Anne-Sophie Mutter about her Stradivars
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- OdSubscribe ➜ bit.ly/subscri...
The violin virtuoso Anne-Sophie Mutter talks about the qualities that make the Strad instruments so unique.
Follow us:
• Facebook: / ceskafilharmonie
• Instagram: / czechphilharmonic
• Twitter (ENG): / czechphil
• Twitter (CZ): / cfilharmonie
• www.ceskafilha...
Anne-Sophie is a world class expert on this subject, and articulates it better than any native English speaking pundit.
Brilliant musician, love her playing with the great Karajan, and the Berliner.
So insightful and well said, as usual!
She is a great artist whom I just got to listen. Her accent might be german but her music is universal. My dream is to see her perform live
Love Anne Sophie. Please come back to Los Angeles soon
the baloney never ends
Well said.
There are millions of native English speakers who can't have such an accent. She is a full performer.
I've heard this Strad in the Philharmonie in Berlin, it fills the air with music in the whole concerthall, a real great instrument and a wonderfull artist!
So many of those violins have beautifully flamed maple backs. It's a pity that so many artists neglect to show the instrument from many angles so that we can appreciate its beauty all the more.
Early on, yes. But when Nickola Amati died in 1684, Stradivari was wealthy enough to purchase the best of Amati's wood, because the Amatis had fallen on hard times, and Stradivari saw the value of Amati's beautiful wood, and felt that at the age of 40, and with two sons helping him, he would be able to make beautiful violins for a long time. The 4-piece back on the Lipinski during Stradivari's use of Amati's wood may have been more the work of his sons, including his youngest, rather than by Stradivari himself.
beste stradivari
Her accent is german as hell
What accent do you have when speaking German?
I would guess her English is better than yours.
@hydrogen bisbee And your point is? Apart from bordering on racism, perhaps you could expand or elaborate on your nasty remark.
Your English-usage lesson for today: Never, never, never modify "unique" with "so" or any other adverb. A thing is unique or it is not!
We say “so unique” to specify levels of uniqueness. The shades of “uniqueness” we commonly say are: uncommon < unique < rare < singular. We add modifiers to give sub-level texture between these notions. If there is contextually some notion of uniqueness then one could say “so unique” to imply it’s a degree more uncommon than simply unique but not quite rare or singular. The only one that really doesn’t make sense is “so singular” as singular already means one.
@@ericlind6581 You are "so" full of shit! When a word is an absolute, such as "unique", it can't be modified, dunce! There are no "levels [sic]" of uniqueness; a thing is unique or it's not. Get it, dunce?
@@autodidact2499 Amazing how you revert to insults so quickly. Truly the end of civility. Yes there is what’s grammatically correct and there’s everyday speech which doesn’t always follow what’s technically grammatically correct. Haven’t you ever heard “it’s quite unique” or “it’s very rare”? Or do live under a rock you imbecile.
but literally every modern analysis of Strads show that they don't produce sounds better than finely made modern violins, nor do does their sound carry any better than modern violins. NPR recently sponsored an analysis where many professional violinists, violin makers and experts were gathered together and asked to differentiate between the sounds of Strads and modern violins. Well over half of these experts couldn't identify the Strad. Then, there are the physical analysis experiments where acoustic physicists have concluded that there's nothing unique to the Strads that modern violins lack. Strads should be valued for their beauty and the histories that each individual one has.
Then that study also proved many COULD differentiate.
A better test of old and new violins would be to have soloists play one of each during a performance. There must be a reason why the top-ranked soloists will choose a Strad or Del Gesu if they can get it.
@@reddragonready Probably they were all required to give an opinion, as opposed to admit they couldn't tell. Then I'd assume, based on those results, that nobody could tell, otherwise I'd be more in favour of recognizing the strad.
@@TheNeilsolaris Your "probable" is not all that probable. To assume all those people voluntarily taking part in the study and half would lie?
And any fairly decent study is set up to take human ego into account.
It's important to note that modern violin-making can be traced back to these models. The sound you hear today is only possible thanks to the way these instruments were constructed. Wood is an organic material, so comparing old violins is unfair (projecting can be harder, supposedly). In the end, it's really up to taste, but the master craftmanship of Stradivari is undeniable.
Türkçe
İngilizce
Turkey Balıkesirt to exact original Stradivarius violin in 1713 sealed the guarantee I talked to sahipiyl Armenians after a team come across and carbon testing done photocopy machines, such as with anything they measured from all sides have taken samples from the adhesive used on time within which play the violin until brass them 2-3 hours to examine 12 people this orjinalt the saying goes, but The owner, whose price is not understood, is descended from the Sultan Abdülmecitten
Too experienced with psychedelics to dig that intro. Warn somebody haha.
I have Stradivarius Violin 1729 i looking for buyer...
Thank you Anne-Sophie Mutter on your breif explanation of the Strad.
I'd like to ask what the background music is in this video？
@@Autumndc Dvorak's violin concerto finale
@@liangseng7474 Thanks!
What's the piece playing in the background?
It’s the 3rd movement of Dvorak’s violin concerto.
It’s called ‘Too loud’!
Full of it
Yeah yeah yeah ! Filthy marketing !
I have a Chinese strad.
There are instruments made today that are just as good and even better than Strads, it's been proved in blind tests numerous times. These experts and musicians spout pretentious nonsense to keep up the mystique and to keep prices high because they are investments as much as musical instruments.
I mean it's not just about the sound but also the history of the violin
And also the sound is subjective to every ear (just like there is some violinist that preferred Guarneri than Stradivari)
Well, Andre Previn certainly played her like a Strad for a few years.