hesus maryusef... how can it be as a member of justice and yet violating for not complying a complete saln.s wow na wow..kaya ang bansa natin tinutularan kayo ng mga ordinaryong filipino at ang bansa natin chaotic, unsystematic at daming korapsyon. mag bago na kayo ses.. hahahaha
Race for power! The next chief justice should not be one out of the five associate justices who filed against CJ Sereno. It's just crab mentality! And to those who just interprets this situation as a movement of the Dilawan, they should not settle on just being a pro-Duterte, please take a deep and close stare to what is the real thing happening now. A mere race for power.
Me point silang pareho kaya lang CJ Sereno should be aware that she is not in position to question others. Dapat ginawa niya yun on before na nalilitis siya. Kasi nga dahil pareho lang sila kaya pinagbigyan niya si Justice Decastro? Kaya nga iyan ang binubutas sa kaniya tsaka niya sasabihin na excuse ikaw din naman...natural iiwas na ang tatamaan sa pamamagitan ng pagsasabing " ikaw ang nililitis at hindi ako"
Nakakatawa tong si Sereno tinatanong cya tpos ibabalik din nya ung tanung.. kung tingin mo na hindi rin sila nag file ng tamang SALN edi mag file ka rin ng kaso against them. Pero ang tinatalakay dito e ung SALN mo. Kahit sa korte or sa senado wala pa ko nakita na pag tinanong ka, ibabalik mo rin tanung.
panong supalpal... Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] Gets nyo? Tinanong si CJ sereno regarding her SALN, tapos, ang response nya eh yung SALN ng ibang Justice. Hahaha...bakit? Is that admission that she indeed loosing by threatening the other justices? Yung ibang nag comment na supalpal daw si AJ Castro, obviously don't know what they are saying
Yun ang mahirap ang accuser gnong din ang ginawa baket moko ipoprosecute kng kaw e gnon din ang ginawa... tama namn c sereno nahingi sya ng justice kng ndi nyo ginawa kayo ang unang bumato kay sereno
Ikaw b nmn tanungin. Tpos ang sagot mo ay isanh tnong... Puro kc ngcocomnt dto mha hukom. Judge agad kc yun ang narinig sa audio. Mga matobato pla tong mga to.
I see comments here obviously didn't learn Philo in college. CJ(onleave) Sereno failed already in this argument . FYI as per wikipedia " Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] Gets nyo? Tinanong si CJ sereno regarding her SALN, tapos, ang response nya eh yung SALN ng ibang Justice. Hahaha...bakit? Is that admission that she indeed loosing by threatening the other justices? Yung ibang nag comment na supalpal daw si AJ Castro, obviously don't know what they are saying
Tarantado! Ad hominem lang ang alam mo sa logical fallacies ano? Tinawag kitang tarantado, means yon ang Ad hominem. Attacking a person na hindi kasali sa actual argument. Hindi naman nilait ng personal ni Sereno si De Castro ah? Yan ang mahirap sa mga "bobong kagaya mo" (
May the good Lord bless you. It looks like you got a lot of problems and that is why you are full of hatred. I truly will pray for you, whoever you are. Also, I learned not to argue with anyone who is using fallacies such as what you are doing. Goodbye!
