@@jiffypoptv5843 So terminate his children’s children with impunity if that was the case? Okay. Glad you clarified things to invalidate your original point.
@@jimohara wtf are you talking about it’s simple abortion isn’t murder it’s health care this 🤡 has six daughters and is openly taking their rights away so my point stands he is a disgrace to his daughters as a father
He said courts SHOULDN’T decide, judges SHOULDN’T decide, people SHOULD decide. I don’t live in Pennsylvania, I don’t support McCormick, but he definitely said shouldn’t.
You are correct, I would never in my lifetime vote for McCormick but we must not sink to their level of disinformation. Hopefully Pakman sees this and takes down this video and re-shoots it with a proper response. That would show he has integrity and accountability for himself which would make his arguments land so much harder
@@frostbite3820 This is a good example of misinformation vs. disinformation. Pakman hearing "should" instead of "shouldn't" based on an honest mistake that anyone could make is misinformation. Intentionally lying to confuse the audience and muddy the waters is disinformation, which doesn't apply here. But I agree, probably best to take the video down and issue a correction.
@@acrophobe ahhh yes you are correct and I'm wrong with my terminology. Part of me wants to edit the comment to correct it but part of me wants to leave this conversation as is so if he doesn't take down the video then maybe someone else can stumble across this and also be humbled
Yes agreed. I had to look at comments to read if anyone else heard shouldn't instead of should. The closed captioning even says he said should but I hear shouldn't. Glad I am not the only one.
Another Dr. Oz, living in rural PA I don't see half as many trump signs as in 2020. Really hoping MAGA stays home Nov 5th, its a rigged election anyways from what they've told me.
State voters chose Republicans to represent them. Now they're subject to bans that allow judges and courts to decide. There is a reason McConnell blocked Obama's nominations.
That is the absolute key point. I'm in Canada where we have no laws about abortion. It's up to the woman and her doctor. Doctors are very reluctant to perform an abortion if the fetus is healthy and past a certain stage of development. And a woman doesn't carry for five+ months and then change her mind on a whim. That said, we do have a problem with access because some areas don't have a doctor who does abortions.
Let’s use an example of a man when it comes to body autonomy on par with abortion. Should the federal government have the right to force a man to medically use his body to save the life of another human being without his consent or approval? There will be guaranteed physical damage, potential mental damage, and most likely financial damage from doing so. Or should he have a say?
Well, there’s no proposal from the Federal government in the first place but if there was it would be a ban on ‘healthcare providers’ from preforming the procedure. There’s a distinction there that invalidates your point. .As far as the Federal government is concerned, if a man finds himself in the shit they don’t care one iota. So, there you go, equality!
There's already a Supreme Court decision on this kind of thing - McFall v Shimp (1978). Shimp refused to donate bone marrow to his cousin even though he was the only available match at the time; the cousin took him to court and lost. While the judge said Shimp's decision was "morally indefensible" he could not force him to donate. The wikipedia summary says, "The court ruled that it is unacceptable to force another person to donate body parts, even in a situation of medical necessity." The judge "also stated that forcing a person to submit to an intrusion of his body in order to donate bone marrow 'would defeat the sanctity of the individual and would impose a rule which would know no limits, and one could not imagine where the line would be drawn.'" (McFall died not long after the case was decided.)
💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸💙💙 Back in the late 70s my husband and I, after being told our baby would be severely disabled. We anguished over this and finally chose to terminate. We knew we would not be able to care for a child with the disabilities described to us. I can't imagine how a woman any family in this position must feel. Where's the government's right to make a decision concerning the quality of life a child who will have? Or the parents who have to watch their child suffering? Then watch them die? I am so glad I am 66 and don't have to worry about this anymore.
What does he mean by decision by the people? Corporations now have human rights. Does he mean corporations for the people? It's really concerning he does not say women have rights to decide.
They think "leave it up to the people" means the state government (because maybe they might sometimes let the people in the state vote on the issue, followed by the government officials doing their damnedest to prevent that vote from mattering when it doesn't go their way). I don't know why anyone thinks their neighbors should get a vote on their medical treatment.
