Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:03 - Welcome & Prayer requests 4:52 - Possession of souls in the state of grace? 22:42 - Demonic oppression 23:31 - Temptation 34:21 - Novus Ordo exorcisms 41:14 - Can a lay person exorcise a demon? 44:56 - History of prayer to St Michael the Archangel 51:51 - Heroic Act for the Poor Souls? 56:46 - Vatican II as a "pastoral council"? 1:12:20 - Saint Frances of Rome 1:17:40 - Forty Martyrs of Sebaste
I have temptations in my life. No matter what I do. Strongest when I was perfectly healthy and I thought making myself sickly would make matters better it had really no effect.
@@lilyw.719yes I remember that when I was young an aunt had a bad pregnancy and prayed to St Gerard and when the child was born perfectly healthy she called him Gerard
The SSPX does ordain exorcists in seminary (concurrently with their education starting at the acolyte level). Though they don’t perform solemn exorcisms at that level, all SSPX priests and seminarians engage in serious spiritual warfare. As to solemn exorcisms, Priors (the pastor in charge of each SSPX priory) are able to do them. It’s my understanding that most are successful in one, two or a few sessions during which priests generally stick to reading the original rite.
This has helped me enormously and has answered a number of my questions. Thank you so much !I have subscribed to your channel.---- but please keep praying for me ---- and for my family ---
No matter what I hav fallen. My Grandfather and Grandmother too. And always fell. Better they always prayed the Rosary and where saved. Grandfather last rites miracle. Grandma in Purgatory which my Mom had vision of and thought she was in Hell. She asked her Daughter my Mom to pray for her my Mom thought she was,in hell asked why but she responded by telling hed somehow it easist the pain. Also I asked my Mom was there any cursing she answered No asked was any Blasphemy she responded no there wasn't.
Thank you for another excellent episode, Father and Thomas. I wanted to add that I have never heard a diocesan trad priest claim what Thomas says he has heard about them: That is that some say that it is legitimate to pick and choose what bits of Vatican ll they want to keep. In fact I have never heard any laud that Council in any way what so ever or repeat that claim that since it was 'pastoral' no changes were instituted Catholic teaching or belief or understanding. My experience has shown me that they know they live in a dangerous time and know they are being watched. They focus on teaching the perrenial and unchanging Faith to their flocks. To give us the best foundation they can. If people have questions concerning these issues those are dealt with quietly and in private mostly in confession where all are protected by its seal. I think Thomas may have heard a falsehood spread to discredit these brave men.
I was listening to a Fr Ripinger, and he claimed Cardinal Ratzinger put a prohibition on that prayer. He claimed they discovered it when a priest who was using that prayer became possessed. He said it was disobedience to say the prayer and that was the opening the devil needed. I just heard him discussing it speaking about prayers the laity can say. I had a particular reason to research this when a woman i knew was consecrated to Satan. Was almost impossible to find anyone to help her. People who need help in the Church can't find it now.
You have to remember father ripping journal matter how much we like him is ordained under the novus ordo FSSP which is a novice Ordo ordination under the hands and the rights of the Novus order new world order Church religion. So his sticking to what rap singer says Ratzinger is outside of the authentic Roman Catholic Church anyway
@@tomstulc9143I understand that. I'm just saying what was told. They priest did become possessed by saying that prayer, and the devil claimed he had the right because of his disobedience. And nobody knew that they put forth the edict saying that prayer couldn't be say. They did discover it after the possession.
@@BelladictaSo they say. Obedience to Ratzinger might lead to demonic possesion too. Objectively, to seek a point of intelectual and moral reference in Joseph Ratzinger poisons the mind and it makes reality blurry.
@@Niklaus777 i just said, that's the story. They didn't know they weren't allowed to say the prayer. The event caused them to look into it, and found out it was true
@@Belladicta There is no logic in it. Supernatural truth does not contradict reason, It is superior to reason, but It does not contradict It. Ratzinger did not have the Catholic faith, and that is a continuos obvious public fact, there is no logic with that and that he would have any authority over the Church's prayers and Catholic priesthood and practice.
