Representations of GL2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @f5673-t1h
    @f5673-t1h 4 місяці тому +128

    RETURN OF THE KING

  • @aziz0x00
    @aziz0x00 4 місяці тому +35

    Wish u long healthy life! Thank you for this 🙏

  • @mariotabali2603
    @mariotabali2603 4 місяці тому +45

    Please never ever retire

  • @lellosbarello90
    @lellosbarello90 4 місяці тому +17

    seeing a new upload from you, Professor, is always a pleasant surprise; wish you the best in your mathematical endeavors.

  • @annaclarafenyo8185
    @annaclarafenyo8185 4 місяці тому +6

    One of the mysteries for a young person encountering modern mathematics is "what happened to continued fractions?" It is helpful in the pedagogical context to explain that continued fractions are just iterations of GL2(C) in another language, because the maps (az+b)/(cz+d) are just the 2 by 2 matrices (a b ; c d)under composition, so that the theory of GL2(F) is really the theory of continued fractions modernized. But many of the classical results don't have obvious translations to the modern abstract form, where you are talking about the group properties mostly, for instance, the representation of various analytic functions by continued fractions is mysterious (at least to me). I believe some of the classical results could still give something new in the modern language, if translated.

  • @atomiccompiler9495
    @atomiccompiler9495 4 місяці тому +21

    Missed your vidoes :)

  • @knight3481
    @knight3481 4 місяці тому +18

    The legend...

  • @KhaledAlekasir
    @KhaledAlekasir 4 місяці тому +10

    we all missed you ;) ❤

  • @pythonwire
    @pythonwire 2 місяці тому

    I enjoy all of your lectures and courses, thank you for your generosity and god bless you. Wishing you the bests. Farhad Abdi

  • @PowerPeteMySettings
    @PowerPeteMySettings 4 місяці тому +1

    Your videoes are so nice and clean!

  • @AndrewZeng-m1k
    @AndrewZeng-m1k 4 місяці тому +11

    Hey Prof . Borcherds, can you please explain your current work on QFT?

    • @ethanjahan780
      @ethanjahan780 4 місяці тому +3

      I think that QFT has bested him, like it has bested every mathematician.
      But I agree that it would be nice having Prof borcherds talk about his interactions with QFT.

    • @hywelgriffiths5747
      @hywelgriffiths5747 4 місяці тому +1

      He talks about it in his interview with Curt Jaimungal on the Theories of Everything channel. But he just says a few scattered remarks about QFT specifically, mainly about how it doesn't make sense from a mathematically rigorous point of view. This makes it very intriguing for me why it nevertheless gives such amazingly accurate results

  • @monkerud2108
    @monkerud2108 4 місяці тому +2

    Welcome back me lord. 🍻

  • @sergey7375
    @sergey7375 27 днів тому

    Thank you very much for these very insightful videos. I appreciate the clarity and lucidness of your presentation. You never sacrifice those in favor of "formal rigor". I am wondering if you could cover the subgroups of GL(2), namely the maximally compact subgroups and the groups corresponding to simple Lie algebras? I understand that the topic is highly dependent on the field in question, but your insight and explanations are extremely valuable nonetheless.

  • @ozymandias4488
    @ozymandias4488 4 місяці тому +2

    He's back people

  • @tommy-v6u
    @tommy-v6u 2 місяці тому +1

    Please do not leave us alone!

  • @JAYMOAP
    @JAYMOAP 4 місяці тому +5

    Thank you

  • @Marryatau
    @Marryatau 4 місяці тому +1

    Thank you King

  • @mamahuhu_one
    @mamahuhu_one 4 місяці тому

    Love it! Do you have plans to finish the Lie group series?

  • @kingarth0r
    @kingarth0r 4 місяці тому +2

    The GOAT

  • @Alphabet576
    @Alphabet576 4 місяці тому +2

    yup, another richard e borcherds classic

  • @SadSocks
    @SadSocks 4 місяці тому +3

    ye

  • @EulerToiler
    @EulerToiler 4 місяці тому +4

    'a bit like the complex numbers - only more so' very open ended