What If Every Nuclear Bomb On Earth Exploded at the Same Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2022
  • There are enough nuclear bombs on Earth to completely wipe out the entire planet from existence, but what would happen if all nukes detonated at once? Check out today's insane doomsday scenario that would spell the end of humanity!
    🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► ua-cam.com/users/theinfograp...
    🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
    TikTok ► / theinfographicsshow
    Discord ► / discord
    Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
    Twitter ► / theinfoshow
    💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
    www.theinfographicsshow.com
    📝 SOURCES:pastebin.com/R6cwbcwr
    All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 859

  • @HClbn
    @HClbn Рік тому +1484

    What if everybody in the world farted at the same time

    • @vibez8095
      @vibez8095 Рік тому +109

      That’s actually a good question

    • @muthondulewis6183
      @muthondulewis6183 Рік тому +163

      The ozone layer would be destroyed instantly🤣🤣

    • @JeffreyNadolny
      @JeffreyNadolny Рік тому +25

      BAD THINGS

    • @Spongyboi897
      @Spongyboi897 Рік тому +60

      The entire world might smell stinky for a few hours

    • @makako86
      @makako86 Рік тому +65

      That is even worse than nukes

  • @ives3572
    @ives3572 Рік тому +65

    "The survivors (of a nuclear war) would envy the dead." - Nikita Khrushchev

    • @FatRescueSwimmer04
      @FatRescueSwimmer04 Рік тому +3

      nah I wanna see the insane destruction first!

    • @stanleykijek6983
      @stanleykijek6983 Рік тому +4

      He was right.

    • @Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman
      @Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman Рік тому +1

      @@FatRescueSwimmer04 not me

    • @ShadowWolfTJC
      @ShadowWolfTJC Рік тому

      Would the survivors, or their descendants, really envy the dead? I suppose they might if they happened to have been citizens of any of the nations that were targeted directly within the nuclear holocaust.
      Otherwise (such as if they were not directly targeted by nuclear attack), I believe the survivors, and their descendants, might pity the dead (perhaps for their foolishness) instead of envying them.

    • @jxsnn14
      @jxsnn14 Рік тому

      @@ShadowWolfTJC Well yeah of course if you survive and are in relatively good shape, then of course you wouldnt care

  • @thegunnitgamer5716
    @thegunnitgamer5716 Рік тому +269

    Considerably, if every nuke was to go off in it's place of storage there would be a whole different end than if they went off on the surface, the dust cloud would be far weaker, as a large portion of the nukes are underwater, as would the rad storms, however ocean life would be far more destroyed.

    • @qwispychild9491
      @qwispychild9491 Рік тому +22

      The country that would be worse off would be russia due to their mobile nuclear deterrence
      Though every nuclear equipped submarine would be devastating

    • @qwispychild9491
      @qwispychild9491 Рік тому +7

      @E Van I mean nuclear weapons moving around are more dangerous than those in storage

    • @rodturner6759
      @rodturner6759 Рік тому +4

      Even if you were correct, life on land is depndant on life in the ocean. So if the oceans die so do we...

    • @notslicedbread3578
      @notslicedbread3578 Рік тому

      @E Van yes the fallout for you but not for everyone else

    • @Solnoric
      @Solnoric Рік тому +3

      @@rodturner6759 how exactly would the oceans be devastated? Water is an incredibly good radiation shield and the ocean is massive compared to land on the surface.

  • @OptimusMaximusNero
    @OptimusMaximusNero Рік тому +48

    Atomic Bomb: *Explodes*
    People from every city: "OH NOOOOOOOOO!!!"
    People of Detroit: "A regular tuesday like any other..."

  • @jean-luceyesofyoureyes5502
    @jean-luceyesofyoureyes5502 Рік тому +13

    "Write that down, write that down!" - Alien 👽 Invaders

  • @dgerdi
    @dgerdi Рік тому +65

    Doomsday shelters are a dangerous thing to depend on. Let’s say, you reach your shelter twelve hours after the (totally unexpected) nuclear attack. You have been exposed to radiation, but you are not injured. And this is a very positive scenario.
    Will the people in the shelter let you in? First you are a problem because of the radiation on you. Second in a total nuclear war everyone knows, that food and water will be a problem in the years to come and that food lasts longer, the less you will have to share.
    And now let’s say, you reach the bunker within two weeks as no car works after the multiple EM-Impulses. You have been exposed to a lot of radiation on your way to the location of the bunker and you had been forced to eat and drink conterminated food and water.
    Again - will the inhabitants that have made it earlier let you in? Especially when a group of regular people is following you in hope of rescue.
    I am not sure, if I would depend on such things. And finally - pure hope is not a strategy.