I mean, the minute he said different states hold different opinions as a premise toward a claim that states should decide, it is clear that different women have different opinions and therefore individual women should decide. Dude is just stupid.
A Washington state pregnant physician I knew decided to not go to a doctor's conference in a red state just in case she had something go wrong with her pregnancy. She really wanted her baby but was afraid for her own health if she started to miscarry. Different rules in various states is a problem. Bye bye conference centers in red states for women or at least decreased attendance there.
@@TommyTheGunM99 I suppose you’re right, a pile of goo is not a body. Yet you have a body, don’t you? From what did your body come from? And isn’t it true that some abortions involve the physical dismemberment of the fetus or is that a myth? I don’t know, don’t preform abortions.
I actually know someone who was anti - abortion and opted to die. Too long of a story to tell here but in the end a doctor told my sister in law after the birth of her 2nd child she should not have any more. She did die during the birth of her third child. I don't know if she thought God would not take her from her children or what but, in the end I'm bitter. Angry. I just wish she would've asked her children if they wanted another sibling or their mother.
Simply did not answer made no commitment on how he felt about it. He’s leaving it open. It seems to me it’s a Republican answer to any difficult question deny deny deny deflect deflect deflect.
Really? Literally anyone, regardless of education, personal responsibility, actual first person interest... ANYBODY BUT THE ACTUAL PREGNANT PERSON!!! 🤬
And leave the father out of it? Just another question for you. Why are you saying some random stranger called doctor has a say in the decision? That’s another question. Couldn’t the whole anti abortion argument be reframed to not allowing doctors to preform needless abortions? Just asking.
@@jimohara You do not have the right to force someone to birth a baby for you. The doctor doesn't have "a say" (except perhaps in a medical emergency where the woman isn't able to make a decision and there's not time to call next of kin); people consult with their doctors when making healthcare decisions. If it's an unviable pregnancy the doctor's job is to tell her what her options are so she can make an informed decision. Legislators shouldn't be deciding what medical care is needed or not. They are not doctors. How the hell would they know if something is done needlessly?
@@allein1001 The original argument was about how it should just be about a woman and her doctor’s decision. I brought the father into it and now you, a different person,, is arguing that the doctor doesn’t actually have a say. Okay I can get what you mean but I have to ask whose choice is it to preform the procedure? That would be the ‘healthcare professionals’.
@@jimohara If she wants the father involved she will involve him, but ultimately it is her decision. He doesn't get to decide for her. It is the woman's choice to have the procedure. There are more than enough doctors who want to provide the care their patients need. The state needs to stay out of it.
@@NM-qd3tm HAHAHAHAAH half the equation?? Why do you think so many families are broken?? WE the WOMEN do the work and suffer every physical aspect. We can turkey baste your contribution. Please.
@@monicarenee7949 it's happened a few times that I've caught lately, different videos and topics, but it has happened so often that it actually crossed my mind that I hope David, sir, isn't being intentionally disingenuous, or losing his hearing.
The more local government is the bigger voice the people have. Leaving it to the state level allows the people to decide. Also, if your state bans abortion you can go to another state to get one.
David, seriously, he clearly meant to say that courts and judges should NOT decide. Blame english that when spoken quickly, should and shouldn't sound almost the same, but the meanimg of the message was pretty obvious. He wants people of each state to decide through their vote for their state legislators - he wants people in each state to vote for those who align with them on the issue. It is pretty clear.
David! I do Not agree with anything this guy says, but you didn't hear him correctly. He said, "Courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide. The people should decide." Listen again, please. These people are disgusting, horrible people, but let's be accurate. ❤
I think he said judges and courts SHOULDN'T decide. People SHOULD decide. That's what I heard anyway. That being said he has SIX daughters? He SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIMSELF!
It’s a good thing I and my girlfriend live next to a blue state because we were pregnant, but the first ultrasound showed that there was no heartbeat. In a republican world my girlfriend would have to suffer for another 8 months just to give birth to a dead baby. She was pretty fucked up about the whole situation, but at least we didn’t have to drive 3 states away to get things resolved. We are currently trying again to start our family. I don’t think she would have ever wanted to try again if she had to carry the baby to full term. It would have been just to much.
