Amazing Game by Mister Fire on Board. One of the best in the world in this type of positions. 1 Inaccuracy 0 Mistakes 0 Blunders 8 Average centipawn loss Black was already lost after e5
I love these Shirov games. But I'll never understand how why some of the players will play positions that appeal to his genius though. Allowing Shirov to play the Keres attack vs the Sicilian? Fuhgettaboutit...
I'm thinking the same thing! "OK. One variation has got to be better than the other, but which one?" My mind was on the rook swap followed by taking and push the h5 pawn to protect the knight after black's Rg8 -AND THIS IS ONE OF MANY MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMATEURS LIKE ME AND PROS LIKE HIM! I didn't see the mating net AT ALL until it was too late! Bravo GM Shirov!!
Yeah, really weak move. Perhaps he was looking for Nf5 g6 g5 and the sacrifice of the knight. Still, in that variation there is a lot of compensativo for the piece.
@@viaconsultingco.7276 Carlsen playing an opening does not validate its soundness. Also, he's really a monster with the d6-e5 pawn structure. It may be a textbook move, but the textbook itself is quite bad. Shirov killed him here with very consistent strategic play.
GM Shirov is very nice and pleasant whenever he wins and comments after the game with his opponent, but when he loses it is the opposite and leaves the game very pissed off. It has two faces, I don't like that.
Nice psychology by Shirov? Looking to his right for ages seemingly more interested in other things. This clearly unsettled his opponent. Though that said Shirov is a gentleman both on and off the board so I think he really was interested in whatever was going on to his right.
Shirov plashed Kf2!! My God! Whats a genius movie!
Kf2 is forced. Nothing incredible there. The pawn g5 was threaten because of the pin along the h file.
grandissimo Shirov, killer micidiale!
Finish is very nice. There is the triple threat of Rf1, Nd5, and Ng4.
Monster on the board, but a gentleman off the board
Amazing Game by Mister Fire on Board. One of the best in the world in this type of positions.
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
8 Average centipawn loss
Black was already lost after e5
I love these Shirov games. But I'll never understand how why some of the players will play positions that appeal to his genius though. Allowing Shirov to play the Keres attack vs the Sicilian? Fuhgettaboutit...
Brilliant ride of the king.
Wow Kh5, he probably saw the sequence when he was deciding between Nxg6 or exchange Rs then Nxg6. Crazy!
pray to jesus begotten son thanks father one god.
pray to jesus begotten son.thanks to
I'm thinking the same thing! "OK. One variation has got to be better than the other, but which one?" My mind was on the rook swap followed by taking and push the h5 pawn to protect the knight after black's Rg8 -AND THIS IS ONE OF MANY MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMATEURS LIKE ME AND PROS LIKE HIM! I didn't see the mating net AT ALL until it was too late! Bravo GM Shirov!!
@@KidsLearnHTML Kh5 is the hard move to spot at the end of it, with multiple mate threats.
el tiempo también se le acabó al negro :00. amenaza: C5d ++
Textbook game. Black was busted out of the opening after e5.
Yeah, really weak move. Perhaps he was looking for Nf5 g6 g5 and the sacrifice of the knight. Still, in that variation there is a lot of compensativo for the piece.
@@renzocavani6524 ..e5 is a theoretical line..Carlsen played that line at Lindores Abbey, against Karjakin!
e5 is theory in the Keres attack guys, that's not the mistake
@@viaconsultingco.7276 Carlsen playing an opening does not validate its soundness. Also, he's really a monster with the d6-e5 pawn structure.
It may be a textbook move, but the textbook itself is quite bad. Shirov killed him here with very consistent strategic play.
Nice conversation
Я думал, что Широв заснёт!
Красота!
pray to jesus begotten son thanks father
Shirov literary playing blindfold in the beginning of the game.
Kf2!! Fantasy
that is not fantasy there was the threat bxg5, the only trick that kid has in mind
@@ziggystardust1505 Kd2!! too
GM Shirov is very nice and pleasant whenever he wins and comments after the game with his opponent, but when he loses it is the opposite and leaves the game very pissed off. It has two faces, I don't like that.
Many players are like that. They don't like being taught a lesson :).
It hurts to lose.
Nice psychology by Shirov? Looking to his right for ages seemingly more interested in other things. This clearly unsettled his opponent. Though that said Shirov is a gentleman both on and off the board so I think he really was interested in whatever was going on to his right.
The jupiter he is actually thinking without looking at the board. A friend of mine played against Shirov and it was the same
@@antoineellis1539 Similar to what Ivanchuk does.
куда ж ты полез с Шировым в вариант, который он знает уже наверное лет 30 как свои 5 пальцев?
1-0
...f5? ...Na6? LOL