    • @drink15
      @drink15 Рік тому +11

      You start the comment saying you have your own shelter then ask would someone let you in. If you have your own, why are you trying to get into someone else's? You say they are dangerous thing to depend on but everyone already in shelter is ok as long as they don't let anyone with radiation in.
      Shelters are find when used correctly just like anything else.

    • @richierich1835
      @richierich1835 Рік тому

      old cars without chips Would still start

    • @drrb4ever
      @drrb4ever Рік тому

      @@richierich1835 spark plugs won’t work

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      @@richierich1835 Diesel engines would survive the EMP. Also up date the vacuum tube.

  • @MinorityHunterRoronoaZoro741
    @MinorityHunterRoronoaZoro741 Рік тому +13

    Imagine being so strong that your inventions can destroy 99% of life

    • @galoombavr
      @galoombavr Рік тому +1

      it's not strength just smarts/stupidity

    • @rvrefxrever
      @rvrefxrever Рік тому

      Thats actually called being too smart for your own good.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      DOOMSDAY MACHINES

  • @insertname3286
    @insertname3286 Рік тому +148

    I’m really loving this theme of exploring the effects of apocalyptic scenarios

  • @hypeairsoftandgaming
    @hypeairsoftandgaming Рік тому +79

    it definitely would make a difference weather they were launched or just blew up at the storage and missile silos

    • @SubjectiveFunny
      @SubjectiveFunny Рік тому +6

      He said it wouldn't matter in the long run, not that there is no difference

    • @MidwestRider559
      @MidwestRider559 Рік тому

      Yeah both Nagasaki and Hiroshima had air detonation, both are thriving

  • @davidrobertson3930
    @davidrobertson3930 Рік тому +5

    In my opinion humans are the only lifeforms on earth that don't learn from past events/ mistakes. Nature always seems to correct it self.

  • @SilverWulfe
    @SilverWulfe Рік тому +28

    Keep up the amazing work mr. Narrator!!

  • @dangilbert895
    @dangilbert895 Рік тому +53

    This is actually an old hypothesis. Scientists have recently said that an all-out nuclear war wouldn't end mankind. Maybe I am wrong, and the study was more based on active nukes.

    • @Cipher_Paul
      @Cipher_Paul Рік тому +17

      Nuclear war wouldn't end humanity, but nuclear winter may do it instead.

    • @killgazmotron
      @killgazmotron Рік тому +7

      The video was a hypothetical about all nukes in existence going of. Meaning ALL of them, those in reserve that wouldnt go off in an initial nuclear face off as well.
      You are right in that a nuclear face off wouldnt end the world completely,
      However the vast majority of the world population is still going to die. As well as serious climate effects and horrible mass extinctions.
      Though all the hardiest stuff will make it.
      Bears for example will probably take a heavy drop but might make it through, just barely.
      Most of us are going to die. We can cross our fingers and hope we are that %2 that makes it through to the other side of winter but those are some desperate odds.

    • @314jeepsnmopars3
      @314jeepsnmopars3 Рік тому +4

      @@Cipher_Paul there has been talks recently whether nuclear winter would actually occur. I'd imagine it would be far worse if we had this type of scenario happen in the mid 80s when the total stockpile was close to 80k...

    • @michaelgiertz-rath7994
      @michaelgiertz-rath7994 Рік тому

      Mankind - nope.
      Civilization - yep.
      I really don't wanna see the day AFTER every single nuke went off. That's because that event will throw mankind back to the stone ages.
      Besides that? Even if we glass our planet three times over, Earth still will be the one and only life supporting planet in this system. Good luck finding another one BEFORE the nuclear event as there's no true AFTER once it's over ...

