Can Native American Hopi Teach Us How to Survive Colorado River Drought?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лип 2024
  • PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: to.pbs.org/DonateTerra.
    ↓ More info below ↓
    The Colorado Basin provides water to over 40 million people in 7 US states and it is currently experiencing its worst drought in 1200 years! But unlike other droughts, our actions may have real impacts on the outcome and it’s very likely that we can make things better.
    Based on current projections scientists are using terms like “aridification” to describe it, meaning that, if we don’t change course things may not go back to normal for a very long time. How is this “hot drought” different from those that have visited the region before? How are climate change and warming temperatures driving these changes? And what can we do to adapt? Watch this episode of Weathered to find out.
    Weathered is a show hosted by meteorologist Maiya May and produced by Balance Media that helps explain the most common natural disasters, what causes them, how they’re changing, and what we can do to prepare.
    Subscribe to PBS Terra so you never miss an episode: bit.ly/3mOfd77
    Keep up with Weathered and PBS Terra...
    Facebook: / pbsdigitalstudios
    Twitter: / pbsds
    Instagram: / pbsds
    Thank you to Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies for supporting PBS.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @thesailor146
    @thesailor146 3 роки тому +63

    LOVE that Hopi dude! Love the simple way he lives and farms. He gives me HOPE!

    • @alexzabala2154
      @alexzabala2154 3 роки тому +1

      Hope for what? He doesn't have to feed 50 million people

    • @ericmuschlitz7619
      @ericmuschlitz7619 3 роки тому +4

      That looked about an acre of land, half spaced, with about a third of the rows missing out, corn in September almost at harvest. I’m surprised they used it for n film without the context of it being unfeasible at scale. The blue corn he had, perhaps he can still make profit by selling at a premium direct to customer at a specialty market, provided his land stays cheap, but the feed corn or even amount of sweet corn needed for national consumption is mind boggling.

    • @TheFourthWinchester
      @TheFourthWinchester 3 роки тому +6

      @@ericmuschlitz7619 Amount for national consumption can be cut in half because 40% of all food imported or grown in America is thrown away as waste.

    • @lilaclizard4504
      @lilaclizard4504 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@ericmuschlitz7619 You just need to think outside the industrialised American box you've been raised in :) Australia raises around 5 million cattle on land that looks like that every year, that's a LOT of meat & a lot of export $$$$$! The farms those cattle are on are as big as Israel, half of them don't even have fences, cause the cattle could never reach the edges. They use planes to round them up twice a year for care & to select the ones to go to market, stick them on road trains (that's a semi truck with 3 trailers on it) for the 36 hour drive to civilisation & the rest are turned loose again to walk between those spaced out plants (native plants taht are drought/desert adapted). The farmers maintain water points at regular intervals throughout the farm & the cows have to find them & find food or die. They therefore need to factor that into their system too, calves that will become their future breeders need to remain with their mothers for long enough to learn how to survive in that lifestyle & breeds with strong mothering instincts must be selected to accommodate this
      In terms of the corn for human consumption (as opposed to feed corn, which obviously should be replaced by native grasses), there's no reason why designs couldn't be developed & machines made to optimise efficiency of harvest with least number of passes & fuel needed. Sure, it would take FAR more land to grow the same amount of corn as regular fields grow, but if you want to grow corn for humans as opposed to the cows that can self-harvest & do the walking themselves, then you just need to make the appropriate machines for it & use appropriate amounts of land for the required yield.
      If the choice is spaced our corn over large areas of desert that is currently not being used for anything, or cutting down forests so as to be able to grow in the cookie cutter way you're used to, which is truly a better option huh?

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS.......

  • @BaconCruiser
    @BaconCruiser 3 роки тому +216

    Also in AZ we grow Alfalfa for the United Arab Emirates. They setup private farms in rural AZ and use billions of gallons of water. It’s terrible, we shouldn’t be exporting “water” in one of the driest states.

    • @msdramamusic
      @msdramamusic 3 роки тому +26

      That is ridiculous. Destroying our country for money those suffering through these droughts won't see.

    • @mazlosoutdooradventures8594
      @mazlosoutdooradventures8594 3 роки тому +19

      Or growing food for the world in the driest region in north America

    • @Jackg1949
      @Jackg1949 3 роки тому +8

      They also are buying the land for the water rights which i believe is 17 dollars an acre. I grew up in my family dairy business and we use to ship hay in containers to Saude Arabia. However the wised up and now do there own farming

    • @jonathancooper4914
      @jonathancooper4914 3 роки тому +3

      Agreed.

    • @jessicac4751
      @jessicac4751 3 роки тому +11

      I've seen and read about this. Sadly probably 98% of Americans don't even know this shit goes on. China has also bought up a lot of our land as well. So have rich billionaires! Man we are so uneducated on sooo many things. We've also got asshole corporations stealing our water all over the place. Nestle is evil, seriously don't support their company and subsidiaries. Also companies who purposely grow water thirsty crops--- almonds! And the big corporations that are constantly drilling deeper and deeper wells into our ground water table. That should be *HIGHLY* regulated. ....it's so depressing, lol. I wish I could remember some of the documentaries I've seen on the water wars that go on right here on America, but I can't remember them. I'm pretty sure several were from either the discovery channel or maybe national geographic channel on tv several years ago when they did either a week or month long segment about water, water wars, droughts, etc etc in America as well as around the world. I'll have to see if I can input the right words into the Google machine (lol!) and manage to find out what they were called. *sigh*

  • @rogeliorodriguez8518
    @rogeliorodriguez8518 3 роки тому +100

    “The frog does not drink up the pond in which he lives“ - Chinese proverb

    • @alexzabala2154
      @alexzabala2154 3 роки тому +9

      But he does poop and pee in it

    • @jasonlarsen4945
      @jasonlarsen4945 3 роки тому +13

      Corporations don't live in the areas they exploit.

    • @jimthompson717
      @jimthompson717 3 роки тому +2

      No , he drinks ours. And calling Chinese people frogs is.... frogist.

    • @lyraserpentine894
      @lyraserpentine894 3 роки тому +4

      @@alexzabala2154 "Don't shit where you eat." First rule we learned living in caves.

    • @lilaclizard4504
      @lilaclizard4504 2 роки тому

      Maybe China should take note of that proverb then instead of draining all the underground water in their deserts in order to make pretty ponds above ground cause they look pretty (while Mongolians thousand year old wells run dry because of it!)

  • @MichaelLloyd
    @MichaelLloyd 3 роки тому +95

    The amount of water removed from the Colorado river is enormous. We (people) are pulling it out faster than it can be replenished. The Hopi are very resourceful because they have to be.

    • @jwsanders1214
      @jwsanders1214 3 роки тому

      And so it goes with the Papago

    • @oldhardrock2542
      @oldhardrock2542 3 роки тому +2

      Speaking of taking water. CAP takes out more and more water. This isn't offset by the water taken out of the Great Basin by the Central Utah Project. Reservoirs like Flaming Gorge, Powell, Mead accelerate evaporation and recharge of aquifers.

    • @robinsss
      @robinsss 3 роки тому +2

      @@oldhardrock2542 the solution for farmers is cloud seeding
      drop enough seeds on the clouds n the southwest and California to make it rain twice a week
      problem solved

    • @oldhardrock2542
      @oldhardrock2542 3 роки тому

      @@robinsss And if there are no clouds?
      Cloud seeding was tried in the 60's. It was stopped. Why?
      Climate changes. That's what it does. Adapt or die.
      Why did the Anasazi, Chaco Canyon, Canyon de Chelly, O'Ohodom peopkes apparently suddenly appear, flourish and disappear? Could have been climate change events that brought them north as the rainfall and temperatures permitted their civilizations to grow and prosper? Perhaps during the Medieval Warming Period that permitted farming in Greenland. Then the Little Ice Age came and "coincidentally", these people generally migrated elsewhere.
      The Hopi, Navajo, Zuni, Laguna, Acoma, Papago and others who remained adapted and survived in spite of being invaded and, in some cases, nearly wiped out by foreign disease, restrictions their way of life.

    • @robinsss
      @robinsss 3 роки тому

      @@oldhardrock2542 ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' And if there are no clouds? '''''''''''''''''''''
      has there ever been an entire week in California where there were no clouds?
      i doubt it
      '''''''''''Cloud seeding was tried in the 60's. It was stopped. Why?'''''''''''''
      i don't know why they stopped but 8 states have started using it again
      here's an article
      www.scientificamerican.com/article/eight-states-are-seeding-clouds-to-overcome-megadrought/
      '''''Climate changes. That's what it does. Adapt or die.''''''''''''''''''
      cloud seeding is adapting to climate change and producing a solution

  • @MrArtist7777
    @MrArtist7777 3 роки тому +41

    Living in Arizona the past 2 decades, I can attest that it's getting warmer and dryer, quick! Here in northern AZ we used to get regular, deep snows in the winter and heavy monsoon rains in the summer. the past several years have had scant snowstorms and our monsoon rain is almost entirely gone. People in the southwest need to adapt or migrate, my family is migrating far north.

    • @Bigazzham
      @Bigazzham 3 роки тому +10

      Up here in Canada is the same thing. The southern parts of the parries, Alberta, Sask, Manitoba have had the worst drought in 50 years. Never rains and hardly snows now. Moving north wont help..... We gotta move continents!

    • @MrArtist7777
      @MrArtist7777 3 роки тому +6

      @@Bigazzham Yeah, the dry places are getting dryer. Fortunately, with climate change, some places are actually getting wetter, we're planning to move there.

    • @Bigazzham
      @Bigazzham 3 роки тому

      @@MrArtist7777 Very true.

    • @supersaiyaman11589
      @supersaiyaman11589 3 роки тому +3

      global warming isn't kind. human beings and how we treat earth is partly to blame. Big companies that abuse the resources are to blame

    • @smithyholm
      @smithyholm 3 роки тому

      I noticed too. I live in Colorado City Az.

