Most usable A.I. Tool Every Producer Needs Right Now.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
- ▶audimee.com/?r...
▶ Support the Channel ⇢ / jonsine
▶ Get My Preset and Sample Packs ⇢ / shop
▶ Listen to the full Track ⇢ fanlink.tv/TRAN
▶ FOLLOW ME
Instagram: jonsine.fanlin...
Spotify: jonsine.fanlin...
▶Contact - pls only for business related stuff!
⇢ hello@jonsine.com
▶▶▶ MY GEAR ◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀
● Studio Software:
⇢ Best Modern Synth: geni.us/c3qUEhM
⇢ Best Classic Synth: geni.us/Ld9Lq
⇢ Best for Mastering: geni.us/aXnzXyB
⇢ Best for Mixing: geni.us/D0Ap5w
⇢ Best for Vocals: fanlink.tv/eEtF
● Studio Hardware:
⇢ Wide Monitor: geni.us/COyL0
⇢ Speakers: geni.us/BcfdABA
⇢ Full size Midi-Keyboard: geni.us/8Cj2D
⇢ Best Headphones: geni.us/BY6ilNf
⇢ Best Soundcard: geni.us/4mt2I9
● DJ Equipment:
⇢ DJ Headphones: geni.us/jshd25
⇢ Mixer: geni.us/aUn3
⇢ CD-Player: geni.us/BDcouIP
⇢ Best DJ USB sticks: geni.us/jlHZ
I completely get it and I learned how to make it, but on the other hand replacing people with this stuff morally it doesn't feel good to me, I wish we could use AI to do Laundry, clean the house all that boring stuff, and keep doing music with real people.
@@ClavixusProducer what about the drum machine.. what about replacing the jobs of maids or cleaners. For someone like me that can’t afford to hire a singer or anyone it would be great to use something like this. I have only used samples for one of my tracks. Btw it’s not actually AI, it’s a generative computer program. Same with chat gpt etc and they’re actually really dumb
the trick is to live a life so deeply mindful of the present moment that doing the laundry and cleaning the house become the most wonderful experiences of your life
@@sonicpulp9417 I hear you but disagree with drum machine, you'd still have to program it and it had a very distinct sound it was distinguishable. And to the point you can't afford a singer I guarantee if you looked around even in your city or smaller artists on soundcloud/ soical media I know you'd find some that would be happy to collab. I think this tool is good for ideas but nothing can beat a singer inflections make all the difference in delivery imo.
@@BenCaesar my point is it doesn’t matter if an artist hires people or uses a machine/program. AI police are in every chat claiming it’s unethical and gonna take jobs … who gives a F
A few caveats. Legally release it as a cover is only one part. Some Distributors like Distrokid assist and help get the license from Harry fox as an example and allow the original writes to be paid through the MLC. Releasing for sale you will still need to get permission from the original writers for use of the mechanical license at a split cost with original writers. So just shoving a new vocal and saying legally releasing isn’t quite right. This only opens the door for the possibility to do it. ☺️
it was fairly obvious that stuff like this will come out at some point, but now that its here - craaaaaaaaaaaaaazy.
is it legal to straight up take someone's performance like this and essentially style transfer to a new voice? I'm not so sure.
It is the same as having someone else sing it.
As long the royalties go to the song writers.
@@duncan.o-vic are you 100% on that? There is precedent? I could legally take Paul McCartney’s voice, do a style transfer to another singer and call it a blackbird cover, there would be no legal ramifications?
@@JoshMobleyMusic You can't use Paul McCartney’s voice unless he agrees.
But I expect that in this specific service, vocalists used to train the AI, sold their rights of use and distribution, so it should be legal.
I'm talking about this practice in principle, I havent read their terms and I'm not a lawyer, so you shouldn't take me 100% for it.
@@duncan.o-vic Ok. so then I could take his voice and swap it with another voice and call it a cover. Yeah, that doesn't sound right at all.
@@JoshMobleyMusic Sure you can, it's like singing it yourself.
I watched two videos of this dude and i gotta say i love his sinister, negative energy, he is so real 😂
Hey buddy, I’m planning to buy Mac book pro for music making. I’m a music composer. M3 pro with 36GB RAM good enough ?
It's the way the music industry is going. There is fakeness everywhere from live stars singing to backing tracks, crap singers just pitch corrected and live recorded pop stars then having the performance mixed and enhanced before being put out as a live version. Over the years a lot has changed from vinyl records to Spotify. Most of the time it's the major players ripping off the Musicians who feel more under threat. I don't like this at all but if you view music as your business then you have to adapt and use whats out there good vid Jon, got a few moaners in the comments but thats normal for those who just moan and do nothing in life 😎
stop blaming milli vanilli jeez
😎
This is really great tool. 100% agree. You make a super song, and than it hits you, I need a great femal vocal in my case. Who should I call, hmmmm. Nahh, they're no good. Now you have all this on your disposal. Fantastic.
