@@Nanalyze I'm sure every investor has wondered this question at least once. Beyond that, your analysis was interesting (like always). Watching your videos made me save money (avoiding some stocks) or gains (selling others before they fall), thanks!
@@xercesss If we can help people become better investors then we're doing our job. All the pundits tell you what you OUGHT to invest in, few tell you what not to invest in. I was really surprised at how much garbage there was/is out there which was one key reason why I founded Nanalyze in the first place. We used to go after OTC companies hard back in the day and they hated us for it! :) That's because we all have elderly relatives these scum prey upon so we shut many of them down. Joe P.
I’m hindsight impressed with a youtuber, forget his name, short red hair with like an electrical engineering background, who stated in a 2022 t if he could only own two, it would be nvdia and Taiwan semiconductor
Hi Joe. I'm just trying to understand the differences between the Subscription and the Shop products. Does the Annual Subscription give you access to all of the Shop products, in terms of the Reports/Portfolio products?
We cannot plan for 10 years let alone 50 years for the stock markets. Maybe purchase a handful of shares…add a stop loss…fine. But that isn’t what bag holders do, right? We hold THROUGH the dips! The world economies are effectively bankrupt and piling on the debt to keep afloat. I think 10 years is the new 50 and even THEN I am not confident. Appreciate all your videos and the discussions here. Thank you
Long term mindset is how I get myself to buy more when the price drops rather than selling at a loss. But long term mindset does impact where I invest. For example I like South America etfs demographics are good. Much of Japan’s three decades where the only returns were dividends was due, I’d argue, to population stagnation.
Demographics is why I won’t buy a European etf with the expectation of holding it long term. Country’s debts can be dealt with by properly taxing the wealthy and mega corporations
@@Nanalyze no, actually addressing the budget deficit means taking money from those who actually have it. I’m being a realist. The economy was thriving in the mid 20th century when top tax brackets were much higher, and they didn’t flee the country to avoid taxes. It simply works.
My top pick would be Danaher. Hard to find a diversified conglomerate using lean manufacturing principles that specializes in diagnostic & test equipment for the life sciences, manufacturing, industrial and biotech sectors that also barely anyone knows about. Kind of like Berkshire, when they’ve liked a company they acquire it as a subsidiary into one of their divisions, very economically resilient.
This is turning out to be quite fun! Everyone is posting firms they think would benefit. We're not overly familiar with Danaher but looks kind of like Thermofisher except they aren't just healthcare. Conglomerates are very attractive because - despite their valuation discounts - they can be very resilient. Joe P.
Recently bought some recommended stocks and now they are just penny stocks. There seems to be more negative portfolios in the last 3rd half of 2023 and first half of this year with markets tumbling, soaring inflation, and banks going out of business. My concern is how can the rapid interest-rate hike be of favor to a value investor, or is it better avoiding stocks for a while?
Don't buy stocks people "recommend." Buy quality names that you feel confident about if you have to, otherwise just invest in ETFs (low-fee ONLY!) and you'll be ahead of 95% of professional money managers who try and beat a benchmark but can't. Don't try and time the market. Dollar-cost-average into quality ETFs (or a diversified portfolio of companies if you want to) and let time do its magic.
yes, just 1 stock would be detrimental! but a 10-15 stocks approach would be more suitable! like: JNJ, UNH, MSFT, AAPL, SPGI, V/MA, NVDA/TSM, PEP, CAT, JPM, BLK
My hat's off to the employees of JNJ - to deliver such consistent performance in a difficult industry like pharma (where outcome is never guaranteed) is really remarkable. They really must have found a way of operation that averages out the failed drug candidates and of course sufficient size is also a factor such that any failed late-stage program doesn't endanger the whole company or even the dividend.
Costco is definitely in the conversation. I'm counting down the days for this to go into the Quantigence portfolio...6 more years left! It's already in my dividend portfolio but would love to see an analysis of how you would account for their consistent, monster special dividends they pay on top of their regular dividend.
Some of our universe constituents - like BEN and TROW - pay very sizable special dividends. These are excluded from yield and payout ratio calculations as is standard practice among index providers. We may Costco at some point. Just depends on how many paying subs ask for the coverage on our Discord server ;)
Aren't they less diversified with the spinoff into Kenvue. Now, they are a device and pharma company. A Honeywell or Carlisle is probably more diversified. Pharma companies are tough as it requires consistent investment into R&D
Good points. We stick with champions only because that track record says a lot about financial discipline and overall business health. If a dividend has no track record then the company paying it has no real incentive to keep steadily increasing it.