Bad take David. He clearly said he doesn’t think courts and judges should decide, and they put it to the states for the people to decide. Love your content and show, but you missed the mark on this one.
Dave McCormick is a hedge fund outsourcer of jobs. He gets better at ripping off public funds as he goes along, as well. He promised to retain and increase local jobs, and in reality, he lost jobs in the US, while growing jobs in China and India. His anti woman position on abortion is also an epic fail. He's not a doofus, he's toxic.
David completely misunderstood this guy. It's still a terrible answer, but he clear says it should NOT be the judges, it should NOT be the courts, it SHOULD be the people. Clearly meaning the voters in the state should decide. This video is a complete nothing burger. I definitely agree with David's point of view on the topic, but he completely missed the argument, there were no multiple answers in this clip.
Unless I heard it wrongly... I thought he said "Courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide. People should decide." BUT then he says because of different views and because it is polirazing, it's a state issue implying the state should decide after all, wether women should have the right to decide or not? And he did not specify "people" as "women" either... Wuut? Come on guys, Vote BLUE.
This is truly horrifying! It is as if we are all in our worst human and earthly crisis right now, and it I real. I support those with mental health, substance use issues who are homeless and have experienced significant adversity in life, some of the stories the courageous and strong humans I support, no one would believe. Yesterday, someone shared recently theyreceived support with this health care, hearing them discuss that experience and where they are in life and circumstances. In Canada, everyone still has access to care-still barriers, but when this was shared, I reflected afterwards of the individuals like this, 1/3 of people in the US cannot access this healthcare currently since the overturning of Roe vs Wade! Never have rights been given and then reversed. Support to our Southern neighbours from Canada. Everyone on David's vlog-thank you for standing against this
I wonder what all those men would say if the state (gouverment, judges, SC...) wanted to be ones to decide if men could have a vasectomy, since this is a vital part of a later pregnancy.
The woman is the only one who should decide what happens to her own body!
No.
No
@@MariaG-g8s absolutely
As an old man, I don't have any say in women's healthcare or reproduction. I can only stand beside them. Never in front of them. ♀️♀️♀️♀️♀️♀️
It's not going well in the polling for the Dems. It looks like Barry and big Mike won't get a 4th term 😂😂😂
Dude has 6 daughters and is a disgrace to them
Would it be different if he had six sons and wanted to protect their children?
@@jimohara nah still a disgrace
@@jimoharabottom line...the government should have no say with regard to a woman's reproductive rights. Period.
@@jiffypoptv5843 So terminate his children’s children with impunity if that was the case?
Okay. Glad you clarified things to invalidate your original point.
@@jimohara wtf are you talking about it’s simple abortion isn’t murder it’s health care this 🤡 has six daughters and is openly taking their rights away so my point stands he is a disgrace to his daughters as a father
I voted against him
I did TOO! 👍✊️💙🇺🇸
👏🏻
Me too. Voted straight blue on my mail in ballot!💙🇺🇸💙
Me too
He said courts SHOULDN’T decide, judges SHOULDN’T decide, people SHOULD decide. I don’t live in Pennsylvania, I don’t support McCormick, but he definitely said shouldn’t.
And according to him, those people are politicians and judges...
I think you’re right
Give women their rights back
They never lostvthrm
women made their choice in 2015
@thedavidpakmanshow578 les't or let's?
They never lost them
@phazon100 yes they did pay attention next time
I don’t understand how somebody else should have a say in what their neighbor medically does with their body.
...because it wrong to murder children?
This has always been my question.
People should vote for the party that works to improve their lives, not the one that promises to make other people's lives miserable... Vote 💙 folks!
?
So republicans. The one offering to remove social security and overtime taxes. Sounds like the party for people that actually matter to me.
He said "Courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide, people should decide." He just didn't enunciate very clearly.
