Nancy Fraser - The Significance of Rosa Luxemburg for Contemporary Social Theory

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @jeffmoore9487
    @jeffmoore9487 8 років тому +2

    At 31:00 Nancy sounds pretty sure that: When contrasting the "inside - outside" vs her "near ground - far ground" descriptions of the realms of capitalism, "Capitalist society is normatively differentiated encompassing a determinant plurality of distinct but interrelated social ontologies".
    Really? I can't argue with that!?

  • @cristinaximera9663
    @cristinaximera9663 3 роки тому +1

    Turning Marx back from the feet to the head? Remind you that it was Marx who suggested that capital is not "just economy", but the base for the entire capitalist society in all its aspects. I don't see the benefit at all of turning the hierarchy of enabling condition and mere phenomenon around by "separating economy from polity"etc.

  • @milascave2
    @milascave2 8 років тому +3

    This dosn't seem to have that much to do with R Lux.

  • @rosaluxstiftung
    @rosaluxstiftung  10 років тому +3

    The significance of Rosa Luxemburg for Contemporary Social Theory.
    Videoaufzeichnung des Vortrags von Nancy Fraser auf dem internationalen Workshop "The Accumulation of Capital" am vergangenen Wochenende.

  • @cristinaximera9663
    @cristinaximera9663 3 роки тому

    No outside to capitalism: agree.

  • @datsfunnie5271
    @datsfunnie5271 10 років тому +3

    Oh my God You talk so well AND look so good!

  • @rfvtgbzhn
    @rfvtgbzhn 2 роки тому

    22:12 does she mean Alan Woods? Because I never heared of Alan Wood, but Alan Woods is a distinguished Marxist theorist.

    • @JoBalDez
      @JoBalDez 5 місяців тому

      Ellen Meiksins Wood

  • @VenugopalanKMcpiml
    @VenugopalanKMcpiml 6 років тому

    Brilliant !
    "Primitive Accumulation" (Rosa Luxemburg ) revisited to be contextualized and put in perspective in the Marxist and feminist frameworks

  • @lorincowell6944
    @lorincowell6944 2 роки тому

    The Jan Patocki version.

  • @darkon4431
    @darkon4431 9 років тому +3

    Wath Nancy F call Division is an other name of Alienation, wich is present in every form of social system, capitalist or communist, religious or atheist, so all those theory are wrong. The roots of Alienation go far deeper, it is an ontological problem. No system will replace courage and conscience.

    • @tymanung6382
      @tymanung6382 Рік тому

      Marx wrote of objective economic social
      structure alienation = workers objectively lost, or never had, workers control of immediate production of physical
      (+ service?) products, so they subjectively feel powerless.

  • @rodericksloan1255
    @rodericksloan1255 9 років тому +6

    Here we go more talking heads talking garbage most folks just want a roof and food to eat and be happy.

    • @marialauraweems7553
      @marialauraweems7553 9 років тому +13

      roderick sloan Funny, that's exactly what Rosa Luxemburg was talking about.

    • @mcmxli-by1tj
      @mcmxli-by1tj 8 років тому

      YES, THAT'S ALL THEY WANT, BUT IT'S NOT EASY TO PROVIDE.

  • @gustavfraser4919
    @gustavfraser4919 5 років тому +1

    Fake Fraser