  • @stanleytolle416
    @stanleytolle416 3 роки тому +117

    The alfalfa in this area is often pelletized and shipped overseas. Like Saudi Arabia has a dairy industry that buys this palatalized alpha to feed their cows. In essence what Saudi Arabia is really doing is importing water in the form of dried alfalfa. Not only is Saudi Arabia doing this, China is doing this, and other places. What we are doing here is really exporting water. The reason farmers are doing this is they are not being charged for the water they are using as in most cases, they have water rights to this water. Like, if, the farmer had to pay for the water in a free market situation for each gallon used, of course different crops would be considered. Bureaucratic craziness also has to be dealt with, so that farmers can make the best choices in how they use their water and what crops they can grow.

    • @lilaclizard4504
      @lilaclizard4504 2 роки тому

      interesting, thanks for sharing :) So that's where the global cattle water use numbers come from as opposed to them being American specific numbers

    • @roberthicks1612
      @roberthicks1612 2 роки тому

      IF you charge the farmer for water, they will go out of business and no one will grow your crops for you. Farming is one of the few businesses that the producer does not decide the price of his produce. What would happen is that a large corporation would buy up all the land as the farmers lost it, and would then decide what the prices would be, driving up the cost of food.

    • @wirelesscaller7518
      @wirelesscaller7518 2 роки тому +1

      Grateful for data

  • @nfbconnect
    @nfbconnect 3 роки тому +21

    Love this content! It’s interesting, it teaches, and it’s solution oriented.

  • @culbinator
    @culbinator 3 роки тому +217

    I’m loving the PBS Terra content. This is such an important topic. Water is the most important resource in existence.

    • @sartiwitt4892
      @sartiwitt4892 3 роки тому +4

      3 days without water and you are history. The Southwest is our wake up call.

    • @jack04593
      @jack04593 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah too bad they left out the fact that not eating meat would be an exponential help with regards to the manner.

    • @nenamart5272
      @nenamart5272 3 роки тому

      They demand conformity so obey you will!

    • @campingintheforest_
      @campingintheforest_ 3 роки тому +1

      @Ivan Schlotzky Time. And 4 days without water and food equals a good fast. Time is the most valuable resource, then Air, then water. IMO.

    • @thetechnicanwithaheart1682
      @thetechnicanwithaheart1682 3 роки тому +1

      It will be worth more the oil. I'm a obsessive climatologist with out a degree and I have a mountain of evidence that the planet could be propelling its self into another possible extinction due to mankind's stupidity and greed. The Arctic and antarctic are ground zero for climate change and the future billion of humans that will die due to starvation, water scarcity and civil conflict and mass migrations into northern latitudes.

  • @cmc3780
    @cmc3780 3 роки тому +161

    largest irrigated crop in the United States is grass for lawns , golf courses and parks. Grass uses more water than corn, wheat and fruit orchards combined.

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 3 роки тому +19

      There are native grasses available that use a lot less water. Some don't even need mowing if you're ready for a 4 inch lawn which sort of "waves". Only problem is, big problem, most of our existing grasses will grow faster and "strangle" these better, slower growing grasses.
      See "Prairie Nursery" for their great garden catalog.

    • @selah71
      @selah71 3 роки тому +1

      Well there's always fake grass. They use it for football fields so why not golf courses?
      Parks could use animals to "mow" lawns. I think they'd use less water.

    • @bmojo7118
      @bmojo7118 3 роки тому +12

      My grass gets its water from the sky or not at all.

    • @selah71
      @selah71 3 роки тому +2

      @@bmojo7118
      Mine, too! Including the Dandelions. 😁

    • @bmojo7118
      @bmojo7118 3 роки тому

      @Stinky Piece of Cheese So a different situation in a different place is a lie- U sir are quite the jakass.

  • @zakleclaire1858
    @zakleclaire1858 3 роки тому +35

    I live in Huntington Beach, the traditional home of the Tonga Kezh people, and I'm actually using something from their "playbook" for my front yard. Super long story short, using a drought tolerant flowering vine (in my case Morning Glory) require 0 water and only about once a month trimming. AND it has these beautiful flower. 10/10 would recommend over a grass lawn.

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 3 роки тому +4

      Green, drought tolerant plants are MUCH better for the environment than a gravel "lawn". Stones absorb and then reflect back the heat.

    • @xxxBradTxxx
      @xxxBradTxxx 3 роки тому +3

      Fun fact about morning glory, their seeds contain a chemical similar in structure to LSD. If you eat 100 or more morning glory seeds you'll trip. see r/LSA for details if you're interested.

    • @4by4squared88
      @4by4squared88 3 роки тому

      We spray to kill it in the Midwest. It’s a weed and a nuisance

    • @TheFourthWinchester
      @TheFourthWinchester 3 роки тому

      @@veramae4098 Lawns will get more water than humans drink at this rate. Grass lawns are utter nonsense.

    • @Moondoggy1941
      @Moondoggy1941 2 роки тому

      And I bet your neighbor loves it as well when it takes over his yard. Maybe you should plant baboon and boysenberry as well.

  • @jckorn9148
    @jckorn9148 3 роки тому +112

    Any "thirsty" crop needs to stop being planted.
    Avocados and almonds, no more in the West.
    You've got to adapt.

    • @jlang7705
      @jlang7705 3 роки тому +4

      We did try to adapt, when Trump passed the USMCA trade agreement. Unfortunately, most democrats voted No, and tried to stop the passage of the agreement

    • @nicoleonlysometimes824
      @nicoleonlysometimes824 3 роки тому +21

      @@jlang7705 trump doesn’t even believe in climate change

    • @Juan-lf6qo
      @Juan-lf6qo 3 роки тому

      q
      The human being wrote the prophecies of the Bible but is not the author.
      DISPERSION: (Deutoronomy 64)
      "And the Lord will scatter you among all the peoples, from one end of the earth to the other end"(NO OTHER PEOPLE OF THE WORLD HAS BEEN DISPERSED LIKE ISRAEL)
      PRESERVATION (Isaiah 66)
      "For as the new heavens and the new earth that I make will remain before me, says the Lord, so your offspring and your name will remain."
      ISRAEL WILL BE A NATION AGAIN: (Ezekiel 36)
      "And I will take you from the nations, and gather you from all lands, and bring you to your country."
      (prophecy fullfilled after WW2)
      I invite you to visit this channel of yotube to listen to the word of God,: Iglesia La Luz del Mundo - Ortodoxia

    • @dianac2498
      @dianac2498 3 роки тому +3

      @@nicoleonlysometimes824
      He believes it’s not fully under our control, and even with our efforts it would have to be global. Since places like India with their brown air aren’t on board it’s not going to make much of a difference to shut down some coal mining plants, etc. This is partly natural anyway - as magnetic north drifts ice caps melt. Can’t do anything about that. Just waste less and use less.

    • @noelleonard2498
      @noelleonard2498 3 роки тому +3

      @@dianac2498 all of that shift has been happening before we were here and it will continue when we are gone.

  • @georgealexanderp
    @georgealexanderp 3 роки тому +57

    "can we come together as a country"
    I feel like the past few years have told us that the answer to that is a solid NO

    • @romanmanner
      @romanmanner 3 роки тому +9

      America has zero capacity for collective action.

    • @Rasmajnoon
      @Rasmajnoon 3 роки тому

      Gollum controllers hate unity,spirituality,,unless its their inverted perverted dark spirituality,

    • @arobertpetersen
      @arobertpetersen 3 роки тому

      I’d like to think this is a pendulum action and we’re going to swing back in a collective bitch slap to the corporate elites.

    • @photonotavailable7936
      @photonotavailable7936 3 роки тому

      My thought exactly.

    • @georgealexanderp
      @georgealexanderp 3 роки тому +1

      @@allgoo1990 I don't think he got that I was talking about his side...

  • @LimeyLassen
    @LimeyLassen 3 роки тому +321

    I hope listening to Native Americans about agriculture catches on more. Obviously what they do works; if it didn't, they're wouldn't be here.

    • @Majorohminus
      @Majorohminus 3 роки тому +16

      They are barely here in the first place.

    • @UberAlphaSirus
      @UberAlphaSirus 3 роки тому +44

      Ohh come on. He had a wheel barrow full of crops in an area rather than 50 wheel barrows if it was watered. The old way works when you have few people to feed and land isn't a problem.

    • @DarthObscurity
      @DarthObscurity 3 роки тому +11

      @@UberAlphaSirus This is what I was thinking. This dude probably has organic fruit cakes buying his stuff for 10x what someone would get from a commercial field. Something outside of normal market forces allows this guy to thrive, not his farming techniques.

    • @mckseal
      @mckseal 3 роки тому +17

      @@UberAlphaSirus On the whole I agree, but there are still lessons. Find crops that suit the land, find techniques that use water you have in a smart way. Market forces are just starting to promote conventional farmers to look into these factors. Educated consumers (as a result of videos/news like this) can also drive demand for less water intensive crops.

    • @ikeekieeki
      @ikeekieeki 3 роки тому +28

      the unsustainable farms are growing livestook feed for an over-productive meat industry. reducing beef production would help many people. daily steaks are not worth straining the water supply.

  • @thatonedog819
    @thatonedog819 3 роки тому +107

    Throw some cover crop on that bare land! It'll help sequester water and refill the water shed, prevent erosion, help sequester carbon and pull other nutrients from the atmosphere, and build soil structure.
    We need to move to regenerative agriculture.

    • @two-sense
      @two-sense 3 роки тому +7

      Clover is our friend.

    • @burtonwilliams5355
      @burtonwilliams5355 3 роки тому +4

      @@two-sense YES ! Food for bees - NO BESS - NO FOOD.

    • @warreneckels4945
      @warreneckels4945 3 роки тому +8

      Sure -- if a cover crop can be found that will thrive on less than 10 inches of water per year and can be planted without labor or equipment.