Nagsisiguro lang si kamong Sereno na kung siya ay kukuwestiyunin dahil sa di pagsumite ng SALN niya, makuwestiyon din ang lahat ng di sumunod sa pagsumite ng SALN, gaya ni kamong De Castro na dapat 39 SALN ang pinasa pero 20 lang ang isinumite. Equal protection of the law po yan, dapat patas ang lahat sa ilalim ng batas. Pareho ang argumento ni Sereno sa argumento ni Miriam noong impeachment ni Corona na kung SALN lang pala ang issue, e di dapat halos lahat na rin ng senado pinatanggal na sa puwesto. At saka, ang hindi nasunod ni Sereno ay ang pagsumite ng 10 taon ng SALN sa JBC bago matanggap bilang CJ. Hindi yan batas, ang batas ay dapat kapag public official, maglabas ka ng SALN every year. Iyun ang hindi nagawa ni Corona. But anyway, good luck na lang sa ating lahat.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE WAS EXCELLENT IN THE ORAL ARGUMENTS. I agree with the CJ that a justice's interpretation of how the SALN was to be submitted was a "unique" interpretation that is absurd and oppressive. It was a nitpicking exercise and an attempt to read "opinions" of the CJ out of context. And I agree with the CJ that the quo warranto was never about ill-gotten wealth and so how did that come about in the questioning of at least one justice. Mukhang the issues are continually mushrooming at every point. And another issue came up which was her position in the Human Rights Commission which prompted the CJ to question the proceeding as "global roaming". Kahit ano na lang tinatanong to the point that the CJ said baka yung high school records nya gusto na rin tanungin. When CJ responded to Justice De Castro that "You have a self-serving statement.", I agree. Self-serving statement is not evidence. "It is important that the context be laid down" on the questions and should not be an exercise to "trap" the Chief Justice. That is the best description made by CJ on how the questioning was being done by a particular justice. CJ was remarkably answering with facts but a justice was stating a "unique" interpretation.. Sabi ni Justice Teresita de Castro on the meaning of the law: "From my reading of the law, that is my conclusion". PERO that is her conclusion. Did it occur to her that her conclusion may be wrong and that the reading of Chief Justice Sereno was correct? I believe CJ's interpertation is within the spirit of the law. When Justice Peralta asked the Solicitor General on the earnings of the CJ because of her being a consultant of PIATCO, the Solicitor General cannot answer directly and with any particularity. In fact there was no substantial answer at all. It was Justice Peralta who came up with the arguments contained in his questions and the Solicitor General can only answer "yes your Honor." In short , it was NOT the solicitor general who made an argument. There was no argument on his part at all. The burden of proof and evidence to prove that CJ did not file a SALN rests on the shoulders of the Solicitor General. Justice Jardeleza should have asked Sol Gen of the proofs of the allegations. Jardeleza also referred to the slide of the OSG, but that was not evidence of non-filing. Its merely a slide. The burden of the proof is on the Sol Gen to prove the allegations and the content of the slide. The CJ was correct in reminding Justice Jardeleza that the burden of proof is on the Solicitor General. There was no shift in the burden of evidence either because the Sol Gen did not prove anything. That is just my take. FEU LAW DEAN
If the SALN was filed consistently then why the records looks like this? Then she could answered directly right? so meaning she needs an amounted words to proof that she consistently filed for her saln where in fact theres none at all. The other thing is she accused the other associate justice for the credibility and integrity but if she was questioning with the same daming sinasabi na kesyo kulay pula etc. As an ordinary citizen i can see theres a truth behind the allegations of gadon...cj sereno should not be on her position!!!!
Ladz Dimasangkay: I completely understand where you're coming from. That's what i thought also at first but there was a paradigm shift when the Chief Justice and her legal counsel refuted all those baseless allegations. I encourage you to visit her fb page "stand with CJ" and from there you will be enlightened. Anyway, the truth shall prevail. Not even the psycopath president can suppress that. 😊
Magkaiba talaga ang nagtuuro sa universidad kesa namumulitikang hwes sa hukuman. Siguro mas magandang buksan ang yaman ng mga atat maupo as cj? Yung 5 na nakadilat ang mata. Tanggalin na rin ang piring ng mga rebulto at sa logo ng mga korte dahil hindi na karapatdapat na nkapiring mga ito. Di ba dapat maimpeach ang isang hwes na nakadilat at accuser ?
I thought that Sereno is the respondent???#confusedsereno Since wen did a respondent ever expressed such demeanor and language to a high court. Using tu quoque is the worst excuse she can manifest before the High court...yep Sereno dragged herself to the level of cats and dogs during the oral arguments.
Bakit ganun ang sagot nya sa tanong ????? Para bagang sinasabi nya na , ikaw nga jan di rin nag submit ng tamang SALN , . Ito un isang halimbawa ng pagiging paimbabaw. Matanda kna po chief justice kaya dapat saktong sagot ang ginawa nyu pata maski papaano maawa kami sa inyu pro sa halip naghahanap kapa ng makakadamay sa kapalaran mo. E kapalaran mo yan na matangal k a sa pwesto kc dika gumamit ng isip. Kong nag isip ka lang sana at sumabay sa daloy panahon e di sana maaayos ang kalagayan mo ngaun. Ganyan naman ang politiko eh dbuh !? And kong may complain ka patungkol sa mga kumakalaban sayu edi mag file ka ng kaso agains them. Tsk ! Tsk !