    • @fabriziobiancucci7702
      @fabriziobiancucci7702 Рік тому +2

      It depends on where the bombs explode. If they exploded all in the same place, than the disaster could be not so destructive (humanity will still have a bad time, but some survivors can resist). But that clearly is not what will happen in a nuclear war. If the bombs will explode in the right place, than just 100 will be really enough to cause small nuclear winter and make a large portion of the planet inabitable. But if all the bombs, nuclear and hidrogen, that we have built will detonate in different part of the world, than the result will be the same of the one caused by the asteroid that wiped out dinosaurs 66 million years ago. That will be humanity extinction event. The reason bevause scientists believe that a nuclear war wouldn't end humanity is because... simply no one should have to explode so much bombs. To destroy an entire country you need far less than 100 bombs. In conclusion, the war will be win by the one that strike first, with no need to make all the nuclear arsenal of the humanity to explode

  • @joshuavgc4160
    @joshuavgc4160 Рік тому +4

    I love this channel. I'm constantly looking for the new uploads now

  • @bryanpayton1168
    @bryanpayton1168 Рік тому +29

    There would be some big holes in the ground, and some tidal waves from submarines. Most mobile launchers are a long way from civilization, the same with bombers. There would be some fallout, and it would be really rough on sea life, but we could bounce back. If everything launched however, pretty much game over.

    • @ilicdjo
      @ilicdjo Рік тому

      Its everything or nothing

    • @MetalTrabant
      @MetalTrabant Рік тому

      @@ilicdjo Not necessarily. If for example the US and Russia would start to bomb eachother, or India and Pakistan, then after a few bombs the damage would already be so much they might not even be able to launch the rest of their stock, or they can even change their mind in the process seeing all the destruction...

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      @@ilicdjo which is a sure fire means of destroying life.

  • @Ali-in-Wonderland.
    @Ali-in-Wonderland. Рік тому +9

    I’m a bit freaked out how well I understood the fission vs fusion bombs… Infographics…you know how to explain extremely complex topics in a way that a peeb like me can understand…. Bravo!

    • @cs77smith67
      @cs77smith67 Рік тому +1

      I learned more from this channel than school 🎒 itself 😂

    • @ChineduOpara
      @ChineduOpara Рік тому +1

      Why freaked out? You should be proud

  • @JohnDoe-jp4em
    @JohnDoe-jp4em Рік тому +11

    A hydrogen bomb is not automatically thousands of times stronger than a conventional nuclear weapon, larger bombs are just built as hydrogen bombs because they are more efficient.

  • @DDlambchop43
    @DDlambchop43 Рік тому +8

    if you wanna see an accurate portrayal of nuclear fallout, watch an old tv movie from the 80s; The Day After. Very realistic, but don't watch it if you're not prepared to be depressed for the rest of the day.

  • @junedhussain6252
    @junedhussain6252 Рік тому +13

    Thank you so much for this interesting video. This video reminds me of the terminator movies when Skynet decides to launch nuclear attacks throughout the planet. Let's hope that such a situation would never happen in our lifetime.

  • @Tkdmaster1991
    @Tkdmaster1991 Рік тому +15

    When do we get part 2 of the survivor's story? We want more!

  • @Porcelaindoll1028
    @Porcelaindoll1028 Рік тому +4

    Always look forward to your content.

  • @CommentLikeDescribe
    @CommentLikeDescribe Рік тому +49

    I feel like infographics is basically every kid who grew up in the late cold war America and wanted to turn lunch period convos into cartoon explainables.

    • @BobTheAnimeDude
      @BobTheAnimeDude Рік тому +4

      @@maxwellkukowski8818 facts bro

    • @CommentLikeDescribe
      @CommentLikeDescribe Рік тому

      @@maxwellkukowski8818 tru but I'm talking like real 80s style Nintendo cold war

  • @daveanderson3805
    @daveanderson3805 Рік тому +4

    I once read somewhere that Robert Oppenheimer in later life regretted his involvement in the Manhatten project, and campaigned against the hydrogen bomb

  • @user-bc6ug7rj1g
    @user-bc6ug7rj1g Рік тому +9

    I love this channel...and "Be Amazed" both are entertaining and pretty accurate, informative and enjoyable to watch.....makes you think, no?

  • @MARTINSMARVEL
    @MARTINSMARVEL Рік тому +3

    Infographics post
    I settled in for another unbelievable story experience 😊

  • @jk09345568
    @jk09345568 Рік тому

    Wow that would be crazy. Nice vid.