This is a bad idea. I have worked professionally in film productions involving music copyright clearances and I can assure you it is definitely not legal to take a vocalist's performance as your source material and then just modify it through an AI voice transformer or plugin and then claim it's 100% original. All the phrasing, rhythm and inflections etc. of the original performance are still there and will easily be recognised by the original artist.
So true
Did you finish the studio? one thing i've noticed is speakers, the other i ceiling. this is not done properly. And the side panels should be mounted to the walls. if you want - i can give you some tips how to make it sound even better.
Wow John I had to give it a quick try pretty damn cool. I uploaded the song "This magic moment - Benny king" and chose Nicole and isolated everything and wow.... Just incredible. 6 minutes and the AI created her singing it solo. Ai is so sick.
That’s really amazing 😊 I will try this out with my own vocal ;) there are a lot of possibilities 👌
Let me guess. Its subscription based
ok wow this is actually really cool
is this studio is at his home or still in that building?
Blown away!
I tried it with my vocals , sounded like a bloke but a bit female. Long way to go!
Jon, have you tried Logic's stem splitter yet?
Cool generative program. Allows the artist to be more creative.
@@sonicpulp9417 allows music labels to skip artists completely 😉
Problem is not to create music - its to be heard. No one cares about 1'000'000 covers from 1'000'000 -> we've entered the era of commodification. What counts is how you can access the market. Do you fit the current trend? Do you have a machine that pushes you.
@@Pablo-px3ct and will you have enough money to plough through ai, then other artists...
blabla man, u still need something decent and professional sounding, nothings gonna help u if u produce shit ;)
Welcome back
You are still using the original recorded track but altered with AI, are you sure its legal? i do know for a cover this is not allowed.
Good to see you again Jon. Thanks for this one. I'm going to check it out.
So excited to make money and so very happy to reedit the work of an artist. Kongrats sir! Lolz
Brought to you by "Against the A.I."
When creating a cover song, it's essential to bring your own artistic interpretation to the work, whether through different instrumentation, a unique arrangement, or a distinct vocal style. This way, you can create a cover that pays homage to the original while still being recognized as a distinct and separate work.
To summarize, using AI-generated vocals in a cover song is just one aspect of creating a legally recognized derivative work. Ensuring that the music arrangement and overall production are also substantially different from the original is equally important. thoughts?
Instantly started to play around with the conversions when I came across your video. It produced mixed results with some being pretty close with minor artifacts and others being almost unusable. I think this tool would be better suited for shorter acapella conversions rather than converting a full length already isolated acapella. I also played with converting female vocalists to male covers which spat out similar results. AI tech is certainly getting better however I think as of right now, to do this sort of thing would cause more headaches when trying to edit them in order to create something consistently usable.
Than you have the same Vocals Everywhere its nothing Special it sounded all the same in a while
@@nourdinh.1450 I didn't incorporate them into a project, everything I was hearing was all still within the website and auditioning each new version the AI created.
Producers that embrace the technology will always be able to carve out a spot for themselves. The combination of technology and creativity/skills and will make us better, more creative and productive. My recent example is that i had an instrumental version of a song I was working on for a long time but I couldn’t get the right vocal melody. I uploaded my music to one of the AI sites who then took my lyrics and music and created the top line which was great. So this is an example of where I was really aided by the song. I had a singer sing it and the song was accepted for a sync listing.
Sounds good, what site was it please?
@@chicagobob keep dreaming
I wish you could input the melody you want ..
The free version is used up and gone before you can properly asses it. Not really that fabulous and very overpriced for what you get. You might think you have access for a month if you pay for a month, like the pricing structure says, but the truth is, for $25, you get 10 hours of conversion time, spread over a month, NOT unlimited time over a month. By the time you've experimented and auditioned the different singers and settings in an average song, you're outa time. For this price, this is a a huge rip off. Especially when you consider what an artist gets per download for their entire song, which includes writing, composing, performing, mixing and mastering for usually 79 pence per song. even at 1/10 of the price it would be a ripoff.
The next problem will be that record companies will create their own AI based tracks and use Spotify to fill the lists to play with and directly get the income from it without the use of any hired artist at all. 🙂. But I agree, the world has been upside down entirely in the music industry. But nevermind, its like ages, we all died when the sampler start to sample beats and vocals, we all had a heart attack when CDs got copied by thousands and we thought the world would end when spotify took all the royalties and paid pennies for streaming, we will see what happens, I think younger producers will make copies over copies and the usual way of creating of something entirely new will fade away soon.
This is cool
How to get the project files in the first place?