    • @two-sense
      @two-sense 3 роки тому +1

      @@warreneckels4945 A crop that can be planted without labour or equipment? Are you some kind of mad scientist?

    • @Automedon2
      @Automedon2 3 роки тому +5

      cover crops need water too. Duh!

  • @coraclements4562
    @coraclements4562 3 роки тому +49

    do not put a brick in the toilet tank, the older toilets are designed to flush with a certain amount of water, if you put a brick in the water and it does not flush all the way that leads to a second flush, which where you are wasting water!! The biggest thing I tried to tell people when I was a plumber was don't let water run if not necessary and do a full load of laundry, if its only a couple items wait till you get a larger load. Love the new water saving toilets and washing machines a lot more efficient that then older models.

    • @sern.21
      @sern.21 3 роки тому +1

      Thankfully I have a newer water efficient toilet but I also know some people don't like them because they say it doesn't provide enough water flow for a proper flush, especially when they take a crap. So they end up flushing twice. I say, ok? How often you take a crap? Twice daily or something? So yeah, rarely you have to flush twice. Big deal. Think about all the times you didn't need the extra water though... But it's about convenience and that's more important to them than conserving water, which is selfish and sad.
      We also have a newer washing machine which adds water and goes to a detect water level cycle to ensure it's not using excessive amounts. The salesman complained that the government was getting in the way and telling us how much water we can use and not letting us set it manually. I thought to myself....yeah? As long as it uses enough water to wash the clothes who cares about manually setting it? It works great, I love it, and it saves water.
      I've also come to find out the modern dish washers typically use less water now than hand washing dishes. I neither have the space or funds for one so I got a kitchen faucet with auto on/off functionality. I wave my hand at it while washing dishes and it turns on and off. I don't know why more people don't have one of those at least in their kitchen. It wasn't that much more expensive for that. And why more people don't have solar water heaters in states that get lots of sun. Oh well..
      Plenty of things to improve the situation and we're going at a snails pace.

    • @bootsarmstrong8421
      @bootsarmstrong8421 3 роки тому +1

      I put a brick in the toilet tank when Cali was having a water shortage decades ago and the toilet worked fine.

    • @brosefmcman8264
      @brosefmcman8264 3 роки тому

      Nuke California and start over! It’s a shithole that needs to go!! 🤷🏼🍺🍺

    • @twotires3115
      @twotires3115 3 роки тому

      Wash, but you need not waste more water with a rinse, fill the sink with water for dishes, syphon it into a bucket for the plants, leave a bucket in the shower and use that, too. I love my water, I don't waste it.

  • @ellsworth1956
    @ellsworth1956 3 роки тому +61

    Yes let us build cities in the friggin Desert!

    • @thetechnicanwithaheart1682
      @thetechnicanwithaheart1682 3 роки тому

      Like abu Dubai?

    • @thetechnicanwithaheart1682
      @thetechnicanwithaheart1682 3 роки тому +2

      Guess what ? In the early 1920s Arizona was not so much a desert. It had lots of water flowing across the state like most other sw states. The Sierra was packed with mountain snow. Anthropogenic climate change started with the start of the industrial revolution in 1760. Every year co2 levels increase little by little and due to the baby boom generation in the 50s and 60s co2 levels excelerated. The global population is now 7.9 billion people. Every man woman and child in the most advanced countries contribute to co2 meteoric rise. Co2 is a powerful greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere.90% of the latent heat energy is reassured into the world's oceans. Heat waves around countries in the mid latitudes it killing off huge coral reefs known as bleaching events. As tge Arctic continues to warm up at twice the global rate the tempature difference between the Arctic and mid latitudes is shrinking. That is contributing to the jet stream to loose its shape and speed casing big storms around the world to move more slowly or stalling casing droughts and hurricanes to move more slowly inland. Hurricane Harvey was one example. It moved inland at 5 mph resulting up to 50 inches to accumulate. In some years climate change is slowing the firmstion of pacific storms. Pacific ocean storms mix up the top layer of tge ocean with lower colder stratification layers to keep the surface of the pacific ocean cool. Summer of 2016 was a stunning summer with no rain for 6 months in the pacific north west. As Arctic ocean continues to loose its ice is is slowing many decadal overturning circulation. The Atlantic decades overturning circulation is one if the well known DOC. Its known at earths air conditioning system. It helps to regulates the tempature of the northern hemisphere. Without it countries in southern latitudes would cook with heat waves between 130-150 degrees.

    • @colecampagna6302
      @colecampagna6302 3 роки тому

      is it any better than cutting down forests on the east coast for cities and farms?

    • @colecampagna6302
      @colecampagna6302 3 роки тому

      @@thetechnicanwithaheart1682 right its hard for people to imagine what it looked like 50, 100, 300 years ago. The planet is changing so rapidly and what we see now is so so wrong.

    • @ellsworth1956
      @ellsworth1956 3 роки тому +1

      @@colecampagna6302 There are more trees on The East Coast now than in the 1940's. Back then the cities and towns were surrounded by Truck Farms. That "Trucked" Their produce to the cities. Not to mention better Forrest practices. We don't clear cut any more.

  • @lithostheory
    @lithostheory 3 роки тому +213

    Hopi are like the real life Fremen from Dune.

    • @Sublimeoo
      @Sublimeoo 3 роки тому +7

      You must drink the water of life

    • @charliecrome207
      @charliecrome207 3 роки тому +15

      Hope the new dune movie actually comes out lol

    • @JoeBob79569
      @JoeBob79569 3 роки тому +5

      I just started reading Dune last night! I think I'll remember this when I come across the Fremen.. Whoever they are..

    • @Sublimeoo
      @Sublimeoo 3 роки тому +5

      @@JoeBob79569 enjoy , its a fantastic book

    • @PiratesRock
      @PiratesRock 3 роки тому +4

      Except without the murderous tendencies. Lol.

  • @harishrv
    @harishrv 3 роки тому +5

    America should go for multi layered, mixed crop farming with intertwined water harvesting ponds for every 5 acres of land. This not only maximises the yield but also act as pest control naturally and at the same time preserving the soil health.

  • @Abby-yc7tt
    @Abby-yc7tt 3 роки тому +50

    FYI - you never want to place a brick in the toilet tank as it will leave rust stains in the bowl. Instead, place a glass canning jar or vase. Once it's full of water it'll stay put. It saves same as a brick.

    • @dag_of_the_west5416
      @dag_of_the_west5416 3 роки тому +4

      Usually there is a way to adjust the float arm so it turns off the water valve sooner, thus less water will be in the tank.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому +2

      You can turn your regular toilet into a 2 stage water saving toilet by replacing the old flapper (which probably should be changed anyway) with a flapper with a float on the chain. You simply raise or lower the float on the chain to suit your toilets design. Lowering the float increases the volume of the flush. Raising it decreases the volume of the flush. To get the maximum volume of flush you simply hold the toilet handle down for a few seconds until the tank empties out into the bowl.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому +3

      @@dag_of_the_west5416 Lowering the float on the fill valve decreases the overall potential volume of the flush. Same with putting some object int the tank. Get a flapper with a float on it. That why if you need a high volume flush you simply hold the handle down until the entire tank empties into the bowl. If you simply press and release the toilet handle it gives a relatively small flush.

    • @casper130rocks
      @casper130rocks 3 роки тому +1

      Just adjust the water level by lowering the float you don't have to put anything in your toilet

    • @Abby-yc7tt
      @Abby-yc7tt 3 роки тому +3

      @@casper130rocks not all toilets have an adjustable float. Mine is hard plastic that won't bend.

  • @culbinator
    @culbinator 3 роки тому +57

    We need to switch from monoculture, annual crops to polyculture, perennial, forest based agriculture. Maybe we should start using mesquite flower as a main food source in the southwest.

    • @johnnydoe2672
      @johnnydoe2672 3 роки тому +1

      The Amazon rainforest would’ve been great to start with but it’s pretty much all gone now

    • @scottowensbyable
      @scottowensbyable 3 роки тому +6

      I live on a farm. I think it would be really great if you would buy a some land and start working on your ideas.

    • @shihtzusrule9115
      @shihtzusrule9115 3 роки тому +5

      Yeah, regenerative farming, permaculture for land management using swales for places that get rain. And we could build that pipeline, only build it to convey water from areas that get flooded to areas that are hit by drought and aridification and call it Cornerstone. if the Romans could manage water, we should be able to also.

    • @codniggh1139
      @codniggh1139 3 роки тому +4

      @@scottowensbyable therea are many people around the world that have made this already. They have suceess, with no product to sell, with no fancy equipment, hat don't have to rely on chemical products or any product of companies and yet they save a lot of money. Most of this have been made in Asutralia.

    • @scottowensbyable
      @scottowensbyable 3 роки тому +1

      @@codniggh1139 no product to sell? That's not my idea of success.

  • @ClarkABennett
    @ClarkABennett 3 роки тому +36

    Why can't the farmer get a permit to change her irrigation processes? Seems it would solve all her problems along with changing to alternative crops with the cost offset by a grant or low interest loan ftrom the state or federal governement. No farmers, no food.

    • @tubebrocoli
      @tubebrocoli 3 роки тому +8

      That's a good question that I'd love if the video had gone further into. But honestly, I've heard of enough cases where the farmer doesn't really try to understand the new system and doesn't get a permit because they can't prove they'd operate it correctly, or that the solution actually works in their situation (instead of being even more wasteful).

    • @krispalermo8133
      @krispalermo8133 3 роки тому +3

      @@tubebrocoli People making decision behind a table in air condition offices where they are protected from any fall out from bad choices they make.
      People making policy about farming and they never grew up on a farm or worked on one.
      " Well, we can't grant you a permit cause we don't have a commission office in dealing with such said permits. "

    • @raypitts4880
      @raypitts4880 3 роки тому

      its called make money should be saving and putting back in.