  • @TheScrubExpress
    @TheScrubExpress Рік тому +57

    if you think the equator would be frozen after just 5 years you are *way* underestimating water's ability to retain heat. The sub-arctic oceans wouldn't freeze nearly that quickly. Especially not very deep. It would be cold, though.

    • @ashtonrickard2075
      @ashtonrickard2075 Рік тому +1

      But if the poles melted, it would stop the currents transporting warm and cool water, and THAT would cause the planet to cool.

    • @TheScrubExpress
      @TheScrubExpress Рік тому +1

      @@ashtonrickard2075 that would also take decades at *least*.. And what in this scenario would be causing the poles to completely melt? Even if the air temperature rose to 100 Fahrenheit at the poles, it would take years for all the ice to melt, and this scenario wouldn't significantly heat the planet for more than a few weeks before the nuclear winter sets in.

    • @FatRescueSwimmer04
      @FatRescueSwimmer04 Рік тому +1

      @@TheScrubExpress I think they meant if you Nuked the Poles with all the nukes in the world. but it would vaporize a ton of it ... so not sure it would end anything lol

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      @@ashtonrickard2075 no just in the north and south no warm water.

  • @squarebreads
    @squarebreads Рік тому +6

    they stop talking about how a bomb works at 5:00 for the ones that just wanna see what happens

  • @jjh58744
    @jjh58744 Рік тому +6

    Next they’ve gotta explore alien life that could be alive deep below a planets oceans, as they said in this one it’s pretty much a completely isolated and different ecosystem where the energy comes originally from the heat of the core of the planet instead of a sun

  • @richk8173
    @richk8173 Рік тому

    You guys are really on it lately. I tune in every day. Here I am watching back video's lol.
    Hey quick question... Is The infographics show a publicly traded company?

  • @pokewack
    @pokewack Рік тому +5

    I love the video, but I think you would easily get millions of views on an extended video on describing fission vs fusion and atomic vs thermonuclear….the info in this video is great, but I want more!

  • @acappuccino8410
    @acappuccino8410 Рік тому +2

    "Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.."

  • @andrewschuschu3499
    @andrewschuschu3499 Рік тому +1

    Pretty sure this was the basic plot of the show The 100. Great show, fun to watch!

  • @diddycollinski5364
    @diddycollinski5364 Рік тому +2

    When it happens do all the radios start playing “here comes the sun *dodododo*”

  • @Oldfartstuff2.0
    @Oldfartstuff2.0 Рік тому +8

    most likely this happened a few billion years ago and we've already done all this.

    • @SpencerAK74M
      @SpencerAK74M Рік тому +2

      So say we all

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      Not us and not billions of years ago. Ramachandra turned their nukes into dust after using them and found them wanting about 80,000 or more years ago. We should do that.

  • @TimothyJChowne
    @TimothyJChowne Рік тому +1

    Infographics nuke obsession ia amazing 😂

    • @NickanM
      @NickanM Рік тому

      _....And I love it!_ 🤪

  • @DavidEsparza2143
    @DavidEsparza2143 10 місяців тому +2

    Oppenheimer’s Nightmare

  • @kurtreese7408
    @kurtreese7408 Рік тому +3

    Most nuclear weapons are deployed far away from urban areas. Our major cities would mostly be spared. The radiation debris would be contained over smaller areas than if they were launched

  • @dargonmao1616
    @dargonmao1616 Рік тому

    The details of the workings of both the bombs are (atleast to me) more exhaustive than, I've read anywhere else.

  • @stagman1500
    @stagman1500 Рік тому +3

    Fallout and Terminator told us a different story about the nukes

  • @unusualincidentsunit2532
    @unusualincidentsunit2532 Рік тому +3

    Love this series of nuclear problems

  • @TenorCantusFirmus
    @TenorCantusFirmus Рік тому +14

    Narrator: "The U.S. and Russia have custody of 90% of all the nukes in the World."
    Me: [Shambles in sheer terror.]

