A great analysis of the Babri Masjid judgement, which everyone knows as logically faulty, which was passed only to please the majoritarian sentiment. Many accepted it only because they thought it would bring to an end the more-than-a-century long communal strife in the country. Also because it upheld the Places of Worship Act 1991, which was specifically designed to put an end to all such future conflicts. Unfortunately, Chandrachud, who apparently wrote the Babri Masjid judgement, ensured through his Gyan Vapi intervention, that the conflicts would go on. What a pathetic legal system!
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
I think former judge forgot that the Ayoudhya Verdict was the Land Dispute decided by High Court and thereafter the Civil Appeal was filed before the Supreme Court. I think learned former judge want to suggest that Land and Civil Disputes should be decided keeping in mind the concept of secularism and not the law. It's really strange to see that.....
With due respect is Secularism to be practiced by only a particular community. Isn't it a long time when everyone, irrespective of caste, creed, or religion have to abide to wellbeing of nation first? Secularism should not be used as a convenient tool for appeasement or propagating ones agenda but should be practiced by all in it spirit .
He has his own views and may not be correct..SC case was not on Secularism. It was whether Mandir was demolished to build Babri by invaders who ruled for some intervening Time. It was long pending unresolved matter during Mughal, British and Cong rule concerning Aastha of 80% population. It was correct judgement for 90% Indians based on evidences too.
Why bring astha. Law is beyond the whims and fancy of people. Yes judgement was given and it was a case based on property rights not on the merit of faith. So pls check the details of judgement
Jis Desh ne democracy world aur secularism word Diya Bharat ko use Desh mein hi yah donon nahin hai, Muslim action karte hain bye stone, stick petrol bom etc, per Hindu nahin karte because they believe in court and still tolerating. Blind judges cannot see demography is changing if it is secularism then free our temple. Just for 3 month pull out all security from judges after giving the judgement, then what will be there word by judges😂
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
These people ruled us brown desis for ages as British loyalists, took over real estate left by white man in mumbai and are now part of that Indian deep state left over by British. For them hindu sentiments dont matter and prefer the divide and rule game played by their British masters. Fortunately Judiciary has acknowledged the rights of hindus. He would not be squirming to go against hindus if his fire temple was desecrated and mosque built over it in Mumbai. The deep india state has been exposed now.
Very true. It is easy to address against Hindus. The moment he speaks against Christians proselytization as bad, we can say he is truly secular. The minute Rohington affirms Islam has no right to convert nor obstruct the highway, we can stand by him and proclaim his thoughts are genuine. Till he is, neither, We can only accuse him of opportunistic 😂😂
Former and present CJI D Y Chandrachud and Sanjeev Khanna should have listened to this lecture.
A great analysis of the Babri Masjid judgement, which everyone knows as logically faulty, which was passed only to please the majoritarian sentiment. Many accepted it only because they thought it would bring to an end the more-than-a-century long communal strife in the country. Also because it upheld the Places of Worship Act 1991, which was specifically designed to put an end to all such future conflicts. Unfortunately, Chandrachud, who apparently wrote the Babri Masjid judgement, ensured through his Gyan Vapi intervention, that the conflicts would go on. What a pathetic legal system!
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
What a great Lecture
Justice nariman - 9:02-1:09:26
Our tradition teaches tolerance
Our philosophy preaches tolerance
Our constitution practices tolerance
Great analysis by Honourable Judge.Secularism is basic feature of constitution
Ambedkar denied secularism
Read constitution debate 😂
53:00 story of acquittal of Advani and gang in criminal conspiracy case where babri masjid was demolished.
We have to think more about nepotism in India judiciary rather than secularism in India society
You are a fool if you think that the Basic Structure is not an important discussion in India.
RF Nariman i salute to you sir phenominal judge i have ever seen deep exprtise of law ,justice and society and truth 🤲❤️🤲
Great lecture !
Great Justice Nariman salute ❤
I think former judge forgot that the Ayoudhya Verdict was the Land Dispute decided by High Court and thereafter the Civil Appeal was filed before the Supreme Court. I think learned former judge want to suggest that Land and Civil Disputes should be decided keeping in mind the concept of secularism and not the law. It's really strange to see that.....
With due respect is Secularism to be practiced by only a particular community. Isn't it a long time when everyone, irrespective of caste, creed, or religion have to abide to wellbeing of nation first? Secularism should not be used as a convenient tool for appeasement or propagating ones agenda but should be practiced by all in it spirit .
Soo much knowledge but still could not address judicial corruption, gender rights and contitutional mistakes like Atc 370.
He has his own views and may not be correct..SC case was not on Secularism. It was whether Mandir was demolished to build Babri by invaders who ruled for some intervening Time. It was long pending unresolved matter during Mughal, British and Cong rule concerning Aastha of 80% population. It was correct judgement for 90% Indians based on evidences too.
Any aastha is not a proof for judgment
Why bring astha. Law is beyond the whims and fancy of people. Yes judgement was given and it was a case based on property rights not on the merit of faith. So pls check the details of judgement
@@parantapyadav4529 Precisely.
Babri ke neeche Murti rakhne se evidence nhi ban jata 😅
SC ka decision Biased hai
Black day 6 dec
Black days were the days of Muslim immigration started in India. They never loved Indians and always try to harm Countrymen.
💖
Joker
Jis Desh ne democracy world aur secularism word Diya Bharat ko use Desh mein hi yah donon nahin hai, Muslim action karte hain bye stone, stick petrol bom etc, per Hindu nahin karte because they believe in court and still tolerating. Blind judges cannot see demography is changing if it is secularism then free our temple. Just for 3 month pull out all security from judges after giving the judgement, then what will be there word by judges😂
@@Kudgaj01but spread by the west
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
@@Kudgaj01If Democracy is a Greek contribution then what is Indian Hindu contribution. Zilch?
What great he is? Which type of secularism, he found secularism in places of worship act and telling Ram Mandir judgment is not secular. How places of worship act is secular?if such views he keeps, he will tell Waqf board is secular
Are you stupid?
Ambedkar denied secularism
Please read constitution debate
WE EXPECT 🎓✒ BAIL TO 🌹 ASHARAM JI BAPU ; FROM SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ; DELHI ...ON 13 DECEMBER 2024.
No they are not good for your women.
He is same as ram rahim
These people ruled us brown desis for ages as British loyalists, took over real estate left by white man in mumbai and are now part of that Indian deep state left over by British. For them hindu sentiments dont matter and prefer the divide and rule game played by their British masters. Fortunately Judiciary has acknowledged the rights of hindus. He would not be squirming to go against hindus if his fire temple was desecrated and mosque built over it in Mumbai. The deep india state has been exposed now.
Very true. It is easy to address against Hindus. The moment he speaks against Christians proselytization as bad, we can say he is truly secular. The minute Rohington affirms Islam has no right to convert nor obstruct the highway, we can stand by him and proclaim his thoughts are genuine. Till he is, neither, We can only accuse him of opportunistic 😂😂