Really enjoy your content. Been investing since 2002, done quite well but always learn something from your content. Much gratitude for sharing your impressive experience and content.
When people say they learn something from our content it warms the cockles of my heart ;) That's what we strive to do - help people become better investors. Joe P.
Predicting things successfully is something only our on-staff Romanian fortune teller can do. And lately she's really sucked at it which is why we're eyeballing her sister up as a replacement. That is, if we can convince her that fortune telling is more lucrative than adult entertainment. 💃
Organizations that benefit from a diversity of industries I have found to be significant in regards of this setup. Currently I'm interested in Cement Roadstone Holding (CRH), Linde, Carpenter Technology and Waste Management. Industries need cement / asphalt. Industries need a variety of natural gases. Industries need specialized metals. Industries need Waste Management.
Not a stock but a total world ETF would do the job. It automatically makes the adjustments, if USA is no longer the leader, it will slowly move the balance to the new one over time provided that the ETF custodian continues to survive. A total world ETF makes you the owner of the whole world and it can be passed onto new generations and it will never lose value. This is one stop solution for someone who's already insanely rich but for the average folk, it will not make you richer and it takes a very long time through generations to grow your share in the world while each generation adds their savings from their earnings.
DCA and collecting dividends is the core of our Quantigence strategy. But if you had to pick one company, best to check their track records. If they have a long record of increasing, the likelihood of future increases is greater than those without such a track record.
Before investing in a stock, make sure they have the right values and don't support evil things. Otherwise, your money is going to support those ideologies.
Thanks for the reply. The leader in the space is Franco Nevada. They just had a mine in their portfolio of royalties seized in Panama. Sprott is poised to become the leader through financing of mines in favourable jurisdictions. They have a five year outlook where they are looking at increasing their royalties portfolio and the buildout of tier one prospects. There may also be a significant change in investment allocation to the precious metals space, where at one time it held as much as 4% of the total investment dollars, whereas the precious metals space only represents 1.5%(I believe) of the space.
@@effingsix3825 Thank you for the info! Any investment thesis that involves things being seized in Panama doesn't pass the systemic risk test ;) Sounds like Sprott is too risky for a "if I could only hold one stock" thesis.
Thank-you. Sprott has better risk management than Franco Nevada. A health care company, if I may say so, has plenty of risks associated with it as well. The idea , is it not, to buy at the beginning of growth in the sector, rather than at the very end of a business cycle, and at the top of the market?
I'll go with something more unconventional - Nestlé - the largest food company on the planet. It is on my shopping list and it is currently beaten down
GE was one of the first stocks i bought, thinking it was a solid conglomerate. Didnt work out too well. These big, unfocused, sleepy giant look good on paper while times are good but they lack significant upside and have a long way to fall when an incompetent management team takes over.
A lot of blue chip American conglomerates like GE, GM, JNJ, PG etc had their heydays in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s & 90’s. People forget a lot of these companies have been publicly traded for over 100 years lol
@@Martinit0 True but typically this progresses slowly over time. CEOs can make or break companies, that's for sure. Classic example of company-specific risk that cannot be hedged.
Hahahaha... I remember being in Swaziland when things were going down a few years back. The king was killing protestors and such. The local lady I was staying with said the U.S. - which has an embassy there - brought in 12 soldiers to guard the gates and that made all the local girls quite excited. Anyways, I though to myself, if this country had oil I bet the U.S. would be all about bringing in some freedom and democracy ;) Joe P.
Now that's not a bad idea. However, when Buffett dies we'll need to hope his successor is equally as successful. It's sort of cheating because it's built like a fund, but then again it is a stock, so you can get away with that. Good idea!
@@Nanalyze But it's like 10 years already that Buffet is not the one deciding on new stock picks. And when you see what they have in their portfolio (Visa, Coca-Cola, etc...), even if they are doing nothing and simply buying back stock, I still think it is (was in 2010) a good choice. By the way, have you noticed the number of stocks that rallied after 2010? What would be the TDLR explanation? Semis and AI were still not the centre of the world (no?)
@@gbibbo1977 Yep, could be easy to put on autopilot. The whole "your portfolio is like a bar of soap - the more you handle it the smaller it gets" thing. We don't pay much attention to broader market movements or the reasons behind them. The stock market is a giant distraction from the business of investing (Bogle). ;)
@@Nanalyze Haha - Nothing but respect and appreciation for the presenter! My unproven theory is that the long French name of the company depresses the price of this monster Canadian dividend growth stock with a simple business model, incredible track record and unparalleled management team.