    • @duanneberry5055
      @duanneberry5055 Рік тому

      We are doomed

    • @BobTheAnimeDude
      @BobTheAnimeDude Рік тому +1

      @@duanneberry5055 im american and trust me must people in our country dont support it. but theres nothing that we can really do about it

    • @BobTheAnimeDude
      @BobTheAnimeDude Рік тому

      @Nikolai we dont support the creation/testing/using nukes. its our government chioce, not ours

    • @User-lo9ez
      @User-lo9ez Рік тому

      @Nikolai same goes for russia, only reason the US hasn’t taken it

    • @Gympotato9981
      @Gympotato9981 Рік тому +1

      @@duanneberry5055 pretty much yeah

  • @BJI82a
    @BJI82a Рік тому +2

    Leaders need to watch this Chanel and realize we don’t need this many nukes on the planet if anything we should point them or send them into space and watch for meteors that are heading toward earth. I want to live a long life then come right back.

  • @shanebeaver6265
    @shanebeaver6265 Рік тому +5

    The bad thing is this can happen at any moment

    • @ChineduOpara
      @ChineduOpara Рік тому +1

      Not really, but I keep hoping it happens ASAP. We need to equalize things.

  • @simonayers8033
    @simonayers8033 Рік тому

    The explanation of a fussion bomb was crazy but imagine trying to get it to work - how long did it really take

  • @freddiebinthaplace2be634
    @freddiebinthaplace2be634 Рік тому +1

    When fallout 3 was still new and it was game of the year I remember seeing an article about it being called the most realistic post apocalyptic simulator

  • @hghghghghghgh6355
    @hghghghghghgh6355 Рік тому +1

    I have a video idea!!! How about what would happen minute by minute if you stood right next to the elephants foot in Chernobyl??

  • @JoeMfDollazOffical
    @JoeMfDollazOffical Рік тому

    The back ground music would be good for the next call of duty start screen music😂

  • @ives3572
    @ives3572 Рік тому +1

    "In nuclear war, all men are cremated equal." - Dexter Gordon

  • @forzalasagna2436
    @forzalasagna2436 Рік тому +1

    Tsunamis and EQ's: Give us a credit too 🌊

  • @mwt5040
    @mwt5040 Рік тому +1

    Nobody
    Kim jong-un: write that down

  • @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778
    @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778 Рік тому +6

    What if everyone in the world smoked a joint at the same time

  • @jmanj3917
    @jmanj3917 Рік тому +2

    6:45, Since when is distance measured in square miles? Nice editing

  • @123gozane
    @123gozane Рік тому +3

    It would be the end of the world if this happened. Scary to even think about it.

    • @trinbaker993
      @trinbaker993 Рік тому +2

      Scary to think that this might happen

    • @123gozane
      @123gozane Рік тому

      @@trinbaker993 True. My friend is in the army and is in Poland right now. He says we are in no danger at this time but if it happens then "that's all folks"

    • @RSVPrr
      @RSVPrr Рік тому

      no such thing as the end of the world.. just the end of humanity. That actually might be a good thing

    • @123gozane
      @123gozane Рік тому

      @@RSVPrr true that.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      Happened before and will happen again.

  • @mangonango8903
    @mangonango8903 Рік тому +1

    Im on a watchlist now lol

  • @Stalker6622
    @Stalker6622 Рік тому +1

    Telling a different Story every week ,no death ,all death ,way to tell me that you have no clue either

  • @pinkgiraffe378
    @pinkgiraffe378 Рік тому

    I love that alien analogy lol.

  • @MawDaws
    @MawDaws Рік тому +5

    Could this be the start of Atlantis? I mean the new humans could evolve underwater over billions of years of evolution when the surface is inhospitable

  • @winniethepoohandeeyore2
    @winniethepoohandeeyore2 Рік тому +1

    The people who die in the initial detonations will be the lucky ones

  • @LastKingLJ
    @LastKingLJ Рік тому +4

    Wouldn’t the oceans be messed up too if all the nukes in submarines exploded too

    • @alrhodes6820
      @alrhodes6820 Рік тому

      The opposite is now likely, unfortunately. China is building it's nuclear arsenal and they are not part of the nuclear non proliferation treaty so no one knows just how many they have. Officially its 300 but many suspect way more

  • @kalebseiler8577
    @kalebseiler8577 Рік тому +2

    Whenever I think about all nukes or nuclear I always think of Terminator lol.