    • @enzofarias6717
      @enzofarias6717 3 роки тому +6

      Fucking stupid that you need a permit to make changes on the land that you yourself legally own. It goes to show that in reality you don’t own anything.

    • @jmd1743
      @jmd1743 3 роки тому

      Money.

  • @thetechnicanwithaheart1682
    @thetechnicanwithaheart1682 3 роки тому +25

    Indoor hydroponics is by far the most efficient form of agriculture. It can consume 90% less water then traditional farming.

    • @hollyivins1668
      @hollyivins1668 3 роки тому +1

      You are so rite . Food companies have been looking into the . Watch Canada i herd they are doing this very smart

    • @loafandjug321
      @loafandjug321 3 роки тому +2

      Yet another ignorant farmer video stuck in their old wasteful ways. They will all be replaced with controlled vertical farms. Good riddance.

    • @mbabcock111
      @mbabcock111 3 роки тому

      I knew there were people with practical common sense. But the alarmists don't see enterprise, technology and innovation as a "good" thing...

    • @mbabcock111
      @mbabcock111 3 роки тому +1

      @@loafandjug321 stop making sense. You are not supposed to go against the alarmist grain...

    • @lilaclizard4504
      @lilaclizard4504 2 роки тому +1

      Indoor??????? There's 2.6 billion hectares of crops on the planet, do you have ANY idea of how much indoor space that means?????? Why don't you do the calculations on how big the buildings need to be for even 1% of the current crops moving indoors! That's 26 million hectares of buildings, 2.6 million hectares if you build them 10 stories high. That's 2.6 million football stadium sized buildings you will need for just 1% of the current crop area!
      Please do some basic research, don't just spout off talking points you've heard but don't understand!
      There's nothing efficient in the maintenance of football stadium sized buildings you fill with moisture & mould, not to mention lighting & ventilation costs & waste disposal! Set up a hydroponics pod in your apartment if you want to learn the truth!

  • @Naglak2008
    @Naglak2008 3 роки тому +30

    i love this show. pbs terra is awesome

  • @gamingtonight1526
    @gamingtonight1526 3 роки тому +28

    This is a show that sort of says "nobody is going to fix the climate crisis, so this is what you need to do to survive"!!

    • @msdramamusic
      @msdramamusic 3 роки тому +4

      So sad when we can fix it. Other desert countries are fixing their problems but not us.

    • @rosairedubrule60
      @rosairedubrule60 3 роки тому +2

      which proves are leaders are self serving greedy idiots

    • @supersaiyaman11589
      @supersaiyaman11589 3 роки тому

      @@msdramamusic because the us is to lazy or doesn't care about climate change and what it means for the rest of the world.

  • @shanefogelsanger7542
    @shanefogelsanger7542 3 роки тому +27

    Hopi... leading the way in agriculture!
    No Monsanto there, pesticides or fertilizers, Amazing 👍

    • @kattiepenn
      @kattiepenn 3 роки тому +2

      If Monsanto finds out he kept his own seeds, they'll come and confiscate.

    • @Black_CoreyNFin
      @Black_CoreyNFin 2 роки тому

      His farm was dead af and laughable. Imagine trying to feed more than 20 people with those dumb farming practices. It turns out watering your plants increases yield.

    • @alexmckee4683
      @alexmckee4683 Рік тому

      @@Black_CoreyNFin sure, it increases yield right up to the point where you have no water to irrigate with and then you lose the lot. Don't be so closed minded, the Hopi technique may not translate into a simple direct answer for other farmer's problems but it does provide ideas and hints in the right direction. There will be a sweet spot between yield and drought tolerance, yield alone is not the most important factor, imagine being able to sell a nice high quality crop for a premium during a drought.

  • @joeme
    @joeme 3 роки тому +34

    Even our ancestor knew better than to live in a cave in the desert WITHOUT AN ADEQUITE WATER SUPPLY.
    They also knew better than to live on a flood plain or below sea water . . .

    • @billiamc1969
      @billiamc1969 3 роки тому +15

      Modern humans are far less intelligent than ancient people

    • @monkaround7830
      @monkaround7830 3 роки тому +1

      We did have a adequate water supply but because of climate change that isn't the case anymore

    • @Jolene8
      @Jolene8 3 роки тому +3

      @@monkaround7830 Too much ecological interference which has sped up the rate of climate change, which happens naturally on it's own but not at the rate we've seen. We have not been good stewards of the planet.

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS......

    • @Power_to_the_people567
      @Power_to_the_people567 Рік тому

      @@billiamc1969 Prove it

  • @superdon1chw
    @superdon1chw 3 роки тому +23

    This happen in the 1915 or so people had to move away. The well feeding farm is lowering ground levels. Remembering the dust bowl

    • @happygolucky1100
      @happygolucky1100 3 роки тому +3

      2.5 million people had to migrate to greener fields that’s a large migration of people over water inside the USA Imagine if that happens today....

    • @liamhackett513
      @liamhackett513 3 роки тому

      @@happygolucky1100 spose you get Trump to build "a big beautiful wall" to keep em in.

    • @agentj1326
      @agentj1326 3 роки тому

      @@liamhackett513 He already did

    • @brosefmcman8264
      @brosefmcman8264 3 роки тому

      @@liamhackett513 hopefully they perish along the way!

    • @liamhackett513
      @liamhackett513 3 роки тому

      @@brosefmcman8264 no. Hopefully it's people like you who go etc....

  • @calebmartinez9350
    @calebmartinez9350 2 роки тому +10

    Oh my goodness the cognitive dissonance people experience to “rationalize” not adopting a plant based diet is amazing. They literally showed a graph of water consumption in a video about water consumption/drought showing agriculture taking up 70%, MOST of our agriculture land goes to feeding livestock as opposed to just growing it for plants we can eat! It is super inefficient means of caloric production. Just addressing the topics in this video, we could dramatically reduce how much agriculture land and water use by adopting a plant based diet far more than anything silly we could do at home like putting a fucking brick in the toilet. And yet what does she recommend to do to help? Says nothing about dietary choices and lists off ridiculous things you can do at home. I don’t really think climate change is something we can really address on an individual scale, we need collective action but I just felt that the recommendations at the end were so fucking ridiculous.

    • @kidlifecrisis9927
      @kidlifecrisis9927 2 роки тому

      You said it perfectly. This video did NOTHING to bring awareness of what needs to happen to address our warming climate and what are the main contributors.

    • @joyaustin6581
      @joyaustin6581 2 роки тому

      Meat will get more expensive. It will happen

    • @wirelesscaller7518
      @wirelesscaller7518 2 роки тому

      Spirilina 1 TBL same as chicken breast without killing.
      Choose vegan .
      Learn hydration

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS......

  • @anjlewis5930
    @anjlewis5930 3 роки тому +16

    I'm glad they featured Natives, but they failed to mention regenerative agriculture

    • @mvmlego1212
      @mvmlego1212 3 роки тому +2

      The inclusion of the native American was thought-provoking, but it didn't add much, concretely. There was no analysis of whether the techniques that he used could be scaled up in terms of land and labor. Sure, his techniques are more water-efficient, but if they take five times as much effort to harvest and use ten times the land, then it's probably not a viable solution.

    • @beth8775
      @beth8775 3 роки тому +1

      I do wish regenerative agriculture would get more attention, but tbf, shifting toward Native American practices would be somewhat regenerative. A big part of it is choosing the right things to grow for your area. It's really ridiculous to try to grow a water heavy crop in a flippin desert.

  • @writereducator
    @writereducator 3 роки тому +6

    Where I live, farmers produce incredible amounts of corn and soybeans with no irrigation. It rains in spring and summer. It is called the Midwest. Average of 180 bushels of corn per acre.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому +1

      Maybe the government should just buy these people out. The South East is covered with commercial forests because the government paid people to stop growing corn and start growing trees. It has kept lumber dirt cheap for the last few decades.
      The recent skyrocketing prices are due to the sawmill bottleneck.

    • @writereducator
      @writereducator 3 роки тому

      @@drmodestoesq ? Take the richest farmland in the world out of production? Why?

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому +3

      @@writereducator Oh...sorry I should have been more specific. I was saying that where you are...natural productive farmland that has no competition for water...because it falls out of the sky...is the place that crops should be grown. So I agree with you.
      The government...and the taxpayer should reconsider heavily subsidizing the growing cotton and rice in the desert lands of the south west.
      And broadening up the conversation...the government should be working in the long term to agricultural policies that require the least amount of taxpayer subsidy.

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS......

  • @patricialessard8651
    @patricialessard8651 3 роки тому +9

    Native Americans have lived with the earth not against it. They've learned to "go with the flow " so to speak(pun intended).
    I grew up with a dug well. We learned early on to conserve water. This was in the 60's before people started taking conserving most any thing, seriously. We didn't get a drilled well until long after I had moved out into my own life, but I took everything that I'd learned with me. I still to this day use what I'd learned and have passed it on to my children and others. Hopefully, it will help.

    • @OutNAboutWithBrad
      @OutNAboutWithBrad 3 роки тому

      People today are too disconnected from nature and where their resources come from. If they were more connected I imagine there would be more conservation and less destruction.

    • @juhaszsc
      @juhaszsc 3 роки тому +1

      In the 60s there was less than 3 billion people on earth. now it is almost 8 billion. Something will have to give.

    • @adspur
      @adspur 3 роки тому

      Native Americans never over populated either

    • @dmannevada5981
      @dmannevada5981 2 роки тому

      Thank you for repeating another Urban myth

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS......

  • @theshuriken
    @theshuriken 3 роки тому +2

    well made video, thanks PBS!

  • @515ventures3
    @515ventures3 3 роки тому +42

    The fires in the west will be absolutely insane in later 2021 with this bad drought!! If I had a home in dangerous fire zones, I’d sell it ASAP!
    June 2nd, 2021

    • @EvenFive
      @EvenFive 3 роки тому +4

      Nobody will listen. We get what we deserve.