Still i stand with the chief justice sereno..god bless po sa inyo...mas naniniwala ako sa inyo kaysa kay de castro
Why can't she just go ahead and explain why she did file her SALN?
hesus maryusef... how can it be as a member of justice and yet violating for not complying a complete saln.s wow na wow..kaya ang bansa natin tinutularan kayo ng mga ordinaryong filipino at ang bansa natin chaotic, unsystematic at daming korapsyon. mag bago na kayo ses.. hahahaha
And they are the so called SUPREME COURT justices?? Batuhan ng mga baho. Parang na sa Barangay hall lang ang eksena.
Race for power! The next chief justice should not be one out of the five associate justices who filed against CJ Sereno. It's just crab mentality! And to those who just interprets this situation as a movement of the Dilawan, they should not settle on just being a pro-Duterte, please take a deep and close stare to what is the real thing happening now. A mere race for power.
Me point silang pareho kaya lang CJ Sereno should be aware that she is not in position to question others. Dapat ginawa niya yun on before na nalilitis siya. Kasi nga dahil pareho lang sila kaya pinagbigyan niya si Justice Decastro? Kaya nga iyan ang binubutas sa kaniya tsaka niya sasabihin na excuse ikaw din naman...natural iiwas na ang tatamaan sa pamamagitan ng pagsasabing " ikaw ang nililitis at hindi ako"
Kung si Miriam ang makapagtanubg sayo Sereno ewan ko lang if di ka maihi sa palda mo.
sereno backed by prayers.
Nakakatawa tong si Sereno tinatanong cya tpos ibabalik din nya ung tanung.. kung tingin mo na hindi rin sila nag file ng tamang SALN edi mag file ka rin ng kaso against them. Pero ang tinatalakay dito e ung SALN mo. Kahit sa korte or sa senado wala pa ko nakita na pag tinanong ka, ibabalik mo rin tanung.
totoo chief justice pa man din.. bugok tlaga. buti nga natanggal
Yung tano nya bumabalik lng din c kanya 🤪🤪🤪
In short, crab mentality still runs in the veins of Filipino people.
Halatang halata naman si de castro na may galit kay sereno...
haha... but all justices hate sereno. si de castro actually ung mabait. mukhang mabait lang si sereno pero arrogante yan haha
si lola kzi gusto ring mag cj Heh3x
Supalpal si DeCashtro.
HAHA TAMA WLANG MASAGOT UNG MATANDANG HUKLUBAN
SUPALPAL TO THE FACE
panu supalpal dun? paranf ewan lang understanding nyoh hayss
Achernar Carpio ano kyo ni john...batman and robin....tlga lang ha.
panong supalpal... Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]
Gets nyo? Tinanong si CJ sereno regarding her SALN, tapos, ang response nya eh yung SALN ng ibang Justice. Hahaha...bakit? Is that admission that she indeed loosing by threatening the other justices? Yung ibang nag comment na supalpal daw si AJ Castro, obviously don't know what they are saying
Layo ng sagot!
de castro mas malala ka pala wh halos kalahati lang ang dineklara mong saln mo eh.
Haaaa ano yun sya yung subject for investigation hindi nya masagot simpleng tanong sa kanya.... Guilty si psychotic
Cj..sereno laban lng mga kapwa hukom inggit sa knya gsto kc nila cla ung uupo bilang chief justice hahahha..go go go sereno
Yun ang mahirap ang accuser gnong din ang ginawa baket moko ipoprosecute kng kaw e gnon din ang ginawa... tama namn c sereno nahingi sya ng justice kng ndi nyo ginawa kayo ang unang bumato kay sereno
No prob..mag file ka rin ng kaso ka de castro.. basta ang importante mapatalsik ka dahil from the very beginning you already voileted the rule..
Ikaw b nmn tanungin. Tpos ang sagot mo ay isanh tnong... Puro kc ngcocomnt dto mha hukom. Judge agad kc yun ang narinig sa audio. Mga matobato pla tong mga to.
C corona pinatalsik nyo dahil sa saln d ikaw di sereno
totoo.. she got a taste of her own medicine
Nagkabukingan na haha
Mga korap talaga kayong lahat sa politiko
pag napatunayan na hindi rin sila nag file ng SALN dapat resign o impeach din. yan ang tama... walang corrupt dapat sa ating bayan....
