Tak, pastwisko im. Baranów. Wielki projekt ciemniaków promujących ciemnotę ( wieś) i zabobony (kościół), trzeba być durniem bez wyobraźni by nierozumieć że konserwatyzm i rozwój to oksymoron, jedno wyklucza drugie, apriorii.
There is a huge mistake about the Istanbul Canal. Montreux Convention also cover Dardanelles. US warships cannot go through Dardanelles. Thus, Istanbul Canal has nothing to do with any warships.
2:05 These stats are a few years out of date, as the Tegel Airport has not been operational since the BER Int. Airport took over as the only Int. Airport for Berlin!
14:50 talking about the Schengen area and showing London as a starting point. The UK was NEVER a member of the Schengen area. Also Hinkley C with a capacity of 3,x GW whereas Hornsea 3+4 are scheduled to produce 5+GW... I assume they get finished earlier than the nuclear plant... This video has so many flaws... 👎
both nuclear and wind option is better then just wind or just nuclear, nuclear can provide a constant base input on system while wind can handle demand peaks . Energy management is more complicated then simply deploying capacity :)
While HPC is a truly desaster of a project, you can't compare nuclear and renewables in capacity. For instance 4GW of offshore wind are equivalent to 1GW of nuclear based on capacity factors
You're forgetting the Semmering Base Tunnel south of Vienna and the Brenner Base Tunnel in western Austria south to Italy. Once these two tunnels open, there will be a lot more north-south freight transport. Both are being built as part of the Trans-European Transport Network. I also expect that the Lötschberg Base Tunnel to be eventually double-tracked all the way through to increase capacity north-south across the Alps and as an alternative to the Gotthard Base Tunnel.
Yes,it was,because it was Eu fonded.....but you can ask mister Farage,Johnson &company to grab pickaxes and continue it themselves,with those 320 millions written on the red bus.
You forgot the Brenner Basis Tunnel, that will be longer than Mont Cenis and the longest in the world, and the Messina Strait Bridge, that will be the world’s longest single-span bridge.
UK Monarch ie one man Charles owns all of the UK seabed. They get rent. Thats why the UK has huge off shore wind farms. UK aristocracy always blocks the best way to pay for infrastructure: Land Value Tax so the HS2 will just pump up private land values at income & VAT Tax payer expense. UK is a pathetic Feudal relic.
The UK seabed is owned by the crown estate which is run by parliament, the profits from the same go to the people and the sovereign by agreed procedures, most of HS2 was privately owned land bought under compulsory purchase by the Department of Transport effectively!?!
British energy companies will continue to sell energy to other countries, and on the islands energy costs will continue to be among the highest for individual consumers in Europe, a sick system because the cost of energy determines the economic development and economic development of the country, just as it did when leaving the recession.
What about Stuttgart 21? Germanys actual largest construction Site, estimated costs about ~11.5 Billion euros, including 60 km of new tunnels and a new high speed line, partly opened in December 2022.
An area nobody uses or needs. It is also better for sealife. Just compare the costs to the nuclear Power plant. It is more Environmental friendly than that as well.
Putin says "Where's my biggest market gone, Asia is cutting my prices back and it's costing me more to get it there, what have I started" most probably if he was smart, but unfortunately he's not, and he's struggling in a 3 day war that has been going on for seven hundred and odd days so far to Ukraine, it would be better if he just withdrew his troops and went home and sorted out his country, but stupid is as stupid does!?!
Great video. Too bad nuclear power continues to be over budget and behind schedule but mostly from non-technical delays because it's the best way to decarbonize the entire electrical grid and fast... Canada runs currently, pun intended, on an 86% mix of hydro and nuclear power, which are the best options for large-scale baseload power with little to no carbon footprint. But even if the project costs doubled with a proposed lifespan of 60-70 years the capital cost overruns will soon be forgotten..
You also need to account the cost for storing the nuclear waste for a very long time. And nuclear power uses a finite resource so it's not suitable to power the world in the longrun.