    • @thetechnicanwithaheart1682
      @thetechnicanwithaheart1682 3 роки тому

      Its a function of several elements. Drought severe dryness of the urban wildlife interface , humidity of 30% , winds over 30 kmh "winds carry firebrand and also flatten entire housing districts. Many areas of the desert sw are in a level 4 extreme drought. Future drinking water from lake mead is at risk of going dry. It feeds 60 million Americans and is running at 37% height. Massive migrating Americans have been occurring and will migrate Northern latitudes

    • @paulferrante5192
      @paulferrante5192 3 роки тому +2

      @@EvenFive A pretty HARSH statement there mate! Lots of people, at least in the Scientific community are listening. The problem, however, is NOBODY has ALL the correct answers yet; and also the politicians won't release the necessary funding to handle the current water shortage problems. Is anybody still talking about Large Scale Sea Water Desalinization plants anymore? Those were and still are long overdue and probably still would not have solved all the issues, but at least it would have helped if they would have been started many years ago. 👍

    • @two-sense
      @two-sense 3 роки тому

      @@paulferrante5192 And where will the massive amounts of energy to run them come from? Hydroelectric power outputs are down all over the west due to low water levels. Or are you thinking fossil fuels?

    • @loafandjug321
      @loafandjug321 3 роки тому +1

      Yet another ignorant farmer video stuck in their old wasteful ways. They will all be replaced with controlled vertical farms. Good riddance.

  • @solchapeau6343
    @solchapeau6343 3 роки тому +22

    A brick can break your ceramic toilet. Be careful when placing it in.
    Also, rainwater catchment systems are illegal in some places. You can't just install it, even if you only plan to irrigate plants with it (not drink it).

    • @cuttwice3905
      @cuttwice3905 3 роки тому +7

      There are plastic bags you can fill with water to put in your toilet tank and hang from the side. They hold about 1/2 gallon.

    • @Ender06
      @Ender06 3 роки тому +3

      @@cuttwice3905 Just take a old 2 liter pop bottle (or other pop bottles) and fill them with water and place them in the tank.

    • @Sprchkn
      @Sprchkn 3 роки тому +8

      I never understand that advice, why not just adjust your float level? Even the ancient toilets I grew up with had that option and all the toilets in our 1980 house already have a low flush and long flush option by using a simple adjustable floating foam piece attached to the chain for the flapper. We replaced one of our toilet insides with a dual flush retrofit kit, and that is more convenient because you don't have to hold it down for long flushes - but you don't have to spend any money at all on a ziplock or brick if you just adjust your float instead.

    • @conribarnes1373
      @conribarnes1373 3 роки тому +4

      @@Sprchkn My toilet doesn’t have any adjustable parts, and I live in an apartment so I can’t change any of the parts in it. So for people like me the best advice is to get a brick/bag/etc to put in it.

    • @Sprchkn
      @Sprchkn 3 роки тому +1

      @@conribarnes1373 Good to know, I didn't realize such toilets existed. The most rudimentary ones I've seen you could still thread the float further in or out on the rod, or if that didn't get you where it needed to be you just bent the rod to get the desired reservoir level.

  • @diannadima7082
    @diannadima7082 10 місяців тому

    Thank you Terra for keeping us up to date on the crisis.

  • @davechristensen8299
    @davechristensen8299 2 роки тому +2

    As a farmer I get depressed. The droughts have slaughtered my income. I wish everyone would watch this. People act like the troubles we farmers are having are temporary, and we will be able to provide them bountiful and cheap food forever. We all have a big shock coming that we cannot comprehend. So many voters don't believe that man is creating global warming. Don't let anyone blame this on God. The culprit is greed. God gave man dominion over the earth. We wanted it. We took it. We have ruined it.

  • @coffeehawk
    @coffeehawk 3 роки тому +14

    It means California's government has know for decades, even 100 years or more, that CA can't sustain their growth and financial standing. I'm surprised the Feds have allowed it to continue at such a rapid pace; the 'big one' is coming.

    • @tjs200
      @tjs200 3 роки тому +2

      Im sorry but how on earth would "the Feds" NOT ALLOW a state to grow? Like what, the federal government is just going to say "Nope you're growing too fast we can't allow that - better force people migrating to turn around" like the federal government has that authority. This isn't a fascist country, people can move and do business wherever they please, and if a state grows and becomes wealthy, it's because people chose to live and work there. What an asinine statement.

    • @coffeehawk
      @coffeehawk 3 роки тому +1

      @@tjs200 You missed the part of the US Constitution where the Feds can moderate interstate issues and country border issues. For example, CA does not have enough water to support it's agriculture so it gets it from out of state. This is more troubling because they keep allowing growth in naturally occurring fire prone areas. CA also can't support it economics without low income migrant/trans-border workers. CA has grown too big for it's boots. It's just greed at this point.

    • @krispalermo8133
      @krispalermo8133 3 роки тому

      @@coffeehawk Back in the late 1970's & early 80's PBS/Nova science report warning about .. Tree Rings .. showing people mass settle California during a .. wet period .. and we will be looking at a on coming drought are begining in the mid 1990's and it will get really bad near 2030's. ... but it was laugh off.
      They built up .. mega ..city locations with out insuring the building of the need water infrastructure to support the locations. Seen a program where junior high school students figure out what the gas cost to bull dozz build an earth work dam to create a reservoir to supply 15x the current population.
      It cost .. too .. much, and children should leave the thinking to the college trained adults.
      No it was too .. cheap .. and Quick .. and the politicians couldn't skim from it.

    • @tjs200
      @tjs200 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@coffeehawkalmost all of California's water that is used for agriculture comes from within the state - via snowmelt from the sierra nevada mountains, or from aquifers. Water that is diverted from the Colorado river mostly goes to the urban areas in southern California, not the central valley (and even in the south a significant chunk also comes from the Los Angeles aqueduct, which diverts water from northern California).
      Furthermore, implying the federal government has the power to restrict California from purchasing water from its neighbors is a ridiculously liberal interpretation of the interstate commerce clause, and any actual attempt by the federal government to do so would most certainly be shot down in court.
      Also, it's not like California just 'opens the door' for illegal immigrants. the border is the domain of the federal govt and border patrol, customs, etc are all federal employees so if people get through, it's not like it's California's fault. And if migrant workers are not caught and deported - that's a failing of the federal government, becuase that is explicitly their job.
      Lastly, the claim the "California's economy cannot be sustained without migrant workers" is unsubstantiated, it may or may not be true. but you don't actually know.

    • @coffeehawk
      @coffeehawk 3 роки тому +1

      @@krispalermo8133 True, but it's an older issue than that. It's as old as any valley by the sea surrounded by mountains where the jet stream and El Nino's can move across, above, or below it. The politicians get their power from taxes, and taxes come from people and jobs/companies not in agriculture, thus putting more pressure on agriculture. All empires expand to the point of collapse.

  • @Thessalin
    @Thessalin 3 роки тому +23

    Dr. Udall: "A permanent move to a dry state."
    Me: No thanks Doc! I prefer cold and wet. Why I still live in Georgia, I'll never know.
    Jokes aside, nice episode. I appreciate the idea to help rather than abandon the farmers. Giving people hope helps.

    • @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
      @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 3 роки тому +3

      Georgia is hardly cold .

    • @CerebrumMortum
      @CerebrumMortum 3 роки тому +4

      Help farmers help us. Say by moving out of flood irrigation and water gazzling crops.
      I mean, its 2020, where has she been for the last 50 years?!

    • @tubebrocoli
      @tubebrocoli 3 роки тому +2

      If they actually want to be part of the solution, yeah. But if you go by the votes and party affinities in rural regions... it really seems they'd rather side with climate change denialists than actually be part of building a solution.

  • @TheThora17
    @TheThora17 3 роки тому +1

    What a great production!

  • @Workingcockers
    @Workingcockers 3 роки тому +11

    “What we are discovering is that higher temperatures leads to higher evaporation in all its forms.” Really, you just discovered this? I’m not a scientist and I could have told you that 30 years ago.

    • @gizzyguzzi
      @gizzyguzzi 3 роки тому

      then what was it like when it was higher temps 1000 years ago than it is now?

    • @lilaclizard4504
      @lilaclizard4504 2 роки тому +1

      and yet so many people are still not grasping what they said in addition to this, about how that water is lost from the immediate water chain. The comments are full of people saying they should plant cover crops & forests & the evaporation from them will make the rain come

  • @DrumToTheBassWoop
    @DrumToTheBassWoop 3 роки тому +6

    *Colorado River*
    “I keep giving, you keep taking, I give up” 😔

  • @burtonwilliams5355
    @burtonwilliams5355 3 роки тому +3

    Grew up on a farm in Tennessee - we went through EVERYTHING. Late freezes/frost, floods, drought, wind storms, etc. - you name it. Don't farm any more (thank goodness). People need to know just how much produce comes from the West. My last job was a produce clerk in a grocery store. All stay safe out there, and Good luck.

    • @krispalermo8133
      @krispalermo8133 3 роки тому +2

      My grand mother grew up on a farm during the US Great Depression in the same county I'm living in right now.
      A flu went through and killed over half the pigs and chickens, and the rest were put down.
      Then the cattle had a white puss ozzing out of their nose, cows had to be put down.
      Talk about laying down a burning trench row with wood, tossing/ dragging the dead on it, cover in dirt and burnt like making charcoal.
      They had to kill off half their horses, mules, and donkeys for meat that winter, then something else when through killing the remaining horses.
      Worst part was, something like .. pneumonia when through one winter killed 40% of the counties' population. From the Official start of the Great Depression to the start of WW II only 15% of the original population remained that had lived there since the county was founded.
      Further history studies pointed out the Irish Potato Famine was cause they only had around three types of potatoes unlike rest of Europe was growing. When a massive flock of birds carrying different types of flu virus drop their waste on farm fields killed off entire crops in the field. Europe had a wider range of potatoes so they didn't get hit at famine levels of hunger.
      Average big city person, " So .. crows eat corn, what's your point?"
      Farmer, ... In cold sweats when seeing flocks the size of small clouds moving over head.
      I grew up .. just .. outside off city limits in a rural next to a golf coarse and corn fields. Waking up in the morning and seeing acres of open land cover by Canadian geese is a sight to behold. Then again waking up in your front yard surround by a few thousand is something too. Packs of coyotes would group up on my grandparents land just to grab a few geese when they could twice a year.
      You have no .. ideal .. what the front yard and golf coarse .. smelt .. like, when all though geese took off. They .. lighten .. their load, on take off and plaster everything around under them.
      Have a good night, and G*D bless.