This is very bad. This type issues should be raise in the impeachment court not in this proceedings. Railroad lahat basta kalaban sa pulitika .
I see comments here obviously didn't learn Philo in college. CJ(onleave) Sereno failed already in this argument . FYI as per wikipedia " Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]
Gets nyo? Tinanong si CJ sereno regarding her SALN, tapos, ang response nya eh yung SALN ng ibang Justice. Hahaha...bakit? Is that admission that she indeed loosing by threatening the other justices? Yung ibang nag comment na supalpal daw si AJ Castro, obviously don't know what they are saying
Tarantado! Ad hominem lang ang alam mo sa logical fallacies ano? Tinawag kitang tarantado, means yon ang Ad hominem. Attacking a person na hindi kasali sa actual argument. Hindi naman nilait ng personal ni Sereno si De Castro ah? Yan ang mahirap sa mga "bobong kagaya mo" (
May the good Lord bless you. It looks like you got a lot of problems and that is why you are full of hatred. I truly will pray for you, whoever you are. Also, I learned not to argue with anyone who is using fallacies such as what you are doing. Goodbye!
Nagsisiguro lang si kamong Sereno na kung siya ay kukuwestiyunin dahil sa di pagsumite ng SALN niya, makuwestiyon din ang lahat ng di sumunod sa pagsumite ng SALN, gaya ni kamong De Castro na dapat 39 SALN ang pinasa pero 20 lang ang isinumite. Equal protection of the law po yan, dapat patas ang lahat sa ilalim ng batas. Pareho ang argumento ni Sereno sa argumento ni Miriam noong impeachment ni Corona na kung SALN lang pala ang issue, e di dapat halos lahat na rin ng senado pinatanggal na sa puwesto. At saka, ang hindi nasunod ni Sereno ay ang pagsumite ng 10 taon ng SALN sa JBC bago matanggap bilang CJ. Hindi yan batas, ang batas ay dapat kapag public official, maglabas ka ng SALN every year. Iyun ang hindi nagawa ni Corona. But anyway, good luck na lang sa ating lahat.
Splash Drone 3 YEAH. YOU'RE TOTALLY RIGHT!
Tama ..c . cj sereno go go laban and2 lng kmi sa likod mo
Unlike Corona who had glaring hidden and unexplained wealth, Sereno does not have reported wealth. So SALN issue is not a huge issue for her.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE WAS EXCELLENT IN THE ORAL ARGUMENTS. I agree with the CJ that a justice's interpretation of how the SALN was to be submitted was a "unique" interpretation that is absurd and oppressive. It was a nitpicking exercise and an attempt to read "opinions" of the CJ out of context. And I agree with the CJ that the quo warranto was never about ill-gotten wealth and so how did that come about in the questioning of at least one justice. Mukhang the issues are continually mushrooming at every point. And another issue came up which was her position in the Human Rights Commission which prompted the CJ to question the proceeding as "global roaming". Kahit ano na lang tinatanong to the point that the CJ said baka yung high school records nya gusto na rin tanungin.
When CJ responded to Justice De Castro that "You have a self-serving statement.", I agree. Self-serving statement is not evidence.
"It is important that the context be laid down" on the questions and should not be an exercise to "trap" the Chief Justice. That is the best description made by CJ on how the questioning was being done by a particular justice. CJ was remarkably answering with facts but a justice was stating a "unique" interpretation..
Sabi ni Justice Teresita de Castro on the meaning of the law: "From my reading of the law, that is my conclusion". PERO that is her conclusion. Did it occur to her that her conclusion may be wrong and that the reading of Chief Justice Sereno was correct? I believe CJ's interpertation is within the spirit of the law.
When Justice Peralta asked the Solicitor General on the earnings of the CJ because of her being a consultant of PIATCO, the Solicitor General cannot answer directly and with any particularity. In fact there was no substantial answer at all. It was Justice Peralta who came up with the arguments contained in his questions and the Solicitor General can only answer "yes your Honor." In short , it was NOT the solicitor general who made an argument. There was no argument on his part at all.
The burden of proof and evidence to prove that CJ did not file a SALN rests on the shoulders of the Solicitor General. Justice Jardeleza should have asked Sol Gen of the proofs of the allegations. Jardeleza also referred to the slide of the OSG, but that was not evidence of non-filing. Its merely a slide. The burden of the proof is on the Sol Gen to prove the allegations and the content of the slide. The CJ was correct in reminding Justice Jardeleza that the burden of proof is on the Solicitor General. There was no shift in the burden of evidence either because the Sol Gen did not prove anything. That is just my take.