No, the costs won't be forgotten. Once that thing finanally starts running, it will be the most expensive power source in the UK. With 10 cents per kWh it barely pays back the loan in 40 years. Assuming the EPR design even makes it that long without extensive retrofits.
@@sebastianstadler4799A not that long time if you re use nuclear waste, wich is the case with the UK. Also, literally every energy source uses a finite resource, solar and wind use a sh1t ton of steel, glass, concrete, some REE's, and not all of that is easy to recycle
i find all european train travel system ,especially in nordics as overrated bullshit. Like copenhagen to aarhus, 200km in 4 hours, and costs 100 eur. And like for me driving with car from helsinki to lahti, costs max like 10-15 eur in gasoline, and it takes 1 hour faster with my car than train, which costs 30 eur. Or plane tickets pretty much across europe ( and not with bullshit companies like ryanair, but decent ones like norwegian, are far cheaper than train, and i will be there around 5-6 or even 10 times faster ). And chunnel train from uk to france, dont make me laugh, when ferry costs you 6 times cheaper, and takes you there in 1 hour and 20 minutes, while the train goes thru tunnel in 1 hour, but you spend driving on it and down from it, + nearly 30 minutes, and you dont enjoy luxury of comfy seating, smoking areas, cafes, which are on ferry.
Your post is full of lies... Channel train is 45 min, ferry is 3 hours. Trust me, i use it every week... You cant compare trains in the north with france, italy or spain. Its like comparing russian economy with germany
@@beravi888 umm, i dont believe you, that you use it every week. I was last time taking ferry 3 months ago, the ferry together with driving on it, it took like 1 hour and 40 min, while chunnel overrate, took 30 minutes to start moving, when i was going to france, and when people told me, bullshit lies of the chunnel speed, compared to price, yes, i was waiting for it to start moving 10 minutes, and same on the other side, to actually get off of it., so it ended up, being 20 minutes faster. I dunno what kind of ferry are you taking, but i took dfds, which was 1.5hrs, on ferry ticket sales websites, it says, 2 hrs, but as all things with ferries and planes, they add extra time, like flights from copenhagen to riga, they say on tickets, that flight is 1 hour 20 minutes, while in reality its 45 minutes. But yes, with their extra added time to travel, DFDS 2hr, P&O ferries , 1 hour 35 minutes, Condor ferries, 2 hours 12 minutes. LeShuttle says 35 minutes, but thats without the driving on and off of it.
A poor 200km high-speed double-track railway, that China, Spain or France usually do for 10 times cheaper and wayyyy faster. HS2 doesn't belong in a "top megaprojects".
you ve missed CPK, polish baltic wind farms, and nuclear powerplants in poland
You miss Polish CPK Project with is high speed railway and new big airport with cargo close to Warsaw.
Tak, pastwisko im. Baranów. Wielki projekt ciemniaków promujących ciemnotę ( wieś) i zabobony (kościół), trzeba być durniem bez wyobraźni by nierozumieć że konserwatyzm i rozwój to oksymoron, jedno wyklucza drugie, apriorii.
There is a huge mistake about the Istanbul Canal. Montreux Convention also cover Dardanelles. US warships cannot go through Dardanelles. Thus, Istanbul Canal has nothing to do with any warships.
2:05 These stats are a few years out of date, as the Tegel Airport has not been operational since the BER Int. Airport took over as the only Int. Airport for Berlin!
14:50 talking about the Schengen area and showing London as a starting point. The UK was NEVER a member of the Schengen area.
Also Hinkley C with a capacity of 3,x GW whereas Hornsea 3+4 are scheduled to produce 5+GW... I assume they get finished earlier than the nuclear plant...