I’m afraid I have to respectfully disagree with you on this Jon. The A.I generated vocals had no life or air to them
🔥
You’re a legend man
Busy, do a video on the legalities regarding this. Also, Jon never explained the legalities of using this type of cover on UA-cam.
we are next
I remember when playing digital songs as a DJ was taboo. The whole you’re not a DJ unless you play records crap. Y’all remember that? Get over yourselves technology only moves in One Direction.
Maybe this is why you don’t get signed? Looking for shortcuts at every step
Nope. He got signed, just not for a major label, for major labels you need to make even more shortcuts.
all those "producers" glorifying AI - until they realise they are not needed anymore 😂😂😂😂 good luck, hope you have plan b, all the best
Cry me a river lol
Lol as if we make money from music production in the first place. Maybe 0.05% of music producers make a livable income.
@Grant82gc how narrow minded... what about self checkouts, self driving cars, robots stacking warehouses, customer services... this is just to start with... think...
Thank you for being you, people just don’t realise what’s coming! 😢
@@saintnicholas5507 they are happy to earn a quick buck without thinking about the consequences. This channel is deleting some f my comments as it clearly doesn't fit him... hopefully he gets to experience this downfall first then...
time to get the guitar out of the closet and get into a heavy metal hairband before its too late , lol
You get to keep Spotify royalties 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, how generous 🤣🤣🤣🤣
You should seriously look up an Artist called “Against The AI” sincerely-Not Ready Yet
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Jon you should hide your email not sure if you meant for you to show it
Das Problem damit ist, daß man zumindest bei einem Pop-Projekt dann die Sängerin auf eine Bühne stellen muss. Bei Dance ist das natürlich etwas anders.
There's other AI lurking ...💀💀💀
Covers work better than original music? I like you John but surely you didn’t just say that, the original vocal track is a Tracey Chapman song from 1988, cool software but lets retain respect for writers 😄
Wow. Kenne ich noch gar nicht. Kenne nur Lalals
Superb one jon bro🎉
7:24 "covers just work way better than original music". That's the bad news. And it was before AIs.
I have a feeling ur gonna take this down
I think you need publishing rights and a Mechanical license...
You still need to obtain copyright from the publisher if not original song / lyrics
you don't need to u just have to make sure when you release the song you add the original copyright owner to the release. this way they get payed directly. it's the same principal for a cover band they do not need permission before every gig they just need to fill out a sheet that gets send to the royalty collecting companies
@@Jonsinethe question is, which one was written the lyrics. That’s the person u have to credit. Spotify doesn’t give u the fast answer. If you are lucks Discogs can do it or maybe one of the PRO (Gema etc)
@@JonsineBut performing a live cover is not the same as releasing a comercial record. Don’t get me wrong, but I honestly believe your are wrong. In order to release commercially you need publishing/writers permission. Furthermore, when doing a cover, you cannot change the original composition, once you alter the beat to a house beat for example that’s not a cover, it’s a remix, and that my friend you need permission.
@@MastiksoulTV for a straight up cover you do not need permission just need to credit the original writers so they get payed through the royalty collecting company. changing things actually needs permission. for example if you start using different words but changing the instrumental is no problem since writing and composition are anyways split. how much changing is to much is something a court needs to decide case by case
@@Jonsine Brother, I may be wrong, and I will for sure chase this just to be sure. But changing the instrumental is changing things , that’s why it’s called a remix, it’s not a cover. Specially if you doing an electronic version. A cover is a performance of a song without altering its original structure and song, melodies and chords. More important, a label can strike your song by claiming you did not ask permission. And all stores will follow and remove your song!
You can go a claim in court after the fact, but you still have no song uploaded. This is a huge debate!
Please support real creatives instead of ai, especially if you like it to be a music business when your kid grows up. And it’s more important to have all of the rights yourself, a lot of the companies nowadays try to sneak in more rights in the fine print. Get a lawyer to always look at the fine print regarding royalties and music rights.
Same thing happening with visual arts. Platforms being spammed with fake art created by talentless, lazy hacks, essentially draining all the joy out of the creative process. Low hanging fruit.
Ai is here to stay. This is a site where you actually still have to do some work afterwards, but take for instance suno, you don’t need to do anything. I like it and the idea of ai singers it’s easy. Most producers/artists will resent it for now. Eventually it will become the norm and the scope of art in general is changing / shifting either you go with the flow or you stay behind. Your job is already gone as is - all pros will have to adapt
or, just use Replay and UVR for free :P
Any AI tool that helps make songs? Or remixes
Buddy, you cannot steal someone's performance like that. You did derivative work based on the mechanical rights. You don't understand mechanical/recording vs publishing/writing rights. And you push this to the whole world, damn dude...
Eh who cares
Jon did you go deaf? The AI generates vocals sound like complete mumbo jumbo. The lyrics are completely butchered and half of the time there isn’t a distinct word being sung.
no it's not it's near perfect, seriously try it
BS, No producer needs this. Yeah, it's not such a good deal, in fact it's well worth steering clear of this. Give it a while, it'll be free. The high price subscription cost is a joke, you could hire an actual person and get a much better result. If it were free, I might use it, although only for backing vox, if I was stuck. It definitely isn't worth the cost and the pricing model is deceiptful.