FEU LAW DEAN
Yellow alert!
CarpeDiem_ Stanley what can you say about cj coronas case?
Ruben So: CJ Corona's case is different from her case. There's no issue of ill-gotten wealth with CJ Sereno
If the SALN was filed consistently then why the records looks like this? Then she could answered directly right? so meaning she needs an amounted words to proof that she consistently filed for her saln where in fact theres none at all. The other thing is she accused the other associate justice for the credibility and integrity but if she was questioning with the same daming sinasabi na kesyo kulay pula etc. As an ordinary citizen i can see theres a truth behind the allegations of gadon...cj sereno should not be on her position!!!!
Ladz Dimasangkay: I completely understand where you're coming from. That's what i thought also at first but there was a paradigm shift when the Chief Justice and her legal counsel refuted all those baseless allegations. I encourage you to visit her fb page "stand with CJ" and from there you will be enlightened. Anyway, the truth shall prevail. Not even the psycopath president can suppress that. 😊
Magkaiba talaga ang nagtuuro sa universidad kesa namumulitikang hwes sa hukuman. Siguro mas magandang buksan ang yaman ng mga atat maupo as cj? Yung 5 na nakadilat ang mata. Tanggalin na rin ang piring ng mga rebulto at sa logo ng mga korte dahil hindi na karapatdapat na nkapiring mga ito. Di ba dapat maimpeach ang isang hwes na nakadilat at accuser ?
Sereno exposed herself more to her incompetence!!!! NO MAN OR WIMAN SHOULD BE ABOVE THE LAW! She has a hard time understanding that simple phrase!!!
good thing, she was quo warrantoed
I thought that Sereno is the respondent???#confusedsereno
Since wen did a respondent ever expressed such demeanor and language to a high court. Using tu quoque is the worst excuse she can manifest before the High court...yep Sereno dragged herself to the level of cats and dogs during the oral arguments.
GET RID OF HER! She doesn’t follow the rules! Bad example to the youth!!!!
Bitter De Castro😝
Bakit ganun ang sagot nya sa tanong ?????
Para bagang sinasabi nya na , ikaw nga jan di rin nag submit ng tamang SALN , . Ito un isang halimbawa ng pagiging paimbabaw.
Matanda kna po chief justice kaya dapat saktong sagot ang ginawa nyu pata maski papaano maawa kami sa inyu pro sa halip naghahanap kapa ng makakadamay sa kapalaran mo. E kapalaran mo yan na matangal k a sa pwesto kc dika gumamit ng isip. Kong nag isip ka lang sana at sumabay sa daloy panahon e di sana maaayos ang kalagayan mo ngaun. Ganyan naman ang politiko eh dbuh !? And kong may complain ka patungkol sa mga kumakalaban sayu edi mag file ka ng kaso agains them. Tsk ! Tsk !
response yan pag walang maidepensa...nag ti-threat nalang...bakit kasi SALN di maipasa , dahil ba
maraming tinago?
defensive si ateng Malou
Why not submit. Hiding something?
sapol si teresing
Resign sereno kung may natitira ka pang kahihiyan.haha.sigurdo matatalo ka jan.
eh hindi nman si de castro ang tinatanong dito.. sagutin mo muna yung tanong
Parang bata si sereno.
May saltik nga tlg.
Napa calm ni justice tijam.si sereno 😤😤😤sampal ky sereno sinabi ni justice tijam.galing ni de castro.👊👊👊
Ms Tion mukang dmo naunawaan mga usapan. May masabi ka lang
jo tambalque karma is on her way.
Tulungan nyo nlng ipagdasal si sereno nyo👊👊👊
Cut lng to.I'm referring about yesterday.alam ko ang snsb ko.lol
Ms Tion yah. Alam ko karma. Sana ikaw alam mo din. At dios nakakaalam. Sino tunay na dimonyo at nga sumasamba sa kanya
Ms Tion kung alam mo sinasabi mo. Dmo sana nasabi yan. Dka marunong umunawa sa pinag uusapan. Obvious na bias ka. Para magpasama ng dmo gusto