    • @Ccyawn123
      @Ccyawn123 Рік тому

      SkyNet's got this 👍

  • @julianaylor4351
    @julianaylor4351 Рік тому +2

    It's the storyline a Ray Bradbury novel, where people living on Mars, watch the Earth get destroyed, after the people on Earth war with each other, which was made into a television series in the eighties.
    It is also the end of the satirical film Doctor Strangelove.
    Note this scenario is not too different from what happened, sixty six million years ago to the dinosaurs, although that wasn't as bad.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      Just no radiation, it removed them so that mammals can take over.

  • @TheREALTRAMP69
    @TheREALTRAMP69 Рік тому +8

    Hey I got a Infographics show you could do. What it would be like to be living on a planet when two planets collide.

  • @XxTheAwokenOnexX
    @XxTheAwokenOnexX Рік тому +3

    What If all the Nukes on earth exploded at once?
    It has been a pleasure smashing Infographics Show like button lolz 🔥👍

  • @joesands8860
    @joesands8860 2 місяці тому

    Yeah the scariest thing comes after the explosion, the looters looking for big screen tv's.

  • @adeedaas8966
    @adeedaas8966 Рік тому +1

    The uranium gun type bomb has been obsolete since 1945

  • @alfredwalker825
    @alfredwalker825 Рік тому

    We need these world leaders to get along. This shouldn’t even be a thing.

  • @heerosanosyuy1173
    @heerosanosyuy1173 Рік тому +3

    Now THIS! Is a true way to end our foolishness.

    • @ChineduOpara
      @ChineduOpara Рік тому +1

      Yes! I keep praying for this to occur. The playing field needs to be leveled.

    • @MetalTrabant
      @MetalTrabant Рік тому +1

      This would be the ultimate foolishness, but sadly it wouldn't just destroy us, but this beautiful planet with all the innocent life on it as well... 😕

    • @ChineduOpara
      @ChineduOpara Рік тому

      @@MetalTrabant Given enough time, the ecosystem would recover and rebalance. Probably with a whole new balance of flora and fauna. I imagine that almost all big mammals would go extinct, same with birds, etc. But insects? Tardigrades? Cockroaches? Most microorganism? Most deep-sea creatures? Many hardy and adaptable simpler plant life? They'll survive, adapt, and mutate.
      Our post-nuclear-apocalypse ecosystem in 1-2 million years, would look VERY strange to us living today. I kinda wish for a glimpse into THAT future...

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      Only for a failed species.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 10 днів тому

      @@ChineduOpara I wholly despize people like you. You refuse to off yourself and want the rest of us to.

  • @Win_De1
    @Win_De1 Рік тому +1

    can u do more survival and zombies videos?????

  • @franny5295
    @franny5295 Рік тому +2

    At that point we really don't have anything to worry about...

  • @shanky.y
    @shanky.y Рік тому

    cool stuff for sure.

  • @austinhughes1924
    @austinhughes1924 Рік тому +1

    And as Dr. Ian Malcolm.From Jurassic Park says “Life will find a way”.

  • @sagarbabar3798
    @sagarbabar3798 Рік тому

    Make a video on if all the ice in antartica melts

  • @Jay-qb9gi
    @Jay-qb9gi Рік тому +1

    I feel like this video of its type was made before on this channel

  • @malcolmwilliams7615
    @malcolmwilliams7615 Рік тому +1

    "You cannot out run it!"
    Meanwhile... Florida Man: "Ka-Chow!"

  • @lambotama
    @lambotama Рік тому +3

    Hold on, doesn't the radiation from radioactive fallout from nuclear bombs drop to acceptable levels in about 2 weeks??

  • @marcleslac2413
    @marcleslac2413 Рік тому

    Queen elizabeth: Pathetic, I SAW THE BIG BANG. Chuck norris: What just happened.

  • @thelittlewatermelon7533
    @thelittlewatermelon7533 Рік тому

    That would be scary

  • @slayerd357
    @slayerd357 Рік тому

    This would make a great movie. Post-apocalyptic juggalo gangs.

  • @SK-bw2cv
    @SK-bw2cv Рік тому

    We would get one heckuva fireworks show

  • @trafalgarlaw7873
    @trafalgarlaw7873 Рік тому

    This is extremely scary to think about tbh, Nukes should have never been created

  • @tylerhaycock6492
    @tylerhaycock6492 Рік тому +1

    No way, it’s my favorite kurgzezaht video!