@@LordDennings Joe here. I made that comment because I have an immature sense of humor sometimes and couldn't help myself. :) You just might be right about the name of the company depressing the price of the stock. Sounds too simple to be true, but it's reminiscent of things like the Hathaway effect. Ticker confusion is also another example of this. Do you know how many years in a row they've been increasing dividends? If they're getting up there we'll make sure it's noted in our universe. Thank you for the kind words!
Half our audience and paying subscribers are from outside America so you ought to stick around. Here's one right up your alley: ua-cam.com/video/Tf8qnVnqUSY/v-deo.html
A classic safe play. It's crazy how many billion-dollar brands they have that few people in the U.S. would have heard of. They're a lot more than just Coca-Cola. Covered here: ua-cam.com/video/P4NssaMM_ho/v-deo.html
$PLTR, because Karp is an eccentric founder, they have such a wide moat across almost all industries it seems (❤ the healthcare opportunity), and they have zero debt with a future money printing machine called AIP. Don't judge me Joe. 🤭🤭🤭🤣🤣🤣🤣✌️✌️✌️✌️🥳
Passive management fees do seem like they're not going anywhere, however, we've seen that many "unknown unknowns" can wreak havoc in the finance industry.
Join thousands of Nanalyze Premium subscribers and become a better investor here: www.nanalyze.com/subscription-plans/
this guy on another fukn level
And sometimes that's not a good thing. ;)
Health is the most important thing in Life, I would have chosen in this sector too.
JnJ is a great company, so is your video.
In Nanalyze we trust ;-)
Really glad you found value in this video! It's a fun thought exercise.
@@Nanalyze I'm sure every investor has wondered this question at least once.
Beyond that, your analysis was interesting (like always).
Watching your videos made me save money (avoiding some stocks) or gains (selling others before they fall), thanks!
@@xercesss If we can help people become better investors then we're doing our job. All the pundits tell you what you OUGHT to invest in, few tell you what not to invest in. I was really surprised at how much garbage there was/is out there which was one key reason why I founded Nanalyze in the first place. We used to go after OTC companies hard back in the day and they hated us for it! :) That's because we all have elderly relatives these scum prey upon so we shut many of them down. Joe P.
I’m hindsight impressed with a youtuber, forget his name, short red hair with like an electrical engineering background, who stated in a 2022 t if he could only own two, it would be nvdia and Taiwan semiconductor
@@SigFigNewton We called NVIDIA likely before that UA-camr was old enough to drink ;)
Hi Joe. I'm just trying to understand the differences between the Subscription and the Shop products. Does the Annual Subscription give you access to all of the Shop products, in terms of the Reports/Portfolio products?
Yes. An annual subscription gets you the whole enchilada - plus sour cream and two servings of guac. Everything ;)
Love the circular filing cabinet 😂
Some classic office banter ;)
We cannot plan for 10 years let alone 50 years for the stock markets. Maybe purchase a handful of shares…add a stop loss…fine. But that isn’t what bag holders do, right? We hold THROUGH the dips! The world economies are effectively bankrupt and piling on the debt to keep afloat. I think 10 years is the new 50 and even THEN I am not confident. Appreciate all your videos and the discussions here. Thank you
Be careful about stop losses: ua-cam.com/video/fDmU6o_2Mqg/v-deo.html
Long term mindset is how I get myself to buy more when the price drops rather than selling at a loss.
But long term mindset does impact where I invest. For example I like South America etfs demographics are good. Much of Japan’s three decades where the only returns were dividends was due, I’d argue, to population stagnation.
Demographics is why I won’t buy a European etf with the expectation of holding it long term.
Country’s debts can be dealt with by properly taxing the wealthy and mega corporations
@@SigFigNewton Taxation is always a NIMBY problem. Tax whoever isn't in my tax bracket :)
@@Nanalyze no, actually addressing the budget deficit means taking money from those who actually have it. I’m being a realist.
The economy was thriving in the mid 20th century when top tax brackets were much higher, and they didn’t flee the country to avoid taxes.
It simply works.
Mine would be JC penny! Cheers from 1922!
Ah JC Penny. Wonder how many viewers haven't a clue what that is? :)
🤪
Sears prehaps? 🧐
My top pick would be Danaher.