    • @burtonwilliams5355
      @burtonwilliams5355 3 роки тому +1

      @@krispalermo8133 My grandparents and parents went through that and then people think that food comes from the grocery store gez.

    • @alexmckee4683
      @alexmckee4683 Рік тому

      @@krispalermo8133 Irish potato famine was caused by blight, not avian influenza (how could that even infect a plant). Your point about the low diversity of the potatoes is absolutely right though; the Scots were the same in the isles (Harris, Skye, etc). Dependence on just a few key crops is always a bad idea, especially if there's low genetic diversity in that crop.

  • @thisisatonofbs
    @thisisatonofbs 3 роки тому +6

    The float arms in toilets can be adjusted without doing something like putting a brick in feed. Just bend the arm downwards means that it takes less water to "fill" the bowl and turn off.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому

      80 percent of replacement fill valves and many on new models are the
      Fluidmaster design. It is a black and grey tower shaped dingus on the left side of the tank. There is a threaded rod attached to the float. By rotating it you can adjust the amount of water it lets into the tank before shutting off.
      But I recommend getting a flapper with float on it so you can change your toilet to having 2 potential volumes of flush. Simply hold the handle down for a few seconds to empty the entire tank into the bowl.

  • @nickybrooks6942
    @nickybrooks6942 2 роки тому +1

    We here in the UK have water meters , the more you use the more you pay! General rule of thumb is " if its yellow let it mellow times 3 , if its brown flush it down" , amazing how much people have saved .

    • @alexmckee4683
      @alexmckee4683 Рік тому

      More than half the UK is still on the rateable value system, not metered. But I agree, metered and sensible water usage is a good idea.

  • @AlexHop1
    @AlexHop1 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you! Permaculture techniques like no-till farming and planting trees to improve retention of water in the soil can help.

  • @KeCzajkowski
    @KeCzajkowski 3 роки тому +57

    "Hello yes I'm very sad that I might not be able to farm in the desert anymore." Notice that the lady's 'fallow' fields are void of all life? No weeds or anything? Might be a hint that it might not be the best place to grow shit.
    Also lol at the classic shift of blame onto the individual instead of giant factory farms that, as this video states, use 70% of the water. But me not having a brick in my toilet is the issue.

    • @beast_boy97
      @beast_boy97 3 роки тому +19

      The problem isn't necessarily growing food in the desert as much as growing the wrong food. Alfalfa is a terrible choice, but as you can see the Hopi have special breeds of crops like blue corn that can grow in the otherwise inhospitable climate. Plus, all that alfalfa goes to feeding livestock, what a waste of water!

    • @danims7329
      @danims7329 3 роки тому +11

      Agree, that shift at the end doesn't make any sense after what is explained in the beginning of the video. And the supposed dilemma of "abandoning farmers" is just absurd to me, I mean, unless we grow our own food ourselves we literally depend on farmers to produce it so there's no way we can afford to "abandon" them.

    • @conribarnes1373
      @conribarnes1373 3 роки тому +6

      That shift at the end to what individuals can do was just unnecessary.
      But, for that farmer, those fallow fields used to be able to grow crops. So it’s not a case of originally farming it a bad location. It’s that the viability of location has changed. And you can’t just pack up and move out of there. So her only real option is to find new ways to work with those fields.

    • @L3vinesNL
      @L3vinesNL 3 роки тому +6

      @@conribarnes1373 or.... Maybe just give her the damn permits for that system that uses less water..

    • @mvmlego1212
      @mvmlego1212 3 роки тому +3

      It's bad statistics to criticize factory farms for the percentage of water that they consume without considering the percentage of food that those factory farms produce. Remember the concept of economy of scale.

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 3 роки тому

    Maiya May is an excellent communicator. Unlike most PBS hosts, she speaks at a nice comfortable pace instead of speed talking.

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 3 роки тому

      I have unsubscribed from all the PBS channels that not only speedtalk, but edit out all the natural spaces between sentences. What the hell is the point in that? They give me anxiety attacks.

  • @sadlfjasdfacv
    @sadlfjasdfacv 3 роки тому

    Great report!

  • @RamonQuiro7
    @RamonQuiro7 3 роки тому +14

    7:42 In my opinion.. State/government should subsidize these farmers to incentivize positive change. Of course us tax payers will initially have to pay the price but we will all reap the benefits in the long run. We have to adapt and learn in this ever-changing world. Just a thought that crossed my mind

    • @PeterLawton
      @PeterLawton 3 роки тому +1

      What positive change, specifically? What actions? Why not let the free market shift farming to areas with enough water?

    • @maggiejetson7904
      @maggiejetson7904 3 роки тому +1

      They were doing the other way around, farmers lobby for all sorts of things for profit, and grow almond for export $ that uses so much water.

    • @supersaiyaman11589
      @supersaiyaman11589 3 роки тому

      @@PeterLawton that may happen after they suck all the ground water out first than they will move. that is a bad decision. gtound water is not meant to be sucked out of the ground at the amount humans are taking it. what will happen wene it runs out is the qestion i would ask you.

    • @PeterLawton
      @PeterLawton 3 роки тому

      @@supersaiyaman11589 Why ask me? I only asked Ramon to justify spending my tax dollars, and I am open to actions that have been well thought out. But Ramon called for spending without saying specifically what actions would justify it. So far, it looks like a knee-jerk call for government spending of a portion of my paycheck.

  • @Albopepper
    @Albopepper 3 роки тому +13

    This is such a great video, touching on a very critical topic! Thanks PBS Terra! For home gardening / farming, I've found sub-irrigated planters to be very effective at harvesting and then retaining water for my crops. Excellent for water conservation.
    On a personal level, I quit eating all animal products over three years ago. Not only does it help to conserve resources, but my health is so much better.

    • @MrTwige
      @MrTwige 3 роки тому +1

      climate change...lol...you are so funny....but you dont tell the truth....look at your planets....are they going thru climate change as well?

  • @Mindfeels
    @Mindfeels 3 роки тому

    A very enlightening video.
    Thank you!

  • @philipnielsen1776
    @philipnielsen1776 3 роки тому

    Super video. The public needs to see your video

  • @klausvonshnytke
    @klausvonshnytke 3 роки тому +4

    when water evaporates it's not lost to the hydrological cycle. I'ts back immediately. I think what you are trying to point out, is that it doesn't go back where it evaporated but can travel long distance before comes back as rain or snow.

    • @tubebrocoli
      @tubebrocoli 3 роки тому +5

      It means the atmosphere can hold more water and thus two things happen:
      1) there's inherently less water available for use by animals and plants.
      2) the total water content in the basin changes as some of that water leaves the area each year and not as much comes back in.
      the first one is the immediate drought, the second one is the gradual and permanent aridification of the basin

    • @jimurrata6785
      @jimurrata6785 3 роки тому

      @@tubebrocoli And look at the subsidence we get when the aquifer is pumped dry....
      You're absolutely right. A warmer climate supports more water in the atmosphere.
      And that moisture isn't going to drop out until the air becomes too cold to support it.
      Perhaps thousands of miles away. Lack of rain and especially snow pack are exactly why we have drought.
      Humans being selfish doesn't create drought, but compounds the problem of resource scarcity.

  • @leviahimsa
    @leviahimsa 3 роки тому +3

    Avoiding to the most comprehensive analysis ever conducted on the environment, avoiding meat and dairy is the "SINGLE BIGGEST WAY" to reduce your environmental impact on Earth. - Oxford University 🌍

    • @roggcast5077
      @roggcast5077 3 роки тому

      vegan are the biggest waste of space!

    • @leviahimsa
      @leviahimsa 3 роки тому +1

      @@roggcast5077 83% of farmland is used for animal agriculture, but it only provides 18% of calories. Such a waste that pathetic animal killers are destroying our environment.

  • @simplycrypto1021
    @simplycrypto1021 3 роки тому

    Great Content!

  • @disky01
    @disky01 3 роки тому

    Very well presented.

  • @naturenuggets4613
    @naturenuggets4613 3 роки тому +9

    A brick in the toilet is a bad idea, ask any plumber.

  • @niceguy9184
    @niceguy9184 3 роки тому +5

    Producing meat requires very high volumes of water, so maybe it would be wise to tax the meat to disincentives its consumption.

    • @islami658
      @islami658 3 роки тому +1

      That’s communism

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 3 роки тому

      That's the biggest user of water.

  • @__cypher__
    @__cypher__ 3 роки тому +2

    Nobody is acknowledging that Southern California, specifically L.A., is unsustainable. The area cannot realistically support the number of people living there... and the numbers continue to grow every month...

  • @swrtsolutionsinc.1092
    @swrtsolutionsinc.1092 3 роки тому +2

    Results of research completed at Michigan State University and replicated in the USA and other countries have shown that SWRT subsurface membrane technology doubles the water holding capacity of coarse textured soils. Dramatic increases in biomass and crop production are possible and expected when more soil moisture is available throughout the growing season.

  • @openyoureyes3113
    @openyoureyes3113 3 роки тому +12

    You never talked about the drought the US create it in Mexico. The Colorado river flowed into Mexico but not anymore. It’s got diverted to California. They’ve been experience drought for a long time.