Where does the possessed persons soul reside during possession, and if the person dies during before an exorcism is properly completed, what then happens to the persons soul?.. I expect it’s a two-fold answer depending on the individual circumstances of the possession (ie, is it an instance of a victim soul or not)? Would really like to understand this better. Thanks in advance & keep up the great work. God Bless & protect over lent
I just read that the General Counsel of the United Methodist Church has lifted the ban on gays being allowed to become clergy. They seem to have lost their moral compass.
@@clarekuehn4372 No, he wasn't, but he did collaborate with the Jews, and scheme at the council. He later repented and is now a saint. There have been tremendous tremendous numbers of conversions through him. I was one of them. He started my conversion from 20 years of atheism. So get off your high horse. It's particularly disgusting that you're attacking a man who did so much to atone for his crimes and who exposed the filth of the Vatican. We wouldn't know half of what we do if he didn't expose it.
I don't think he performed hundreds of exorcisms. Exorcisms are extremely, extremely rare. Full-time exorcists don't perform hundreds of exorcisms. My priest is a full-time exorcist and his only done a dozen or so exorcisms in as many years.
@@lilyw.719 Then you obviously haven't listened to his interviews with Bernard Janzen. He was still assisting in exorcisms at the time of his death at 78
@lilyw.719 incorrect. They are not 'rare'. Father Gabriele Amorth, the exorcist in the diocese of Rome, claimed to have performed tens of thousands; at least 60,000 in his words. This is just one exorcist. Every diocese has an exorcist, either the Bishop himself by default, or a priest he selects as the diocesan exorcist. Do the math.
Father your position regarding the New Rites of Ordinations, ect is more sensible than some others ive heard speak about this matter. If you can please give me your input on this position i have maintained when i hear someone say the New Orders are invalid. I respond, you cannot say they are invalid, but only doubtful. My reasoning is as such. I knew a priest from India that was Ordained in 1970. He assured me that his bishop used the Old Rite. When he came to the U. S. everyone believed he was Ordained in the New Rite because of the year and because he was attached to the Novus Ordo even said the New Mass. Another N.O. priest I know was told at ordination to use the new rite of Mass but as you concecrate the species have the Intention of 'Many', not 'all'. So i have maintained like Fr. Amore there were plenty of older priests/bishops that did not use the New Rites or they used them with proper intention. So a person cannot assume that all the N.O. bishops and priests are invalidly ordained. My understanding has been, the Form signifies the Intent. So there are two different ways some bishops or priests of the Novus Ordo could be valid. Lastly Pope Leo condemned the Anglican rite as being invalid, but the Church waited two hundred years to make that declaration. In researching why i learned the Church informally condemned that rite when it first began to be used, but prudently waited to see if their was proper intent before formally condemning it as invalid. Only when it was obvious that none of the 'priests' of the Anglican schism were keeping the faith did She act with authority.
The novus ordo ordination is invalid and also the novus ordo rite of consecrating bishops is invalid as well. Also remember a doubtful rite is an invalid rite as well.
My point is, intentions is the dominant element of validity, so some may be valid. As a layman I can say the New Rite is doubtful. That means little and binds no one. If the Church declares the New Rite doubtful, then it must be treated as an invalid rite. Since there has been no declaration the debate is less important than the effects of the New Rite. I'm saying the New Rite should be avoided because it is a danger to the faith and we should leave the validity out of the discussion.
My family Members that I know went to Hell went because they wanted to. Those who went to Heaven because they Chose. Is all I can say. It is long story short and I know of the eternal Fate of Priest Monsieur J Wade and a girl that was murdered who is a Saint. My Both Grandfather's one of my grandmother s my Dad All I know he died a,Holy Death in good and Holy dispositions. The ones that went to hell a cousin my Grandmother's Sister my Great Uncle.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Intro
1:03 - Welcome & Prayer requests
4:52 - Possession of souls in the state of grace?
22:42 - Demonic oppression
23:31 - Temptation
34:21 - Novus Ordo exorcisms
41:14 - Can a lay person exorcise a demon?
44:56 - History of prayer to St Michael the Archangel
51:51 - Heroic Act for the Poor Souls?
56:46 - Vatican II as a "pastoral council"?
1:12:20 - Saint Frances of Rome
1:17:40 - Forty Martyrs of Sebaste
Jesus Mary and Joseph
I have temptations in my life. No matter what I do. Strongest when I was perfectly healthy and I thought making myself sickly would make matters better it had really no effect.