Hard to find a diversified conglomerate using lean manufacturing principles that specializes in diagnostic & test equipment for the life sciences, manufacturing, industrial and biotech sectors that also barely anyone knows about. Kind of like Berkshire, when they’ve liked a company they acquire it as a subsidiary into one of their divisions, very economically resilient.
This is turning out to be quite fun! Everyone is posting firms they think would benefit. We're not overly familiar with Danaher but looks kind of like Thermofisher except they aren't just healthcare. Conglomerates are very attractive because - despite their valuation discounts - they can be very resilient. Joe P.
Recently bought some recommended stocks and now they are just penny stocks. There seems to be more negative portfolios in the last 3rd half of 2023 and first half of this year with markets tumbling, soaring inflation, and banks going out of business. My concern is how can the rapid interest-rate hike be of favor to a value investor, or is it better avoiding stocks for a while?
Don't buy stocks people "recommend." Buy quality names that you feel confident about if you have to, otherwise just invest in ETFs (low-fee ONLY!) and you'll be ahead of 95% of professional money managers who try and beat a benchmark but can't. Don't try and time the market. Dollar-cost-average into quality ETFs (or a diversified portfolio of companies if you want to) and let time do its magic.
yes, just 1 stock would be detrimental!
but a 10-15 stocks approach would be more suitable!
like: JNJ, UNH, MSFT, AAPL, SPGI, V/MA, NVDA/TSM, PEP, CAT, JPM, BLK
Indeed. This is a thought exercise. Anyone that holds just one stock is a fool.
My hat's off to the employees of JNJ - to deliver such consistent performance in a difficult industry like pharma (where outcome is never guaranteed) is really remarkable. They really must have found a way of operation that averages out the failed drug candidates and of course sufficient size is also a factor such that any failed late-stage program doesn't endanger the whole company or even the dividend.
Great comment.
JnJ share price is up maybe 6% over the past 5 years vs. S&P is up maybe 80% in the same time period
Costco is definitely in the conversation. I'm counting down the days for this to go into the Quantigence portfolio...6 more years left! It's already in my dividend portfolio but would love to see an analysis of how you would account for their consistent, monster special dividends they pay on top of their regular dividend.
Some of our universe constituents - like BEN and TROW - pay very sizable special dividends. These are excluded from yield and payout ratio calculations as is standard practice among index providers. We may Costco at some point. Just depends on how many paying subs ask for the coverage on our Discord server ;)
Retailer have a 3 or 4 decade lifespan. See Sears, A&P, Wards, K-mart JC Penney etc...
Bought ABB at $25. More than doubled. No complaints!
Planning on holding it for 50 years are you?
@@robertkemp6937 fine Swedish company. Investor ticker INVE B is something in always buying when i find good spots.
Aren't they less diversified with the spinoff into Kenvue. Now, they are a device and pharma company. A Honeywell or Carlisle is probably more diversified. Pharma companies are tough as it requires consistent investment into R&D
Good points. We stick with champions only because that track record says a lot about financial discipline and overall business health. If a dividend has no track record then the company paying it has no real incentive to keep steadily increasing it.
Staple: Nestle, Coke, Pepsi, Procter, JNJ spinoff Kenvue, railroads, and defense.
Consumer staples. Yes, those should be around for a while.
Yeah, I’ve been considering railroads for portfolio stability. I like higher risk tho
sso…..S&P times 2….I know the warning….can we bail in a real bear market?
Stocks, not ETFs. If you had to pick one.
Really enjoy your content. Been investing since 2002, done quite well but always learn something from your content. Much gratitude for sharing your impressive experience and content.
When people say they learn something from our content it warms the cockles of my heart ;) That's what we strive to do - help people become better investors. Joe P.
To play it safe I would go with something highly predictable. Maybe like a railroad stock, or MCO/SPGI
Predicting things successfully is something only our on-staff Romanian fortune teller can do. And lately she's really sucked at it which is why we're eyeballing her sister up as a replacement. That is, if we can convince her that fortune telling is more lucrative than adult entertainment. 💃
Organizations that benefit from a diversity of industries I have found to be significant in regards of this setup. Currently I'm interested in Cement Roadstone Holding (CRH), Linde, Carpenter Technology and Waste Management. Industries need cement / asphalt. Industries need a variety of natural gases. Industries need specialized metals. Industries need Waste Management.
Also for a REIT, industries need Warehouses. Stag Industrial would be a solid choice.