    • @lucanidae100
      @lucanidae100 3 роки тому

      They are growing our crops and they get too much water

    • @jeffgold3091
      @jeffgold3091 Рік тому

      All the water in the colorado river is drained off before it reaches mexico

  • @patriciakavanaugh5300
    @patriciakavanaugh5300 3 роки тому +9

    Would love to xeriscape my yard but the HOA won't allow it. Thinking of selling and moving as soon as COVID restrictions allow.

    • @pendragon_cave1405
      @pendragon_cave1405 3 роки тому +3

      Xeriscaping isn't just rocks and shrubs. Depending on where you live there are a lot of options. We recently moved to Denver and I've been pleasantly surprised by the wide range of plants and landscaping options that fall into xeriscaping out here. (We have an HOA too, so i feel your pain)

    • @beskamir5977
      @beskamir5977 3 роки тому +3

      You might be able to get away with it by making your yard a "wildlife reserve". One of the biohack chats on the thought emporium (I think it was in one of these? ua-cam.com/video/jrXvuJx7a9Y/v-deo.html or ua-cam.com/video/Z52mEdVCV88/v-deo.html ) talked about that idea.
      Anyway in theory that should work for bylaw legal bullshit and it might even work on HOA related bullshit. A quick google search found these sources which might also be of interest if you decide to try doing this: www.hgtv.com/outdoors/gardens/animals-and-wildlife/how-to-create-a-certified-wildlife-habitat en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backyard_Wildlife_Habitat www.nwf.org/garden-for-wildlife/certify

  • @shadowscribe
    @shadowscribe 3 роки тому +1

    Many of our systems, especially agriculture we did a lot of changing the environment to suit us, but the unsung flip side of that is the environment provided all we needed to do it. We surely can adapt to getting along with what the it gives, but we're in some growing pains getting there.

  • @KressRudra
    @KressRudra 3 роки тому

    great video

  • @earlwallace2015
    @earlwallace2015 3 роки тому +4

    We need to start recycling gray water. Even if it's only used for irrigation. Would cut down on the cycle significantly.

    • @mountainmikemmel8289
      @mountainmikemmel8289 3 роки тому

      In the desert southwest pools and golf courses use too much precious water. Just look at satellite photos of residential development in California, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico and you will see plenty of water. Hundreds of years ago the people of Chaco canyon disappeared leaving behind evidence of severe drought including evidence of cannibalism.

  • @sidneyboo9704
    @sidneyboo9704 3 роки тому +7

    That Hopi dry farm is amazing! It has enough to feed a small family.

    • @dag_of_the_west5416
      @dag_of_the_west5416 3 роки тому

      Hopi farm at 5:45 was amazing, I had no idea that was possible. Imagine what he could do with just a little water.

    • @jimurrata6785
      @jimurrata6785 3 роки тому

      Then consider how many small families there are in 25 acres of a city.
      Let's send them each out into the desert to toil in the 100°+ blazing sun.
      Huge factory farms, intensive fertilization and use of pesticides is all so we can sustain insane population density.
      That woman said 7 acre feet of water to grow _alfalfa_ ....
      Thousands of acres get flooded _seven feet deep_ (total) in the middle of the desert to grow feed, per season. (and that's her one farm!)
      Do you eat alfalfa? Does alfalfa occur in the desert normally?

  • @100perdido
    @100perdido 3 роки тому

    There are many practical ways to conserve water which are overlooked.
    1. Never wash your car. It's a frivolous use of water and an exercise in vanity.
    2. Never water a lawn. If there is not enough rain, fill your yard with gravel.
    3. Stop bathing. The only real reason to bathe is to remove bacteria which causes body odor. Wipe down with wash cloth soaked in alcohol or use those sanitary wipe things. And you can always go outside with a bar of soap when it rains,
    4. Stop using flush toilets. Either use an outhouse or if you are not the outdoor type, have the outhouse installed inside your house. No flushing required.
    5. Stop washing dishes. Wipe your dishes with a damp cloth to remove food and then wipe with alcohol to kill any bacteria.
    6. Stop washing clothes so often. Other than underwear and socks, unless an article of clothing has actual 'dirt" on it, hang it outside in the sunlight to kill any odor causing bacteria. You don't wash your shoes, do you?

  • @Bigtimepeanut
    @Bigtimepeanut Рік тому

    “ we know this country” was the ultimate mic drop no cap lol

  • @psychlops924
    @psychlops924 3 роки тому +3

    Depending on local regulations, catching rainwater may be illegal. I remember watching a video about some places in Colorado where it’s illegal, so check local laws before you do it.

    • @dag_of_the_west5416
      @dag_of_the_west5416 3 роки тому +1

      The state law in Colorado has changed to allow 2 rain barrels now with a maximum capacity of 110 gallons. The water must be used at the property where it is collected.

  • @rutufn0596
    @rutufn0596 3 роки тому +8

    20% less on surface waters, what about the underground stocks and the impact of drills ?

  • @scavengerspc
    @scavengerspc 3 роки тому +2

    Im from Little Rock and we have nearly doubled our normal rainfall amounts every year for 3 or 4 years now. To bad we can't send some of that to the west and south-west.

  • @scottschaeffer8920
    @scottschaeffer8920 2 роки тому

    Not just southwest either, our weather is getting drier and hotter in the midwest as well. Everything and everybody should be on the table.

  • @starcrib
    @starcrib 3 роки тому +16

    "Get Ready for Human Habitat Loss"...we are the extinction level events. 🦖☄

    • @Mwolf-yw4hb
      @Mwolf-yw4hb 3 роки тому +2

      Living in CA is crazy of what is happening with the drought.

    • @10ikehawk
      @10ikehawk 3 роки тому +2

      The dinosaur and astroid emoji combo is so cute and sad at the same time!

    • @brosefmcman8264
      @brosefmcman8264 3 роки тому

      Good! The die of is well over do!!

  • @TheFourthWinchester
    @TheFourthWinchester 3 роки тому +7

    Imagine if people stopped eating beef. So much water can be saved and toxic gases can be cut.

  • @bodaciousbull8553
    @bodaciousbull8553 3 роки тому

    Nice job

  • @obes8
    @obes8 Рік тому +2

    Bring back Hopi Teachings

  • @fabianreusch4870
    @fabianreusch4870 3 роки тому +4

    I love how this really has become one of the best Shows on UA-cam 👍

    • @lithostheory
      @lithostheory 3 роки тому +1

      I disagree, this channel was something special, but now it's just another generic PBS channel :^(

  • @emeraldchina7365
    @emeraldchina7365 3 роки тому +8

    Once again, we're reminded that the native americans are the key to respecting nature, protecting it & enjoying the fruits of that relationship.

    • @loafandjug321
      @loafandjug321 3 роки тому +2

      Yet another ignorant farmer video stuck in their old wasteful ways. They will all be replaced with controlled vertical farms. Good riddance.

    • @mbabcock111
      @mbabcock111 3 роки тому

      Which is why, in a modern world of abundance and technology, the natives don't need to be shackled with subsistence living any more.

  • @faerieSAALE
    @faerieSAALE 3 роки тому

    LOVE the way MAIYA MAY eloquently speaks and her hand gestures. She will do well in the media because she is also pretty as well as educated and talented.

  • @Momoka7
    @Momoka7 3 роки тому +2

    3:35 It is nice to know that... again... bureaucracy is in the way of improving situations at hand.

  • @chriss2295
    @chriss2295 3 роки тому +6

    We left SoCal for Seattle many years ago. Everyone thought I was crazy when I said we’d eventually have the same weather as Northern CA weather.

    • @LK-pc4sq
      @LK-pc4sq 2 роки тому

      They were ignorant! are you a intj? I am I watched the climate series of vidios from all gore. It never clicked what he was talking about was the next mass extinction of earth. In the last 750 million years three of the last five mass extinction were due to excessive levels of co2 emissions over heating the planet and forcing life into the arctic while the rest of Earth Cooked!

  • @robbabcock_
    @robbabcock_ 3 роки тому +4

    Great episode! It's long past time for people to wake up. Thanks, Maya!🙏😁

    • @mbabcock111
      @mbabcock111 3 роки тому

      Meanwhile, here where I live, I literally do the complete opposite of what this young lady advocates. My location, in a rainforest region of the northwest, will never be affected by the same enduring problems faced in a desert geography.

  • @zachcarter3186
    @zachcarter3186 3 роки тому

    Yet here I am in what once was a drought given area looking at my flooded yard
    Crazy how places change

  • @billiamc1969
    @billiamc1969 3 роки тому +1

    Here in Maryland, our tree canopy is in sharp decline due to declining rainfall...eventually the entire Mid-Atlantic will have much fewer trees and therefore much hotter summers

  • @EdwardThimbleHands
    @EdwardThimbleHands 3 роки тому +7

    7:36, Anyone else notice that they don't bother controlling for the the same mass to make the graph accurate, or even keep the units the same, but instead use "gallons per serving" as the metric to illustrate water usage. Even using the same caloric amount would have been preferable to an arbitrary measurement like "serving size" which isn't standardized globally and can change over time.
    Also, why would you compare cooked and raw foods anyway?
    And for the "sliced bread":
    Is that thin or thick?
    White or wheat?
    There are so many variables that aren't being controlled for that the graph isn't an effective tool to accurately display water usage. I really hope this channel doesn't get as bad as another PBS channel "Above the Noise," because you can find 5+ errors in every episode of theirs.

    • @briantaylor1232
      @briantaylor1232 3 роки тому

      For example, in what world is 6 oz of beef comparable to 3 oz of pork?