The expectant mothers in need of prayers should pray to Our Lady of the Good Event of the Purification (Our Lady of Good Success).
Or especially Saint Gerard Majella, because he is the actual patron saint of expecting mothers.
@@lilyw.719yes I remember that when I was young an aunt had a bad pregnancy and prayed to St Gerard and when the child was born perfectly healthy she called him Gerard
The SSPX does ordain exorcists in seminary (concurrently with their education starting at the acolyte level). Though they don’t perform solemn exorcisms at that level, all SSPX priests and seminarians engage in serious spiritual warfare.
As to solemn exorcisms, Priors (the pastor in charge of each SSPX priory) are able to do them. It’s my understanding that most are successful in one, two or a few sessions during which priests generally stick to reading the original rite.
This has helped me enormously and has answered a number of my questions. Thank you so much !I have subscribed to your channel.---- but please keep praying for me ---- and for my family ---
Been watching WCB since it was broadcast on BET years ago.
Thank you for your faithful viewership! May God bless you.
🙏🙏🙏🌹
No matter what I hav fallen. My Grandfather and Grandmother too. And always fell. Better they always prayed the Rosary and where saved. Grandfather last rites miracle. Grandma in Purgatory which my Mom had vision of and thought she was in Hell. She asked her Daughter my Mom to pray for her my Mom thought she was,in hell asked why but she responded by telling hed somehow it easist the pain. Also I asked my Mom was there any cursing she answered No asked was any Blasphemy she responded no there wasn't.
24:16 - 26:42 Well said!!
Thank you for another excellent episode, Father and Thomas.
I wanted to add that I have never heard a diocesan trad priest claim what Thomas says he has heard about them: That is that some say that it is legitimate to pick and choose what bits of Vatican ll they want to keep.
In fact I have never heard any laud that Council in any way what so ever or repeat that claim that since it was 'pastoral' no changes were instituted Catholic teaching or belief or understanding. My experience has shown me that they know they live in a dangerous time and know they are being watched. They focus on teaching the perrenial and unchanging Faith to their flocks. To give us the best foundation they can.
If people have questions concerning these issues those are dealt with quietly and in private mostly in confession where all are protected by its seal. I think Thomas may have heard a falsehood spread to discredit these brave men.
St. Anthony of the Desert was one example but he started a monastery .
Allan.
I was listening to a Fr Ripinger, and he claimed Cardinal Ratzinger put a prohibition on that prayer.
He claimed they discovered it when a priest who was using that prayer became possessed. He said it was disobedience to say the prayer and that was the opening the devil needed.
I just heard him discussing it speaking about prayers the laity can say.
I had a particular reason to research this when a woman i knew was consecrated to Satan. Was almost impossible to find anyone to help her.
People who need help in the Church can't find it now.
You have to remember father ripping journal matter how much we like him is ordained under the novus ordo FSSP which is a novice Ordo ordination under the hands and the rights of the Novus order new world order Church religion. So his sticking to what rap singer says Ratzinger is outside of the authentic Roman Catholic Church anyway
@@tomstulc9143I understand that. I'm just saying what was told. They priest did become possessed by saying that prayer, and the devil claimed he had the right because of his disobedience.
And nobody knew that they put forth the edict saying that prayer couldn't be say. They did discover it after the possession.
@@BelladictaSo they say. Obedience to Ratzinger might lead to demonic possesion too. Objectively, to seek a point of intelectual and moral reference in Joseph Ratzinger poisons the mind and it makes reality blurry.
@@Niklaus777 i just said, that's the story. They didn't know they weren't allowed to say the prayer. The event caused them to look into it, and found out it was true
@@Belladicta There is no logic in it. Supernatural truth does not contradict reason, It is superior to reason, but It does not contradict It. Ratzinger did not have the Catholic faith, and that is a continuos obvious public fact, there is no logic with that and that he would have any authority over the Church's prayers and Catholic priesthood and practice.
Where does the possessed persons soul reside during possession, and if the person dies during before an exorcism is properly completed, what then happens to the persons soul?.. I expect it’s a two-fold answer depending on the individual circumstances of the possession (ie, is it an instance of a victim soul or not)? Would really like to understand this better. Thanks in advance & keep up the great work. God Bless & protect over lent
Remnant TV has thanked the African Bishops for Resisting the blessings of Gay Couples.