You are correct, I would never in my lifetime vote for McCormick but we must not sink to their level of disinformation. Hopefully Pakman sees this and takes down this video and re-shoots it with a proper response. That would show he has integrity and accountability for himself which would make his arguments land so much harder
That’s what I heard too
@@frostbite3820 This is a good example of misinformation vs. disinformation. Pakman hearing "should" instead of "shouldn't" based on an honest mistake that anyone could make is misinformation. Intentionally lying to confuse the audience and muddy the waters is disinformation, which doesn't apply here. But I agree, probably best to take the video down and issue a correction.
@@acrophobe ahhh yes you are correct and I'm wrong with my terminology. Part of me wants to edit the comment to correct it but part of me wants to leave this conversation as is so if he doesn't take down the video then maybe someone else can stumble across this and also be humbled
Yes agreed. I had to look at comments to read if anyone else heard shouldn't instead of should. The closed captioning even says he said should but I hear shouldn't. Glad I am not the only one.
I am a PA resident, Dave McCormick is doing his best dr Oz impression. Go back to CT McCormick. You can run there where you live.
yes he's a CLOWN and a LOSER MORON!!!!
As a Pennsylvania resident, I will not be voting for this man. I am refraining from bashing.
Another out of state rich guy is trying to buy a senate seat here in PA. Hope we reject him and Trump on November 5
You deff aren't. At least not Trump. PA is firmly Trump at this point which secures it for the election.
@@NM-qd3tmit's not even close to being firmly in anyone's favour
Another Dr. Oz, living in rural PA I don't see half as many trump signs as in 2020.
Really hoping MAGA stays home Nov 5th, its a rigged election anyways from what they've told me.
@@7mike2300 I DID! 😊
An answer for every abortion that his mistresses have had.
He puts his career over his daughters.
💜🇺🇸💜
@@Greg-usa He puts the Almighty $$ over ANYTHING! 💙🇺🇸💙
To be fair, he said, "Courts SHOULDN'T decide, judges SHOUDN'T decide."
Yeah, it's easy to mishear it though.
He didn't enunciate well, but I agree with you here, I think David got this one wrong, even though this guy is not great.
@@VideoViewer33512 wrong David. I agree this guy is mealey mouth politician but don’t misrepresent his words David
Bump to push this up. Yes, he wasn’t speaking clearly, but it’s not uncommon for David to mishear when it’s close like this.
State voters chose Republicans to represent them. Now they're subject to bans that allow judges and courts to decide.
There is a reason McConnell blocked Obama's nominations.
Yep. No commitment on answering. Period. Completely evading the question isn’t that a republican thing these days?
Maybe he was born in a middle class family.
That's 5 answers that "involve" hundreds (if not thousands) of different people -- who have no business in the matter.
Yeah they do
@@phazon100 ... each with 5 answers of their own!
But not the woman. 😠.
That is the absolute key point.
I'm in Canada where we have no laws about abortion. It's up to the woman and her doctor. Doctors are very reluctant to perform an abortion if the fetus is healthy and past a certain stage of development. And a woman doesn't carry for five+ months and then change her mind on a whim.
That said, we do have a problem with access because some areas don't have a doctor who does abortions.
Let’s use an example of a man when it comes to body autonomy on par with abortion. Should the federal government have the right to force a man to medically use his body to save the life of another human being without his consent or approval? There will be guaranteed physical damage, potential mental damage, and most likely financial damage from doing so. Or should he have a say?
Great point!
Name the example?
Well, there’s no proposal from the Federal government in the first place but if there was it would be a ban on ‘healthcare providers’ from preforming the procedure.
There’s a distinction there that invalidates your point. .As far as the Federal government is concerned, if a man finds himself in the shit they don’t care one iota. So, there you go, equality!
There's already a Supreme Court decision on this kind of thing - McFall v Shimp (1978). Shimp refused to donate bone marrow to his cousin even though he was the only available match at the time; the cousin took him to court and lost. While the judge said Shimp's decision was "morally indefensible" he could not force him to donate. The wikipedia summary says, "The court ruled that it is unacceptable to force another person to donate body parts, even in a situation of medical necessity."
The judge "also stated that forcing a person to submit to an intrusion of his body in order to donate bone marrow 'would defeat the sanctity of the individual and would impose a rule which would know no limits, and one could not imagine where the line would be drawn.'" (McFall died not long after the case was decided.)