    • @EdwardThimbleHands
      @EdwardThimbleHands 3 роки тому

      @@briantaylor1232 Well, you can compare protein content, fats, and minerals, but the graphic and voiceover doesn't go into that much detail. My problem when I watched it was you can't make a comparison without having controls in place. If you can't make honest comparisons, then you can't make worthwhile decisions on what to spend that water on. Like avocados take up lots of fresh water that could go to people or other crops, but most of that water passes through the plant in turn altering humidity and weather patterns around those areas. Same goes for rainforests, but saying that production avocado trees have the same impact as a rainforest with the huge diversity of species(etc) wouldn't be controlling for the size, density, and other impacts of either.

    • @syamkumarkaturi9761
      @syamkumarkaturi9761 2 роки тому

      USE SILVER IODIDE TO MAKE RAINS .BY SPRAYING SILVER IODIDE IS ATMOSPHERE WE CAN MAKE ARTIFICIAL RAINS......

  • @ZeNashB
    @ZeNashB 3 роки тому +17

    "What we found out was higher temperatures cause greater evaporations and make things more dry"
    Wow, what a genius.

    • @krispalermo8133
      @krispalermo8133 3 роки тому +1

      Fall of the Maya empire in Mexico,
      Global cold snap, due to Solar mimi, volcano erupting, or space rock impact, the global temp drop due to more dust in the air.
      Result less sun light hitting and heating the ocean water for evaporation equaling to less rain water leading to drought, famine, weaker health and disease set in killing hundreds of thousands.
      And .. they are .. worried .. about warmer temperatures.

    • @drugbuddy665
      @drugbuddy665 3 роки тому +3

      All scientists have to collect evidence and test their ideas before drawing definitive conclusions, even if it seems obvious based on their current understanding of the world. If you don't like the scientific method, you can always head back to 1400's europe when we concluded that baths caused cholera and lobotomies were a cure for all mental illnesses...

    • @davebruneau6068
      @davebruneau6068 3 роки тому +2

      @paul lennon You can get a whooosh of hot air outta conservatives head with 1 bullet

    • @mrmoncherz2574
      @mrmoncherz2574 3 роки тому

      My thoughts exactly 😂

    • @dmannevada5981
      @dmannevada5981 2 роки тому

      We've been doing the same thing for years, didn't you see recently The Rittenhouse story?

  • @canuckprogressive.3435
    @canuckprogressive.3435 3 роки тому

    Those Hopi really know their stuff!

  • @nibiruresearch
    @nibiruresearch 2 роки тому +1

    If we spent only 10% of the defense budget on developing seawater desalination and building freshwater infrastructure, we could continue to grow food and have enough drinking water. In addition, wastewater can be reused quite easily for multiple purposes.

  • @davegiambrone7974
    @davegiambrone7974 3 роки тому +11

    How about running a pipeline from S Louisiana?? Since we flood every spring??

    • @bossdillman7011
      @bossdillman7011 3 роки тому

      Shatners pipeline idea was good

    • @warreneckels4945
      @warreneckels4945 3 роки тому

      There's just the little problem of lifting the water thousands of feet over thousands of miles. Water is heavy.
      It could be engineered, and it would be great if some of us east of the Mississippi who now expect annual floods could ship the excess West during years of excessive abundance.
      On the other hand, it would also be great if those farmers left the growing of alfalfa to the Midwest and Plains. (They can keep the almonds -- if killing frosts don't get them, disease will on our side of the Rockies)

    • @islami658
      @islami658 3 роки тому

      Hauling enough water to irrigate crops out west would have to in the millions of acre feet which would use a lot of fuel

    • @krispalermo8133
      @krispalermo8133 3 роки тому

      @@islami658 a.) Nuclear power, just turn the water into pressurize steam and it moves to the highest point.
      b.) Thermite can burn for .. days .. under a few tons of concrete.
      They have to burn thermite any ways to create most on the elements to build electronics anyhow.
      Have waystations being fueled with scrap rust steel and used tires for carbon to power steam power electric power plants to move the steam pressure water to different locations. It is cheap and effective and big business can't price gauge it, so it is blocked. Been reading on it for 30 years, my grand father turn me onto it. The technology been around since the 1950's.

    • @buttercuptaylor7135
      @buttercuptaylor7135 3 роки тому

      @@warreneckels4945
      We do it with oil. Let's confiscate the oil pipelines and use them for water.

  • @yoopermann7942
    @yoopermann7942 3 роки тому +13

    what about crops like the thornless prickly pear catcus, the honey mesqeet and other dry crops like the HOPI use??

    • @KainusGulch
      @KainusGulch 3 роки тому +1

      It needs to be publicly enjoyed more places for it to be financially viable for more farmers to raise it. If there's no demand it's kind of a waste. But this does bring up an interesting point to research. Thanks.

    • @yoopermann7942
      @yoopermann7942 3 роки тому +1

      @@KainusGulch i found that i enjoy most "wild" plants that were once/still used by the first peoples of better tasting and quality

    • @KainusGulch
      @KainusGulch 3 роки тому +1

      I think they're fun to try, but I've never gotten accustomed to regular consumption of yucca or the different gourds and squashes, and most other people I know treat those native foods like novelties to have once a year at some celebration, if even that frequent.

    • @dodopson3211
      @dodopson3211 3 роки тому +1

      @@KainusGulch if the situation doesn't change eventually the drought tolerant crops will be all that's left for us. Better to get used to it incrementally instead of suddenly.

    • @xxxBradTxxx
      @xxxBradTxxx 3 роки тому +1

      Or even Peruvian apple cactus

  • @missesraisin
    @missesraisin 3 роки тому +2

    I like solar panel farms in the desert, harvesting the sun for energy. Not super profitable but very reliable in sunny California. Wish farmers could afford to invest or change to sun crop, lol.

  • @MellowsPlay
    @MellowsPlay Рік тому +1

    This is amazing. Somalia and other regions in East Africa could use the Hopi method. We shouldn’t be struggling with this

  • @kirstinstrand6292
    @kirstinstrand6292 3 роки тому +6

    All Farmers are good, Courageous people. Respect. ☺🤗

    • @joyaustin6581
      @joyaustin6581 3 роки тому +1

      I feel need to google serial killer farmers

    • @walden6272
      @walden6272 3 роки тому

      @@joyaustin6581 All serial killers are farmers, they harvest human lives :)

    • @victorhopper6774
      @victorhopper6774 3 роки тому

      i am a farmer and nope we all are not.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 3 роки тому +1

      @@joyaustin6581 I googled it. It spell corrected me to "cereal" farmers.

  • @ranysaab
    @ranysaab 3 роки тому +25

    The graph at 7:40 seems a little misleading considering you are talking about a 6 oz portion of steak to a 3 oz portion of pork or a 1.5 oz portion of nuts. I understand they are comparing suggested portion sizes here but when talking about water use on a grander scale I believe an ounce for ounce comparison would likely be more apt. Perhaps just a reminder to pay extra close attention to charts and graphs as they can be both eye catching and misleading. This is definitely not the worst manipulation I have seen by any measure but remember data can easily be manipulated to show dramatic results.

    • @LimeyLassen
      @LimeyLassen 3 роки тому +12

      A per calorie comparison would also be appropriate.

    • @ElementalWildfire
      @ElementalWildfire 3 роки тому +7

      Yea, this is a difficult one and I really welcome the discussion because the intent is certainly not to manipulate! Comparing ounce to ounce also feels misleading because nuts are almost as consumptive as beef by weight but no one really eats them in the same volume. Either way, thanks for your thoughts, I think healthy discussion of the facts is what it'll take to figure out how to use the resources we have in the best way we can.

    • @ElementalWildfire
      @ElementalWildfire 3 роки тому +2

      @@LimeyLassen Yes, and/or looking at the protein, vitamins, and calories needed for a healthy diet? Certainly more work to be done here.

    • @danriddick914
      @danriddick914 3 роки тому +2

      @@ElementalWildfire Next time possibly consider including multiple graphs and/or better explaining your reasoning and acknowledge the deficiencies of the metric you're using - I thought the same thing as Bearfighter, I thought it was a bit misleading as well.

    • @danriddick914
      @danriddick914 3 роки тому +12

      @@ElementalWildfire Also, the use of "ounces" vs "# of eggs" vs "cups of COOKED lentils" (Also, why cooked? Doesn't that use up water as well?) vs "grams" vs "slices" --- the units in this chart are all over the place...

  • @alrightyru
    @alrightyru Рік тому +1

    The story told in my province is that Nestle is at the river headwaters near Jasper, they're "first" out of the ground taking our water. The fee paid to the province is negligible. Our stupid government gave them the contracted right to take our water for bottling for pittance ...smdh

  • @Kay-xi9kv
    @Kay-xi9kv 3 роки тому

    We have so much to learn from the Hopi people

  • @Wutzmename
    @Wutzmename 3 роки тому +5

    Maiya May I.......tell you something? Rainwater catch basins are illegal in some areas. Fun fact. Reasoning is that caught water isn't water returning to replenish the water table. This also adds to whole counties seeing 18 feet of subsidence.

  • @markman63
    @markman63 3 роки тому +5

    The average American has enough food storage (fat) to last a year on water and bread alone.

    • @two-sense
      @two-sense 3 роки тому

      Water and rice cakes.

    • @raypitts4880
      @raypitts4880 3 роки тому

      iv seen that us can live on a third of their diet in the 50s yanks in the uk would tuck in to a pile of food enough for us 3 to have a good feed like 2 burgers and 10 slices of bread with filling we called them gutses. evan the kids wide as they were tall.

    • @bircruz555
      @bircruz555 3 роки тому

      Off, then, I go to the store to grab a chunk of bacon. No fat reserve in my body.

  • @borisp9499
    @borisp9499 3 роки тому +2

    This shows a clear failure of government and they don't even stop and focus on this. Around the 3:40 mark they mention that drip irrigation is much more efficient way to use water, but Nancy can't get a permit to get that implemented on her farm. Why is that? Why do they not focus on that part? How much water can be saved by implementing more efficient irrigation techniques? Why is government standing in the way of efficiency/progress?

  • @Once800-
    @Once800- 3 роки тому

    Interesting.