Cheers for the comment Roger! We covered Linde in a video on finding good stocks here: ua-cam.com/video/iw0zZhty6n8/v-deo.html
Not a stock but a total world ETF would do the job. It automatically makes the adjustments, if USA is no longer the leader, it will slowly move the balance to the new one over time provided that the ETF custodian continues to survive. A total world ETF makes you the owner of the whole world and it can be passed onto new generations and it will never lose value. This is one stop solution for someone who's already insanely rich but for the average folk, it will not make you richer and it takes a very long time through generations to grow your share in the world while each generation adds their savings from their earnings.
You are correct, and we covered that topic here: ua-cam.com/video/D45ioke9VCU/v-deo.html
For me it is BEP. Energy; clean and crude mixed
Heavily dependent on oil which is a commodity that can be very volatile
@@Nanalyze very true but this comp will never vanish . When it comes down, DCA and collect dividends for life .
DCA and collecting dividends is the core of our Quantigence strategy. But if you had to pick one company, best to check their track records. If they have a long record of increasing, the likelihood of future increases is greater than those without such a track record.
I thought Boeing would be the ONE, then they built star liner, now they have engine covers and doors flying off planes. Oops!
You know what the quickest way to become a millionaire? Invest a billion in an airline. ;)
The best way to take a billion and turn it into a million is by investing in airlines and airliners lol
@@Nanalyze 😂
Blackstone!📈👊
The world's largest alternative asset manager. Provided they don't get involved in any dubious schemes and stay well diversified.
Before investing in a stock, make sure they have the right values and don't support evil things. Otherwise, your money is going to support those ideologies.
And don't count on ESG frameworks. They all differ based on what the provider thinks is "good."
JNJ neve appealed to me..lawsuits, regulations, mgmt, etc
The class action lawsuits from ambulance chasers are a concern but the company seems to have weathered it well so far.
Guessing before I heard it.. Berkshire.
Knew I was wrong when I heard the D word
Many people said Berkshire. D word?
@@Nanalyze D word = Dividend...... JNJ is such a good pick though, especially with the talc thing about to go away
@@leweezo33 Oh gotcha :)
Berkshire perhaps.
Lots of votes for the big B
🤔 The stock I would buy is Sprott, inc.
Pretty small though. The odds of survival increase with size.
Thanks for the reply. The leader in the space is Franco Nevada. They just had a mine in their portfolio of royalties seized in Panama. Sprott is poised to become the leader through financing of mines in favourable jurisdictions. They have a five year outlook where they are looking at increasing their royalties portfolio and the buildout of tier one prospects. There may also be a significant change in investment allocation to the precious metals space, where at one time it held as much as 4% of the total investment dollars, whereas the precious metals space only represents 1.5%(I believe) of the space.
@@effingsix3825 Thank you for the info! Any investment thesis that involves things being seized in Panama doesn't pass the systemic risk test ;) Sounds like Sprott is too risky for a "if I could only hold one stock" thesis.
Thank-you. Sprott has better risk management than Franco Nevada. A health care company, if I may say so, has plenty of risks associated with it as well. The idea , is it not, to buy at the beginning of growth in the sector, rather than at the very end of a business cycle, and at the top of the market?
I'll go with something more unconventional - Nestlé - the largest food company on the planet. It is on my shopping list and it is currently beaten down
That's one of the names in our International Dividend Champions report
Berkshire?
It's a collection of stocks, but it is a stock, so you kind of skirted the rules there. Yep, that's a very diversified asset.
GE was one of the first stocks i bought, thinking it was a solid conglomerate. Didnt work out too well. These big, unfocused, sleepy giant look good on paper while times are good but they lack significant upside and have a long way to fall when an incompetent management team takes over.
Yes, the fall of GE is worth studying. A dividend track record is usually a sign that management is competent.
A lot of blue chip American conglomerates like GE, GM, JNJ, PG etc had their heydays in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s & 90’s. People forget a lot of these companies have been publicly traded for over 100 years lol
@@themusic6808 True dat
@@Nanalyze Therefore, the (unavoidable) change in management team is a major risk factor.
@@Martinit0 True but typically this progresses slowly over time. CEOs can make or break companies, that's for sure. Classic example of company-specific risk that cannot be hedged.
MSFT
They are remarkably well diversified actually. We looked at them here: ua-cam.com/video/VGUytXkbnYo/v-deo.html
What a company did 50 years ago is not relevant, it's not the same management, lots of the time it does not have the same product for sale.
True enough. That's why track record of increasing dividend is a ground truth that points to some serious financial discipline.
Blackrock
Two votes for Blackrock now! They have a strong franchise, that's for sure.