@@caledunsmore Organ donation.
Bob Casey already got my vote. The carpetbagger doesn't care about us in PA
💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸💙💙
Back in the late 70s my husband and I, after being told our baby would be severely disabled. We anguished over this and finally chose to terminate. We knew we would not be able to care for a child with the disabilities described to us. I can't imagine how a woman any family in this position must feel. Where's the government's right to make a decision concerning the quality of life a child who will have? Or the parents who have to watch their child suffering? Then watch them die? I am so glad I am 66 and don't have to worry about this anymore.
He said ‘courts shouldn’t decide, judges shouldn’t decide, people should decide’
What does he mean by decision by the people? Corporations now have human rights. Does he mean corporations for the people? It's really concerning he does not say women have rights to decide.
They think "leave it up to the people" means the state government (because maybe they might sometimes let the people in the state vote on the issue, followed by the government officials doing their damnedest to prevent that vote from mattering when it doesn't go their way). I don't know why anyone thinks their neighbors should get a vote on their medical treatment.
I mean, the minute he said different states hold different opinions as a premise toward a claim that states should decide, it is clear that different women have different opinions and therefore individual women should decide. Dude is just stupid.
Everyone should decide except the woman and her doctor. They’re obviously ignorant.
He was actually saying courts shouldn't decide and judges shouldn't decide.
Dave McCormick is not "confused." He's Republican.
And yet the woman who’s actually pregnant can’t make this decision themselves? Why?
Exactly my question.
The answer is the woman with support from her doctor.
You heard him incorrectly David. Listen carefully he said courts and judges “shouldN’T”decide.
A Washington state pregnant physician I knew decided to not go to a doctor's conference in a red state just in case she had something go wrong with her pregnancy. She really wanted her baby but was afraid for her own health if she started to miscarry. Different rules in various states is a problem. Bye bye conference centers in red states for women or at least decreased attendance there.
Only the woman & her physician are the deciding individuals in the physician's office. No old geezer has the right to mingle 🤬
This should have never been a governmental situation.
Her body Her choice...it's not Rocket Science.
No its not
It’s not her body that is being aborted.
@@jimoharaa pile of goo isn’t a “body”. A electrical pulse does not constitute a “heartbeat”.
@@TommyTheGunM99 I suppose you’re right, a pile of goo is not a body. Yet you have a body, don’t you?
From what did your body come from?
And isn’t it true that some abortions involve the physical dismemberment of the fetus or is that a myth? I don’t know, don’t preform abortions.
I think he’s saying “courts/states shouldn’t , people should”?
That's how I heard it.
@Eheggsb4tst yeah he did but bottom line and what he did not say is that it's nobody's business what any woman does with her own body
I actually know someone who was anti - abortion and opted to die. Too long of a story to tell here but in the end a doctor told my sister in law after the birth of her 2nd child she should not have any more. She did die during the birth of her third child. I don't know if she thought God would not take her from her children or what but, in the end I'm bitter. Angry. I just wish she would've asked her children if they wanted another sibling or their mother.
He says courts and judges SHOULDN'T decide. I listened several times and even slowed it down.
Concur
Hearing is difficult for pakman
Simply did not answer made no commitment on how he felt about it. He’s leaving it open. It seems to me it’s a Republican answer to any difficult question deny deny deny deflect deflect deflect.
Come on Pennsylvania! Send Dave back to Connecticut!
He said "shouldn't" for judges and courts. (I vote for democrats)
At 1:11 he states courts shouldn’t decide, judges shouldn’t decide, people should decide. He mumbles over “shouldn’t” but it’s what he said.
Really? Literally anyone, regardless of education, personal responsibility, actual first person interest... ANYBODY BUT THE ACTUAL PREGNANT PERSON!!! 🤬
He's saying "courts/judges shouldn't", not "should".
Pssst. That's the point. David is a useless left wing grifter. Catch the drift?
David's ears are malfunctioning, I agree with you.
Pakman he said shouldn't, you need to adress this mistake
Just why is women's health regulated ?
Perhaps a woman and her doctor should decide? Im just asking questions here.
No
And leave the father out of it?
Just another question for you.