It's funny and kind of contradictory that you make this "promoting AI video" while wearing a t-shirt that says: WE NEED ART. If you think we need ART then get real, make music, make art and stay away from AI. And if you can't afford a singer then be creative and find another way to get there, that is ART.
@@oceanix1929 what he’s doing does feel predatory
😂😂😂😂 are you sure about royalties?? Are you a musician that supports ai vocal machine??
8:40 "singing like they were drunk" twisted, ugly IMHO. The technology is impressive, but do you think that sounds appealing? They are singing in the wrong key here and there!
Do you realize that you are kinda digging your own grave with this? You as a producer might like the fact that you can now generate AI voices and don't need a singer with all the troubles involved. But do you realize that with promoting this, singers, labels etc. can do exactly the same thing with the beats you create? AI might not be at that level yet, but it's what you said, it's still at the beginning. What happens in 5, 10, 20 years from now?
AI and writing music... have fun with it... I'll skip this. Good luck with the copyright strikes.
puh. is sowieso schon alles vollgemüllt mit cover und remixes und interpolations ..
wenn die leute wenigstens mal originals machen würden..
hmmmm, its a good tool every now and then but every singer brings along an extra layer of musicality, by real humans. AI cannot do that. With just AI, music would sound the same all the time. Dont get me wrong, im not against AI but if u as an artist want to express something specific, an unique feeling, create a specific atmosphere, AI cannot deliver this. It always spits out average..... AI algorithms are based on the use of the average. Having said that, i still might try and use this vocal tool, and lets see what happens
Goodbye popmusic
Stealing someone else’s vocal performance and just swap the tonal sound of the voice, is not only unethical but could also land you in legal trouble.
The original singer might not be one of the writers and wouldn’t be compensated.
the vocals is so lifeless...so robotic....so absurb to put robots to replace the emotions, the being, the presence of a human voice.
True but the same was said about drum machines years ago and now they are everywhere in music. PS I love blue monday new order
now if thats not a biased and pissed singer/songwriter right here ^^
Don’t worry I’m sure that’s coming
Thanks Jon, (ps your email is visible)
not cool. I do agree on using any contemporary technology but this is rip off. Why would you do this?
Jon my friend, I have really enjoyed your content for years but you can’t be both pro AI and Against the AI (which is one of your artist projects). Let’s not promote the AI in this mess of a time for all musicians! This is not good 🙏 as musicians, we’re all in danger so let’s promote each other as opposed to AI. Thanks
I actually hate this A.I. Stuff and I’d rather go back to the 1980’s or 90’s.
All this is problematic, not only if one wants to make money or become famous with producing (why should I?). The more annoying and desturbing side will be that we will have less and less access to authentic, meaningful, original high quality art. Making art is a religious act, it's a way of connecting beyond the expectations and rules of society. It's religious but it's free of organised religion. Whatever AI ( wich doesn't exist, it's AT - artificial thinking ) will be, it will never be intelligent, I mean, It's the Mac-Donalds of art! It's an empty box, it's only about the looks, the taste, the form and when art
... is only about the outside, the technique, the form IT'S EMPTY, MEANINGLESS, it's.... it's MEANINGLOSS. And ask yourself, Where is the joy, the fun, the personal journey, the deep meaning to be found in effortless, easy and fast producing? Hard work, going slowly, solving problems, communication, getting lost and finding new ways, celebration, tripping together is what thru creativity is all about. AI- or AT, as I prefer to call it, used like this makes you just a thief, and what is stolen will never taste like the thing you've earned, discovered, what you hear when the universe sings.... And the word "covering" has a totally other meaning when it's done with real people from a band.... EVERY DAY A COVER tastes like EVERY DAY FAST-FOOD ! I agree man IT'S INSANE HAHA! I don't mean this in a good way. Why don't you look for a human artist for your art-work?, But I guess you don't give a damn do you? As long as it's beautyful on the outside, easy, cheap and fast God-Damn! Well, don't come complaining when all the human society has become easy, cheap and fast....and totally superficial . This way of producing in so narcissistic, it's all about you, the "me", no communication, no working together, "nothing to go thru" as you put it, the others are a problem!!! Where is the time where music started, in our caves, after the hunt, belly's full, and we celebrated that....together, the joy, the extacy.!!!! NOT ALL EVOLUTION IS PROGRESS.... today? I don't need anybody... Now what's there to celebrate? I'm on the way of becoming the loneliest person in the world.... Great isn't it? But hey.... chear up, there's always the hope it will make me money......
Sounds weird.
Nothing legal about that.
Just unsubscribed