This video has so many flaws... 👎
Nuclear has a higher utilization rate. Wind power operates at around 50% peak performance on average in windy places.
both nuclear and wind option is better then just wind or just nuclear, nuclear can provide a constant base input on system while wind can handle demand peaks . Energy management is more complicated then simply deploying capacity :)
While HPC is a truly desaster of a project, you can't compare nuclear and renewables in capacity. For instance 4GW of offshore wind are equivalent to 1GW of nuclear based on capacity factors
I think the UK was included within the EU!
The title sais Europe's,not Europena Union's projects. I hope some day you will realise the difference.
The UA-cam thumbnail says Top 10 European Union Megaprojects. I hope some day you will realise the difference.@@draculakickyourass
this is nothing, serbia is about to invest (steal) 17 bill. for two shed for expo 2027 😂😂
Nice B1M copycat, how abt making original stuff instead?
why you didnt put Kosovo broders or Flag ? Yugoslavia died long time ago !!
You're forgetting the Semmering Base Tunnel south of Vienna and the Brenner Base Tunnel in western Austria south to Italy. Once these two tunnels open, there will be a lot more north-south freight transport. Both are being built as part of the Trans-European Transport Network. I also expect that the Lötschberg Base Tunnel to be eventually double-tracked all the way through to increase capacity north-south across the Alps and as an alternative to the Gotthard Base Tunnel.
Thank you. I will try to make another video on these topic.
Only Norwegians have the money to build their projects right now.
Alredy outdated video, the Hs2 it was deleted the past month
Yes,it was,because it was Eu fonded.....but you can ask mister Farage,Johnson &company to grab pickaxes and continue it themselves,with those 320 millions written on the red bus.
Hs2 is still happening
By the way, it's the video of another youtuber...
HS2 is only taking from Birmingham to London the Leeds and Manchester routes have been scrapped
Bro how's the messina bridge not here?
Because he's not start to construction yet. All of project under construction
sorry, infos are outdatet
You forgot the Brenner Basis Tunnel, that will be longer than Mont Cenis and the longest in the world, and the Messina Strait Bridge, that will be the world’s longest single-span bridge.
And Uk not in EU ..hs2 has been put on hold..
HS2 is still ongoing...
And even though the UK isn't in the EU it's still in Europe
These are projects in Europe, not just EU's. Norway is also not a member of the EU and its project also appears
UK Monarch ie one man Charles owns all of the UK seabed. They get rent. Thats why the UK has huge off shore wind farms. UK aristocracy always blocks the best way to pay for infrastructure: Land Value Tax so the HS2 will just pump up private land values at income & VAT Tax payer expense. UK is a pathetic Feudal relic.
None of this is true.
The UK seabed is owned by the crown estate which is run by parliament, the profits from the same go to the people and the sovereign by agreed procedures, most of HS2 was privately owned land bought under compulsory purchase by the Department of Transport effectively!?!
Windpower is just stupid or woke.
The one thing I don’t understand why don’t we use tidal power in uk 🇬🇧 that would produce excess renewable energy power
British energy companies will continue to sell energy to other countries, and on the islands energy costs will continue to be among the highest for individual consumers in Europe, a sick system because the cost of energy determines the economic development and economic development of the country, just as it did when leaving the recession.
'on the islands energy costs will continue to be among the highest for individual consumers in Europe'
This is an outright lie.
What about Stuttgart 21? Germanys actual largest construction Site, estimated costs about ~11.5 Billion euros, including 60 km of new tunnels and a new high speed line, partly opened in December 2022.
This Norway motorway which goes through its west cost is the most stupid idea. The cost of building will go to infinity.
How about Lisbon new airport...
Well that one is still not decided where to build it.
@@biosecurePMAnd never will be
You missed out on some larger mega projects in Europe.
So let me get this straight... HS1-4 have a combined yeald of
An area nobody uses or needs. It is also better for sealife. Just compare the costs to the nuclear Power plant. It is more Environmental friendly than that as well.
@@julihan91shortsightedness at its finest!
The UK is not short of sea, land? that's a different story!?!
ehm..what does mister Putin say about all this?