Why are you saying some random stranger called doctor has a say in the decision?
That’s another question.
Couldn’t the whole anti abortion argument be reframed to not allowing doctors to preform needless abortions?
Just asking.
@@jimohara You do not have the right to force someone to birth a baby for you.
The doctor doesn't have "a say" (except perhaps in a medical emergency where the woman isn't able to make a decision and there's not time to call next of kin); people consult with their doctors when making healthcare decisions. If it's an unviable pregnancy the doctor's job is to tell her what her options are so she can make an informed decision.
Legislators shouldn't be deciding what medical care is needed or not. They are not doctors. How the hell would they know if something is done needlessly?
@@allein1001 The original argument was about how it should just be about a woman and her doctor’s decision. I brought the father into it and now you, a different person,, is arguing that the doctor doesn’t actually have a say.
Okay I can get what you mean but I have to ask whose choice is it to preform the procedure? That would be the ‘healthcare professionals’.
@@jimohara If she wants the father involved she will involve him, but ultimately it is her decision. He doesn't get to decide for her. It is the woman's choice to have the procedure. There are more than enough doctors who want to provide the care their patients need. The state needs to stay out of it.
David, are you going to correct this? He said courts and judges SHOULDN'T decide.
He actually said judges and courts shouldn’t decide. He doesn’t enunciate well enough for everyone to hear it. He’s still an idiot.
Good job David
He DOES NOT live in Pennsylvania! Enough said. Oz 2.0
Maybe....just maybe? Men. Who contribute a sample....should stop talking.
Yeah, you're right. Men, who contribute half of the equation, should have no say. Be a bigger tool.
@@NM-qd3tm HAHAHAHAAH half the equation?? Why do you think so many families are broken?? WE the WOMEN do the work and suffer every physical aspect. We can turkey baste your contribution. Please.
@@NM-qd3tm I'm going to strongly guess you have no children and no one to call your own. At all.
He has 6 daughters and they all need to be made sure they're OK.
the need to be sure by themselves. Their dad does not care about them
Love you David, but he was definitely saying, "courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide"
David is a well known sufferer of premature attackulation when it comes to matters such as this.
I agree
Yeah not sure how this made it through editing with no one catching that
@@monicarenee7949 it's happened a few times that I've caught lately, different videos and topics, but it has happened so often that it actually crossed my mind that I hope David, sir, isn't being intentionally disingenuous, or losing his hearing.
@@user-ye1go6hw9r yeahhh I’ve noticed that as well. Could be to drive engagement. Algorithm and all that
This is just a matter of pronunciation. He said "shouldn't" 2 times
He said courts shouldn't. Just to be fair
If people should decide then let them and make it a NATIONAL decision so it doesn’t not depend on state boundaries. Gotcha,
The more local government is the bigger voice the people have. Leaving it to the state level allows the people to decide. Also, if your state bans abortion you can go to another state to get one.
Courts and judges shouldn't decide is what he said
He might of just responded : "Yes" , which makes as much sense as his original response !🤣🤣🤣
Pretty sure he said courts and judges "shouldn't" decide. or did I mishear?
David, seriously, he clearly meant to say that courts and judges should NOT decide. Blame english that when spoken quickly, should and shouldn't sound almost the same, but the meanimg of the message was pretty obvious.
He wants people of each state to decide through their vote for their state legislators - he wants people in each state to vote for those who align with them on the issue. It is pretty clear.
I'm a guy and I've voted 💙 straight down the ballot. Tuck Frump and the GQP.
The important thing about his answer(s) is that at no time did he allow that women and doctors should decide.
"One's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone."
If you know you know ...
david mccormick lives in Connecticut not Pennsylvania go run in your own state. PA does not need you.
Are you sure he's saying should?
He said people should decide. But, then he said states should decide. It seems that he thinks that women aren't people.
David! I do Not agree with anything this guy says, but you didn't hear him correctly. He said, "Courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide. The people should decide." Listen again, please.
These people are disgusting, horrible people, but let's be accurate. ❤
Yeah I pointed this out on the full episode video.
Listen again. You're mishearing his '"should" and "shouldn't." He didn't say "should" repeatedly. Granted, he does have poor enunciation.