Berkshire Hathaway!
Lots of votes for Berkshire
Democracy advancement facilitation will always be in demand. Let's say LMT or RTX.
Hahahaha... I remember being in Swaziland when things were going down a few years back. The king was killing protestors and such. The local lady I was staying with said the U.S. - which has an embassy there - brought in 12 soldiers to guard the gates and that made all the local girls quite excited. Anyways, I though to myself, if this country had oil I bet the U.S. would be all about bringing in some freedom and democracy ;) Joe P.
Maybe a bank that pays dividends.
Banking hasn't proved to be the most stable sector over time
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY
Now that's not a bad idea. However, when Buffett dies we'll need to hope his successor is equally as successful. It's sort of cheating because it's built like a fund, but then again it is a stock, so you can get away with that. Good idea!
@@Nanalyze But it's like 10 years already that Buffet is not the one deciding on new stock picks. And when you see what they have in their portfolio (Visa, Coca-Cola, etc...), even if they are doing nothing and simply buying back stock, I still think it is (was in 2010) a good choice.
By the way, have you noticed the number of stocks that rallied after 2010? What would be the TDLR explanation? Semis and AI were still not the centre of the world (no?)
@@gbibbo1977 Yep, could be easy to put on autopilot. The whole "your portfolio is like a bar of soap - the more you handle it the smaller it gets" thing. We don't pay much attention to broader market movements or the reasons behind them. The stock market is a giant distraction from the business of investing (Bogle). ;)
CSCO
Covered here: ua-cam.com/video/x3q8cNDLhio/v-deo.html
BRK-A
This would be the third vote for Berkshire
$BLK or $BRK.B..
Lots of votes for the big guy
Corning, Inc diversifies well through glass innovation. Thanks as always for the insightful videos. I’m learning a lot.
You're most welcome. Great to hear you're learning a lot!
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
Now the presenter does have his issues but that's no excuse for name calling. ;)
@@Nanalyze Haha - Nothing but respect and appreciation for the presenter! My unproven theory is that the long French name of the company depresses the price of this monster Canadian dividend growth stock with a simple business model, incredible track record and unparalleled management team.
@@LordDennings Joe here. I made that comment because I have an immature sense of humor sometimes and couldn't help myself. :) You just might be right about the name of the company depressing the price of the stock. Sounds too simple to be true, but it's reminiscent of things like the Hathaway effect. Ticker confusion is also another example of this. Do you know how many years in a row they've been increasing dividends? If they're getting up there we'll make sure it's noted in our universe. Thank you for the kind words!
@@Nanalyze 17 years of dividend increases. The dividend is growing very quickly despite maintaining a very low payout ratio.
@@LordDennings Very useful info, thank you!
Playing your money in only one stock is wrong,
Could not agree more! This was a thought exercise.
Rolls Royce and Deutsche bank
Autos have had it rough historically. And banks.
Coke, will always be around.
Seems like it given their pervasive international brands
GameStop
Oh boy
I would say this is for USA investors... As a foreigner I'm unsubbing... good luck
Half our audience and paying subscribers are from outside America so you ought to stick around. Here's one right up your alley: ua-cam.com/video/Tf8qnVnqUSY/v-deo.html
WM
Interesting pick. This theme came up in our Discord server. Will pass that on to the person who was asking for waste management plays. Ty!
Great pick @punyaweeco4370. Am going to dedicate some time to investigating rubbish ideas.
@@shoelessjoe428 Absolute rubbish ;)
Visa.
The "crypto will transform the financial system" people would like a word with you.
KO
A classic safe play. It's crazy how many billion-dollar brands they have that few people in the U.S. would have heard of. They're a lot more than just Coca-Cola. Covered here: ua-cam.com/video/P4NssaMM_ho/v-deo.html
Th xs
Any time
The fucking one…
The only person who truly realizes that there is no spoon
@@Nanalyze 🤣
$PLTR, because Karp is an eccentric founder, they have such a wide moat across almost all industries it seems (❤ the healthcare opportunity), and they have zero debt with a future money printing machine called AIP. Don't judge me Joe. 🤭🤭🤭🤣🤣🤣🤣✌️✌️✌️✌️🥳
You've already been judged but because you smoke weed you get a pass
@@Nanalyze lol! I hear that brother. ✌️👍🙏
Blackrock
Passive management fees do seem like they're not going anywhere, however, we've seen that many "unknown unknowns" can wreak havoc in the finance industry.