Hey Zig you captured some interesting shots. I shot a lot if Arista (specially 100) which is supposedly Fomapan rebranded. When I shot 100 (or 400) I double the speed and develop it at bax speed (100 becomes 200 in the cmaera and I develop it at 100 speed, I do not know if you developed it 2 exrtra stops or not. If you try it again , keep the above inmind or else you over exposed negs. Liked you video and keep shooting.
He starts out with a pre-conceived idea of what he wants the film's imaging to look like. He processes the film and finds that what he got is not what he expected, or wants. He scans the negatives and digitally manipulates the images to look like his idea of what they should look like. He makes a video showing the edited digital images as what the film looks like. Why bother? You could do exactly the same thing with almost any film. Don't hate it, but it does seem pointless.
So awesome man I just shot of roll of this today and planning on pushing a stop
Hey Zig you captured some interesting shots. I shot a lot if Arista (specially 100) which is supposedly Fomapan rebranded. When I shot 100 (or 400) I double the speed and develop it at bax speed (100 becomes 200 in the cmaera and I develop it at 100 speed, I do not know if you developed it 2 exrtra stops or not. If you try it again , keep the above inmind or else you over exposed negs. Liked you video and keep shooting.
Nice picture! Which Time did. you use for the développement?
Nice tonal range, quite reminiscent of Tri-X pushed to 1600 ISO. Which developer did you use? The grain is quite fine.
xtol
So cool 👏🏻
Thanks！
2:02 im really curious to know where you went to get that view
From a hostel room window
How did you push it?
Shot it at iso 1600, and develop for a longer time (I forgot how long).
Which Developer did you use?
@@autobus11a Xtol
@@ZijLi-ns1mk maybe that's why you didn't get the result straight out. maybe you should developed it regularly
He starts out with a pre-conceived idea of what he wants the film's imaging to look like. He processes the film and finds that what he got is not what he expected, or wants. He scans the negatives and digitally manipulates the images to look like his idea of what they should look like. He makes a video showing the edited digital images as what the film looks like. Why bother? You could do exactly the same thing with almost any film. Don't hate it, but it does seem pointless.
Which developer did you use?
xtol
loss too much of shadaw tone.
Terrible results.
wtf did you tried to say at beginning ?
French...
@@ZijLi-ns1mk ok, but what ?
and wtf are you tryna say?