, nah, the most nefarious thing she wants to do is she wants to encourage their curiosity [if they become curious enough, they could seek out knowledge for good, or maybe forbidden knowledge... who knows]).
It can be fun, but it can also really hurt players. It's always easier to discuss OOC to clear up.
I always discuss it beforehand when I play my LG Disney Princessesque PF1e Cleric of Sarenrae that she has a trauma based fear of orcs (parental death related). Just so half orc players know. If it's not okay, just skip it. You never know when someone is having a bad day and may be dealing with so much, that they may not have the emotional bandwidth for added stuff (I know I don't for dudes who talk over me, especially when I'm GMing).
Haha I once made a racist paladin because I thought it would be fun. I tried to make him like a crusader that’s a religious nut and his church was actually a cult that’s pretending to be a church so adventurers won’t take them out, but he never knew this so while he thinks he’s following one god he’s actually following the teachings of another. He mostly hates elves and sees monster like people as actual monster and know hope to be good
I'm glad that he continued playing and his group convinced him
The paladin idea isn't bad the player just got toxic with how far he took it
It sounds like the player was the problem, not the character.
Laughing in gnoll paladin
You should try the Selabast it's almost identical to lizardfolk but with the added RP of being a basilisk hybrid. They can use flesh to stone on any creature of small to medium size after every short rest, to balance this out they have to take the creature with them as they don't gain the normal benefits from food. They can go longer than normal without food but after every day they gain stacks of exhaustion.
I played a tempest cleric that wasent racest towards monster races but hesitant towards them when adenturing with them it was like this because i was apart of a awareness event that supported the lgbt+ community with being trying to being more open with eachother
Lizardfolk aren't even Monstrous, they're Rare, was he confusing them for Yuan-Ti?
Classic case of Lawful Stupid XD
I actually thought he was a pretty good player for comitting to the paladin's racism, some good rp and conflict in the group. But nope, he was just an asshole.
honestly? the dm should have had the paladin fall the moment he swung, generally murder is frowned upon by most good gods.
I imagine that if he’d won the duel he would’ve lost his Paladin Powers!
Fantasy racism is always a fun thing imo, cause its always kinda blunt... but always allows for that 'learning to be better' arc where pcs get over it or are shown up, as DM it tells you a lot about the players, so i always have some of it... and love to turn it on its head:
Oh that Tiefling?! Evil devil spawn! Waaait... how are they smiting? Theyre a Paladin?!
Oh what a prim and proper Elf Cleric there! So pious and well natured... uh... wait, why do they know sneak attack?
Oh look at thay ugly half orc! Hes huge must be a barbarian-wait? Why is he singing? Where did my pants go?!
I love fantasy racism, it teaches a lot about prejudices... and why they are bad~ ufufufu~ and one of the more organic ways to curb real world racism... but well, some people just refuse to learn >.>
*me a changeling disguised as human just watching with some popcorn*
Since I'm new to DND (only played it a handful of times) and is comfortable with orcs
The group I'm part of doesn't have any hate bones in them and pretty respectful
If the group had someone like the guy in the story we be pretty pissed at the guy
A close friend of mine is very prone to derailing campaigns so the dm made them be a lawful good paladin. They were human and no person was beyond redemption, no murderer, no prostitute, no one. The life of every person was sacred. However elves, halflings, dwarves, etc weren't people. She had her paladin change their evil ways from enslaving and killing people and monsters to just monsters and helping people. She got her paladin to become the lawful good lieutenant of a minor and evil slaver into them becoming the BBEG of the campaign and turning the whole human kingdom into an extremely racist and xenophobic paradise for people because no person is beyond salvation every single one was precious and should better themselves and become the best version of themselves that they could be. But what about those that weren't people? Oof, yeah not going there. Just use your imagination and the answer is probably "yes".
She had the group destroy the entire campaigns setting, the initial planned story, everything. Got them to fight for and against the slaver, ultimately killing him and having evil still win. All while still being lawful and "good" according to her tenets about humanity is good, not being human is bad, fire and sun good. Basically "praise the sun" and a twisted "humanity fuck yeah". She also made speeches based on actual speeches by evil people to get others to commit atrocities, speeches specifically adapted to the campaign.
nothing wrong in "humanity, fck yeah". I like it.
As a dm, sounds cool as fuck. She managed to pull off a palpatine
Ayeeeeee that's awesome. 😂
@@michaelalvarez8112I like this person 😂. If palp was both good and evil
Just reading the title by itself says enough....
When playing you should make sure your neighbor is comfortable and having a fun time... Not just you.
People shouldn't dumb shit like this.
I love to play as tabaxi's so I am SUPER hesitant to seek out other games that is not my current group. If that makes sense.
*Laughs in Lizardfolk barbarian.* My lizardfolk barb was racist against "smoothskins" i.e. human, elves, dwarves, halflings, gnomes, etc. until the party won him over when they tried to show a goblin camp mercy because prior to that, having been raised a pirate, all the smoothskins he met had tried to kill him and his found family of non-standard PC races.
Looking at the positives in this situation, that romance was extremely well and the way they managed to roleplay around the problem player was masterful
I played a racist kobald once to be fair he was in lizard hitlers youth program and died saving those who he saw as lesser. Despite being a racist he clashed eith his commanders cause he refused to kill civilians actually dying to save an orphaned dwarf.
Player vs player situations never bothered me, even if they ended up being fatal to one or multiple parties involved. However, when you lose, and then you make a new character just to try and get revenge, even though said character should know nothing about the previous conflict, that's when you took it too far. If you're willing to go through with something like this, you gotta accept the possibility of 'losing'.
I've played an Uncle ruckes high elf monk before, but It made everyone laugh cause it was only at random moments or when I met a stuck up elf. Half way through the campaign another high elf joined and they were a caster expecting to befriend me the fastest..nope we butted heads even when we were working together...by the end of the campaign I was her wingman and bride champion for her wedding to a dwarf(convinced her love is more important than heritage and continuing a bloodline). And my dude also learned not all elves are what he thinks they are..some can be bad ass..also I kept the Pali in check by saying he was being racist.
Which always got me these looks ( 🤔, 🧐🤨🙄😒
The lizardfolk in the art looks like a horse
And here we go, another player playing Lawful Stupid Paladin. And on top of that, the Paladin is racist.
If I heard another story like this, I would ban the Paladin class in my campaign because I realized that nobody knows how to play that class.
It's a sad truth that there are few people out there that understand the point of paladins, and far more that love to use them to mock religion and faith in general while ascting like murderhobos
*looks at my list of Kobolds* "What that Paladin said was fightin' words." *Proceeds to sick my Hexblade Warlock, Nature Cleric, Wild Magic Sorcerer, and Battle Smith Artificer on him.*
I dunno people kissing lizards it's kinda weird. 100% would smite.