Allan.
But these bishops are novus ordo bishops.
I just read that the General Counsel of the United Methodist Church has lifted the ban on gays being allowed to become clergy. They seem to have lost their moral compass.
They may be NO bishops but at least they’re brave men. My local bishop is NO and weak as well when confronting pope.
And Father Gabriel Amorth said the new right of exorcism was ineffective against the devil...so your Vatican II critiques are true
He said the New Rite has no power.
These are evil days with little protection.
We have to stay on our rosary
Church of England already has Woman Bishops I thought that the Catholic Church gives the lead.
Allan.
Novus ordo church occupies our Catholic buildings, the Catholic Church is underground.
I remember Malachi Martin saying that the possessed individual has to agree to let the demon in. And he performed hundreds of exorcisms
He was involved in the usurpation of the papacy.
@@clarekuehn4372 No, he wasn't, but he did collaborate with the Jews, and scheme at the council. He later repented and is now a saint. There have been tremendous tremendous numbers of conversions through him. I was one of them. He started my conversion from 20 years of atheism.
So get off your high horse. It's particularly disgusting that you're attacking a man who did so much to atone for his crimes and who exposed the filth of the Vatican. We wouldn't know half of what we do if he didn't expose it.
I don't think he performed hundreds of exorcisms. Exorcisms are extremely, extremely rare. Full-time exorcists don't perform hundreds of exorcisms. My priest is a full-time exorcist and his only done a dozen or so exorcisms in as many years.
@@lilyw.719 Then you obviously haven't listened to his interviews with Bernard Janzen. He was still assisting in exorcisms at the time of his death at 78
@lilyw.719 incorrect. They are not 'rare'. Father Gabriele Amorth, the exorcist in the diocese of Rome, claimed to have performed tens of thousands; at least 60,000 in his words. This is just one exorcist. Every diocese has an exorcist, either the Bishop himself by default, or a priest he selects as the diocesan exorcist. Do the math.
Father your position regarding the New Rites of Ordinations, ect is more sensible than some others ive heard speak about this matter.
If you can please give me your input on this position i have maintained when i hear someone say the New Orders are invalid.
I respond, you cannot say they are invalid, but only doubtful.
My reasoning is as such. I knew a priest from India that was Ordained in 1970. He assured me that his bishop used the Old Rite. When he came to the U. S. everyone believed he was Ordained in the New Rite because of the year and because he was attached to the Novus Ordo even said the New Mass.
Another N.O. priest I know was told at ordination to use the new rite of Mass but as you concecrate the species have the Intention of 'Many', not 'all'.
So i have maintained like Fr. Amore there were plenty of older priests/bishops that did not use the New Rites or they used them with proper intention. So a person cannot assume that all the N.O. bishops and priests are invalidly ordained. My understanding has been, the Form signifies the Intent. So there are two different ways some bishops or priests of the Novus Ordo could be valid.
Lastly Pope Leo condemned the Anglican rite as being invalid, but the Church waited two hundred years to make that declaration. In researching why i learned the Church informally condemned that rite when it first began to be used, but prudently waited to see if their was proper intent before formally condemning it as invalid. Only when it was obvious that none of the 'priests' of the Anglican schism were keeping the faith did She act with authority.
The novus ordo ordination is invalid and also the novus ordo rite of consecrating bishops is invalid as well. Also remember a doubtful rite is an invalid rite as well.
My point is, intentions is the dominant element of validity, so some may be valid. As a layman I can say the New Rite is doubtful. That means little and binds no one. If the Church declares the New Rite doubtful, then it must be treated as an invalid rite. Since there has been no declaration the debate is less important than the effects of the New Rite. I'm saying the New Rite should be avoided because it is a danger to the faith and we should leave the validity out of the discussion.
My family Members that I know went to Hell went because they wanted to. Those who went to Heaven because they Chose. Is all I can say. It is long story short and I know of the eternal Fate of Priest Monsieur J Wade and a girl that was murdered who is a Saint. My Both Grandfather's one of my grandmother s my Dad All I know he died a,Holy Death in good and Holy dispositions. The ones that went to hell a cousin my Grandmother's Sister my Great Uncle.