Putin says "Where's my biggest market gone, Asia is cutting my prices back and it's costing me more to get it there, what have I started" most probably if he was smart, but unfortunately he's not, and he's struggling in a 3 day war that has been going on for seven hundred and odd days so far to Ukraine, it would be better if he just withdrew his troops and went home and sorted out his country, but stupid is as stupid does!?!
Great video. Too bad nuclear power continues to be over budget and behind schedule but mostly from non-technical delays because it's the best way to decarbonize the entire electrical grid and fast... Canada runs currently, pun intended, on an 86% mix of hydro and nuclear power, which are the best options for large-scale baseload power with little to no carbon footprint. But even if the project costs doubled with a proposed lifespan of 60-70 years the capital cost overruns will soon be forgotten..
You also need to account the cost for storing the nuclear waste for a very long time. And nuclear power uses a finite resource so it's not suitable to power the world in the longrun.
No, the costs won't be forgotten. Once that thing finanally starts running, it will be the most expensive power source in the UK. With 10 cents per kWh it barely pays back the loan in 40 years. Assuming the EPR design even makes it that long without extensive retrofits.
@@sebastianstadler4799A not that long time if you re use nuclear waste, wich is the case with the UK. Also, literally every energy source uses a finite resource, solar and wind use a sh1t ton of steel, glass, concrete, some REE's, and not all of that is easy to recycle
@@Psi-StormMostly UK's fault though...
Why do you mention Berlin Tegel. Its was closed back in 2021.
Why do you have trouble reading "2019" statistics?
i find all european train travel system ,especially in nordics as overrated bullshit. Like copenhagen to aarhus, 200km in 4 hours, and costs 100 eur. And like for me driving with car from helsinki to lahti, costs max like 10-15 eur in gasoline, and it takes 1 hour faster with my car than train, which costs 30 eur. Or plane tickets pretty much across europe ( and not with bullshit companies like ryanair, but decent ones like norwegian, are far cheaper than train, and i will be there around 5-6 or even 10 times faster ). And chunnel train from uk to france, dont make me laugh, when ferry costs you 6 times cheaper, and takes you there in 1 hour and 20 minutes, while the train goes thru tunnel in 1 hour, but you spend driving on it and down from it, + nearly 30 minutes, and you dont enjoy luxury of comfy seating, smoking areas, cafes, which are on ferry.
Your post is full of lies... Channel train is 45 min, ferry is 3 hours. Trust me, i use it every week... You cant compare trains in the north with france, italy or spain. Its like comparing russian economy with germany
@@beravi888 umm, i dont believe you, that you use it every week. I was last time taking ferry 3 months ago, the ferry together with driving on it, it took like 1 hour and 40 min, while chunnel overrate, took 30 minutes to start moving, when i was going to france, and when people told me, bullshit lies of the chunnel speed, compared to price, yes, i was waiting for it to start moving 10 minutes, and same on the other side, to actually get off of it., so it ended up, being 20 minutes faster. I dunno what kind of ferry are you taking, but i took dfds, which was 1.5hrs, on ferry ticket sales websites, it says, 2 hrs, but as all things with ferries and planes, they add extra time, like flights from copenhagen to riga, they say on tickets, that flight is 1 hour 20 minutes, while in reality its 45 minutes.
But yes, with their extra added time to travel, DFDS 2hr, P&O ferries , 1 hour 35 minutes, Condor ferries, 2 hours 12 minutes.
LeShuttle says 35 minutes, but thats without the driving on and off of it.
@@Swarmah im a truck driver, so belive it
@@beravi888 and i dont believe when ive been there just a few months ago
@@Swarmah yeah, whatever...
HS2 🤣😂
Is being built.
A poor 200km high-speed double-track railway, that China, Spain or France usually do for 10 times cheaper and wayyyy faster. HS2 doesn't belong in a "top megaprojects".
@@gmaildinozz Nonsense - half of HS2 is underground, and goes through areas of population density vastly higher than in rural Spain, France or China.