I think he said judges and courts SHOULDN'T decide. People SHOULD decide. That's what I heard anyway. That being said he has SIX daughters? He SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIMSELF!
6 daughters, jeez. Do you think he was trying for a son and it just never happened
I heard "shouldn't"
It's like watching Family Feud....survey says. ❌️❌️❌️🤣
It’s a good thing I and my girlfriend live next to a blue state because we were pregnant, but the first ultrasound showed that there was no heartbeat. In a republican world my girlfriend would have to suffer for another 8 months just to give birth to a dead baby. She was pretty fucked up about the whole situation, but at least we didn’t have to drive 3 states away to get things resolved. We are currently trying again to start our family. I don’t think she would have ever wanted to try again if she had to carry the baby to full term. It would have been just to much.
Bye bye 👋 next
Medical providers and patients only. The govt can F off
I TOTALLY AGREE!!! Very sad situation, makes me sick.
He is the father of six daughters???!!!!!😮
Bad take David. He clearly said he doesn’t think courts and judges should decide, and they put it to the states for the people to decide.
Love your content and show, but you missed the mark on this one.
He says courts SHOULDN'T decide, judges SHOULDN'T decide. Not SHOULD....
LIAR
He said courts and Judges SHOULDN'T decide
I have 6 (and they’re all ashamed of me) daughters!
He said courts shouldn’t decide.
He clearly says “shouldn’t decide” for courts and judges.
I'm David, he said, "courts shouldn't decide. Judges shouldn't decide. People should decide." 😅
Didn't we fight a war over state's rights some years ago?
So much for the protection of life.
What an hypocrit.
💙💙💙
Do any of his six daughters even speak to him? I wouldn’t. 😡
He said courts shouldn’t decide people should
Dave McCormick is a hedge fund outsourcer of jobs. He gets better at ripping off public funds as he goes along, as well.
He promised to retain and increase local jobs, and in reality, he lost jobs in the US, while growing jobs in China and India.
His anti woman position on abortion is also an epic fail.
He's not a doofus, he's toxic.
David completely misunderstood this guy. It's still a terrible answer, but he clear says it should NOT be the judges, it should NOT be the courts, it SHOULD be the people. Clearly meaning the voters in the state should decide. This video is a complete nothing burger. I definitely agree with David's point of view on the topic, but he completely missed the argument, there were no multiple answers in this clip.
Kamala Harris 🇺🇸💙 next president.
Unless I heard it wrongly... I thought he said "Courts shouldn't decide, judges shouldn't decide. People should decide."
BUT then he says because of different views and because it is polirazing, it's a state issue implying the state should decide after all, wether women should have the right to decide or not? And he did not specify "people" as "women" either...
Wuut?
Come on guys, Vote BLUE.
If you're a Republican, vote blue and like here! No offence.
Everyone should decide except the pregnant person. Got it. 😮
This is truly horrifying! It is as if we are all in our worst human and earthly crisis right now, and it I real. I support those with mental health, substance use issues who are homeless and have experienced significant adversity in life, some of the stories the courageous and strong humans I support, no one would believe. Yesterday, someone shared recently theyreceived support with this health care, hearing them discuss that experience and where they are in life and circumstances. In Canada, everyone still has access to care-still barriers, but when this was shared, I reflected afterwards of the individuals like this, 1/3 of people in the US cannot access this healthcare currently since the overturning of Roe vs Wade! Never have rights been given and then reversed. Support to our Southern neighbours from Canada. Everyone on David's vlog-thank you for standing against this
Individual women must decide!
He didn’t say that did he. All anyone needs to know about him, and the Republican Party.
To be fair, I think he said courts and judges ‘shouldn’t decide.
Love you David. You're [sic] humor is entertaining.
He is saying courts…judges shouldn’t decide. I love your show just thought i heard something different.
The audio mustn’t have been good enough for David.
And he’s a d!ck
I wonder what all those men would say if the state (gouverment, judges, SC...) wanted to be ones to decide if men could have a vasectomy, since this is a vital part of a later pregnancy.
Feel sorry for his daughters.