  • @user-iw4ue8zz1n
    @user-iw4ue8zz1n Рік тому

    Nice jersey at the start XD

  • @LexiLunarpaw
    @LexiLunarpaw Рік тому +3

    Then we'd all be Playing Fallout IRL

  • @PaulJackino
    @PaulJackino Рік тому

    That hypothetical alien scenario really IS poetic.

  • @szaveljev
    @szaveljev Рік тому +3

    Nuclear winter is not scientifically proven.
    The concept of nuclear winter was popularized in the early 80's, when the so-called TTAPS model/study was published by Carl Sagan(and others, but he was the famous "rockstar" scientist, so to speak).
    But, later on, in 1991, when the kuwaiti oil wells was set on fire by Saddam, Carl Sagan and his fellows applied their TTAPS model on the well fires to predict the environmental effects, and they stated that burning oil would cause the same effect as a nuclear winter - the black soot would rise into the stratosphere, remain there for years, the temperatures will drop, crops will fail, weallgonnadie, etcetc.
    Needless to say, nothing like that happened.
    The 2 common flaws of these nuclear winter models: they predict that 1. considerable amount of soot will reach stratosphere 2. it will remain there for many years.
    But none of these predictions are verified.
    The detonations themselves simply not strong enough to launch up considerable amount of powdery material into the stratosphere - moreover, there's no material at all to be launched up, since the nukes typically detonated high up in the air.
    The other way soot can reach the stratosphere is by the fires started by the bomb's heatwave.
    Well, soot from simple fires can not reach the stratosphere, period. They remain in the troposphere and settle down quickly.
    IF firestorms are formed, they have the capability to lift up soot into the lower layer of stratosphere. These firestorms occur occasionally during the largest wildfires, and can bring considerable amount of soot into the stratosphere, but even if that's the case, the soot remains there for months, not years - and this is not an assumption, this is fact, it was observed, measured during the 2017 Australian bushfires.
    So, based on the facts, observations, and current scientific knowledge, even the worst case scenario would be most likely a few month, maybe half year long "nuclear autumn", which is nowhere near to a decade long freezing winter.

  • @hereitcomes3912
    @hereitcomes3912 Рік тому

    In that case, there is no where to run anymore. You just hug and kiss your loved ones (if you are lucky enough, and they are near you), you open your best cigar, and you enjoy the view (of course opera would play).

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 11 місяців тому +1

    If you exploded all the nuclear bombs in the same place at the same time... it would break the Earth's crust! 🌍💣🔥

  • @r.a.wdefenceministry4489
    @r.a.wdefenceministry4489 Рік тому +2

    When is the part 2 of “100 days in nuclear war “

  • @mlembrant
    @mlembrant Рік тому +1

    1:48 "This is our city and this is what we do every day, because that's who we are.. "

  • @epoul
    @epoul Рік тому +1

    All of the worlds nukes: blow up
    South America: that sounds like a you problem

  • @sherronthejedi
    @sherronthejedi Рік тому

    0:07 not tekashi69 getting hit with a nuke 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 i love it

  • @jpbernier4196
    @jpbernier4196 Рік тому

    Time to move into vault 101.

  • @TwiztedHumor
    @TwiztedHumor 9 місяців тому

    This should be made into an actual film.

  • @fluffybeast444
    @fluffybeast444 Рік тому

    6:10 could've had one doing a dab

  • @aungoo9700
    @aungoo9700 Рік тому +2

    "had I known that the Germans would not succeed in developing an atomic bomb, I would have done nothing." - Albert Einstein
    "I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - sticks and stones". - Albert Einstein

  • @cotati76
    @cotati76 Рік тому

    If I knew where a nuke was going to fall I’d try to be right underneath it when it goes off. Getting instantly vaporized is much better than dying from radiation burns and poisoning.

  • @user-ci8zu1wx2z
    @user-ci8zu1wx2z 6 місяців тому

    If we faced nuke war , id go streaking

  • @wgdavidson9669
    @wgdavidson9669 Рік тому

    We're going to find this out soon.

  • @Magno_Money
    @Magno_Money Рік тому

    0:10 R.I.P Iverson

  • @StephenFoy
    @StephenFoy Рік тому

    Bro just did a Kurzgesagt 💀